Analyze Diet
PloS one2024; 19(10); e0311919; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311919

Rein tensions and behaviour with five rein types in international-level vaulting horses.

Abstract: Health and performance of vaulting horses cantering with reins might be affected by rein tensions. The primary aim of this present study was to measure rein and lunge line tensions in international-level vaulting horses with several types of reins adjusted in accordance with the requirements of the FEI Vaulting Rules and study the effect of reins types on it. The secondary aim was to evaluate behavioural signs of discomfort under the same conditions and study the effect of reins types on it. The relationship between tensions and behavioural signs of discomfort was then explored. Thirty-nine international-level vaulting horses took part in this study and tested side reins either with an elastic part, all elastic or without elastic, draw reins with an upper adjustment triangle and side reins fixed on the noseband. Tensions of the left and right reins and the lunge line were measured with sensors at a rate of 80 Hz for a canter of 1min30 on a 15-meter circle, without a vaulter, and behavioural analyses (on the locomotion, tail, head, mouth and ears movements) were performed using video filmed by a camera attached to the lunger's chest. Mixed models revealed that the Root mean square (RMS) of the tensions of the left and right reins, of the total, as well as the lunge line, were significantly influenced by rein type (p<0.001) in all cases). Total RMS tension ranged from 6.2 kg to 11.7 kg with a right RMS tension superior to left RMS (p < 0.001). When tension was high, mouth opening increased (p = 0.007). It was with draw reins that total tension (p < 0.05) and mouth openings were lower (p = 0.005), even if a high proportion of variance of these discomfort behaviours could be explained by the individual horse.
Publication Date: 2024-10-17 PubMed ID: 39418261PubMed Central: PMC11486377DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311919Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on evaluating the impact of different types of reins on the rein tensions and behavioural discomfort signs in international-level vaulting horses. Through testing, researchers found that the rein type significantly affected the rein and lunge line tensions as well as discomfort behaviors of the 39 horses studied.

Methods and Participants

  • The researchers studied thirty-nine international-level vaulting horses. The horses were tested with different types of reins, including side reins with and without elastic, all-elastic reins, draw reins with an upper adjustment triangle, and side reins fixed on the noseband. The rein types were adjusted in accordance with the FEI Vaulting Rules.
  • The horses performed a certain activity, namely cantering for 1 minute and 30 seconds on a 15-metre circle without a vaulter.
  • The tensions of the left and right reins, as well as the lunge line, were measured using sensors at a frequency rate of 80 Hz to understand their influence on the horses’ behaviour and performance.
  • Accompanying these measurements, the researchers utilized video footage to further analyse the horses’ behavior, specifically focusing on locomotion, tail, head, mouth and ear movements.

Outcomes

  • It was observed that the root mean square (RMS), a statistical measure used to calculate average tension, of the left and right reins, as well as the total sum and lunge line, were affected by the type of rein used. In all cases, these influences were significant (p < 0.001).
  • The total RMS tension range was between 6.2 kg and 11.7 kg, with the tension on the right rein being greater than that on the left (p < 0.001).
  • Higher rein tension correlated with increased mouth opening in horses (p = 0.007), indicating discomfort.
  • Draw reins resulted in less total tension (p < 0.05) and fewer mouth openings (p = 0.005), even though individual horse variance played a role in these discomfort behaviours.

Interpretation

  • The findings suggest that the type of rein used in handling vaulting horses significantly impacts both the tension on the reins and lunge line and the behavioral signs of discomfort displayed by the horses.
  • Draw reins appear to be linked with less discomfort and lower tension rates, although it should be noted that individual horse characteristics also play a critical role in determining these effects.
  • The study thus informs best practices for vaulting horses’ handling and care, showing how the right equipment, when used appropriately, can enhance the horses’ performance and wellbeing.

Cite This Article

APA
Biau S, Pycik E, Boichot L, Berg LC, Ruet A. (2024). Rein tensions and behaviour with five rein types in international-level vaulting horses. PLoS One, 19(10), e0311919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311919

Publication

ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 19
Issue: 10
Pages: e0311919

Researcher Affiliations

Biau, Sophie
  • IFCE (French Horse and Riding Institute), Saumur Technical Platform, Saumur, France.
Pycik, Elena
  • IFCE (French Horse and Riding Institute), Saumur Technical Platform, Saumur, France.
Boichot, Laetitia
  • IFCE (French Horse and Riding Institute), Saumur Technical Platform, Saumur, France.
Berg, Lise-Charlotte
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.
Ruet, Alice
  • IFCE (French Horse and Riding Institute), Saumur Technical Platform, Saumur, France.
  • INRAe, CNRS, University of Tours, PRC, Nouzilly, France.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Behavior, Animal / physiology
  • Male
  • Female
  • Locomotion / physiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 45 references