FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Acta Vet Scand / Prospective study of the primary evaluation of 1016 horses w...
Acta veterinaria Scandinavica2015; 57; 69; doi: 10.1186/s13028-015-0160-9

Prospective study of the primary evaluation of 1016 horses with clinical signs of abdominal pain by veterinary practitioners, and the differentiation of critical and non-critical cases.

Abstract: The majority of research on the evaluation of horses with colic is focused on referral hospital populations. Early identification of critical cases is important to optimise outcome and welfare. The aim of this prospective study was to survey the primary evaluation of horses with clinical signs of abdominal pain by veterinary practitioners, and compare the initial presentation of critical and non-critical cases. Results: Data from 1016 primary evaluations of horses presenting with clinical signs of colic were submitted by 167 veterinary practitioners across the United Kingdom over a 13 month period. The mean age of the study population was 13.5 years (median 12.0, range 0-42). Mean heart rate on primary presentation was 47 beats/min (median 44, range 18-125), mean respiratory rate was 20 breaths/min (median 16, range 6-100), and median gastrointestinal auscultation score (0-12, minimum-maximum) was 5 (range 0-12). Clinical signs assessed using a behavioural severity score (0-17, minimum-maximum), were between 0 and 6 in 70.4 % of cases, and 7-12 for 29.6 % of cases. Rectal examination was performed in 73.8 % of cases. Cases that responded positively to simple medical treatment were categorised retrospectively as 'non-critical'; cases that required intensive medical treatment, surgical intervention, died or were euthanased were categorised as 'critical'. Eight-hundred-and-twenty-two cases met these criteria; 76.4 % were 'non-critical' and 23.6 % were 'critical'. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify features of the clinical presentation associated with critical cases. Five variables were retained in the final multivariable model: combined pain score: (OR 1.19, P < 0.001, 95 % CI 1.09-1.30), heart rate (OR 1.06, P < 0.001, 95 % CI 1.04-1.08), capillary refill time >2.5 s (OR 3.21, P = 0.046, 95 % CI 1.023-10.09), weak pulse character (OR 2.90, P = 0.004, 95 % CI 1.39-5.99) and absence of gut sounds in ≥1 quadrant (OR 3.65, P < 0.001, 95 % CI 2.08-6.41). Conclusions: This is the first study comparing the primary presentation of critical and non-critical cases of abdominal pain. Pain, heart rate, gastrointestinal borborygmi and simple indicators of hypovolaemia were significant indicators of critical cases, even at the primary veterinary examination, and should be considered essential components of the initial assessment and triage of horses presenting with colic.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2015-10-06 PubMed ID: 26444675PubMed Central: PMC4596518DOI: 10.1186/s13028-015-0160-9Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article focuses on a study that looked at how veterinary practitioners approach the primary evaluation of horses showing signs of abdominal pain. The study differentiates between non-critical and critical cases, providing novel insight into important indicators that can help early identification of serious cases, potentially improving the outcome and welfare of the horses.

Research Overview

  • If a horse shows signs of abdominal pain, early identification of critical cases is crucial to optimising its outcome and welfare. This study gathered data from 1016 evaluations by 167 veterinary practitioners in the United Kingdom over 13 months.
  • The cases were divided into non-critical ones, which positively responded to basic medical treatment, and critical ones, which required intensive medical treatment, surgical interventions, or which resulted in death or euthanasia.
  • The research aims to highlight the differences in initial presentations between non-critical and critical cases, something that most of the existing research focusing mainly on referral hospital populations overlooks.

Results

  • A various range of clinical signs were measured, including heart and respiratory rates, and gastrointestinal auscultation scores. A rectal examination was conducted in a considerable majority of cases.
  • Of the cases that met the study’s criteria, over three-quarters were non-critical, while less than a quarter were critical.
  • Behavioural severity scores of the clinical signs ranged from 0 to 17, with 70.4% of cases scoring from 0 to 6 and 29.6% scoring from 7 to 12.

Indicators of Critical Cases

  • The study used multivariable logistic regression to identify features in clinical presentations that were associated with critical cases.
  • Five key indicators were identified in predicting the severity of the case: the combined pain score, heart rate, capillary refill time longer than 2.5 seconds, weak pulse character, and absence of gut sounds in one or more quadrants. These variables had strong associations with critical cases and showed significant statistical relevance.
  • Pain, heart rate, gastrointestinal borborygmi (rumbling or gurgling noise made by the movement of fluid and gas in the intestines), and simple indicators of hypovolaemia (a decrease in the volume of blood plasma) were significant indicators of critical cases, even at the initial veterinary examination.

Conclusion

  • The study was the first to differentiate the primary presentation of non-critical and critical cases of abdominal pain in horses.
  • The results suggest that monitoring the identified significant clinical signs would be important in initial assessments and triage of horses presenting with colic (abdominal pain), potentially improving their diagnosis, treatment, and welfare.

Cite This Article

APA
Curtis L, Burford JH, Thomas JS, Curran ML, Bayes TC, England GC, Freeman SL. (2015). Prospective study of the primary evaluation of 1016 horses with clinical signs of abdominal pain by veterinary practitioners, and the differentiation of critical and non-critical cases. Acta Vet Scand, 57, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0160-9

Publication

Acta veterinaria Scandinavica
ISSN: 1751-0147
NlmUniqueID: 0370400
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 57
Pages: 69
PII: 69

Researcher Affiliations

Curtis, Laila
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE, LE12 5RD, UK. lailacurtis@hotmail.co.uk.
Burford, John Harold
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE, LE12 5RD, UK. john.burford@nottingham.ac.uk.
Thomas, Jennifer Sara Marian
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE, LE12 5RD, UK. svyjt@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
Curran, Marise Linda
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE, LE12 5RD, UK. curran.marise@pdsa.org.uk.
Bayes, Tom Curtis
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE, LE12 5RD, UK. tom.bayes@live.com.
England, Gary Crane William
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE, LE12 5RD, UK. gary.england@nottingham.ac.uk.
Freeman, Sarah Louise
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE, LE12 5RD, UK. sarah.freeman@nottingham.ac.uk.

MeSH Terms

  • Abdominal Pain / diagnosis
  • Abdominal Pain / etiology
  • Abdominal Pain / veterinary
  • Animals
  • Colic / diagnosis
  • Colic / etiology
  • Colic / veterinary
  • Data Collection
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / etiology
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Veterinarians / statistics & numerical data

References

This article includes 38 references
  1. Tinker MK, White NA, Lessard P, Thatcher CD, Pelzer KD, Davis B, Carmel DK. Prospective study of equine colic incidence and mortality.. Equine Vet J 1997 Nov;29(6):448-53.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03157.xpubmed: 9413717google scholar: lookup
  2. Ireland JL, Clegg PD, McGowan CM, Platt L, Pinchbeck GL. Factors associated with mortality of geriatric horses in the United Kingdom.. Prev Vet Med 2011 Sep 1;101(3-4):204-18.
    doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.06.002pubmed: 21733586google scholar: lookup
  3. Fischer AT Jr. Advances in diagnostic techniques for horses with colic.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1997 Aug;13(2):203-19.
    pubmed: 9290181doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30237-7google scholar: lookup
  4. Canonico M, Plu-Bureau G, Lowe GD, Scarabin PY. Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism in postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis.. BMJ 2008 May 31;336(7655):1227-31.
    doi: 10.1136/bmj.39555.441944.BEpmc: PMC2405857pubmed: 18495631google scholar: lookup
  5. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.. BMJ 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6.
    doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ADpmc: PMC2335261pubmed: 18436948google scholar: lookup
  6. Proudman CJ. A two year, prospective survey of equine colic in general practice.. Equine Vet J 1992 Mar;24(2):90-3.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1992.tb02789.xpubmed: 1582399google scholar: lookup
  7. Hillyer MH, Mair TS. Recurrent colic in the mature horse: a retrospective review of 58 cases.. Equine Vet J 1997 Nov;29(6):421-4.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03152.xpubmed: 9413712google scholar: lookup
  8. Hillyer MH, Taylor FG, Proudman CJ, Edwards GB, Smith JE, French NP. Case control study to identify risk factors for simple colonic obstruction and distension colic in horses.. Equine Vet J 2002 Jul;34(5):455-63.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776117746pubmed: 12358047google scholar: lookup
  9. Hillyer MH, Taylor FG, French NP. A cross-sectional study of colic in horses on thoroughbred training premises in the British Isles in 1997.. Equine Vet J 2001 Jul;33(4):380-5.
    doi: 10.2746/042516401776249499pubmed: 11469771google scholar: lookup
  10. Goncalves S, Leblond A, Drogoul C, Julliand V. Using feces characteristics as a criterion for the diagnosis of colic in the horse: a clinical review of 207 cases.. Revue Med Vet 2006;157(1):3–10.
  11. Scantlebury CE, Archer DC, Proudman CJ, Pinchbeck GL. Recurrent colic in the horse: incidence and risk factors for recurrence in the general practice population.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2011 Aug;(39):81-8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00383.xpubmed: 21790759google scholar: lookup
  12. Traub-Dargatz JL, Salman MD, Voss JL. Medical problems of adult horses, as ranked by equine practitioners.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991 May 15;198(10):1745-7.
    pubmed: 2071472
  13. Issaoui L. Survey of colic cases seen in first-opinion practice.. Vet Rec 2013 Jun 15;172(24):643-4.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.f3633pubmed: 23772003google scholar: lookup
  14. Issaoui L. Equine practitioner participation required for colic survey.. Vet Rec 2012 Oct 27;171(17):430.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.e7153pubmed: 23104791google scholar: lookup
  15. Iarossi G. The power of survey design: a user’s guide for managing surveys, interpreting results, and influencing respondents.. Washington DC: The World Bank. 2006.
  16. Price J, Catriona S, Welsh EM, Waran NK. Preliminary evaluation of a behaviour-based system for assessment of post-operative pain in horses following arthroscopic surgery.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2003 Jul;30(3):124-37.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00139.xpubmed: 14498844google scholar: lookup
  17. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 1: Short-term survival following a single laparotomy.. Equine Vet J 2005 Jul;37(4):296-302.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054529409pubmed: 16028616google scholar: lookup
  18. Sutton GA, Dahan R, Turner D, Paltiel O. A behaviour-based pain scale for horses with acute colic: scale construction.. Vet J 2013 Jun;196(3):394-401.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.10.008pubmed: 23141961google scholar: lookup
  19. Sasaki N, Murata A, Lee I, Yamada H. Evaluation of equine cecal motility by ausculation, ultrasonography and electrointestinography after jejunocecostomy.. Res Vet Sci 2008 Apr;84(2):305-10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.04.009pubmed: 17570455google scholar: lookup
  20. Hillyer MH, Taylor FG, Proudman CJ, Edwards GB, Smith JE, French NP. Case control study to identify risk factors for simple colonic obstruction and distension colic in horses.. Equine Vet J 2002 Jul;34(5):455-63.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776117746pubmed: 12358047google scholar: lookup
  21. Traub-Dargatz JL, Kopral CA, Seitzinger AH, Garber LP, Forde K, White NA. Estimate of the national incidence of and operation-level risk factors for colic among horses in the United States, spring 1998 to spring 1999.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001 Jul 1;219(1):67-71.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.219.67pubmed: 11439773google scholar: lookup
  22. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.. N Engl J Med 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1887-92.
    doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422507pmc: PMC1557642pubmed: 10861325google scholar: lookup
  23. Mair TS, Mellor D. BEVA evidence based medicine study of analgesia for colic: preliminary findings.. 8th International Colic Research Symposium, Q; 2005.
  24. Hallowell GD. Retrospective study assessing efficacy of treatment of large colonic impactions.. Equine Vet J 2008 Jun;40(4):411-3.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X288282pubmed: 18321804google scholar: lookup
  25. Furr MO, Lessard P, White NA 2nd. Development of a colic severity score for predicting the outcome of equine colic.. Vet Surg 1995 Mar-Apr;24(2):97-101.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1995.tb01302.xpubmed: 7778263google scholar: lookup
  26. Thoefner MB, Ersbøll AK, Jensen AL, Hesselholt M. Factor analysis of the interrelationships between clinical variables in horses with colic.. Prev Vet Med 2001 Feb 16;48(3):201-14.
    doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00193-8pubmed: 11182463google scholar: lookup
  27. van der Linden MA, Laffont CM, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM. Prognosis in equine medical and surgical colic.. J Vet Intern Med 2003 May-Jun;17(3):343-8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2003.tb02459.xpubmed: 12774977google scholar: lookup
  28. Pritchett LC, Ulibarri C, Roberts MC, Schneider RK, Sellon DC. Identification of potential physiological and behavioral indicators of postoperative pain in horses after exploratory celiotomy for colic.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003;80(1):31–43.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00205-8google scholar: lookup
  29. Puotunen-Reinert A. Study of variables commonly used in examination of equine colic cases to assess prognostic value.. Equine Vet J 1986 Jul;18(4):275-7.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1986.tb03626.xpubmed: 3758004google scholar: lookup
  30. Reeves MJ, Curtis CR, Salman MD, Hilbert BJ. Prognosis in equine colic patients using multivariable analysis.. Can J Vet Res 1989 Jan;53(1):87-94.
    pmc: PMC1255520pubmed: 2914230
  31. Ihler CF, Venger JL, Skjerve E. Evaluation of clinical and laboratory variables as prognostic indicators in hospitalised gastrointestinal colic horses.. Acta Vet Scand 2004;45(1-2):109-18.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-45-109pmc: PMC1820986pubmed: 15535091google scholar: lookup
  32. Proudman CJ, Dugdale AH, Senior JM, Edwards GB, Smith JE, Leuwer ML, French NP. Pre-operative and anaesthesia-related risk factors for mortality in equine colic cases.. Vet J 2006 Jan;171(1):89-97.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.09.005pubmed: 16427585google scholar: lookup
  33. Reeves MJ, Curtis CR, Salman MD, Stashak TS, Reif JS. Validation of logistic-regression models used in the assessment of prognosis and the need for surgery in equine colic patients.. Prev Vet Med 1992;13(3):155–172.
    doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(92)90100-Tgoogle scholar: lookup
  34. Grosche A, Schrodl W, Schusser GF. Specific parameters of blood and peritoneal fluid to indicate the severity of intestinal ischemia in colic horses.. Tierarztl Prax G N 2006;34(6):387–396.
  35. Van den Boom R, Butler CM, Van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MMS. The usability of peritoneal lactate concentration as a prognostic marker in horses with severe colic admitted to a veterinary teaching hospital.. Equine Vet Ed 2010;22(8):420–425.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2010.00093.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  36. Grulke S, Olle E, Detilleux J, Gangl M, Caudron I, Serteyn D. Determination of a gravity and shock score for prognosis in equine surgical colic.. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2001 Oct;48(8):465-73.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2001.00374.xpubmed: 11710672google scholar: lookup
  37. Parry BW, Gay CC, Anderson GA. Assessment of the necessity for surgical intervention in cases of equine colic: a retrospective study.. Equine Vet J 1983 Jul;15(3):216-21.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01770.xpubmed: 6884311google scholar: lookup
  38. White NA, Elward A, Moga KS, Ward DL, Sampson DM. Use of web-based data collection to evaluate analgesic administration and the decision for surgery in horses with colic.. Equine Vet J 2005 Jul;37(4):347-50.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054529391pubmed: 16028625google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 18 times.
  1. Straticò P, Varasano V, Palozzo A, Guerri G, Celani G, Revelant O, Petrizzi L. Retrospective Study on Risk Factors and Short-Term Outcome of Horses Referred for Colic from 2016 to 2022. Vet Sci 2022 Oct 3;9(10).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9100545pubmed: 36288158google scholar: lookup
  2. Costa MHDS, Medeiros PR, Melo UP, de Souza RF, da Silva GEL, Ferreira C, de Assis DB, da Silva LP, de Brito EL. Survey on the recognition, attitudes, and experience of horse owners during episodes of equine colic in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Braz J Vet Med 2022;44:e003022.
    doi: 10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm003022pubmed: 36284628google scholar: lookup
  3. Ekstrand C, Michanek P, Gehring R, Sundell A, Källse A, Hedeland M, Ström L. Plasma atropine concentrations associated with decreased intestinal motility in horses. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:951300.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.951300pubmed: 36118347google scholar: lookup
  4. Iglesias-García M, Rodríguez Hurtado I, Ortiz-Díez G, De la Calle Del Barrio J, Fernández Pérez C, Gómez Lucas R. Predictive Models for Equine Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy in Spain: Pre-, Intra-, and Post-Operative-Mortality-Associated Factors. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 27;12(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12111375pubmed: 35681838google scholar: lookup
  5. Kos VK, Kramaric P, Brloznik M. Packed cell volume and heart rate to predict medical and surgical cases and their short-term survival in horses with gastrointestinal-induced colic. Can Vet J 2022 Apr;63(4):365-372.
    pubmed: 35368402
  6. Hellstrom EA, Ziegler AL, Blikslager AT. Postoperative Ileus: Comparative Pathophysiology and Future Therapies. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:714800.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.714800pubmed: 34589533google scholar: lookup
  7. Wild I, Freeman S, Robles D, Matamoros D, Ortiz M, Rodriguez J, Burford J. Owners' Knowledge and Approaches to Colic in Working Equids in Honduras. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 13;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11072087pubmed: 34359215google scholar: lookup
  8. Lightfoot KL, Burford JH, England GCW, Bowen IM, Freeman SL. Mixed methods investigation of the use of telephone triage within UK veterinary practices for horses with abdominal pain: A Participatory action research study. PLoS One 2020;15(9):e0238874.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238874pubmed: 32966300google scholar: lookup
  9. Bowden A, Burford JH, Brennan ML, England GCW, Freeman SL. Horse owners' knowledge, and opinions on recognising colic in the horse. Equine Vet J 2020 Mar;52(2):262-267.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13173pubmed: 31461570google scholar: lookup
  10. Barker I, Freeman SL. Assessment of costs and insurance policies for referral treatment of equine colic. Vet Rec 2019 Oct 26;185(16):508.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105415pubmed: 31439823google scholar: lookup
  11. Curtis L, Burford JH, England GCW, Freeman SL. Risk factors for acute abdominal pain (colic) in the adult horse: A scoping review of risk factors, and a systematic review of the effect of management-related changes. PLoS One 2019;14(7):e0219307.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219307pubmed: 31295284google scholar: lookup
  12. Gitari A, Nguhiu J, Varma V, Mogoa E. Occurrence, treatment protocols, and outcomes of colic in horses within Nairobi County, Kenya. Vet World 2017 Oct;10(10):1255-1263.
    doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.1255-1263pubmed: 29184373google scholar: lookup
  13. Siwinska N, Zak A, Baron M, Cylna M, Borowicz H. Right dorsal colon ultrasonography in normal adult ponies and miniature horses. PLoS One 2017;12(10):e0186825.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186825pubmed: 29065146google scholar: lookup
  14. Tharwat M, Al-Sobayil F. Equine colic: A comprehensive overview of the sonographic evaluation, diagnostic criteria, and management of different categories. Open Vet J 2025 Mar;15(3):1116-1139.
    doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i3.5pubmed: 40276205google scholar: lookup
  15. Chiavaccini L, Reed RA, Spadavecchia C. Editorial: Advancements in equine pain management. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2025;6:1547764.
    doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1547764pubmed: 39974313google scholar: lookup
  16. Mickevičienė I, Mikalauskienė D, Miknienė Z. The prognostic importance of physiological and biochemical parameters in horses afflicted with colic. Open Vet J 2024 Aug;14(8):1801-1807.
    doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i8.8pubmed: 39308735google scholar: lookup
  17. Laleye BOFV, Seye M, Chiavaccini L. Early recognition of pain: improving colic outcomes in horses in Senegal. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2024;5:1429849.
    doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1429849pubmed: 39301324google scholar: lookup
  18. Azizi S, Mazaheri-Khameneh R, Davoodi F, Gooran MM, Ghoreishi SS, Mozaffari N, Dalir-Naghadeh B. Unusual left colon displacement and clockwise torsion in a 10-month-old Arab filly: A case report. Vet Med Sci 2024 Jul;10(4):e1481.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.1481pubmed: 39031749google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.