Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2020; 95; 103314; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103314

Riding Soundness-Comparison of Subjective With Objective Lameness Assessments of Owner-Sound Horses at Trot on a Treadmill.

Abstract: Lameness is a symptom indicative of pain or injury of the locomotor apparatus. Lame horses generally should not be ridden. However, owners' ability to assess lameness has been questioned. This study's aim was to use subjective lameness assessments and objective gait analysis to generate a descriptive overview of movement and weight-bearing asymmetries of owner-sound riding horses. 235 horses were subjectively assessed in a field study, and the owner's perception of their horse's orthopedic health was recorded through an online survey. 69 horses were re-evaluated by gait analysis at an equine hospital. During trot on an instrumented treadmill, the gait was scored by a veterinarian using lameness grades from 0/5 (sound) to 3/5 (moderate lameness visible at trot). Movement asymmetry of the head (HDmin) and pelvis (PDmin) and weight-bearing asymmetry were quantified simultaneously. The prevalence of subjectively scored lameness grade ≥2/5 in one or more limbs was 55% during study part 1 and 74% during study part 2. Movement asymmetry of the head and/or pelvis exceeding HDmin ≥12 mm and/or PDmin ≥6 mm was found in 57% of the horses. 58% showed weight-bearing asymmetries between contralateral front and/or hind limbs of ≥3% body mass. Gait analysis showed considerable variability of movement and weight-bearing asymmetry values, sometimes independent of the clinical lameness grade, especially in the forehand. Several horses with lameness grade ≤1/5 had asymmetry values greater than mentioned thresholds. The analysis of movement and weight-bearing asymmetry revealed that these objective variables did not necessarily act uniformly and therefore should be interpreted with caution.
Publication Date: 2020-11-01 PubMed ID: 33276930DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103314Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research studied the ability of horse owners to accurately assess lameness in their horses, comparing subjective assessments with objective gait analysis. The findings showed a discrepancy between owner perceptions and the measured degree of lameness, highlighting the need for careful interpretation of both subjective and objective evaluations.

Study Methodology

  • This study was conducted in two parts. In the first part, 235 horses were subjectively assessed in a field study where owners filled out an online survey to record their perception of their horse’s orthopedic health.
  • In the second part, 69 of these horses underwent objective gait analysis at an equine hospital.
  • A veterinarian used a scale of 0/5 (sound) to 3/5 (moderate lameness visible at trot) to score the horse’s gait while the horse trotted on a treadmill.
  • Together with the gait score, movement asymmetry of the head and pelvis and weight-bearing asymmetry were simultaneously quantified.

Study Findings

  • The majority of horses exhibited signs of lameness according to the subjective scoring of the owners, with 55% receiving a lameness grade of ≥2/5 in the first part of the study, increasing to 74% in the second part.
  • Despite this, the objective gait analysis revealed a significant number of horses with movement asymmetry (57%) and weight-bearing asymmetries (58%) that were sometimes unrelated to the clinical lameness grade – particularly in the forehand.
  • Interestingly, several horses with a lameness grade of ≤1/5 exhibited asymmetry values beyond that which is normally expected, indicating that there may be clinically undetected lameness or other health issues.

Implications of the Study

  • This study highlights that there can be significant discrepancies between owner-perceived lameness and actual lameness as identified through gait analysis.
  • The findings also underscore the need for careful interpretation of both subjective assessments and objective measurements when it comes to assessing lameness in horses.
  • Moreover, the research suggests that even low grades of clinical lameness could be accompanied by significant asymmetry values, indicating the presence of under-identified pain or injury in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Müller-Quirin J, Dittmann MT, Roepstorff C, Arpagaus S, Latif SN, Weishaupt MA. (2020). Riding Soundness-Comparison of Subjective With Objective Lameness Assessments of Owner-Sound Horses at Trot on a Treadmill. J Equine Vet Sci, 95, 103314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103314

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 95
Pages: 103314
PII: S0737-0806(20)30405-6

Researcher Affiliations

Müller-Quirin, Jasmin
  • Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: jasmin.mueller-quirin@uzh.ch.
Dittmann, Marie T
  • Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Roepstorff, Christoffer
  • Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Arpagaus, Samuel
  • Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Latif, Selma N
  • Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Weishaupt, Michael A
  • Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Forelimb
  • Gait
  • Hindlimb
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horses
  • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Hobbs SJ, Serra Braganca FM, Rhodin M, Hernlund E, Peterson M, Clayton HM. Evaluating Overall Performance in High-Level Dressage Horse-Rider Combinations by Comparing Measurements from Inertial Sensors with General Impression Scores Awarded by Judges.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 2;13(15).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13152496pubmed: 37570304google scholar: lookup
  2. Leclercq A, Lundblad J, Persson-Sjodin E, Ask K, Zetterberg E, Hernlund E, Haubro Andersen P, Rhodin M. Perceived sidedness and correlation to vertical movement asymmetries in young warmblood horses.. PLoS One 2023;18(7):e0288043.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288043pubmed: 37418437google scholar: lookup
  3. Lawin FJ, Byström A, Roepstorff C, Rhodin M, Almlöf M, Silva M, Andersen PH, Kjellström H, Hernlund E. Is Markerless More or Less? Comparing a Smartphone Computer Vision Method for Equine Lameness Assessment to Multi-Camera Motion Capture.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 24;13(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13030390pubmed: 36766279google scholar: lookup
  4. Leclercq A, Byström A, Söderlind M, Persson E, Rhodin M, Engell MT, Hernlund E. Evaluation of feedback methods for improved detection of hindlimb lameness in horses among riding instructors and trainers.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:992954.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.992954pubmed: 36299634google scholar: lookup
  5. Feuser AK, Gesell-May S, Müller T, May A. Artificial Intelligence for Lameness Detection in Horses-A Preliminary Study.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 17;12(20).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12202804pubmed: 36290189google scholar: lookup
  6. Ask K, Andersen PH, Tamminen LM, Rhodin M, Hernlund E. Performance of four equine pain scales and their association to movement asymmetry in horses with induced orthopedic pain.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:938022.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.938022pubmed: 36032285google scholar: lookup
  7. Haussler KK, Hesbach AL, Romano L, Goff L, Bergh A. A Systematic Review of Musculoskeletal Mobilization and Manipulation Techniques Used in Veterinary Medicine.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 24;11(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102787pubmed: 34679808google scholar: lookup