Analyze Diet
ALTEX2005; 22(3); 169-174;

Replacement of the in vivo neutralisation test for efficacy demonstration of tetanus vaccines ad us. vet.

Abstract: The bacterium Clostridium (C.) tetani is an ubiquitous pathogen. This anaerobic, gram-positive bacterium can form spores and can be found in the whole environment. It enters the body via injuries of the skin and wounds where it releases the neurotoxin "tetanospasmin" (= tetanus toxin). The animals most susceptible to tetanus infection are horses and sheep. Only active immunisation by tetanus vaccine provides effective protection against tetanus intoxication. The marketing authorisation requirements stipulate that efficacy of tetanus vaccines ad us. vet. must be demonstrated in all target animal species via determination of neutralising tetanus serum antitoxin concentrations. The standard method used for this purpose is still the toxin neutralisation test (TNT), as it quantifies the tetanus toxin-neutralising effect of tetanus serum antibodies in vivo. In this test, tetanus toxin is added to dilutions of serum from vaccinated horse and sheep. The serum dilutions are then administered to mice or guinea pigs, which are observed for toxic symptoms. Against the background of animal protection, the goal of one project of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry for Education and Research), 0312636) was to establish an alternative to the toxin neutralisation test, enabling the testing of efficacy of tetanus vaccines with serological in vitro methods. For this purpose, a so-called double antigen ELISA (DAE) was established which enables the testing of sera of different species in one assay. In addition, the sera were tested in an indirect ELISA for horses and sheep separately. Altogether, ten groups of horses and eight groups of sheep were immunised with ten animals per group each. The tetanus vaccines comprised almost all products authorised for the German market at the start of the project. 564 horse sera and 257 sheep sera were tested using the two ELISA methods. Some sera were also tested in vivo. The kinetics of antibody responses were recorded. The in vitro DAE method seems to be suitable to replace the mouse neutralisation test used for the detection of tetanus antitoxin in sera of target animal species. The comparison of some sera in the ELISA and the TNT showed good equivalence of results. Nevertheless, before an ELISA titre in horse and sheep sera indicating unambiguous protection against tetanus can be fixed, further comparative assays of low titre sera in the TNT and the DAE will have to be performed.
Publication Date: 2005-09-28 PubMed ID: 16186992
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the efficacy of a new testing technique for tetanus vaccines in animals compared to the traditionally employed toxin neutralization test (TNT). The researchers aim to use serological in vitro methods, specifically a double antigen ELISA (DAE), in order to provide a less invasive alternative to the TNT that is more aligned with animal rights.

Background and Objective of the Research

  • The research is primarily driven by the need to find an alternative to the TNT (toxin neutralisation test), an in vivo method that tests the neutralising effect of tetanus serum antibodies on tetanus toxins in mice or guinea pigs.
  • The TNT is considered intrusive and detrimental towards animal welfare, prompting the researchers to set their primary objective of finding a less invasive, in vitro alternative that can deliver equivalent results.
  • The bacterium Clostridium tetani causes tetanus, a serious and often fatal disease caused by the toxin the bacterium releases into the body, and is often prevalent in horses and sheep. Currently, vaccines are the most effective form of prevention.

Methodology

  • The researchers established a double antigen ELISA (DAE) in vitro method which tests the sera of different animals in one assay. The DAE test was used alongside an indirect ELISA test designed especially for horses and sheep.
  • Ten groups of horses and eight groups of sheep were immunised, with each group comprising of ten animals each. A suite of vaccines covering almost all products authorised for the German market was used.
  • The researchers tested both horse and sheep sera using the DAE and indirect ELISA methods and recorded the kinetics of antibody responses. Some sera were also tested in vivo.

Findings and Conclusion

  • The in vitro DAE test appears suitable for replacing the in vivo TNT used for detecting antitoxin in animal sera, showing good equivalence of results when compared to the TNT.
  • However, the researchers caution that, before a specific ELISA titre indicating clear protection against tetanus can be established for horse and sheep sera, additional comparative assays of low titre sera in both the TNT and DAE are necessary.

Cite This Article

APA
Rosskopf U, Noeske K, Werner E. (2005). Replacement of the in vivo neutralisation test for efficacy demonstration of tetanus vaccines ad us. vet. ALTEX, 22(3), 169-174.

Publication

ISSN: 1868-596X
NlmUniqueID: 100953980
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 3
Pages: 169-174

Researcher Affiliations

Rosskopf, Ute
  • Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, D-Langen. rosut@pei.de
Noeske, Kerstin
    Werner, Esther

      MeSH Terms

      • Animal Testing Alternatives / methods
      • Marketing / economics
      • Marketing / standards
      • Neutralization Tests
      • Reproducibility of Results
      • Tetanus Toxoid / analysis
      • Tetanus Toxoid / economics
      • Tetanus Toxoid / standards
      • Tetanus Toxoid / toxicity

      Citations

      This article has been cited 0 times.