FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Scientific reports2022; 12(1); 12618; doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16627-z

Relationship between anatomical characteristics and personality traits in Lipizzan horses.

Abstract: We tested 35 Lipizzan horses older than 5 years, ridden and healthy in three behavioural tests (handling, fear-reaction, and target training test). Physiological (heart rate and heart rate variability) and anatomical measurements (120 head and body distances and angles) were collected to validate parameters that reliably inform on handling/cooperation, fear/exploration and trainability in horses. Utilizing a standard clustering methodology on the behavioural data, we identified four general types of responses and categorised an individual as intermediate, low fearful, horses with low cooperation or low trainability. We additionally analysed the head morphology following Tellington-Jones and Taylor recommendations and correlated the measurements with data from a horse personality questionnaire. Although allocation to a particular personality group was not associated with these two methods, these groups differed in six anatomical characteristics of head and body. Regardless of the group, our results indicated that shorter horses (10.5 cm) are trustworthy, less fearful and easier to handle and train. We also demonstrated that horses with stronger legs and a wider base of the head have a lower heart rate when exposed to the second trial of the handling test.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-07-23 PubMed ID: 35871229PubMed Central: PMC9308772DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16627-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study evaluated the relationship between the anatomical features of 35 Lipizzan horses and their personality traits by conducting behavioural and physical tests. The researchers found that certain physical features, specifically a shorter height and wider muzzle, were indicative of traits like trustworthiness and ease of handling.

Study Methodology

  • The research was performed on 35 healthy Lipizzan horses over the age of five which were involved in some sort of physical activity (ridden).
  • Each horse was subjected to three behavioural tests that were designed to gauge their responses to handling, fear reactions, and target training.
  • Alongside the behavioural tests, physiological and anatomical data were also collected, including heart rate, heart rate variability, and measurements of 120 different body and head distances and angles.
  • The purpose of these measurements was to identify reliable indicators of a horse’s cooperativeness, propensity for fear/exploration, and trainability.

Findings

  • Using a standard clustering methodology on the behavioural data gathered from the horses during the tests, the researchers were able to identify four general types of responses, subsequently classifying the horses into groups based on their observance of such responses.
  • These groups were classified as intermediate, low fearful, low cooperation and low trainability.
  • Further analysis was conducted on the horse’s head morphology using the Tellington-Jones and Taylor recommendations, and the data was correlated with that from a horse personality questionnaire. However, the allocation to any given personality group was not directly associated with these two methods.
  • Despite the lack of link between personality groups and the indicated methods, the groups differed in six distinct anatomical characteristics related to the head and body of the horses.
  • The study found that, regardless of the group a horse belonged to, those that were shorter (under 75.9 cm) and had a wider muzzle (more than 10.5 cm), were less fearful, more trusting, and easier to handle and train.
  • The study also revealed that horses with stronger legs and a wider base head exhibited lower heart rates when exposed to the second trial of the handling test, implying they might be more adaptable or less anxious in challenging situations.

Implications

  • The findings suggest that certain physical features in horses, such as their height and muzzle width, could potentially serve as indicators of their behaviour characteristics, which could significantly aid horse trainers in understanding and managing their horses more effectively.
  • In addition, the study points out the connection between a horse’s physical characteristics and its heart rate responses to potentially stressful situations, providing further insights into how a horse’s physical characteristics can be reflective of its emotional responses.

Cite This Article

APA
Debeljak N, Košmerlj A, Altimiras J, Šemrov MZ. (2022). Relationship between anatomical characteristics and personality traits in Lipizzan horses. Sci Rep, 12(1), 12618. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16627-z

Publication

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
NlmUniqueID: 101563288
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
Pages: 12618
PII: 12618

Researcher Affiliations

Debeljak, Nataša
  • Department of Animal Science, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Groblje 3, 1230, Domžale, Slovenia.
Košmerlj, Aljaž
  • Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Altimiras, Jordi
  • Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Šemrov, Manja Zupan
  • Department of Animal Science, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Groblje 3, 1230, Domžale, Slovenia. manja.zupansemrov@bf.uni-lj.si.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Fear
  • Heart Rate / physiology
  • Horses / psychology
  • Personality

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Hausberger M, Bruderer C, Le Scolan N, Pierre JS. Interplay between environmental and genetic factors in temperament/personality traits in horses (Equus caballus).. J Comp Psychol 2004 Dec;118(4):434-46.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.4.434pubmed: 15584780google scholar: lookup
  2. Olsson KA. Review of methods used to measure temperamental characteristics in horses. Preprint 2010.
  3. Graf P, König von Borstel U, Gauly M. Importance of personality traits in horses to breeders and riders. J Vet Behav 2013;8:316–325.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.05.006google scholar: lookup
  4. Axel-Nilsson M, Peetz-Nielsen P, Visser EK, Nyman S, Blokhuis HJ. Perceived relevance of selected behavioural traits in horses—A survey conducted in Sweden. Acta Agr Scand A-An 2015;65:23–32.
    doi: 10.1080/09064702.2015.1047791google scholar: lookup
  5. Rankins EM, Wickens CL. A systematic review of equine personality. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2020;231:105076.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105076google scholar: lookup
  6. Grandin T, Deesing MJ. Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press, 2014.
  7. Górecka A, Golonka M, Chruszczewski M, Jezierski T. A note on behaviour and heart rate in horses differing in facial hair whorl. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007;105:244–248.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.013google scholar: lookup
  8. Sereda NH, Kellogg T, Hoagland T, Nadeau J. Association between whorls and personality in horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2015;35:428.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.03.116google scholar: lookup
  9. Tellington-Jones L, Taylor S. Getting in TTouch with your horse: how to assess and influence personality, potential, and performance. Trafalgar Square Books, 2009.
  10. Groesel M, Zsoldos RR, Kotschwar A, Gfoehler M, Peham C. A preliminary model study of the equine back including activity of longissimus dorsi muscle.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010 Nov;(38):401-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00282.xpubmed: 21059036google scholar: lookup
  11. Holmström M, Back W. The effects of conformation in Equine Locomotion. Saunders Elsevier, 2012, pp 229–244.
  12. Latzman RD, Hecht LK, Freeman HD, Schapiro SJ, Hopkins WD. Neuroanatomical correlates of personality in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Associations between personality and frontal cortex.. Neuroimage 2015 Dec;123:63-71.
    doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.041pmc: PMC4626258pubmed: 26311604google scholar: lookup
  13. Holl JW, Rohrer GA, Brown-Brandl TM. Estimates of genetic parameters among scale activity scores, growth, and fatness in pigs.. J Anim Sci 2010 Feb;88(2):455-9.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1559pubmed: 19820051google scholar: lookup
  14. Hansen I I, Christiansen F, Hansen HS, Braastad B, Bakken M. Variation in behavioural responses of ewes towards predator-related stimuli.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001 Jan 6;70(3):227-237.
    doi: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00155-6pubmed: 11118663google scholar: lookup
  15. Krushinskii LV, Haigh B. Animal behavior: Its normal and abnormal development. Consultants Bureau, 1961.
  16. McGreevy PD, Georgevsky D, Carrasco J, Valenzuela M, Duffy DL, Serpell JA. Dog behavior co-varies with height, bodyweight and skull shape.. PLoS One 2013;8(12):e80529.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080529pmc: PMC3864788pubmed: 24358107google scholar: lookup
  17. Back W, Clayton HM. Equine Locomotion. Saunders Elsevier, 2012.
  18. McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. J Vet Behav 2010;5:187–195.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.04.002google scholar: lookup
  19. Visser EK. Quantifying aspects of young horses’ temperament: Consistency of behavioural variables. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001;74:241–258.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00177-0google scholar: lookup
  20. Brunberg E, Gille S, Mikko S, Lindgren G. Icelandic horses with the Silver coat colour show altered behaviour in a fear reaction test. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2013;146:72–78.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.04.005google scholar: lookup
  21. Le Scolan N, Hausberger M, Wolff A. Stability over situations in temperamental traits of horses as revealed by experimental and scoring approaches.. Behav Processes 1997 Dec;41(3):257-66.
    doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00052-1pubmed: 24896858google scholar: lookup
  22. Masko M, Domino M, Lewczuk D, Jasinski T, Gajewski Z. Horse Behavior, Physiology and Emotions during Habituation to a Treadmill.. Animals (Basel) 2020 May 26;10(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10060921pmc: PMC7341274pubmed: 32466423google scholar: lookup
  23. Lansade L, Bouissou MF, Erhard HW. Fearfulness in horses: A temperament trait stable across time and situations. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008;115:182–200.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.06.011google scholar: lookup
  24. Bergvall UA, Schäpers A, Kjellander P, Weiss A. Personality and foraging decisions in fallow deer Dama dama. Anim Behav 2011;81:101–112.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.018google scholar: lookup
  25. Brem G. Der Lipizzaner im Spiegel der Wissenschaft (German Edition) (2nd ed.). Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 2011.
  26. Lipizzan International Federation. http://www.lipizzan-online.com/main.asp?kat1=64&kat2=543&kat3=&vid=1&_=2&scsqs=1&scsqs=1&_=2 (2022).
  27. Langenhof MR, Komdeur J. Why and how the early-life environment affects development of coping behaviours.. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2018;72(3):34.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-018-2452-3pmc: PMC5805793pubmed: 29449757google scholar: lookup
  28. Fureix C, Pagès M, Bon R, Lassalle JM, Kuntz P, Gonzalez G. A preliminary study of the effects of handling type on horses' emotional reactivity and the human-horse relationship.. Behav Processes 2009 Oct;82(2):202-10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.012pubmed: 19591910google scholar: lookup
  29. Henry S, Richard-Yris MA, Hausberger M. Influence of various early human-foal interferences on subsequent human-foal relationship.. Dev Psychobiol 2006 Dec;48(8):712-8.
    doi: 10.1002/dev.20189pubmed: 17111402google scholar: lookup
  30. Forkman B, Boissy A, Meunier-Salaün MC, Canali E, Jones RB. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses.. Physiol Behav 2007 Oct 22;92(3):340-74.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016pubmed: 18046784google scholar: lookup
  31. Budzyńska M. Stress reactivity and coping in horse adaptation to environment. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34:935–941.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2014.05.010google scholar: lookup
  32. Finkemeier M-A. Assessment of personality types in Nigerian dwarf goats (Capra hircus) and cross-context correlations to behavioural and physiological responses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2019;217:28–35.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.05.004google scholar: lookup
  33. Bennett D. Timing and rate of skeletal maturation in horses. Preprint 2008.
  34. Draaisma R. No communication in Language Signs and Calming Signals of Horses: Recognition and Application (1st ed.). CRC Press, 2017.
    doi: 10.1201/9781315265667google scholar: lookup
  35. Rus J. Rejski program za pasmo lipicanski konj. Preprint 2010.
  36. Gosling SD, Vazire S. Are we barking up the right tree: Evaluating a comparative approach to personality. J Res Pers 2002;36:607–614.
    doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00511-1google scholar: lookup
  37. Morris PH, Gale A, Duffy K. Can judges agree on the personality of horses?. Pers Individ Differ 2002;33:67–81.
    doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00136-2google scholar: lookup
  38. Seaman SC, Davidson HPB, Waran NK. How reliable is temperament assessment in the domestic horse (Equus caballus)?. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2002;78:175–191.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00095-3google scholar: lookup
  39. Momozawa Y. Assessment of equine temperament by a questionnaire survey to caretakers and evaluation of its reliability by simultaneous behavior test. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003;84:127–138.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.08.001google scholar: lookup
  40. Murphy J, Arkins S. Facial hair whorls (trichoglyphs) and the incidence of motor laterality in the horse.. Behav Processes 2008 Sep;79(1):7-12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.03.006pubmed: 18511219google scholar: lookup
  41. Walker RN, Tanner JM. Prediction of adult Sheldon somatotypes I and II from ratings and measurements at childhood ages.. Ann Hum Biol 1980 May-Jun;7(3):213-24.
    doi: 10.1080/03014468000004261pubmed: 7425549google scholar: lookup
  42. Trut LN. Early Canid Domestication: The Farm-Fox Experiment: Foxes bred for tamability in a 40-year experiment exhibit remarkable transformations that suggest an interplay between behavioral genetics and development. Am Sci 1999;87:160–169.
  43. Munsters CC, Visser KE, van den Broek J, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM. The influence of challenging objects and horse-rider matching on heart rate, heart rate variability and behavioural score in riding horses.. Vet J 2012 Apr;192(1):75-80.
    pubmed: 21612959doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.04.011google scholar: lookup
  44. Romero LM, Platts SH, Schoech SJ, Wada H, Crespi E, Martin LB, Buck CL. Understanding stress in the healthy animal - potential paths for progress.. Stress 2015;18(5):491-7.
    doi: 10.3109/10253890.2015.1073255pubmed: 26365223google scholar: lookup
  45. Debeljak N, Zupan M. Evaluation of horse personality based on constitutional characteristics. Acta Agric Slov 2014;104:33–44.
    doi: 10.14720/aas.2014.104.1.4google scholar: lookup
  46. Bouton ME. Extinction of instrumental (operant) learning: interference, varieties of context, and mechanisms of contextual control.. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2019 Jan;236(1):7-19.
    doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5076-4pmc: PMC6374202pubmed: 30350221google scholar: lookup
  47. Valenchon M, Lévy F, Górecka-Bruzda A, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Characterization of long-term memory, resistance to extinction, and influence of temperament during two instrumental tasks in horses.. Anim Cogn 2013 Nov;16(6):1001-6.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0648-5pubmed: 23743707google scholar: lookup
  48. McDonnell SA. A practical field guide to horse behavior: The Equid ethogram. Eclipse Press, 2003.
  49. Heipertz-Hengst C. Equine Sport with Feeling and Know How. Preprint 2002.
  50. Lloyd AS, Martin JE, Bornett-Gauci HLI, Wilkinson RG. Evaluation of a novel method of horse personality assessment: Rater-agreement and links to behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007;105:205–222.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.017google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Gobbo E, Topal O, Novalija I, Mladenić D, Zupan Šemrov M. An iterative approach to identify key predictive features of fear reactivity and fearfulness in horses (Equus caballus). Sci Rep 2025 Jul 9;15(1):24590.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10725-4pubmed: 40628935google scholar: lookup
  2. Zupan Šemrov M, Přibylová L, Gobbo E. Task-specific morphological and kinematic differences in Lipizzan horses. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1569067.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1569067pubmed: 40599329google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.