Prospective randomised comparison of different antimicrobial protocols for the prevention of surgical site infections in horses undergoing emergency exploratory celiotomy.
Abstract: Surgical site infection (SSI) is an important complication following emergency celiotomy in the horse. Judicious antimicrobial use is important for the prevention of antimicrobial resistance and the limitation of antimicrobial-associated complications. Previous studies in horses have found no association between SSI and perioperative antimicrobial duration, but the ideal duration of antimicrobial administration in horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy remains unclear. Objective: To compare SSI and describe post-operative complications, survival, duration and cost of hospitalisation in horses receiving one of two antimicrobial protocols following clean or select clean-contaminated emergency exploratory celiotomy. Methods: Prospective randomised clinical study. Methods: Adult horses undergoing clean or selected clean-contaminated emergency celiotomy at The University of Georgia Teaching Hospital (2013-2019) were prospectively enrolled and randomised to protocol A (pre- and intra-operative antimicrobials only, n = 39) or protocol B (antimicrobials continued for 72 h of post-operative administration, n = 37). Incisional closure and protection were standardised. The prevalence of SSI was compared between protocols for horses surviving beyond day five of hospitalisation and additional clinical outcomes were described. Results: Horses in protocol A had an increased prevalence of SSI during hospitalisation compared with protocol B (6/37 [16%] vs. 0/35 [0%]; p = 0.03). The difference was of borderline significance at 4 weeks post-operatively (7/32 [22%] vs. 1/31 [3%]; p = 0.05). Conclusions: Planned enrolment was not met, providing only enough data for a small study. Numbers were limited by inclusion criteria as well as difficulties regarding owner consent and surgeon-determined enrolment. In light of the low statistical power of the study, results should be used to direct further research, and caution must be taken in applying them to clinical practice. Conclusions: The difference in hospitalised SSI between groups and the low prevalence of SSI, particularly in the 72-h post-operative group, supports the need for continued research to determine optimal antimicrobial duration and protocols to reduce SSI in horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The study explores the effects of two different antibiotic protocols on surgical site infections (SSIs) in horses undergoing emergency exploratory celiotomy. It found a significant reduction in SSIs in horses that were given antibiotics for 72 hours post-surgery compared to those who only received pre- and intra-operative antibiotics.
Study Design and Methodology
The research is a prospective randomised clinical study conducted at The University of Georgia Teaching Hospital from 2013-2019.
Adult horses undergoing clean or selected clean-contaminated emergency celiotomy were randomly divided into two groups. In protocol A, the horses received only pre- and intra-operative antibiotics (39 horses). In protocol B, the antibiotics continued for 72 hours post-operatively (37 horses).
All surgical procedures were standardized, including incisional closure and protection.
The primary comparison was the prevalence of SSIs between the two groups for horses surviving beyond the fifth day of hospitalization.
Results
There was an increased prevalence of SSI among the horses in protocol A during hospitalization when compared to protocol B.
The difference was significant during hospitalization (16% in protocol A vs. 0% in protocol B), and was of borderline significance at four weeks post-operatively (22% in protocol A vs. 3% in protocol B).
Conclusions
The study did not reach its planned enrolment due to a combination of strict inclusion criteria, inability to obtain owner consent, and surgeon-determined enrolment. Consequently, the study had low statistical power, causing the results to be suggestive rather than conclusive.
However, the observed difference in SSIs between the two groups supports the need for further research in determining the optimal duration and protocol of antimicrobial administration in horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy.
The researchers advise caution in applying the results directly to clinical practice due to the limitations of the study.
Cite This Article
APA
Christie KD, Epstein KL, Tyma JF, Afonso T, Fultz LE, Giguère S.
(2025).
Prospective randomised comparison of different antimicrobial protocols for the prevention of surgical site infections in horses undergoing emergency exploratory celiotomy.
Equine Vet J.
https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14489
Vala H, Vaja MA, Gohil AB. A comparative study of surgical site infection after single dose of preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis versus multiple doses of antimicrobials in clean and clean contaminated abdominal surgeries.. Int Surg J 2020;7:1143–1147.
Nelson RL, Gladman E, Barbateskovic M. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;5:CD001181.
Duclos G, Zieleskiewicz L, Leone M. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is critical for preventing surgical site infection.. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:2826–2828.
AlBuhairan B, Hind D, Hutchinson A. Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90(7):915–919.
Ban KA, Minei JP, Laronga C, Harbrecht BG, Jensen EH, Fry DE. American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 update.. J Am Coll Surg 2017;224(1):59–74.
Crader MF, Varacallo M. Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.. Treasury Island, FL: StatPearls [Internet]; 2020.
Berríos‐Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR. Guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection.. JAMA Surg 2017;152:784.
Brown DC. Wound infection and antimicrobial use.. In: Tobias KM, Johnston SA, editors. Veterinary surgery small animal. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2012. p. 135–139.
Rockow M, Griffenhagen G, Landolt G, Hendrickson D, Pezzanite L. The effect of antimicrobial protocols and other perioperative factors on postoperative complications in horses undergoing celiotomy: a retrospective analysis, 2008–2021.. Animals Basel 2023;13(22):3573.
Branch‐Elliman W, O'Brian W, Strymish J, Itani K, Wyatt C, Gupta K. Association of duration and type of surgical prophylaxis with antimicrobial‐associated adverse events.. Jama 2019;154:590–598.
Abrams‐Ogg ACG, Kruth SA. Infections associated with neutropenia in the dog and cat.. In: Giguere S, Prescott JF, Baggot JD, et al., editors. Antimicrobial therapy in veterinary medicine. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013.
Southwood LL. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: current standards of care.. Equine Vet Educ 2023;35:607–616.
Singleton DA, Rayner A, Brant B, Smyth S, Noble PJM, Radford AD. A randomised controlled trial to reduce highest priority critically important antimicrobial prescription in companion animals.. Nat Commun 2021;12:1593.
Weber WP, Marti WR, Zwahlen M, Misteli H, Rosenthal R, Reck S. The timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.. Ann Surg 2008;247(6):918–926.
Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Purke JP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical‐wound infection.. N Engl J Med 1992;326:281–286.
Salem SE, Proudman CJ, Archer DC. Prevention of post‐operative complications following surgical treatment of equine colic: current evidence.. Equine Vet J 2016;48:143–151.