FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Resilience of Faecal Microbiota in Stabled Thoroughbred Hors...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(9); doi: 10.3390/ani11092611

Resilience of Faecal Microbiota in Stabled Thoroughbred Horses Following Abrupt Dietary Transition between Freshly Cut Pasture and Three Forage-Based Diets.

Abstract: The management of competition horses in New Zealand often involves rotations of short periods of stall confinement and concentrate feeding, with periods of time at pasture. Under these systems, horses may undergo abrupt dietary changes, with the incorporation of grains or concentrate feeds to the diet to meet performance needs, or sudden changes in the type of forage fed in response to a lack of fresh or conserved forage. Abrupt changes in dietary management are a risk factor for gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances, potentially due to the negative effects observed on the population of GI microbiota. In the present study, the faecal microbiota of horses was investigated to determine how quickly the bacterial communities; (1) responded to dietary change, and (2) stabilised following abrupt dietary transition. Six Thoroughbred mares were stabled for six weeks, consuming freshly cut pasture (weeks 1, 3 and 5), before being abruptly transitioned to conserved forage-based diets, both offered ad libitum. Intestinal markers were administered to measure digesta transit time immediately before each diet change. The conserved forage-based diets were fed according to a 3 × 3 Latin square design (weeks 2, 4 and 6), and comprised a chopped ensiled forage fed exclusively (Diet FE) or with whole oats (Diet FE + O), and perennial ryegrass hay fed with whole oats (Diet H + O). Faecal samples were collected at regular intervals from each horse following the diet changes. High throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to evaluate the faecal microbiota. There were significant differences in alpha diversity across diets (p < 0.001), and a significant effect of diet on the beta diversity (ANOSIM, p = 0.001), with clustering of samples observed by diet group. There were differences in the bacterial phyla across diets (p < 0.003), with the highest relative abundances observed for Firmicutes (62-64%) in the two diets containing chopped ensiled forage, Bacteroidetes (32-38%) in the pasture diets, and Spirochaetes (17%) in the diet containing hay. Major changes in relative abundances of faecal bacteria appeared to correspond with the cumulative percentage of intestinal markers retrieved in the faeces as the increasing amounts of digesta from each new diet transited the animals. A stable faecal microbiota profile was observed in the samples from 96 h after abrupt transition to the treatment diets containing ensiled chopped forage. The present study confirmed that the diversity and community structure of the faecal bacteria in horses is diet-specific and resilient following dietary transition and emphasised the need to have modern horse feeding management that reflects the ecological niche, particularly by incorporating large proportions of forage into equine diets.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-09-06 PubMed ID: 34573577PubMed Central: PMC8471312DOI: 10.3390/ani11092611Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explores how sudden changes in diet can impact the gut bacteria in horses, specifically Thoroughbred mares, investigating how quickly this bacterial ecosystem adapts to and stabilizes after an abrupt dietary shift. The findings suggest that the horse’s gut microbiota demonstrates resilience in response to different feeding patterns and underscore the importance of including large amounts of forage in the horse’s diet.

Study Methodology

  • Six Thoroughbred mares were kept in stables for six weeks and fed freshly cut pasture during the 1st, 3rd, and 5th weeks.
  • The horses were abruptly switched to conserved forage-based diets (a chopped ensiled forage fed exclusively or with whole oats, and perennial ryegrass hay fed with whole oats) during the 2nd, 4th, and 6th weeks following a 3×3 Latin square design.
  • High throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing, a technique used for analyzing bacterial diversity, was employed to study the fecal microbiota collected at regular intervals after diet modifications.
  • Intestinal markers were introduced in the horses’ diet to measure transit time of digested food before each diet change.

Key Findings

  • There were significant differences in bacterial diversity, known as alpha diversity, across diets.
  • The study also noted a significant impact on beta diversity, indicating distinct clustering of samples based on their diet group.
  • Response and stabilization of gut bacteria following abrupt dietary changes seemed to align with observable changes in fecal matter related with the passage of new diet through the horses’ system.
  • The bacterial phylum showed substantial variations across diets with Bacteroidetes exhibiting highest abundance in pasture diets, Firmicutes in diets containing chopped ensiled forage, and Spirochaetes in the diet with hay.
  • A stable fecal microbiota profile was observed around 96 hours after transitioning the horses to treatment diets containing ensiled chopped forage.

Implications and Conclusion

  • The findings affirm that the fecal bacteria in horses are diet-specific and can rapidly adapt to dietary transitions.
  • This resilience of gut microbiota to abrupt changes in diet supports the argument for a horse feeding management approach that includes large quantities of forage, which aligns with the horse’s natural feeding ecology.
  • The study emphasizes a better understanding of horse gut microbiota’s response to different diets, which can aid in designing healthier feeding strategies, thereby reducing risk of dietary-induced gastrointestinal ailments.

Cite This Article

APA
Fernandes KA, Rogers CW, Gee EK, Kittelmann S, Bolwell CF, Bermingham EN, Biggs PJ, Thomas DG. (2021). Resilience of Faecal Microbiota in Stabled Thoroughbred Horses Following Abrupt Dietary Transition between Freshly Cut Pasture and Three Forage-Based Diets. Animals (Basel), 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092611

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 9

Researcher Affiliations

Fernandes, Karlette A
  • School of Agriculture and Environment, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Rogers, Chris W
  • School of Agriculture and Environment, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
  • School of Veterinary Science, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Gee, Erica K
  • School of Veterinary Science, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Kittelmann, Sandra
  • AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Bolwell, Charlotte F
  • School of Veterinary Science, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Bermingham, Emma N
  • AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Biggs, Patrick J
  • School of Veterinary Science, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Thomas, David G
  • School of Agriculture and Environment, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.

Grant Funding

  • FFFL1003 / Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors confirm that there are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report.

References

This article includes 75 references
  1. Janis C. The evolutionary strategy of the Equidae and the origins of rumen and cecal digestion.. Evolution 1976;30:757–774.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00957.xpubmed: 28563331google scholar: lookup
  2. Glinsky M, Smith R, Spires H, Davis C. Measurement of volatile fatty acid production rates in the cecum of the pony.. J. Anim. Sci. 1976;42:1465–1470.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1976.4261465xpubmed: 931822google scholar: lookup
  3. Lewis L.D, Knight A, Lewis B, Lewis C. Equine Clinical Nutrition: Feeding and Care.. Wiley-Blackwell; Baltimore, MD, USA: 1995. 587p.
  4. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Horses.. 6th ed. National Academies Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2007. 357p.
  5. Fernandes K.A, Rogers C.W, Gee E.K, Bolwell C.F, Thomas D.G. A cross-sectional survey of rider and horse demographics, and the feeding, health and management of Pony Club horses in New Zealand.. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2014;74:11–16.
  6. Verhaar N, Rogers C.W, Gee E.K, Bolwell C.F, Rosanowski S.M. The feeding practices and estimated workload in a cohort of New Zealand competition horses.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2014;34:1257–1262.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2014.08.008google scholar: lookup
  7. Fernandes K.A, Rogers C.W, Gee E.K, Bolwell C.F, Thomas D.G. Body condition and morphometric measures of adiposity in a cohort of Pony Club horses and ponies in New Zealand.. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2015;75:195–199.
  8. Rogers C.W, Gee E.K, Firth E.C. A cross-sectional survey of Thoroughbred stud farm management in the North Island of New Zealand.. N. Z. Vet. J. 2007;55:302–307.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2007.36785pubmed: 18059648google scholar: lookup
  9. Williamson A, Rogers C.W, Firth E.C. A survey of feeding, management and faecal pH of Thoroughbred racehorses in the North Island of New Zealand.. N. Z. Vet. J. 2007;55:337–341.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2007.36790pubmed: 18059653google scholar: lookup
  10. Van den Berg M, Hoskin S.O, Rogers C.W, Grinberg A. Fecal pH and microbial populations in Thoroughbred horses during transition from pasture to concentrate feeding.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013;33:215–222.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.06.004google scholar: lookup
  11. Cohen N, Gibbs P, Woods A. Dietary and other management factors associated with colic in horses.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1999;215:53–60.
    pubmed: 10397066
  12. Garber A, Hastie P, McGuinness D, Malarange P, Murray J.A. Abrupt dietary changes between grass and hay alter faecal microbiota of ponies.. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0237869.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237869pmc: PMC7446798pubmed: 32810164google scholar: lookup
  13. Flint H.J, Duncan S.H, Scott K.P, Louis P. Links between diet, gut microbiota composition and gut metabolism.. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2015;74:13–22.
    doi: 10.1017/S0029665114001463pubmed: 25268552google scholar: lookup
  14. Costa M.C, Weese J.S. The equine intestinal microbiome.. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2012;13:121–128.
    doi: 10.1017/S1466252312000035pubmed: 22626511google scholar: lookup
  15. Fernandes K.A, Kittelmann S, Rogers C.W, Gee E.K, Bolwell C.F, Bermingham E.N, Thomas D.G. Faecal microbiota of forage-fed horses in New Zealand and the population dynamics of microbial communities following dietary change.. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e112846.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112846pmc: PMC4226576pubmed: 25383707google scholar: lookup
  16. Dougal K, de la Fuente G, Harris P.A, Girdwood S.E, Pinloche E, Newbold C.J. Identification of a core bacterial community within the large intestine of the horse.. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e77660.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077660pmc: PMC3812009pubmed: 24204908google scholar: lookup
  17. Moore B.E, Dehority B.A. Effects of diet and hindgut defaunation on diet digestibility and microbial concentrations in the cecum and colon of the horse.. J. Anim. Sci. 1993;71:3350–3358.
    doi: 10.2527/1993.71123350xpubmed: 8294287google scholar: lookup
  18. Harlow B.E, Lawrence L.M, Hayes S.H, Crum A, Flythe M.D. Effect of dietary starch source and concentration on equine fecal microbiota.. PLoS ONE 2016;11:e0154037.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154037pmc: PMC4851386pubmed: 27128793google scholar: lookup
  19. Destrez A, Grimm P, Cézilly F, Julliand V. Changes of the hindgut microbiota due to high-starch diet can be associated with behavioral stress response in horses.. Physiol. Behav. 2015;149:159–164.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.039pubmed: 26048306google scholar: lookup
  20. Hansen N.C, Avershina E, Mydland L.T, Næsset J.A, Austbø D, Moen B, Måge I, Rudi K. High nutrient availability reduces the diversity and stability of the equine caecal microbiota.. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015;26:27216.
    doi: 10.3402/mehd.v26.27216pmc: PMC4526772pubmed: 26246403google scholar: lookup
  21. Daly K, Proudman C.J, Duncan S.H, Flint H.J, Dyer J, Shirazi-Beechey S.P. Alterations in microbiota and fermentation products in equine large intestine in response to dietary variation and intestinal disease.. Brit. J. Nutr. 2012;107:989–995.
    doi: 10.1017/S0007114511003825pubmed: 21816118google scholar: lookup
  22. Kristoffersen C.T. Diet Effects on the Short-Term Temporal Dynamics of the Equine Hindgut Microbiota.. Master’s Thesis. Norwegian University of Life Sciences; As, Norway: 2014.
  23. Warzecha C.M, Coverdale J.A, Janecka J.E, Leatherwood J.L, Pinchak W.E, Wickersham T.A, McCann J.C. Influence of short-term dietary starch inclusion on the equine cecal microbiome.. J. Anim. Sci. 2017;95:5077–5090.
    doi: 10.2527/jas2017.1754pmc: PMC6095290pubmed: 29293739google scholar: lookup
  24. Al Jassim R.A.M, Andrews F.M. The bacterial community of the horse gastrointestinal tract and its relation to fermentative acidosis, laminitis, colic, and stomach ulcers.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine. 2009;25:199–215.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2009.04.005pubmed: 19580934google scholar: lookup
  25. Costa M.C, Arroyo L.G, Allen-Vercoe E, Stämpfli H.R, Kim P.T, Sturgeon A, Weese J.S. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses and horses with colitis by high throughput sequencing of the V3-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene.. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e41484.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041484pmc: PMC3409227pubmed: 22859989google scholar: lookup
  26. Milinovich G.J, Trott D.J, Burrell P.C, Van Eps A.W, Thoefner M, Blackall L.L, Al Jassim R.A.M, Morton J.M, Pollitt C.C. Changes in equine hindgut bacterial populations during oligofructose-induced laminitis.. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;8:885–898.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00975.xpubmed: 16623745google scholar: lookup
  27. De Fombelle A, Julliand V, Drogoul C, Jacotot E. Feeding and microbial disorders in horses: 1-effects of an abrupt incorporation of two levels of barley in a hay diet on microbial profile and activities.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2001;21:439–445.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(01)70018-4google scholar: lookup
  28. Elzinga S, Weese J, Adams A. Comparison of the fecal microbiota in horses with Equine Metabolic Syndrome (EMS) and metabolically normal controls fed a similar all forage diet.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;44:9–16.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.05.010google scholar: lookup
  29. Dong H.-j, Hwang H, Han J, Cho S. Diversity of the Gastric Microbiota in Thoroughbred Racehorses Having Gastric Ulcer.. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;26:763–774.
    doi: 10.4014/jmb.1507.07054pubmed: 26809803google scholar: lookup
  30. Schoster A, Mosing M, Jalali M, Staempfli H, Weese J. Effects of transport, fasting and anaesthesia on the faecal microbiota of healthy adult horses.. Equine Vet. J. 2016;48:595–602.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12479pubmed: 26122549google scholar: lookup
  31. Harlow B.E, Lawrence L.M, Flythe M.D, Hayes S.H, Gellin G.L, Strasinger L.A, Brümmer M, Fowler A.L. Microbial species richness of equine fecal microflora in horses challenged with antibiotics.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013;33:331.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.03.033google scholar: lookup
  32. Costa M, Stampfli H, Arroyo L, Allen-Vercoe E, Gomes R, Weese J. Changes in the equine fecal microbiota associated with the use of systemic antimicrobial drugs.. BMC Vet. Res. 2015;11:19.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0335-7pmc: PMC4323147pubmed: 25644524google scholar: lookup
  33. Fernandes K.A, Gee E.K, Rogers C.W, Kittelmann S, Biggs P.J, Bermingham E.N, Bolwell C.F, Thomas D.G. Seasonal variation in the faecal microbiota of mature adult horses maintained on pasture in New Zealand.. Animals 2021;11:2300.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082300pmc: PMC8388417pubmed: 34438757google scholar: lookup
  34. Fernandes K, Rogers C, Gee E, Fitch G, Bolwell C, Kittelmann S, Bermingham E, Thomas D.G. Comparison of gastrointestinal transit times in stabled Thoroughbred horses during abrupt dietary transition between freshly cut pasture and three conserved forage-based diets.. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2021:accepted.
    pmc: PMC8471312pubmed: 34573577
  35. McGreevy P.D, Webster A.J.F, Nicol C.J. Study of the behaviour, digestive efficiency and gut transit times of crib-biting horses.. Vet. Rec. 2001;148:592–596.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.148.19.592pubmed: 11386445google scholar: lookup
  36. Henneke D.R, Potter G.D, Kreider J.L, Yeates B.F. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares.. Equine Vet. J. 1983;15:371–372.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01826.xpubmed: 6641685google scholar: lookup
  37. Fadrosh D.W, Ma B, Gajer P, Sengamalay N, Ott S, Brotman R.M, Ravel J. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform.. Microbiome 2014;2:6.
    doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-6pmc: PMC3940169pubmed: 24558975google scholar: lookup
  38. Kozich J.J, Westcott S.L, Baxter N.T, Highlander S.K, Schloss P.D. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:5112–5120.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13pmc: PMC3753973pubmed: 23793624google scholar: lookup
  39. Cox M, Peterson D, Biggs P. SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data.. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:485.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-485pmc: PMC2956736pubmed: 20875133google scholar: lookup
  40. Caporaso J.G, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman F.D, Costello E.K, Fierer N, Peña A.G, Goodrich J.K, Gordon J.I. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.. Nat. Methods 2010;7:335–336.
    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303pmc: PMC3156573pubmed: 20383131google scholar: lookup
  41. Good I.J. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters.. Biometrika 1953;40:237–264.
    doi: 10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.237google scholar: lookup
  42. Gihring T.M, Green S.J, Schadt C.W. Massively parallel rRNA gene sequencing exacerbates the potential for biased community diversity comparisons due to variable library sizes.. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;14:285–290.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02550.xpubmed: 21923700google scholar: lookup
  43. Hammer Ø, Harper D, Ryan P. PAST: Palaeontological statistics software package for education and data analysis.. Plalaeontol. Electron. 2001;4:9.
  44. Simpson E.H. Measurement of diversity.. Nature 1949;163:688.
    doi: 10.1038/163688a0google scholar: lookup
  45. Spellerberg I.F, Fedor P.J. A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the ‘Shannon–Wiener’ Index.. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2003;12:177–179.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00015.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  46. Gotelli N.J, Colwell R.K. Estimating species richness.. Biol. Divers. Front. Meas. Assess. 2011;12:39–54.
  47. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:2725–2729.
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197pmc: PMC3840312pubmed: 24132122google scholar: lookup
  48. Vazquez-Baeza Y, Pirrung M, Gonzalez A, Knight R. EMPeror: A tool for visualizing high-throughput microbial community data.. GigaScience 2013;2:16.
    doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-2-16pmc: PMC4076506pubmed: 24280061google scholar: lookup
  49. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling C.S. Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management.. Ann. Rev. Ecol. 2004;35:557–581.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711google scholar: lookup
  50. Lozupone C.A, Stombaugh J.I, Gordon J.I, Jansson J.K, Knight R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota.. Nature 2012;489:220–230.
    doi: 10.1038/nature11550pmc: PMC3577372pubmed: 22972295google scholar: lookup
  51. Walker B, Holling C.S, Carpenter S.R, Kinzig A. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social—Ecological systems.. Ecol. Soc. 2004;9:5.
    doi: 10.5751/ES-00650-090205google scholar: lookup
  52. Costa M.C, Silva G, Ramos R.V, Staempfli H.R, Arroyo L.G, Kim P, Weese J.S. Characterization and comparison of the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract compartments in horses.. Vet. J. 2015;205:74–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.03.018pubmed: 25975855google scholar: lookup
  53. Schoster A, Arroyo L.G, Staempfli H.R, Weese J.S. Comparison of microbial populations in the small intestine, large intestine and feces of healthy horses using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism.. BMC Res. Notes 2013;6:91.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-91pmc: PMC3622624pubmed: 23497580google scholar: lookup
  54. Flint H.J, Bayer E.A. Plant Cell Wall Breakdown by Anaerobic Microorganisms from the Mammalian Digestive Tract.. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008;1125:280–288.
    doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.022pubmed: 18378598google scholar: lookup
  55. Moreau M.M, Eades S.C, Reinemeyer C.R, Fugaro M.N, Onishi J.C. Illumina sequencing of the V4 hypervariable region 16S rRNA gene reveals extensive changes in bacterial communities in the cecum following carbohydrate oral infusion and development of early-stage acute laminitis in the horse.. Vet. Microbiol. 2014;168:436–441.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.11.017pubmed: 24355533google scholar: lookup
  56. Biddle A.S, Black S.J, Blanchard J.L. An in vitro model of the horse gut microbiome enables identification of lactate-utilizing bacteria that differentially respond to starch induction.. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e77599.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077599pmc: PMC3788102pubmed: 24098591google scholar: lookup
  57. Weese J.S, Holcombe S.J, Embertson R.M, Kurtz K.A, Roessner H.A, Jalali M, Wismer S.E. Changes in the faecal microbiota of mares precede the development of post partum colic.. Equine Vet. J. 2015;47:641–649.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12361pubmed: 25257320google scholar: lookup
  58. Leng J, Proudman C, Blow F, Darby A, Swann J. Understanding Intestinal Microbiota in Equine Grass Sickness: Next Generation Sequencing of Faecal Bacterial DNA.. Equine Vet. J. 2015;47:9.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12486_19google scholar: lookup
  59. Costa M, Stämpfli H, Allen-Vercoe E, Weese J. Development of the faecal microbiota in foals.. Equine Vet. J. 2015;48:681–688.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12532pubmed: 26518456google scholar: lookup
  60. Dougal K, de la Fuente G, Harris P.A, Girdwood S.E, Pinloche E, Geor R.J, Nielsen B.D, Schott H.C, Elzinga S, Newbold C.J. Characterisation of the faecal bacterial community in adult and elderly horses fed a high fibre, high oil or high starch diet using 454 pyrosequencing.. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e87424.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087424pmc: PMC3913607pubmed: 24504261google scholar: lookup
  61. Biagi E, Candela M, Fairweather-Tait S, Franceschi C, Brigidi P. Ageing of the human metaorganism: The microbial counterpart.. Age 2012;34:247–267.
    doi: 10.1007/s11357-011-9217-5pmc: PMC3260362pubmed: 21347607google scholar: lookup
  62. Drogoul C, de Fombelle A, Julliand V. Feeding and microbial disorders in horses: 2-effect of three hay, grain ratios on digesta passage rate and digestibility in ponies.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2001;21:487–491.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(01)70211-0google scholar: lookup
  63. Bulmer L, McBride S, Williams K, Murray J.-A. The effects of a high-starch or high-fibre diet on equine reactivity and handling behaviour.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015;165:95–102.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.008google scholar: lookup
  64. Grimm P, Julliand V, Philippeau C, Sadet-Bourgeteau S. Effect of yeast supplementation on hindgut microbiota and digestibility of horses subjected to an abrupt change of hays.. Livest. Sci. 2016;186:34–40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.11.022google scholar: lookup
  65. Julliand V, Grimm P. The microbiome of the horse hindgut: History and current knowledge.. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:2262–2274.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0198pubmed: 27285903google scholar: lookup
  66. Blackmore T.M, Dugdale A, Argo C.M, Curtis G, Pinloche E, Harris P.A, Worgan H.J, Girdwood S.E, Dougal K, Newbold C.J. Strong Stability and Host Specific Bacterial Community in Faeces of Ponies.. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e75079.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075079pmc: PMC3770578pubmed: 24040388google scholar: lookup
  67. De Fombelle A, Varloud M, Goachet A.G, Jacotot E, Philippeau C, Drogoul C, Julliand V. Characterization of the microbial and biochemical profile of the different segments of the digestive tract in horses given two distinct diets.. Anim. Sci. 2003;77:293–304.
    doi: 10.1017/S1357729800059038google scholar: lookup
  68. Clarridge J.E. Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases.. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004;17:840–862.
    doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.840-862.2004pmc: PMC523561pubmed: 15489351google scholar: lookup
  69. O’Donnell M.M, Harris H.M.B, Jeffery I.B, Claesson M.J, Younge B, O’Toole P.W, Ross R.P. The core faecal bacterial microbiome of Irish Thoroughbred racehorses.. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2013;57:492–501.
    doi: 10.1111/lam.12137pubmed: 23889584google scholar: lookup
  70. Steelman S.M, Chowdhary B.P, Dowd S, Suchodolski J, Janecka J.E. Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes in fecal samples reveals high diversity of hindgut microflora in horses and potential links to chronic laminitis.. BMC Vet. Res. 2012;8:231.
    doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-231pmc: PMC3538718pubmed: 23186268google scholar: lookup
  71. Lee S.-H, Park J.-H, Kang H.-J, Lee Y.H, Lee T.J, Park H.-D. Distribution and abundance of Spirochaetes in full-scale anaerobic digesters.. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;145:25–32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.070pubmed: 23562175google scholar: lookup
  72. Frape D. Equine Nutrition and Feeding.. Wiley-Blackwell; Baltimore, MD, USA: 2010.
  73. Cohen N, Peloso J. Risk factors for history of previous colic and for chronic, intermittent colic in a population of horses.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1996;208:697.
    pubmed: 8617626
  74. Cramer G.R, Urano K, Delrot S, Pezzotti M, Shinozaki K. Effects of abiotic stress on plants: A systems biology perspective.. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:163.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-163pmc: PMC3252258pubmed: 22094046google scholar: lookup
  75. Daly K, Stewart C.S, Flint H.J, Shirazi-Beechey S.P. Bacterial diversity within the equine large intestine as revealed by molecular analysis of cloned 16S rRNA genes.. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2001;38:141–151.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00892.xgoogle scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
  1. Bachmann M, Bochnia M, Wensch-Dorendorf M, Glatter M, Schäfer S, Simroth K, Greef JM, Zeyner A. Feed intake, digestibility and passage kinetics in grazing horses. Sci Rep 2026 Jan 22;16(1):3052.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-35647-7pubmed: 41571885google scholar: lookup
  2. François AC, Taminiau B, Renaud B, Gonza-Quito IE, Massey C, Hyde C, Piercy RJ, Douny C, Scippo ML, Daube G, Gustin P, Delcenserie V, Votion DM. In Vitro Investigation of Equine Gut Microbiota Alterations During Hypoglycin A Exposure. Animals (Basel) 2025 Nov 19;15(22).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15223343pubmed: 41302050google scholar: lookup
  3. Campbell BE, Hassan MM, Moore RJ, Olchowy T, Ranjbar S, Soust M, Ramirez-Garzon O, Al Jassim R, Alawneh JI. Temporal Changes in Faecal Microbiota Composition and Diversity in Dairy Cows Supplemented with a Lactobacillus-Based Direct-Fed Microbial. Animals (Basel) 2024 Nov 27;14(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14233437pubmed: 39682401google scholar: lookup
  4. Leduc L, Costa M, Leclère M. The Microbiota and Equine Asthma: An Integrative View of the Gut-Lung Axis. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jan 13;14(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14020253pubmed: 38254421google scholar: lookup
  5. Springer RW, Cherry NM, Raub RH, Wellmann KB, Jones TN. Estimation of In Vitro True Digestibility and Fiber Degradation from Feedstuff Fiber Composition When Incubated in Equine Fecal Inoculum. Animals (Basel) 2023 Nov 29;13(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13233699pubmed: 38067050google scholar: lookup
  6. Thorel M, Obregon D, Mulot B, Maitre A, Mateos-Hernandez L, Moalic PY, Wu-Chuang A, Cabezas-Cruz A, Leclerc A. Conserved core microbiota in managed and free-ranging Loxodonta africana elephants. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1247719.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1247719pubmed: 37860133google scholar: lookup
  7. Wen X, Luo S, Lv D, Jia C, Zhou X, Zhai Q, Xi L, Yang C. Variations in the fecal microbiota and their functions of Thoroughbred, Mongolian, and Hybrid horses. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:920080.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.920080pubmed: 35968025google scholar: lookup
  8. Lucassen A, Hankel J, Finkler-Schade C, Osbelt L, Strowig T, Visscher C, Schuberth HJ. Feeding a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fermentation Product (Olimond BB) Does Not Alter the Fecal Microbiota of Thoroughbred Racehorses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jun 8;12(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12121496pubmed: 35739833google scholar: lookup
  9. Liepman RS, Swink JM, Habing GG, Boyaka PN, Caddey B, Costa M, Gomez DE, Toribio RE. Effects of Intravenous Antimicrobial Drugs on the Equine Fecal Microbiome. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 13;12(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12081013pubmed: 35454258google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.