Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(2); 453; doi: 10.3390/ani11020453

Relationships between the Rider’s Pelvic Mobility and Balance on a Gymnastic Ball with Equestrian Skills and Effects on Horse Welfare.

Abstract: Riders need core stability to follow and guide the horse's movements and avoid giving unintended or conflicting signals. This study evaluated the rider's performance of exercises on a gymnastic ball with on-horse performance and indicators of stress in the horse. Twenty experienced riders were scored performing three exercises on a gymnastic ball and for quality and harmony when riding based on evaluation of video recordings in which conflict behaviours were evident. The horse's heart rate and number of conflict behaviors during the riding test and cortisol levels after completion of the test were measured. The rider's ability to roll the pelvis from side-to-side on a gymnastic ball was highly correlated with ability to circle the pelvis on the ball and with quality and harmony during riding. However, pelvic roll and riding quality and harmony showed a trend toward a negative correlation with balancing skills on the ball. It appears that the ability to actively move the pelvis is more relevant to equestrian performance than static balancing skill. Horses ridden by riders with better pelvic mobility and control showed significantly fewer conflict behaviors. On the contrary, high scores for balancing on the gymnastic ball were negatively correlated with the horses' working heart rates, suggesting a less energetic performance. Pelvic control and mobility may be predictive for equestrian skills and riding harmony.
Publication Date: 2021-02-09 PubMed ID: 33572205PubMed Central: PMC7915365DOI: 10.3390/ani11020453Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores whether the pelvic mobility and balancing skills of horse riders on a gymnastic ball impacts both their own equestrian performance and the well-being of their horses.

Objective of the Study

  • The main objective of the study was to analyze the correlation between a horse rider’s pelvic mobility and balance on a gymnastic ball with their equestrian skills, and how it effects horse welfare.

Methodology

  • The study involved a sample of 20 experienced riders who were scored based on their performance on three exercises on a gymnastic ball. The goal was to analyze the relationship between the riders’ active pelvic movement and static balancing skill.
  • The researchers also evaluated the quality and harmony of the riders’ performance on the horse. This was done by reviewing video recordings where conflict behaviors between the rider and horse were clearly visible.
  • Various parameters of the horses, such as their heart rate during the riding test, number of conflict behaviors, and cortisol levels after the completion of the test, were also measured. This was to determine the impact of the rider’s skills on the horse’s stress level.

Findings

  • The research found a strong correlation between a rider’s ability to roll their pelvis side-to-side on a gymnastic ball and their quality and harmony during riding. This indicates the significance of active pelvic movement in influencing riding performance.
  • However, there was a trend toward a negative correlation between the rider’s pelvic roll and balancing skills on the ball with the quality and harmony of their riding performance. This suggests that static balancing skills may be less relevant to equestrian performance than active pelvic movement.
  • The study also found that riders with better pelvic control demonstrated less conflict behaviors with their horses. This implies that the rider’s pelvic mobility can significantly affect horse welfare.
  • Interestingly, high scores for balancing on the gymnastic ball correlated negatively with the horses’ working heart rates, implying a less energetic performance from the horse. This further emphasizes the dominant role of active pelvic movement over static balancing skills.

Conclusion

  • In conclusion, the study proposes that pelvic control and mobility may serve as predictive indicators of a rider’s equestrian skills and riding harmony. Understanding these correlations can lead towards more effective training methods targeting specific skillsets for better riding performance and improved horse welfare.

Cite This Article

APA
Uldahl M, Christensen JW, Clayton HM. (2021). Relationships between the Rider’s Pelvic Mobility and Balance on a Gymnastic Ball with Equestrian Skills and Effects on Horse Welfare. Animals (Basel), 11(2), 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020453

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 2
PII: 453

Researcher Affiliations

Uldahl, Mette
  • Vejle Hestepraksis, Fasanvej 12, 7120 Vejle, Denmark.
Christensen, Janne W
  • Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Clayton, Hilary M
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, 736 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Grant Funding

  • none / The Danish Horse Levy Foundation

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 33 references
  1. Galloux P, Barrey E. Components of the total kinetic moment in jumping horses.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1997 May;(23):41-4.
  2. Hobbs SJ, St George L, Reed J, Stockley R, Thetford C, Sinclair J, Williams J, Nankervis K, Clayton HM. A scoping review of determinants of performance in dressage.. PeerJ 2020;8:e9022.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.9022pmc: PMC7185025pubmed: 32355578google scholar: lookup
  3. Terada K, Mullineaux DR, Kiyotada K, Clayton HM. Electromyographic activity of the rider’s muscles at trot.. Equine Compar. Exerc. Physiol. 2004;1:193–198.
  4. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. The role of biomechanical analysis of horse and rider in equitation science.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:123–132.
  5. Münz A, Eckardt F, Witte K. Horse-rider interaction in dressage riding.. Hum Mov Sci 2014 Feb;33:227-37.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.09.003pubmed: 24290612google scholar: lookup
  6. Engell M, Clayton H, Egenvall A, Weishaupt M, Roepstorff L. Postural changes and their effects in elite riders when actively influencing the horse versus sitting passively at trot.. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2016;12:27–33.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP150035google scholar: lookup
  7. Hampson A, Randle H. The influence of an 8-week rider core fitness program on the equine back at sitting trot.. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport. 2015;15:1145–1159.
  8. Engell MT, Byström A, Hernlund E, Bergh A, Clayton H, Roepstorff L, Egenvall A. Intersegmental strategies in frontal plane in moderately-skilled riders analyzed in ridden and un-mounted situations.. Hum Mov Sci 2019 Aug;66:511-520.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.05.021pubmed: 31203021google scholar: lookup
  9. Persson-Sjodin E, Hernlund E, Pfau T, Haubro Andersen P, Rhodin M. Influence of seating styles on head and pelvic vertical movement symmetry in horses ridden at trot.. PLoS One 2018;13(4):e0195341.
  10. Byström A, Clayton HM, Hernlund E, Roepstorff L, Rhodin M, Braganca FS, Engell MT, van Weeren PR, Weis-Haupt MA, Egenvall A. Gait asymmetries of horses walking and trotting on a treadmill with and without a rider.. Equine Vet. J. 2020;52:1.
  11. Egenvall A, Byström A, Roepstorff L, Rhodin M, Weishaupt MA, Van Weeren R, Clayton HM. Withers vertical movement asymmetry in dressage horses walking in different head-neck positions with and without riders.. J. Vet. Behav. 2020;36:72–83.
  12. Guire R, Mathie H, Fisher M, Fisher D. Riders’ perception of symmetrical pressure on their ischial tuberosities and rein contact tension whilst sitting on a static object.. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2017;13:7–12.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP160026google scholar: lookup
  13. Christensen JW, Bathellier S, Rhodin M, Palme R, Uldahl M. Increased Rider Weight Did Not Induce Changes in Behavior and Physiological Parameters in Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jan 6;10(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10010095pmc: PMC7023133pubmed: 31935981google scholar: lookup
  14. Palme R, Möstl E. Measurement of cortisol metabolites in faeces of sheep as a parameter of cortisol concentration in blood.. Int. J. Mamm. Biol. 1997;62:192–197.
  15. Schmidt A, Möstl E, Aurich J, Neuhauser S, Aurich C. Comparison of cortisol and cortisone levels in blood plasma and saliva and cortisol metabolite concentrations in faeces for stress analysis in horses; Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the International Society for Equitation Science; Sydney, Australia.. 12–14 July 2009; p. 53.
  16. Peham C, Licka T, Schobesberger H, Meschan E. Influence of the rider on the variability of the equine gait.. Hum Mov Sci 2004 Nov;23(5):663-71.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.10.006pubmed: 15589627google scholar: lookup
  17. Lagarde J, Kelso JA, Peham C, Licka T. Coordination dynamics of the horse-rider system.. J Mot Behav 2005 Nov;37(6):418-24.
    doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.6.418-424pmc: PMC1821095pubmed: 16280312google scholar: lookup
  18. Byström A, Rhodin M, von Peinen K, Weishaupt MA, Roepstorff L. Kinematics of saddle and rider in high-level dressage horses performing collected walk on a treadmill.. Equine Vet J 2010 May;42(4):340-5.
  19. Terada K. Comparison of Head Movement and EMG Activity of Muscles between Advanced and Novice Horseback Riders at Different Gaits.. J. Equine Sci. 2000;11:83–90.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.11.83google scholar: lookup
  20. Pantall A, Barton S, Collins P. Surface electromyography of abdominal and spinal muscles in adult horse riders during rising trot; Proceedings of the XXVII International Conference on Biomechanics in Sport; Limerick, Ireland.. 17–21 August 2009.
  21. Byström A, Roepstroff L, Geser-von Peinen K, Weishaupt MA, Rhodin M. Differences in rider movement pattern between different degrees of collection at the trot in high-level dressage horses ridden on a treadmill.. Hum Mov Sci 2015 Jun;41:1-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.01.016pubmed: 25703543google scholar: lookup
  22. Eckardt F, Witte K. Kinematic Analysis of the Rider According to Different Skill Levels in Sitting Trot and Canter.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;39:51–57.
  23. de Cocq P, Clayton HM, Terada K, Muller M, van Leeuwen JL. Usability of normal force distribution measurements to evaluate asymmetrical loading of the back of the horse and different rider positions on a standing horse.. Vet J 2009 Sep;181(3):266-73.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.03.002pubmed: 18502669google scholar: lookup
  24. Gunst S, Dittmann MT, Arpagaus S, Roepstorff C, Latif SN, Klaassen B, Pauli CA, Bauer CM, Weishaupt MA. Influence of Functional Rider and Horse Asymmetries on Saddle Force Distribution During Stance and in Sitting Trot.. J Equine Vet Sci 2019 Jul;78:20-28.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.03.215pubmed: 31203980google scholar: lookup
  25. de Cocq P, Duncker AM, Clayton HM, Bobbert MF, Muller M, van Leeuwen JL. Vertical forces on the horse's back in sitting and rising trot.. J Biomech 2010 Mar 3;43(4):627-31.
  26. Peham C, Licka T, Kapaun M, Scheidl M. A new method to quantify harmony of the horse-rider system in dressage.. Sports Eng. 2001;4:95–101.
  27. Wolframm IA, Bosga J, Meulenbroek RG. Coordination dynamics in horse-rider dyads.. Hum Mov Sci 2013 Feb;32(1):157-70.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.11.002pubmed: 23290116google scholar: lookup
  28. Engell MT, Hernlund E, Bystrøm A, Egenvall A, Bergh A, Clayton HM, Roepstorff L. Head, trunk and pelvic kine-matics in the frontal plane in un-mounted horseback riders rocking a balance chair from side-to-side.. Compar. Exerc. Physiol. 2018;14:249–259.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP170036google scholar: lookup
  29. Hrysomallis C. Balance ability and athletic performance.. Sports Med 2011 Mar 1;41(3):221-32.
  30. Giboin LS, Gruber M, Kramer A. Task-specificity of balance training.. Hum Mov Sci 2015 Dec;44:22-31.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.012pubmed: 26298214google scholar: lookup
  31. Christensen JW, Munk R, Hawson L, Palme R, Larsen T, Egenvall A, König von Borstel U, Rørvang RV. Rider effects on horses’ conflict behaviour, rein tension, physiological measures and rideability scores.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;234:105184.
  32. Tessem S, Hagstrøm N, Fallang B. Weight distribution in standing and sitting positions, and weight transfer during reaching tasks, in seated stroke subjects and healthy subjects.. Physiother Res Int 2007 Jun;12(2):82-94.
    doi: 10.1002/pri.362pubmed: 17536646google scholar: lookup
  33. Christensen JW, Beekmans M, van Dalum M, VanDierendonck M. Effects of hyperflexion on acute stress responses in ridden dressage horses.. Physiol Behav 2014 Apr 10;128:39-45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.024pubmed: 24518858google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Murray R, Fisher M, Fairfax V, MacKechnie-Guire R. Saddle Thigh Block Design Can Influence Rider and Horse Biomechanics.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 27;13(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13132127pubmed: 37443924google scholar: lookup