Role of U.S. animal control agencies in equine neglect, cruelty, and abandonment investigations.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
The research examines the role and capabilities of local animal control services in the U.S. that handle cases of horse neglect, cruelty, and abandonment. It reveals that neglect is the most common reason for investigations, primarily due to the owner’s ignorance, economic hardships, and irresponsibility. However, issues such as lack of funding, insufficient facilities for horses, and a shortage of educational materials for horse owners contribute to the challenges faced.
Research Study Overview
The main goal of this study was to understand the role of animal control services in handling cases involving horses and the issues confronted during these investigations. An online survey of 128 detailed questions was used to collect comprehensive data relevant to the study, from capacities of the agencies to causes and outcomes of the horse investigations.
Survey Composition and Response
- The online survey was filled out by 165 respondents from 26 U.S states.
- The questions ranged from the capacity of the agency to handle horse cases, their funding and housing facilities for horses, and the factors and outcomes of their investigations.
- The respondents were further asked to detail information about a specific case, such as the condition of the horses, their seizure and custody procedures, the costs incurred, and prosecution procedures.
Findings
- Between 2007 and 2009, 90 agencies instigated 6,864 equine investigations, equalling about 38 cases per agency annually.
- A typical agency had an average annual budget of $740,000 and employed seven animal control officers, spending approximately $10,000 each year on equine cases.
- Neglect was the most frequent cause of investigation, generally due to the owner’s ignorance, economic hardship, and irresponsibility.
- Regarding the physical wellbeing of the horses, low body condition, presence of parasites, and compromised dental condition were commonly observed in most seized horses.
Legal Proceedings and Challenges
- Over half of the horse owners had prior investigations or charges for neglect or cruelty to animals or were associated with cruelty or abuse offences towards people.
- Less than 3% of the cases proceeded to adjudication and were likely decided by a judge rather than a jury. Guilty pleas and verdicts were nine times more prevalent than acquittals.
- Among the challenges faced during horse investigation cases were limited funding, insufficient horse facilities, and a lack of educational materials for horse owners to help prevent and resolve neglect cases.
Cite This Article
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616.
MeSH Terms
- Animal Welfare / legislation & jurisprudence
- Animals
- Data Collection
- Horses
- Housing, Animal
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- United States
Citations
This article has been cited 3 times.- Koralesky KE, Rankin JM, Fraser D. Using institutional ethnography to analyse animal sheltering and protection I: Animal protection work. Anim Welf 2023;32:e44.
- Koralesky KE, Rankin JM, Fraser D. Animal sheltering: A scoping literature review grounded in institutional ethnography. Anim Welf 2023;32:e3.
- Weiss E, Dolan ED, Mohan-Gibbons H, Gramann S, Slater MR. Estimating the Availability of Potential Homes for Unwanted Horses in the United States. Animals (Basel) 2017 Jul 20;7(7).