Abstract: Alterations in intestinal microbiota composition, as determined by DNA sequencing, are reported in horses with acute colitis compared with healthy horses. Objective: Changes in specific bacterial populations can detect overall intestinal disruption of the normal intestinal microbiota. Identify bacterial taxa that indicate intestinal dysbiosis or health in horses using quantitative PCR (qPCR). Methods: Thirty horses with undifferentiated colitis, 13 with colitis associated with Salmonella spp., 14 with antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD), 52 healthy horses from Canada and 48 from the United States. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter cross-sectional study. Horses were included in this study through a search of medical records of acute colitis cases, for which a fecal sample was collected. qPCR assays were developed for 14 bacterial taxa and compared using Welch t-test, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis or Welch's ANOVA. Results: qPCR analysis showed significant differences in absolute abundance in 7 out of the 14 bacterial taxa tested. Differences that were consistent across all colitis groups included higher abundance of Enterobacteriaceae (mean log10DNA ± SD; Control_Canada: 2.51 ± 0.53 vs undifferentiated: 3.43 ± 1.00; Control_USA: 2.06 ± 0.91 vs Salmonella spp.: 3.65 ± 1.05 and AAD: 4.22 ± 0.97, all P < .01) and Escherichia coli (2.28 ± 1.13 vs 3.54 ± 1.54; 1.80 ± 1.25 vs 3.74 ± 1.30 and 3.90 ± 1.52, all P < .01) and lower abundance of Turicibacter spp. (4.10 ± 0.24 vs 3.86 ± 0.37; 3.64 ± 0.27 vs 3.17 ± 0.30 and 2.96 ± 0.60, respectively; all P < .01). Conclusions: This study reports changes in bacterial taxa across various colitis phenotypes and indicates that this approach could serve as a faster, cost-effective proxy for detecting dysbiosis in the gastrointestinal tract of horses.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study used quantitative PCR to identify specific bacteria in the intestines of healthy and diarrheic horses, aiming to find bacterial markers that signal intestinal health or disruption (dysbiosis).
Background and Objective
Previous research using DNA sequencing has shown that the intestinal microbiota composition differs between healthy horses and those with acute colitis (intestinal inflammation and diarrhea).
However, changes in specific bacterial populations can provide a more direct and quantitative measure of intestinal health or dysbiosis.
The objective was to identify which bacterial taxa differ between healthy horses and those with various forms of colitis using quantitative PCR (qPCR), a sensitive and targeted method to measure bacterial DNA abundance.
Methods
Study Design: Retrospective multicenter cross-sectional study analyzing fecal samples collected from horses.
Subjects:
30 horses with undifferentiated colitis (unknown cause)
13 horses with colitis linked to Salmonella species
14 horses with antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD)
52 healthy control horses from Canada
48 healthy control horses from the United States
Assays: Developed qPCR assays for 14 bacterial taxa relevant to gut health and dysbiosis.
Statistical Analysis: Compared absolute abundances of bacterial taxa using appropriate tests including Welch t-test, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, or Welch’s ANOVA depending on data distribution.
Key Findings
Out of the 14 bacterial taxa tested, 7 showed significant differences in abundance between healthy and diarrheic horses.
Common changes observed across all colitis groups included:
Increased abundance of Enterobacteriaceae: This bacterial family was significantly higher in all diarrhea groups compared to healthy controls. The measured log10 DNA values indicate a clear rise, for example, Canadian controls averaged 2.51 vs. 3.43 in undifferentiated colitis, showing notable bacterial expansion.
Increased abundance of Escherichia coli: E. coli counts were also significantly elevated in diarrheic horses across all groups, suggesting overgrowth associated with disease.
Decreased abundance of Turicibacter spp.: This presumably beneficial or commensal bacterial genus showed reduced levels in all colitis phenotypes, indicating its loss may correlate with intestinal dysbiosis.
Interpretation and Conclusions
The study highlights that specific bacterial taxa are consistently altered in horses suffering from different types of colitis compared to healthy horses.
Particularly, increased Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli combined with decreased Turicibacter spp. can serve as microbial markers of intestinal dysbiosis in horses.
Using targeted qPCR offers a faster and cost-effective method to detect these microbial imbalances compared to broad DNA sequencing approaches.
This quantitative approach could help veterinarians quickly identify intestinal microbiota disruption in horses, potentially guiding treatment and management of diarrheal disease.
Significance
Improves understanding of microbial changes in equine colitis, a condition with significant health and economic impacts.
Provides practical diagnostic tools for monitoring gut health in horses.
May lead to better-targeted therapeutic strategies by identifying specific bacterial taxa associated with disease or health states.
Cite This Article
APA
Boucher L, Karmacharya R, Arroyo LG, Leclère M, Suchodolski JS, Pilla R, Powledge S, Cruz VD, Richardson M, Arnold C, Costa MC.
(2026).
Quantitative assessment of specific bacterial taxa of the intestinal microbiota of healthy and diarrheic horses.
J Vet Intern Med, 40(5), aalag231.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jvimsj/aalag231
Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 2M2, Canada.
Karmacharya, Rockson
Comparative Microbiome Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, Texas 79106, United States.
Arroyo, Luis G
Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
Leclère, Mathilde
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe J2S 2M2, Canada.
Suchodolski, Jan S
Gastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845, United States.
Pilla, Rachel
Gastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845, United States.
Powledge, Sherri
Comparative Microbiome Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, Texas 79106, United States.
Cruz, Victor Dellevedove
Department of Microbiology, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 19802475, Brazil.
Richardson, Makayla
Comparative Microbiome Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, Texas 79106, United States.
Arnold, Carolyn
Comparative Microbiome Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, Texas 79106, United States.
Costa, Marcio Carvalho
Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 2M2, Canada.
MeSH Terms
Animals
Horses / microbiology
Diarrhea / veterinary
Diarrhea / microbiology
Horse Diseases / microbiology
Retrospective Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Colitis / veterinary
Colitis / microbiology
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Female
Feces / microbiology
Male
Anti-Bacterial Agents / adverse effects
Bacteria / classification
Bacteria / genetics
Salmonella Infections, Animal / microbiology
Canada
Grant Funding
#RGPIN/4514-2018 / Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada