Analyze Diet
Drug testing and analysis2017; 9(9); 1472; doi: 10.1002/dta.2265

Quantification of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) in equine plasma and urine using HILIC-MS/MS.

Abstract: This paper describes quantitative methods for the determination of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) in equine plasma and urine based on simple precipitation and dilution followed by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS/MS). DMSO is a polar solvent with analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. Its pharmacological features make it prohibited in horse racing. However, since DMSO is naturally present in the horses' environment, international threshold values have been implemented for plasma and urine (1 and 15 µg/mL, respectively). Previously presented quantitative methods for the determination of DMSO are based on gas chromatography, thus demanding a tedious extraction step to transfer the analyte from the aqueous bodily fluid to an injectable organic solvent. The column used in the presented method was an Acquity BEH HILIC and the mobile phase was a mixture of ammonium acetate buffer and acetonitrile delivered as a gradient. Hexadeuterated DMSO (2 H6 -DMSO) was used as the internal standard. Validation was performed in the range of the international thresholds concerning selectivity, carry-over, linearity, precision, accuracy, stability and inter-individual matrix variation. The results fulfilled the predefined criteria and the methods were considered fit for purpose. Successful applications on real equine doping control samples were carried out with determined DMSO concentrations exceeding the international thresholds. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Publication Date: 2017-08-30 PubMed ID: 28945329DOI: 10.1002/dta.2265Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Published Erratum

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study developed and validated a simple HILIC‑MS/MS method to measure dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) in horse plasma and urine around international doping-control thresholds. It offers a faster, solvent-friendly alternative to older gas chromatography approaches and worked on real samples that exceeded regulatory limits.

What the researchers studied and why it matters

  • DMSO is a highly polar solvent with analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects; because it can alter performance or mask pain, it is prohibited in horse racing.
  • DMSO also occurs naturally in the environment, so racing authorities set threshold concentrations to distinguish incidental exposure from prohibited use: 1 µg/mL in plasma and 15 µg/mL in urine.
  • The goal was to create and validate a robust, routine laboratory method to quantify DMSO in equine plasma and urine that is accurate around these thresholds and practical for high-throughput doping control.

Analytical challenge and rationale for the chosen technique

  • DMSO’s high polarity makes it poorly retained on conventional reversed-phase LC and historically pushed labs to use gas chromatography (GC).
  • GC methods typically require laborious liquid–liquid extraction to move DMSO from water-rich biofluids into an organic injection solvent, increasing time and risk of loss or contamination.
  • Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) retains polar analytes effectively, enabling direct handling of aqueous samples after simple preparation.
  • Coupling HILIC to tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) provides the selectivity and sensitivity needed to quantify DMSO near low µg/mL thresholds in complex matrices like plasma and urine.

Sample preparation and chromatographic conditions

  • Sample preparation was intentionally minimal:
    • Plasma: protein precipitation to remove major interferents.
    • Urine: dilution to bring matrix salts and DMSO into a range compatible with HILIC-MS/MS.
  • Chromatography used an Acquity BEH HILIC column, suitable for retaining small polar molecules such as DMSO.
  • The mobile phase was a gradient of acetonitrile and an ammonium acetate buffer, a standard HILIC system that balances retention, peak shape, and MS compatibility.

Quantitation strategy and internal standardization

  • Quantitation relied on stable-isotope dilution with hexadeuterated DMSO (d6‑DMSO) as the internal standard.
  • The isotopically labeled internal standard co-extracts and co-elutes with native DMSO, correcting for:
    • Variations in sample preparation and injection volume,
    • Ionization suppression/enhancement from matrix constituents, and
    • Instrumental drift over time.

Method validation design

  • Validation covered the concentration ranges relevant to regulatory thresholds in both matrices.
  • Assessed performance characteristics included:
    • Selectivity: absence of interfering signals at the DMSO retention time/transition.
    • Carry-over: negligible analyte residue after high-concentration injections.
    • Linearity: proportional response across the calibration range around 1 µg/mL (plasma) and 15 µg/mL (urine).
    • Precision: repeatability and intermediate precision within predefined acceptance limits.
    • Accuracy: agreement of measured versus nominal concentrations using quality controls.
    • Stability: DMSO stability under typical storage and analytical conditions (e.g., bench-top, autosampler).
    • Inter-individual matrix variation: consistent performance across plasma and urine from different horses.
  • All criteria were met; the methods were deemed fit for purpose for doping-control testing.

Applications to real-world samples

  • The validated methods were applied to actual equine doping-control specimens.
  • Measured DMSO concentrations in some samples exceeded the international thresholds, demonstrating the method’s practical utility for regulatory enforcement.

Advantages compared with traditional GC approaches

  • Simplified workflow: precipitation/dilution replaces time-consuming extraction into GC-compatible solvents.
  • Improved throughput: fewer manual steps and HILIC-MS/MS’s rapid analysis shorten turnaround times.
  • Enhanced selectivity and robustness: MS/MS with isotope dilution mitigates matrix effects common in biological samples.
  • Better fit to polar analytes: HILIC provides reliable retention and peak shape for highly water-soluble compounds like DMSO.

Practical considerations and potential limitations

  • Environmental ubiquity of DMSO requires vigilant contamination control (e.g., avoiding DMSO-containing lab reagents and plastics).
  • Carry-over must remain tightly managed due to high-solubility analytes being run near regulatory decision limits.
  • Laboratories should verify matrix effects across diverse horse populations and diets, as done here via inter-individual matrix checks.

Implications for equine anti-doping and surveillance

  • This HILIC‑MS/MS method enables reliable differentiation between environmental background and pharmacological use by targeting established thresholds.
  • The streamlined protocol supports routine, high-volume testing, improving responsiveness in racing oversight.
  • The approach is broadly transferable to other small, polar veterinary analytes where GC extraction burdens testing capacity.

Key takeaways

  • A validated, isotope-dilution HILIC‑MS/MS method accurately quantifies DMSO in equine plasma (around 1 µg/mL) and urine (around 15 µg/mL) with minimal sample prep.
  • Performance met stringent criteria for selectivity, carry-over, linearity, precision, accuracy, stability, and cross-subject matrix effects.
  • Real-world application confirmed its suitability for enforcing DMSO thresholds in horse racing.

Cite This Article

APA
Salomonsson ML, Bondesson U, Hedeland M. (2017). Quantification of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) in equine plasma and urine using HILIC-MS/MS. Drug Test Anal, 9(9), 1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2265

Publication

ISSN: 1942-7611
NlmUniqueID: 101483449
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 9
Pages: 1472

Researcher Affiliations

Salomonsson, Matilda L
    Bondesson, Ulf
      Hedeland, Mikael

        Citations

        This article has been cited 0 times.