Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2020; 7; 601665; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.601665

Radiographic and Venographic Appearance of Healthy and Laminitic Feet in Amiata Donkeys.

Abstract: Laminitis is a debilitating disorder resulting in irreversible anatomical changes in the feet of equids. Assessing specific anatomical features through radiography and venography provides diagnostic and prognostic information. The reference ranges are well-established in horses, but not in donkeys. It is also uncertain as to whether these ranges can be applied to every donkey breed. The present study characterizes the radiological and venographic hoof anatomy of healthy feet of Amiata donkeys and defines the changes associated with severe and mild laminitis. A total of 16 forefeet were evaluated in 8 Amiata jennies. The animals underwent musculoskeletal examination, Obel grading assessment and radiological evaluation. Based on clinical examination and radiographic findings, the forefeet were grouped as healthy, mild or severe laminitic feet, thus the digital venograms were performed according to the group definition. Radiology revealed 7/16 healthy, 4/16 mild laminitic, and 5/16 severe laminitic forefeet. Statistical analysis showed differences between the healthy and laminitic forefeet for the dorsal angle ( < 0.0001) and angle of solar aspect ( < 0.0001) of the distal phalanx, for deviation between dorsal aspect of distal phalanx and the hoof wall ( < 0.0001) and phalangeal rotation angle ( = 0.0032). Venography was abnormal in mild and severe laminitic forefeet. In particular, the vascularization was reduced or absent at the lamellar-circumflex junction dorsally, at the sub-lamellar vascular bed and at the circumflex veins. Coronary plexus vascularization was absent in severe laminitic forefeet. This study provides the radiological parameters for the assessment of healthy and laminitic forefeet of Amiata donkeys. The mild laminitic foot venogram showed decreased vascularization mainly on lamellar-circumflex junction and sub-lamellar vascular bed, in latero-medial views. The severe laminitic foot showed very poor or absent vascularization in multiple areas. The technique is easily applicable and provides diagnostic support in laminitis.
Publication Date: 2020-12-21 PubMed ID: 33409297PubMed Central: PMC7779588DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.601665Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores laminitis, a severe and painful foot condition that affects donkeys, through imaging techniques of foot anatomy. Subsequent findings provide valuable insights into the diagnosis and prognosis of the condition in Amiata Donkeys.

Objective and Methodology

  • The researchers aimed to evaluate and compare the radiographic and venographic anatomy of a healthy donkey’s foot to those suffering from laminitis.
  • They executed this by examining the forefeet of 8 Amiata donkeys: 7 classified as healthy, 4 with mild laminitis, and 5 with severe laminitis.
  • Each foot was subjected to a musculoskeletal examination, an Obel grading assessment (to determine the severity of laminitis), and a radiological evaluation.

Results

  • X-ray imaging and venography showed distinct anatomical changes in the foot from healthy to mild and severe laminitis.
  • These differences were quantitatively confirmed through statistical analysis with the variations becoming more pronounced as the severity of laminitis increased. This was most observable in the dorsal angle and angle of the solar aspect of the distal phalanx, deviation between the dorsal aspect of distal phalanx and the hoof wall, and phalangeal rotation angle.
  • Equally, abnormal venograms indicated diminished or even non-existent vascularization at the lamellar-circumflex junction, the sub-lamellar vascular bed, circumflex veins, and in severe cases the coronary plexus.

Implications and Contribution

  • This study offers the essential radiological parameters required to assess and compare healthy and laminitic forefeet of Amiata donkeys, laying groundwork for potential future solutions or treatments for laminitis.
  • The noted changes in the blood vessels (vascularization) due to laminitis can help veterinarians in diagnostic support of the debilitating condition.
  • The findings from this research are important as they provide necessary diagnostic information that was missing for this donkey breed, thus filling a critical knowledge gap.

Cite This Article

APA
Nocera I, Aliboni B, Ben David L, Gracia-Calvo LA, Sgorbini M, Citi S. (2020). Radiographic and Venographic Appearance of Healthy and Laminitic Feet in Amiata Donkeys. Front Vet Sci, 7, 601665. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.601665

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 7
Pages: 601665
PII: 601665

Researcher Affiliations

Nocera, Irene
  • Department of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Aliboni, Benedetta
  • Department of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Ben David, Liri
  • Private Equine Practitioner, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gracia-Calvo, Luis Alfonso
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Sgorbini, Micaela
  • Department of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Citi, Simonetta
  • Department of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Patterson-Kane JC, Karikoski NP, McGowan CM. Paradigm shifts in understanding equine laminitis.. Vet J 2018 Jan;231:33-40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.11.011pubmed: 29429485google scholar: lookup
  2. Obel N. Studies on the Histopathology of Acute Laminitis. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksells; (1948).
  3. Mitchell B. The importance of dietary management in laminitis. Equine Health (2015) 22:10–5.
    doi: 10.12968/eqhe.2015.22.10google scholar: lookup
  4. Collins SN, Dyson SJ, Murray RC, Burden F, Trawford A. Radiological anatomy of the donkey's foot: objective characterisation of the normal and laminitic donkey foot.. Equine Vet J 2011 Jul;43(4):478-86.
  5. Kameya T. Clinical studies on laminitis in the racehorse. Exp Rept Eq Health Labor (1973) 10:19–40.
  6. Stick JA, Jann HW, Scott EA, Robinson NE. Pedal bone rotation as a prognostic sign in laminitis of horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1982 Feb 1;180(3):251-3.
    pubmed: 7056672
  7. Cripps PJ, Eustace RA. Radiological measurements from the feet of normal horses with relevance to laminitis.. Equine Vet J 1999 Sep;31(5):427-32.
  8. Tacchio G, Davies HM, Morgante M, Bernardini D. A radiographic technique to assess the longitudinal balance in front hooves.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2002 Sep;(34):368-72.
  9. Floyd AE. Environmental management of the severe laminitic horse. In: Floyd AE, Mansmann RA, editors. Equine Podiatry. St Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; (2007). p. 359–69.
  10. D'Arpe L, Bernardini D. Digital venography in horses and its clinical application in Europe.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2010 Aug;26(2):339-59.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.06.006pubmed: 20699179google scholar: lookup
  11. Hunt RJ, Wharton RE. Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and prognosis of chronic laminitis in North America.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2010 Apr;26(1):141-53.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2009.12.006pubmed: 20381743google scholar: lookup
  12. Eastman S, Redden RF, Williams CA. Venograms for use in laminitis treatment. J Equine Vet Sci (2012) 32:757–9.
  13. Alves FR, Guerra PC, Fioretto ET, Júnior AANM, Machado FCF, Aranha RMC. Angiographic aspect of the distal forelimb in donkeys (Equus asinus) used for animal traction. Biotemas (2009) 22:163–7.
  14. El-Shafaey EA, Salem MG, Mosbah E, Zaghloul AE. Morphometric evaluation of relevant radiographic parameters of the forefeet of clinically normal donkeys (Equus αsinus). J Hell Vet Med Soc (2017) 68:467–78.
    doi: 10.12681/jhvms.15543google scholar: lookup
  15. Nocera I, Aliboni B, Puccinelli C, Pietrini G, Sgorbini M, Citi S. Radiographic parameters of the digit in a cohort population of Amiata donkeys. Open Vet J (2020) 10:354–62.
  16. Burden F, Thiemann A. Donkeys are different. J Equine Vet Sci (2015) 3:376–82.
  17. Said AH, Khamis Y, Mahfouz MF, El-Keiey MT. Angiographic appearance of the metacarpus, phalanges and foot of the donkey.. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1983 Dec;30(10):788-95.
  18. Salem M, El-Shafaey ES, Mosbah E, Ei A.n. Plain and contrast radiographic evaluation of the digit in donkeys (Equus asinus). Mans Vet Med J (2016) 18:51–65.
  19. National Research Council. The Nutrient Requirements of Horses. 6th ed Washington, DC: National Academy Press; (2007).
  20. Herthel D, Hood DM. Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and prognosis of chronic laminitis.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1999 Aug;15(2):375-94, vii.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30151-7pubmed: 10472118google scholar: lookup
  21. Van Eps A. General clinical aspects of the laminitis case. In: Belknap JK, Geor RJ, editors. Equine Laminitis. 1st ed Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Inc. (2017). p. 183–90.
  22. Evangelista F, Tayari H, Degani M, Nocera I, Briganti A. Sedative and respiratory effects of intramuscular detomidine and butorphanol in donkeys sedated for bronchoalveolar lavage. J Equine Vet Sci (2018) 69:96–101.
  23. Parks AH, Belknap JK. Diagnostic imaging. In: Belknap JK, Geor RJ, editors. Equine Laminitis. 1st ed Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Inc; (2017). p. 226–39.
  24. Rucker A. The digital venogram. In: Belknap JK, Geor RJ, editors. Equine Laminitis. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Inc. (2017). p. 240–51.
  25. Linford RL, O'Brien TR, Trout DR. Qualitative and morphometric radiographic findings in the distal phalanx and digital soft tissues of sound thoroughbred racehorses.. Am J Vet Res 1993 Jan;54(1):38-51.
    pubmed: 8427471
  26. Butler JA, Colles CM, Dyson SJ, Kold SE, Poulos PW, Puchalski S. The foot. In: Butler JA, Colles CM, Dyson SJ, Kold SE, Poulos PW, Puchalski S, editors. Clinical Radiology of the Horse. 4th ed The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons. (2017). p. 55–148.
  27. Goulet C, Olive J, Rossier Y, Beauchamp G. RADIOGRAPHIC AND ANATOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF DORSAL HOOF WALL LAYERS IN NONLAMINITIC HORSES.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2015 Nov-Dec;56(6):589-94.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12280pubmed: 26226838google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.