Analyze Diet
Journal of animal science2014; 92(5); 2342-2349; doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7303

Role of U.S. animal control agencies in equine neglect, cruelty, and abandonment investigations.

Abstract: Every state in the United States has regulations prohibiting acts of neglect and cruelty against animals. Local law enforcement and animal control agencies are responsible in many communities to enforce these statutes. As society's perception of horses has changed from their origin as livestock to companion animals in modern times, owners have transitioned their care and management. The goal of this study was to identify the role and capacities of local animal control services in the United States that investigate equine neglect, cruelty, and abandonment investigations and to identify challenges and outcomes of the investigations. A 128-question online survey was accessible for animal agencies to complete. Comprehensive questions included their capacity for investigating equine cases, funding, housing for horses, and causes and outcomes of investigations. Respondents also were asked to select a single case and provide detailed information on the condition of horses, seizure and custody procedures, costs, and prosecution proceedings. A total of 165 respondents from 26 states completed all or the majority of the questions. A total of 6,864 equine investigations were initiated between 2007 and 2009 by 90 agencies, which extrapolates to 38 investigations annually per agency. A typical agency has an average annual budget of $740,000, employs 7 animal control officers, and spends about $10,000 annually on equine cases. Neglect was ranked as the most common reason for investigation. Owner ignorance, economic hardship, and lack of responsibility were the highest ranked causes of neglect and cruelty. Individual cases were provided by 91 agencies concerning 749 equines. The physical condition of the horse was the primary factor of investigation, and low body condition, parasite infestation, and compromised dental condition were present in most seized horses. Over half of the equine owners previously had been investigated or charged with neglect or cruelty of animals or were identified with cruelty or abuse offenses to people. Less than 3% of the cases advanced to adjudication, and these were likely to be decided by a judge rather than a jury. Judgments of guilty verdicts and pleas were 9 times more common than acquittal. Challenges for equine investigations cases included lack of funding, limited availability of facilities for horses, and providing educational materials for horse owners to aid in prevention and resolution of neglect cases.
Publication Date: 2014-03-18 PubMed ID: 24663185DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-7303Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examines the role and capabilities of local animal control services in the U.S. that handle cases of horse neglect, cruelty, and abandonment. It reveals that neglect is the most common reason for investigations, primarily due to the owner’s ignorance, economic hardships, and irresponsibility. However, issues such as lack of funding, insufficient facilities for horses, and a shortage of educational materials for horse owners contribute to the challenges faced.

Research Study Overview

The main goal of this study was to understand the role of animal control services in handling cases involving horses and the issues confronted during these investigations. An online survey of 128 detailed questions was used to collect comprehensive data relevant to the study, from capacities of the agencies to causes and outcomes of the horse investigations.

Survey Composition and Response

  • The online survey was filled out by 165 respondents from 26 U.S states.
  • The questions ranged from the capacity of the agency to handle horse cases, their funding and housing facilities for horses, and the factors and outcomes of their investigations.
  • The respondents were further asked to detail information about a specific case, such as the condition of the horses, their seizure and custody procedures, the costs incurred, and prosecution procedures.

Findings

  • Between 2007 and 2009, 90 agencies instigated 6,864 equine investigations, equalling about 38 cases per agency annually.
  • A typical agency had an average annual budget of $740,000 and employed seven animal control officers, spending approximately $10,000 each year on equine cases.
  • Neglect was the most frequent cause of investigation, generally due to the owner’s ignorance, economic hardship, and irresponsibility.
  • Regarding the physical wellbeing of the horses, low body condition, presence of parasites, and compromised dental condition were commonly observed in most seized horses.

Legal Proceedings and Challenges

  • Over half of the horse owners had prior investigations or charges for neglect or cruelty to animals or were associated with cruelty or abuse offences towards people.
  • Less than 3% of the cases proceeded to adjudication and were likely decided by a judge rather than a jury. Guilty pleas and verdicts were nine times more prevalent than acquittals.
  • Among the challenges faced during horse investigation cases were limited funding, insufficient horse facilities, and a lack of educational materials for horse owners to help prevent and resolve neglect cases.

Cite This Article

APA
Stull CL, Holcomb KE. (2014). Role of U.S. animal control agencies in equine neglect, cruelty, and abandonment investigations. J Anim Sci, 92(5), 2342-2349. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7303

Publication

ISSN: 1525-3163
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 92
Issue: 5
Pages: 2342-2349

Researcher Affiliations

Stull, C L
  • Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616.
Holcomb, K E

    MeSH Terms

    • Animal Welfare / legislation & jurisprudence
    • Animals
    • Data Collection
    • Horses
    • Housing, Animal
    • Surveys and Questionnaires
    • United States

    Citations

    This article has been cited 3 times.
    1. Koralesky KE, Rankin JM, Fraser D. Using institutional ethnography to analyse animal sheltering and protection I: Animal protection work. Anim Welf 2023;32:e44.
      doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.39pubmed: 38487424google scholar: lookup
    2. Koralesky KE, Rankin JM, Fraser D. Animal sheltering: A scoping literature review grounded in institutional ethnography. Anim Welf 2023;32:e3.
      doi: 10.1017/awf.2022.4pubmed: 38487412google scholar: lookup
    3. Weiss E, Dolan ED, Mohan-Gibbons H, Gramann S, Slater MR. Estimating the Availability of Potential Homes for Unwanted Horses in the United States. Animals (Basel) 2017 Jul 20;7(7).
      doi: 10.3390/ani7070053pubmed: 28726730google scholar: lookup