FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
The Veterinary record2017; 182(6); 169; doi: 10.1136/vr.104546

Retrospective evaluation of correlation and agreement between two recovery scoring systems in horses.

Abstract: No abstract available
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2017-12-01 PubMed ID: 29196490PubMed Central: PMC5870460DOI: 10.1136/vr.104546Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research attempts to understand the correlation and agreement between two different recovery scoring systems (RSS) employed in horse anaesthesia. These scores help assess the likelihood of complications during the recovery phase post-anaesthesia.

Objective of The Study

The study intends to contribute additional insights into recovery procedures for horses by comparing the correlation and alignment between two commonly used recovery scoring systems at the researcher’s facility. They analyze the efficacy of these scoring systems, named ‘Y’ and ‘D’, in providing a comprehensive evaluation of the horse’s condition post-anesthesia.

Methodology

  • The research is a retrospective review of anaesthetic records of horses that underwent general anaesthesia from January 2013 to November 2015.
  • During this timeframe, the authors used two types of recovery scoring systems: ‘Y’, modified from Young and Taylor, and ‘D’, amended from Donaldson and others.

The Recovery Scoring Systems

  • System Y is a simplistic descriptive scale that employs a scale from 1 to 5 to score the quality of recovery. It assigns several descriptors to each score. Higher numerical values indicate a ‘worse’ recovery.

The study, thus, explores the effectivity and reliability of these two prevalent scoring systems in assessing the recovery from anaesthesia in horses. It also underscores the need for a universally accepted recovery scoring system for horses, which could aid in more efficient comparison and analysis in future studies.

Cite This Article

APA
Scarabelli S, Rioja E. (2017). Retrospective evaluation of correlation and agreement between two recovery scoring systems in horses. Vet Rec, 182(6), 169. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.104546

Publication

The Veterinary record
ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 182
Issue: 6
Pages: 169

Researcher Affiliations

Scarabelli, Stefania
  • School of Veterinary Science, Philip Leverhulme Equine Hospital, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.
Rioja, Eva
  • School of Veterinary Science, Philip Leverhulme Equine Hospital, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Anesthesia Recovery Period
  • Anesthesia, General / veterinary
  • Animals
  • Female
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies

Conflict of Interest Statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

This article includes 10 references
  1. Johnston GM, Eastment JK, Wood J, Taylor PM. The confidential enquiry into perioperative equine fatalities (CEPEF): mortality results of Phases 1 and 2.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2002 Oct;29(4):159-170.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2002.00106.xpubmed: 28404360google scholar: lookup
  2. Young SS, Taylor PM. Factors influencing the outcome of equine anaesthesia: a review of 1,314 cases.. Equine Vet J 1993 Mar;25(2):147-51.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb02926.xpubmed: 8467775google scholar: lookup
  3. Donaldson LL, Dunlop GS, Holland MS, Burton BA. The recovery of horses from inhalant anesthesia: a comparison of halothane and isoflurane.. Vet Surg 2000 Jan-Feb;29(1):92-101.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2000.00092.xpubmed: 10653499google scholar: lookup
  4. Vettorato E, Chase-Topping ME, Clutton RE. A comparison of four systems for scoring recovery quality after general anaesthesia in horses.. Equine Vet J 2010 Jul;42(5):400-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00093.xpubmed: 20636775google scholar: lookup
  5. Valverde A, Gunkelt C, Doherty TJ, Giguère S, Pollak AS. Effect of a constant rate infusion of lidocaine on the quality of recovery from sevoflurane or isoflurane general anaesthesia in horses.. Equine Vet J 2005 Nov;37(6):559-64.
    doi: 10.2746/042516405775314772pubmed: 16295936google scholar: lookup
  6. Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiol 1941;2:281–4.
    doi: 10.1097/00000542-194105000-00004google scholar: lookup
  7. Suthers JM, Christley RM, Clutton RE. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of three scoring systems for assessing recovery quality after general anaesthesia in horses.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2011 Jul;38(4):352-62.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00629.xpubmed: 21672127google scholar: lookup
  8. Leece EA, Corletto F, Brearley JC. A comparison of recovery times and characteristics with sevoflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia in horses undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2008 Sep;35(5):383-91.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00399.xpubmed: 18466165google scholar: lookup
  9. Clark-Price SC, Lascola KM, Carter JE, da Cunha AF, Donaldson LL, Doherty TJ, Martin-Flores M, Hofmeister EH, Keating SCJ, Mama KR, Mason DE, Posner LP, Sano H, Seddighi R, Shih AC, Weil AB, Schaeffer DJ. Assessment of agreement among diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia for scoring the recovery of horses from anesthesia by use of subjective grading scales and development of a system for evaluation of the recovery of horses from anesthesia by use of accelerometry.. Am J Vet Res 2017 Jun;78(6):668-676.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.78.6.668pubmed: 28541154google scholar: lookup
  10. Farmer EJL. Perspective of recovery ‘quality’ in horses after general anaesthesia. Scottish Agricultural College and The University of Edinburgh, 2009. Bsc (Hons) Dissertation.

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Kälin I, Henze IS, Ringer SK, Torgerson PR, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R. Comparison of Recovery Quality Following Medetomidine versus Xylazine Balanced Isoflurane Anaesthesia in Horses: A Retrospective Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 19;11(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082440pubmed: 34438896google scholar: lookup
  2. Gozalo-Marcilla M, Ringer SK. Recovery after General Anaesthesia in Adult Horses: A Structured Summary of the Literature. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 14;11(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061777pubmed: 34198637google scholar: lookup
  3. Joseph EJ, Love L, Mayakis M, Varner K. Preanesthetic Administration of Trazodone Does Not Impact Anesthetic Recovery Scores in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2025 Oct 6;15(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15192907pubmed: 41096502google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.