Analyze Diet
Australian veterinary journal1999; 77(10); 678-679; doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1999.tb13166.x

Prevalence of stereotypic and other problem behaviours in thoroughbred horses.

Abstract: No abstract available
Publication Date: 1999-12-11 PubMed ID: 10590799DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1999.tb13166.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses a study conducted to determine the prevalence of problematic behaviours in Thoroughbred horses in Australia and find out any relationship between time spent outside the stable and the occurrence of such behaviours.

Methodology

  • The research was carried out through a survey. The survey questionnaire was mailed to 607 Australian trainers, who were selected randomly from The Australian Thoroughbred Directory.
  • The invitation to the survey was made attractive by promising the respondents a copy of the result and an entry into a draw to win a reference book.
  • The questionnaire was divided into three sections containing quantitative questions. These included asking the total number of horses in training, how much time they spent out of their stalls, and the number of horses demonstrating several listed stereotypic or other problem behaviours.
  • The behaviours under study included crib-biting or wind-sucking, weaving, stall-walking and self-biting along with wood-chewing, bed-eating, manure-eating, rug-chewing or tearing, stall-kicking, aggression towards humans and masturbation.

Data Analysis

  • Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 5.0 to establish the prevalence of each problem behaviour and the overall prevalence of problem behaviours in each stable.
  • The researchers also analysed how time spent out of the stable affected the occurrence of these behaviours. For this purpose, they divided the time spent out of the stables into quartiles and analysed the proportion of horses showing certain behaviours in each quartile.
  • A chi-square test for linear trend in proportions was used to examine the relationship between the time spent out of the stable and the prevalence of each behaviour.
  • The researchers also calculated Odds Ratios (OR) to explore the statistical relationship between time spent out of the stable and the prevalence of each problem behaviour. The OR represents the odds that an outcome will occur given a particular exposure, compared to the odds of the outcome occurring in the absence of that exposure.

Response Rate and Sample Size

  • The overall response rate of the survey was 35.0% and the usable response rate was 31.3% due to incomplete submissions.
  • The study was based on a total of 3009 horses, out of which 1690 were stabled and 1319 were available for the survey.

Cite This Article

APA
Pell SM, McGreevy PD. (1999). Prevalence of stereotypic and other problem behaviours in thoroughbred horses. Aust Vet J, 77(10), 678-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1999.tb13166.x

Publication

ISSN: 0005-0423
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 77
Issue: 10
Pages: 678-679

Researcher Affiliations

Pell, S M
  • Department of Animal Science, University of Sydney, New South Wales.
McGreevy, P D

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Behavior, Animal
    • Breeding
    • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
    • Horses / psychology
    • New South Wales / epidemiology
    • Odds Ratio
    • Prevalence
    • Stereotyped Behavior

    Citations

    This article has been cited 5 times.
    1. Lewis K, Parker MO, Proops L, McBride SD. Risk factors for stereotypic behaviour in captive ungulates. Proc Biol Sci 2022 Sep 28;289(1983):20221311.
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1311pubmed: 36168756google scholar: lookup
    2. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
      doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
    3. Krueger K, Esch L, Farmer K, Marr I. Basic Needs in Horses?-A Literature Review. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 16;11(6).
      doi: 10.3390/ani11061798pubmed: 34208615google scholar: lookup
    4. Jonckheer-Sheehy VS, Houpt KA. Management methods to improve the welfare of horses used in research. Lab Anim (NY) 2015 Sep;44(9):350-8.
      doi: 10.1038/laban.741pubmed: 26300095google scholar: lookup
    5. Christie JL, Hewson CJ, Riley CB, Mcniven MA, Dohoo IR, Bate LA. Demographics, management, and welfare of nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island. Can Vet J 2004 Dec;45(12):1004-11.
      pubmed: 15646847