Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2026; 13; 1910221; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1910221

Pulled-up race outcomes as welfare-relevant surveillance indicators in United States Steeplechase horses, 2023-2025.

Abstract: Pulled-up race outcomes are routinely recorded but are nonspecific, potentially reflecting fatigue, poor performance, footing, rider judgment, suspected injury, or physiological compromise. We evaluated their association with subsequent participation disruption in United States steeplechase horses. Unassigned: National Steeplechase Association Race Results Reports from 2023 to 2025 were analyzed retrospectively at the horse-start level. Outcomes were time to the next later-date start, ≥60-day interruption, ≥183-day absence, and no recorded later-date start. Cox models were stratified by race type with horse-clustered robust covariance; binary outcomes used horse-clustered generalized estimating equations. Sensitivity analyses excluded November starts because racing is seasonal from March through November. Unassigned: Among 3,070 starts by 710 horses, 367 (11.95%) were pulled up, involving 277 horses (39.0%). No later-date start was recorded after 37.6% of pulled-up and 21.2% of non-pulled-up starts. Among returners, median time to the next start was 42 versus 35 days; Kaplan-Meier medians for all starts were 148 versus 45 days. Pulled-up status was associated with a lower recorded return rate (hazard ratio 0.589, 95% confidence interval 0.515-0.675). Race-type-adjusted odds ratios were 2.10 (1.67-2.64) for ≥60-day interruption and 2.36 (1.80-3.10) for ≥183-day absence. Associations persisted after excluding November starts. Unassigned: Pulled-up outcomes were associated with participation disruption, although clinical reasons were unavailable. They may help prioritize follow-up and longitudinal surveillance but cannot replace veterinary examination or clinical records.
Publication Date: 2026-10-02 PubMed ID: 42890324PubMed Central: PMC13672835DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1910221Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study analyzed pulled-up race outcomes in United States steeplechase horses from 2023 to 2025 to determine whether being pulled up during a race is associated with disruptions in future participation.
  • The research found that horses pulled up during races were more likely to have extended breaks, including missing future starts, suggesting pulled-up outcomes might be useful as indicators for welfare monitoring.

Background and Purpose

  • Pulled-up outcomes occur when a horse stops or is stopped during a race before finishing; these are routinely recorded but not specific to any one cause.
  • Potential reasons for being pulled up include fatigue, poor performance, unsafe footing, rider’s decision, suspected injury, or physiological compromise.
  • The study aimed to determine whether these pulled-up outcomes correlate with future disruptions in racing participation, which may indicate underlying welfare issues.
  • Understanding this association could help use pulled-up race outcomes as surveillance indicators for horse welfare in steeplechase racing.

Methods

  • Data Source: Retrospective analysis of National Steeplechase Association Race Results Reports from 2023 through 2025 at the horse-start level.
  • Sample: 3,070 race starts by 710 different horses.
  • Key outcome measures included:
    • Time to the next recorded race start after a pulled-up event.
    • Binary indicators for extended breaks defined as ≥60 days interruption and ≥183 days absence.
    • Whether the horse had any future recorded race start after the pulled-up event.
  • Statistical Analyses:
    • Cox proportional hazards models stratified by race type and accounting for clustering by horse, to analyze time-to-event data.
    • Generalized estimating equations used for binary outcomes with horse clustering.
    • Sensitivity analyses excluded November starts since steeplechase races generally occur between March and November, to check seasonal effects.

Results

  • Out of all starts, 367 (11.95%) were pulled up, involving 277 horses (39% of horses had at least one pulled-up event).
  • After a pulled-up start:
    • 37.6% of those horses never had a later recorded race start.
    • Among horses who returned to racing, the median time to next start was 42 days compared to 35 days after non-pulled-up starts.
    • Considering all starts, the difference in median time extended to 148 days (pulled-up) versus 45 days (non-pulled-up), indicating longer disruptions.
  • Statistical associations found:
    • Pulled-up status related to a significantly lower rate of returning to racing (Hazard Ratio 0.589, meaning about 41% reduced hazard of return compared to non-pulled-up horses).
    • Odds of experiencing a ≥60-day interruption were 2.10 times higher after being pulled up.
    • Odds of experiencing a ≥183-day absence were 2.36 times higher after being pulled up.
    • These associations persisted even when excluding November races, suggesting seasonality did not drive the findings.

Interpretation

  • Being pulled up during a steeplechase race strongly correlates with disruptions in continued racing participation.
  • Because pulled-up outcomes are nonspecific, the exact reasons for these disruptions are unknown and could include injury or other welfare concerns.
  • Despite their limitations, pulled-up race outcomes can serve as useful indicators to prioritize horses needing veterinary follow-up or more detailed clinical evaluation.
  • However, they should not replace direct veterinary examinations or clinical data for diagnosing or managing health or performance problems.

Potential Implications

  • Race organizers and steeplechase associations could use pulled-up outcomes as part of welfare surveillance systems to monitor horse health trends longitudinally.
  • These indicators could help target resources for veterinary care or rest periods for horses at risk of injury or prolonged absence due to underlying issues.
  • Future research could focus on linking pulled-up events with clinical findings to improve specificity of welfare monitoring.

Cite This Article

APA
Markowitz JS. (2026). Pulled-up race outcomes as welfare-relevant surveillance indicators in United States Steeplechase horses, 2023-2025. Front Vet Sci, 13, 1910221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1910221

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Pages: 1910221
PII: 1910221

Researcher Affiliations

Markowitz, Jeffrey S
  • Independent Researcher, Princeton Junction, NJ, United States.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 11 references
  1. Tanner JC, Rogers CW, Bolwell CF, Cogger N, Gee EK, McIlwraith CW. Analysis of failure to finish a race in a cohort of thoroughbred racehorses in New Zealand. Animals (Basel) (2016) 6:36.
    doi: 10.3390/ani6060036pmc: PMC4929416pubmed: 27231944google scholar: lookup
  2. Boden LA, Anderson GA, Charles JA, Morgan KL, Morton JM, Parkin TDH. Risk factors for thoroughbred racehorse fatality in jump starts in Victoria, Australia (1989-2004). Equine Vet J (2007) 39:422–8.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X183757pubmed: 17910267google scholar: lookup
  3. Legg KA, Bolwell CF, Gee EK, Gibson MJ, Rogers CW. Risk factors for horse falls in New Zealand thoroughbred jumps racing. Vet J (2022) 289:105915.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105915pubmed: 36243304google scholar: lookup
  4. Gibson MJ, Legg KA, Gee EK, Rogers CW. Risk factors for horse fatality in thoroughbred jumps racing in New Zealand. J Equine Vet Sci (2023) 129:104897.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104897pubmed: 37544490google scholar: lookup
  5. . Rules of Racing 2025. Rules 5.16 and 7.4.
  6. Gibson MJ, Bolwell CF, Gee EK, Legg KA, Rogers CW. Race-level reporting of incidents during two seasons (2015/16 to 2016/17) of thoroughbred flat racing in New Zealand. Animals (2022) 12:1033.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12081033pmc: PMC9029521pubmed: 35454278google scholar: lookup
  7. Morrice-West AV, Thomas M, Wong ASM, Flash M, Whitton RC, Hitchens PL. Linkage of jockey falls and injuries with racehorse injuries and fatalities in thoroughbred flat racing in Victoria, Australia. Front Vet Sci (2025) 11:1481016.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1481016pmc: PMC11865924pubmed: 40018508google scholar: lookup
  8. Fuller CW, Ekstrand J, Junge A, Andersen TE, Bahr R, Dvorak J. Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries. Br J Sports Med (2006) 40:193–201.
    doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.025270pmc: PMC2491990pubmed: 16505073google scholar: lookup
  9. Bahr R, Clarsen B, Derman W, Dvorak J, Emery CA, Finch CF. International Olympic Committee consensus statement: methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sport 2020. Br J Sports Med (2020) 54:372–89.
  10. . Equibase Horse Profile And Result Records. .
  11. . Rules of Thoroughbred Racing, Chapter 27: Commission Veterinarians, Official Veterinarians and Other Veterinarians. .

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.