Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2007; 39(1); 37-41; doi: 10.2746/042516407x165414

Retrospective study of dystocia in mares at a referral hospital.

Abstract: The period between the onset of dystocia and its resolution has an important bearing on fetal outcome. There are few published data on which to base decisions regarding optimum management of cases in practice. Objective: To evaluate and compare the effects of a coordinated dystocia management protocol (CDMP) with that of a previous protocol of random management on time to resolution and outcome in both an emergency dystocia referral population of mares (referred emergency cases: EM) and in a population of mares residing in hospital due to high risk pregnancy (HRP) concerns that then experience dystocia at parturition. Methods: Retrospective study performed at a university hospital referral centre of cases presenting from 1991-2004 divided into Group 1 (pre-CDMP) and Group 2 (CDMP). Results: Medical records of 71 cases with dystocia were retrieved and data recorded. For referred emergency cases (EM), time from hospital presentation to resolution decreased significantly by 32 min (P = 0.03) after institution of CDMP. Survival rate of mares at discharge was 86%. Survival of EM foals was low, with 10% in Group 1 and 13% in Group 2, surviving to discharge. For EM foals delivered alive, survival to discharge was 30% and 43% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Median Stage II was significantly (P < 0.001) different at 71 and 282 min for EM foals delivered alive vs. those not alive at delivery, respectively. Median duration of Stage II was also significantly (P < 0.001) different between EM foals surviving and not surviving to discharge, at 44 and 249 min, respectively. Survival of HRP dystocia foals to discharge was 79%. Conclusions: Although CDMP reduced the time from presentation at the hospital to resolution significantly for EM, total duration of Stage II for EM was unchanged, as was foal outcome. Conclusions: Very early referral of mares with dystocia to referral centres with dystocia management protocols may improve fetal outcome as increased duration of Stage II in the horse affects fetal outcome negatively.
Publication Date: 2007-01-19 PubMed ID: 17228593DOI: 10.2746/042516407x165414Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research is a retrospective study examining the efficacy of a coordinated dystocia management protocol (CDMP) in reducing the time to resolution of dystocia, a difficult or abnormal birth labor, in mares. The study also evaluates the survival rates of both the mares and the foals under this protocol.

Methodology

  • The study was conducted at a university hospital referral center and included cases presenting from 1991 to 2004. These cases were split into two groups – Group 1, which included cases from before the institution of the CDMP, and Group 2, which included cases managed under CDMP.
  • The cases were further categorized based on whether the mares were part of an emergency dystocia referral population (referred as EM cases) or were already in the hospital due to high-risk pregnancy concerns (referred as HRP cases), and subsequently experienced dystocia at parturition.

Results

  • In referred emergency cases, the time from hospital presentation to the resolution of dystocia significantly decreased by 32 minutes following the use of CDMP.
  • The survival rate of mares at discharge was 86%. Among the foals of EM cases, only 10% in Group 1 and 13% in Group 2 survived to discharge. However, for EM foals delivered alive, the survival rate to discharge increased to 30% and 43% in Groups 1 and 2 respectively.
  • The study also found a significant correlation between the duration of Stage II of labor and survival rates – longer durations negatively impacted foal survival rates. The median duration of Stage II for EM foals delivered alive was 71 minutes, as opposed to 282 minutes for those not alive at delivery. Similarly, the median duration of Stage II was significantly less for EM foals surviving to discharge – 44 minutes versus 249 minutes for those not surviving to discharge.
  • The survival rate of HRP dystocia foals to discharge was recorded at 79%.

Conclusions

  • The implementation of CDMP improved timing from presentation to resolution in emergency dystocia cases, but did not significantly alter the total duration of Stage II or the foal outcome.
  • The study urges the very early referral of mares with dystocia to referral centers featuring dystocia management protocols. It was observed that increasing the duration of Stage II labor negatively affects the fetal outcome, suggesting the necessity of early intervention for improved chances of survival.

Cite This Article

APA
Norton JL, Dallap BL, Johnston JK, Palmer JE, Sertich PL, Boston R, Wilkins PA. (2007). Retrospective study of dystocia in mares at a referral hospital. Equine Vet J, 39(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516407x165414

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 39
Issue: 1
Pages: 37-41

Researcher Affiliations

Norton, J Lynch
  • Department of Clinical Studies, Section of Large Animal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, George D. Widener Hospital for Large Animals, New Bolton Center, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348, USA.
Dallap, B L
    Johnston, J K
      Palmer, J E
        Sertich, P L
          Boston, R
            Wilkins, P A

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Animals, Newborn / growth & development
              • Delivery, Obstetric / methods
              • Delivery, Obstetric / veterinary
              • Dystocia / mortality
              • Dystocia / therapy
              • Dystocia / veterinary
              • Female
              • Horse Diseases / mortality
              • Horse Diseases / therapy
              • Horses
              • Hospitals, Animal / statistics & numerical data
              • Pregnancy
              • Pregnancy Outcome / veterinary
              • Pregnancy, High-Risk
              • Retrospective Studies
              • Risk Factors
              • Survival Analysis
              • Time Factors

              Citations

              This article has been cited 5 times.
              1. Felici M, Sgorbini M, Baragli P, Lanatà A, Marmorini P, Camillo F. Autonomic nervous system balance in parturient mares: Spontaneous vs induced delivery.. PLoS One 2023;18(3):e0283116.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283116pubmed: 36930584google scholar: lookup
              2. Willette J, Gerras A, Sledge D, Koch D. A Case Report of Uterine Body Constriction Precluding Normal Parturition Leading to Dystocia in a Mare.. Vet Sci 2023 Feb 10;10(2).
                doi: 10.3390/vetsci10020139pubmed: 36851443google scholar: lookup
              3. Lanci A, Perina F, Donadoni A, Castagnetti C, Mariella J. Dystocia in the Standardbred Mare: A Retrospective Study from 2004 to 2020.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jun 8;12(12).
                doi: 10.3390/ani12121486pubmed: 35739823google scholar: lookup
              4. Kimura Y, Aoki T, Chiba A, Nambo Y. Effects of dystocia on blood gas parameters, acid-base balance and serum lactate concentration in heavy draft newborn foals.. J Equine Sci 2017;28(1):27-30.
                doi: 10.1294/jes.28.27pubmed: 28400704google scholar: lookup
              5. Rioja E, Cernicchiaro N, Costa MC, Valverde A. Perioperative risk factors for mortality and length of hospitalization in mares with dystocia undergoing general anesthesia: a retrospective study.. Can Vet J 2012 May;53(5):502-10.
                pubmed: 23115362