Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2018; 50(5); 564-579; doi: 10.1111/evj.12808

Recent advances in articular cartilage evaluation using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Abstract: Articular cartilage is a critical joint tissue and its evaluation remains a diagnostic challenge in horses. Coupled with a poor capacity for healing, early degenerative changes in articular cartilage are difficult to characterise using routine diagnostic imaging evaluations. Both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide volumetric joint assessment and highlight morphological and quantitative properties of articular cartilage, improving assessment of this essential tissue. While the use of CT and MRI for joint evaluation is not new, there still remains a shortage of literature and scientific studies on the ability of these methods to evaluate articular cartilage in the horse. This review article summarises current CT and MRI techniques capable of characterising equine articular cartilage, highlights recent advances in these techniques and discusses the numerous methods studied in human subjects that have been minimally investigated in horses. Imaging techniques are presented in terms of their capabilities of offering morphological and quantitative evaluation along with a discussion of their benefits and limitations. Finally, it summarises the current state-of-the-art approaches and identifies unmet clinical imaging needs to propel the advancement of articular cartilage and joint imaging in the horse.
Publication Date: 2018-02-27 PubMed ID: 29344988DOI: 10.1111/evj.12808Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper reviews the recent advancements in techniques and technology for evaluating knee cartilage in horses using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It also discusses the current challenges and limitations in these imaging techniques and highlights areas where further research and improvement are needed.

Introduction

  • The research begins by emphasizing the importance of evaluating articular cartilage, a critical joint tissue in horses. This tissue is significant to the health and movement of horses, but it possesses poor healing ability and is hard to assess with standard imaging tools.
  • Techniques for imaging this cartilage, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have improved over time, providing better anatomical and quantitative data on the tissue. However, both remain underutilized in veterinary medicine, particularly in horse care.

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques

  • The paper outlines different CT and MRI techniques currently in use for examining horse cartilage and the way they capture the shape and quantity of the tissue.
  • CT and MRI not only provide a three-dimensional assessment of the joint but also allow the observation of early degenerative changes that are otherwise challenging to detect.
  • The paper also examines the limitations and advantages of these imaging techniques, noting that each offers unique insight into the structure and condition of the horse’s cartilage but has certain restrictions and drawbacks.

Methods Studied in Humans

  • The researchers draw attention to certain imaging techniques and methods that have been used in human patients but have not been sufficiently explored or applied in veterinary medicine for horses.
  • These techniques could potentially offer greater insight into cartilage health in horses and might serve as a resource for developing better diagnostic tools.

Future Strategies and Needs

  • The paper concludes with a summary of the current state-of-the-art approaches to articular cartilage and joint imaging in horses.
  • It identifies gaps in the clinical imaging field and discusses potential future actions, such as research and technical advancements, which would contribute to improved diagnosis and better care for horses with joint-related issues.

Cite This Article

APA
Nelson BB, Kawcak CE, Barrett MF, McIlwraith CW, Grinstaff MW, Goodrich LR. (2018). Recent advances in articular cartilage evaluation using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Equine Vet J, 50(5), 564-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12808

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 50
Issue: 5
Pages: 564-579

Researcher Affiliations

Nelson, B B
  • Gail Holmes Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Kawcak, C E
  • Gail Holmes Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Barrett, M F
  • Gail Holmes Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
  • Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
McIlwraith, C W
  • Gail Holmes Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Grinstaff, M W
  • Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Chemistry and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Goodrich, L R
  • Gail Holmes Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cartilage, Articular / diagnostic imaging
  • Cartilage, Articular / physiology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / veterinary
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 17 times.
  1. Thampi P, Seabaugh KA, Pezzanite LM, Chu CR, Phillips JN, Grieger JC, McIlwraith CW, Samulski RJ, Goodrich LR. A pilot study to determine the optimal dose of scAAVIL-1ra in a large animal model of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Gene Ther 2023 Sep 11;.
    doi: 10.1038/s41434-023-00420-2pubmed: 37696981google scholar: lookup
  2. Thampi P, Samulski RJ, Grieger JC, Phillips JN, McIlwraith CW, Goodrich LR. Gene therapy approaches for equine osteoarthritis. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:962898.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.962898pubmed: 36246316google scholar: lookup
  3. Hagag U, Nahas AE, Almohamad ZA, Brehm W, Gerlach K. 3T Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of the bovine carpus. BMC Vet Res 2022 Jun 22;18(1):236.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03346-wpubmed: 35733155google scholar: lookup
  4. Baccarin RYA, Seidel SRT, Michelacci YM, Tokawa PKA, Oliveira TM. Osteoarthritis: a common disease that should be avoided in the athletic horse's life. Anim Front 2022 Jun;12(3):25-36.
    doi: 10.1093/af/vfac026pubmed: 35711506google scholar: lookup
  5. Honkanen MKM, Mohammadi A, Te Moller NCR, Ebrahimi M, Xu W, Plomp S, Pouran B, Lehto VP, Brommer H, van Weeren PR, Korhonen RK, Töyräs J, Mäkelä JTA. Dual-contrast micro-CT enables cartilage lesion detection and tissue condition evaluation ex vivo. Equine Vet J 2023 Mar;55(2):315-324.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13573pubmed: 35353399google scholar: lookup
  6. Johnston GCA, Ahern BJ, Palmieri C, Young AC. Imaging and Gross Pathological Appearance of Changes in the Parasagittal Grooves of Thoroughbred Racehorses. Animals (Basel) 2021 Nov 24;11(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11123366pubmed: 34944142google scholar: lookup
  7. Nelson BB, Stewart RC, Kawcak CE, Freedman JD, Patwa AN, Snyder BD, Goodrich LR, Grinstaff MW. Quantitative Evaluation of Equine Articular Cartilage Using Cationic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography. Cartilage 2021 Apr;12(2):211-221.
    doi: 10.1177/1947603518812562pubmed: 33722083google scholar: lookup
  8. Talha SMU, Mairaj T, Yousuf WB, Zahed JA. Region-Based Segmentation and Wiener Pilot-Based Novel Amoeba Denoising Scheme for CT Imaging. Scanning 2020;2020:6172046.
    doi: 10.1155/2020/6172046pubmed: 33381254google scholar: lookup
  9. Shi B, Huang H. Computational technology for nasal cartilage-related clinical research and application. Int J Oral Sci 2020 Jul 27;12(1):21.
    doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-00089-ypubmed: 32719336google scholar: lookup
  10. Bertoni L, Jacquet-Guibon S, Branly T, Legendre F, Desancé M, Mespoulhes C, Melin M, Hartmann DJ, Schmutz A, Denoix JM, Galéra P, Demoor M, Audigié F. An experimentally induced osteoarthritis model in horses performed on both metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal joints: Technical, clinical, imaging, biochemical, macroscopic and microscopic characterization. PLoS One 2020;15(6):e0235251.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235251pubmed: 32584901google scholar: lookup
  11. van Zadelhoff C, Schwarz T, Smith S, Engerand A, Taylor S. Identification of Naturally Occurring Cartilage Damage in the Equine Distal Interphalangeal Joint Using Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:508.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00508pubmed: 32064268google scholar: lookup
  12. De Zani D, Rabbogliatti V, Rabba S, Auletta L, Longo M, Zani DD. Subchondral and Osteochondral Unit Bone Damage in the Fetlock Region of Sport Horses Using Low-Field MRI: Case Series. Animals (Basel) 2025 Dec 2;15(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15233468pubmed: 41375526google scholar: lookup
  13. Turek B, Pawlikowski M, Jankowski K, Borowska M, Skierbiszewska K, Jasiński T, Domino M. Selection of density standard and X-ray tube settings for computed digital absorptiometry in horses using the k-means clustering algorithm. BMC Vet Res 2025 Mar 13;21(1):165.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04591-5pubmed: 40082938google scholar: lookup
  14. Nahas AE, Hagag U. Magnetic resonance imaging of the dromedary camel carpus. BMC Vet Res 2024 Sep 6;20(1):394.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04184-8pubmed: 39242548google scholar: lookup
  15. Peng X, Xie AM, Fan HG, Zhu HL, Yang D, Wan DE, He F, Luo C, Li H, Shuang F. The clinical application value of 3.0T magnetic resonance T2 mapping imaging in evaluating the degree of acetabular cartilage degeneration in joint replacement surgery running title: MRI and acetabular cartilage degeneration. J Orthop Surg Res 2024 Jul 19;19(1):414.
    doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04898-3pubmed: 39030606google scholar: lookup
  16. Witkowska-Piłaszewicz O, Malin K, Dąbrowska I, Grzędzicka J, Ostaszewski P, Carter C. Immunology of Physical Exercise: Is Equus caballus an Appropriate Animal Model for Human Athletes?. Int J Mol Sci 2024 May 10;25(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms25105210pubmed: 38791248google scholar: lookup
  17. Seidler A, Aßmann A, Torgerson PR, Sánchez-Andrade JS, Bischofberger A. Ex Vivo Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences in Depicting Normal Articular Cartilage in Equine Stifle Cadavers. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 19;14(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14010015pubmed: 38200746google scholar: lookup