Analyze Diet

Public veterinary medicine: public health. Serologic evaluation of vesicular stomatitis virus exposure in horses and cattle in 1996.

Abstract: To determine potential risk factors for vesicular stomatitis (VS) in Colorado livestock in 1995 and evaluate VS virus (VSV) exposure of Colorado livestock in 1996. Methods: Retrospective case-control study of VS risk factors and seroprevalence evaluation. Methods: Premises included 52 that had VS-positive animals and 33 that did not have VS-positive animals during the 1995 epidemic, and 8 in the vicinity of premises that had VS-positive animals during the 1995 epidemic. Methods: Layout and management data for premises were collected during site visits in 1996. Signalment and management data were collected for animals from which samples were obtained, and samples were tested by serologic examination and virus isolation. The VSV seroprevalence rate was estimated for Colorado, using serum obtained for equine infectious anemia testing and from the Market Cattle Identification program in Colorado. Results: At least 1 animal was seropositive for VSV on 35 of 52 (67%) premises, and 71 of 228 (31%) animals tested were seropositive for VSV. Seroprevalence was 63 of 170 (37%) for horses and 8 of 54 (15%) for cattle. Seroprevalence of VSV in animals from non-study premises in Colorado in 1996 was estimated to be 1.1% in cattle and 0.8% in horses. Conclusions: Overall VSV seroprevalence in Colorado livestock was less than seroprevalence in epidemic areas, and seroprevalence rates in epidemic areas were greater for horses than cattle. Results may indicate that some animals had subclinical VSV infection during epidemics and that animals may be exposed to VSV between epidemics.
Publication Date: 1998-11-12 PubMed ID: 9810380
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines the risk factors and exposure levels of the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) in livestock in Colorado. It concludes that there was a lower overall VSV seroprevalence in Colorado livestock as compared to epidemic areas.

Objectives and Methods

  • The objective of the study was to identify potential risk factors contributing to the spread of vesicular stomatitis (VS), a viral disease affecting livestock, in Colorado’s livestock during 1995 and to assess the level of exposure to the VS virus (VSV) in animals in 1996.
  • The researchers conducted a retrospective case-control study and evaluated the seroprevalence (measure of the frequency of individuals in a population who test positive for a specific disease) of VS.
  • The study sites comprised 52 premises that had VS-positive animals during the 1995 epidemic and 33 premises that did not, as well as 8 in the vicinity of premises that had VS-positive animals.
  • Site visits were conducted in 1996 to gather layout and management data of premises. Additionally, signalment (information detailing an animal’s species, breed, age, and other attributes) and management data were collected from animals from which samples were procured. These samples underwent serological examinations and virus isolation tests.
  • The VSV seroprevalence rate for Colorado was estimated using sera acquired for equine infectious anaemia testing and the Market Cattle Identification program in the state.

Results

  • Findings indicated at least one animal was seropositive for VSV on 35 out of 52 (67%) premises. Out of 228 animals tested, 71 (31%) were seropositive for VSV.
  • Seroprevalence was determined at 37% for horses (63 of 170) and 15% for cattle (8 of 54).
  • Seroprevalence of VSV in Colorado’s non-study livestock premises in 1996 was estimated at 1.1% for cattle and 0.8% for horses.

Conclusions

  • In summary, the seroprevalence of VSV in Colorado’s livestock was lower than in areas hit by the epidemic. It was also noted that seroprevalence rates in the epidemic hotspots were higher for horses than for cattle.
  • There may be an indication in these results that some animals experienced subclinical VSV infection (an infection that’s virtually symptomless) during the epidemic periods, and that livestock might still be exposed to VSV even between the epidemics.

Cite This Article

APA
Mumford EL, McCluskey BJ, Traub-Dargatz JL, Schmitt BJ, Salman MD. (1998). Public veterinary medicine: public health. Serologic evaluation of vesicular stomatitis virus exposure in horses and cattle in 1996. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 213(9), 1265-1269.

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 213
Issue: 9
Pages: 1265-1269

Researcher Affiliations

Mumford, E L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA.
McCluskey, B J
    Traub-Dargatz, J L
      Schmitt, B J
        Salman, M D

          MeSH Terms

          • Age Factors
          • Animals
          • Antibodies, Viral / blood
          • Case-Control Studies
          • Cattle
          • Cattle Diseases / epidemiology
          • Colorado / epidemiology
          • Complement Fixation Tests / veterinary
          • Disease Outbreaks / veterinary
          • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / veterinary
          • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
          • Horses
          • Neutralization Tests / veterinary
          • Retrospective Studies
          • Rhabdoviridae Infections / epidemiology
          • Rhabdoviridae Infections / veterinary
          • Risk Factors
          • Seroepidemiologic Studies
          • Sheep
          • Stomatitis / epidemiology
          • Stomatitis / veterinary
          • Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus / immunology

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.