Analyze Diet
BMC genomics2015; 16; 764; doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1977-3

Runs of homozygosity reveal signatures of positive selection for reproduction traits in breed and non-breed horses.

Abstract: Modern horses represent heterogeneous populations specifically selected for appearance and performance. Genomic regions under high selective pressure show characteristic runs of homozygosity (ROH) which represent a low genetic diversity. This study aims at detecting the number and functional distribution of ROHs in different horse populations using next generation sequencing data. Methods: Next generation sequencing was performed for two Sorraia, one Dülmen Horse, one Arabian, one Saxon-Thuringian Heavy Warmblood, one Thoroughbred and four Hanoverian. After quality control reads were mapped to the reference genome EquCab2.70. ROH detection was performed using PLINK, version 1.07 for a trimmed dataset with 11,325,777 SNPs and a mean read depth of 12. Stretches with homozygous genotypes of >40 kb as well as >400 kb were defined as ROHs. SNPs within consensus ROHs were tested for neutrality. Functional classification was done for genes annotated within ROHs using PANTHER gene list analysis and functional variants were tested for their distribution among breed or non-breed groups. Results: ROH detection was performed using whole genome sequences of ten horses of six populations representing various breed types and non-breed horses. In total, an average number of 3492 ROHs were detected in windows of a minimum of 50 consecutive homozygous SNPs and an average number of 292 ROHs in windows of 500 consecutive homozygous SNPs. Functional analyses of private ROHs in each horse revealed a high frequency of genes affecting cellular, metabolic, developmental, immune system and reproduction processes. In non-breed horses, 198 ROHs in 50-SNP windows and seven ROHs in 500-SNP windows showed an enrichment of genes involved in reproduction, embryonic development, energy metabolism, muscle and cardiac development whereas all seven breed horses revealed only three common ROHs in 50-SNP windows harboring the fertility-related gene YES1. In the Hanoverian, a total of 18 private ROHs could be shown to be located in the region of genes potentially involved in neurologic control, signaling, glycogen balance and reproduction. Comparative analysis of homozygous stretches common in all ten horses displayed three ROHs which were all located in the region of KITLG, the ligand of KIT known to be involved in melanogenesis, haematopoiesis and gametogenesis. Conclusions: The results of this study give a comprehensive insight into the frequency and number of ROHs in various horses and their potential influence on population diversity and selection pressures. Comparisons of breed and non-breed horses suggest a significant artificial as well as natural selection pressure on reproduction performance in all types of horse populations.
Publication Date: 2015-10-09 PubMed ID: 26452642PubMed Central: PMC4600213DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1977-3Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examines the effect of positive selection on reproduction traits in certain populations of horses. A series of sequencing tests revealed specific regions of the genome, known as runs of homozygosity (ROHs), which show low genetic diversity due to selective pressures. The study contributes to understanding the impact of both artificial and natural selection on horse populations and their reproduction performance.

Methodology

  • The study began with next generation sequencing performed on ten horses from six populations, representing both breed and non-breed types. This involved two Sorraia, one Dülmen Horse, one Arabian, one Saxon-Thuringian Heavy Warmblood, one Thoroughbred, and four Hanoverian horses.
  • Following quality control, reads were mapped to the reference genome EquCab2.70.
  • ROH detection was done using PLINK, version 1.07 for a trimmed dataset consisting of 11,325,777 SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) and a mean read depth of 12.
  • The definition of ROHs was stretches containing over 40kb and beyond 400kb with homozygous genotypes.
  • Functional classification was performed on the genes annotated within these ROHs using PANTHER gene list analysis. Any functional variants were tested for their distribution between breed and non-breed groups.

Results

  • An average number of 3492 ROHs were detected in windows of a minimum of 50 consecutive homozygous SNPs, while around 292 ROHs were found in windows of 500 consecutive homozygous SNPs.
  • Functional analysis of these ROHs showed a high frequency of genes affecting cellular, metabolic, developmental, immune system, and reproduction processes.
  • In non-breed horses, there was an enrichment of genes involved in reproduction, embryonic development, energy metabolism, muscle and cardiac development present in 198 ROHs in 50-SNP windows and seven ROHs in 500-SNP windows.
  • Breed horses revealed only three common ROHs in 50-SNP windows containing the fertility-related gene YES1.
  • In the Hanoverian horse population, 18 private ROHs were found in the region of genes potentially involved in neurologic control, signaling, glycogen balance, and reproduction.
  • Collective analysis of all ten horses demonstrated three ROHs in the region of KITLG, a ligand known for its role in melanogenesis, haematopoiesis, and gametogenesis.

Conclusions

  • This study provides comprehensive insight into the number and frequency of ROHs across various horse populations, shedding light on their possible influence on population diversity and selection pressures.
  • Comparisons between breed and non-breed horses suggest significant artificial as well as natural selection pressure on reproduction performance in all horse populations.

Cite This Article

APA
Metzger J, Karwath M, Tonda R, Beltran S, Águeda L, Gut M, Gut IG, Distl O. (2015). Runs of homozygosity reveal signatures of positive selection for reproduction traits in breed and non-breed horses. BMC Genomics, 16, 764. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1977-3

Publication

ISSN: 1471-2164
NlmUniqueID: 100965258
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 16
Pages: 764

Researcher Affiliations

Metzger, Julia
  • Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17p, 30559, Hannover, Germany. julia.metzger@tiho-hannover.de.
Karwath, Matthias
  • Lower Saxony State Office for the Environment, Agriculture and Geology, Unit 74, Animal Breeding and Hygiene, Schlossallee 1, 01468, Moritzburg, Germany. Matthias.Karwath@smul.sachsen.de.
Tonda, Raul
  • Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Parc Científic de Barcelona, Torre I Baldiri Reixac, 4, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. rtonda@pcb.ub.cat.
Beltran, Sergi
  • Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Parc Científic de Barcelona, Torre I Baldiri Reixac, 4, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. sbeltrana@pcb.ub.cat.
Águeda, Lídia
  • Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Parc Científic de Barcelona, Torre I Baldiri Reixac, 4, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. lagueda@pcb.ub.cat.
Gut, Marta
  • Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Parc Científic de Barcelona, Torre I Baldiri Reixac, 4, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. mgut@pcb.ub.cat.
Gut, Ivo Glynne
  • Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Parc Científic de Barcelona, Torre I Baldiri Reixac, 4, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. igut@pcb.ub.es.
Distl, Ottmar
  • Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17p, 30559, Hannover, Germany. ottmar.distl@tiho-hannover.de.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Breeding
  • Genomics
  • Genotype
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
  • Homozygote
  • Horses / genetics
  • Phenotype
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
  • Reproduction / genetics
  • Selection, Genetic

References

This article includes 83 references
  1. Petersen JL, Mickelson JR, Rendahl AK, Valberg SJ, Andersson LS, Axelsson J. Genome-wide analysis reveals selection for important traits in domestic horse breeds.. PLoS Genet 2013;9(1):e1003211.
  2. Makvandi-Nejad S, Hoffman GE, Allen JJ, Chu E, Gu E, Chandler AM, Loredo AI, Bellone RR, Mezey JG, Brooks SA, Sutter NB. Four Loci explain 83 % of size variation in the horse.. PLoS ONE 2012;7(7):e39929.
  3. Orlando L, Ginolhac A, Zhang G, Froese D, Albrechtsen A, Stiller M, Schubert M, Cappellini E, Petersen B, Moltke I, Johnson PL, Fumagalli M, Vilstrup JT, Raghavan M, Korneliussen T, Malaspinas AS, Vogt J, Szklarczyk D, Kelstrup CD, Vinther J, Dolocan A, Stenderup J, Velazquez AM, Cahill J, Rasmussen M, Wang X, Min J, Zazula GD, Seguin-Orlando A, Mortensen C. Recalibrating Equus evolution using the genome sequence of an early Middle Pleistocene horse.. Nature 2013;499(7456):74–78.
    doi: 10.1038/nature12323pubmed: 23803765google scholar: lookup
  4. Brooks SA, Makvandi-Nejad S, Chu E, Allen JJ, Streeter C, Gu E, McCleery B, Murphy BA, Bellone R, Sutter NB. Morphological variation in the horse: defining complex traits of body size and shape.. Anim Genet 2010;41(Suppl 2):159–165.
  5. Beckmann S. Roentgenologische Untersuchung zur Osteochondrosis dissecans an Fessel-, Sprung-und Kniegelenken bei 85 Duelmener Wildpferden.. Berlin: Freie Universitaet Berlin, Diss., 2011; 2011.
  6. Pinheiro M, Kjöllerström HJ, Oom MM. Genetic diversity and demographic structure of the endangered Sorraia horse breed assessed through pedigree analysis.. Livest Sci 2013;152(1):1–10.
  7. Warmuth V, Manica A, Eriksson A, Barker G, Bower M. Autosomal genetic diversity in non-breed horses from eastern Eurasia provides insights into historical population movements.. Anim Genet 2013;44(1):53–61.
  8. Ku CS, Naidoo N, Teo SM, Pawitan Y. Regions of homozygosity and their impact on complex diseases and traits.. Hum Genet 2011;129(1):1–15.
    doi: 10.1007/s00439-010-0920-6pubmed: 21104274google scholar: lookup
  9. Bosse M, Megens HJ, Madsen O, Paudel Y, Frantz LA, Schook LB, Crooijmans RP, Groenen MA. Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome: consequence of demography and the recombination landscape.. PLoS Genet 2012;8(11):e1003100.
  10. Purfield DC, Berry DP, McParland S, Bradley DG. Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle.. BMC Genet 2012;13:70.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-70pmc: PMC3502433pubmed: 22888858google scholar: lookup
  11. Gibson J, Morton NE, Collins A. Extended tracts of homozygosity in outbred human populations.. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15(5):789–795.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi493pubmed: 16436455google scholar: lookup
  12. Gu J, Orr N, Park SD, Katz LM, Sulimova G, MacHugh DE, Hill EW. A genome scan for positive selection in thoroughbred horses.. PLoS ONE 2009;4(6):e5767.
  13. Freedman AH, Gronau I, Schweizer RM, Ortega-Del Vecchyo D, Han E, Silva PM, Galaverni M, Fan Z, Marx P, Lorente-Galdos B. Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs.. PLoS Genet 2014;10(1):e1004016.
  14. Kirin M, McQuillan R, Franklin CS, Campbell H, McKeigue PM, Wilson JF. Genomic runs of homozygosity record population history and consanguinity.. PLoS ONE 2010;5(11):e13996.
  15. McQuillan R, Leutenegger AL, Abdel-Rahman R, Franklin CS, Pericic M, Barac-Lauc L, Smolej-Narancic N, Janicijevic B, Polasek O, Tenesa A, Macleod AK, Farrington SM, Rudan P, Hayward C, Vitart V, Rudan I, Wild SH, Dunlop MG, Wright AF, Campbell H, Wilson JF. Runs of homozygosity in European populations.. Am J Hum Genet 2008;83(3):359–372.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.007pmc: PMC2556426pubmed: 18760389google scholar: lookup
  16. Nothnagel M, Lu TT, Kayser M, Krawczak M. Genomic and geographic distribution of SNP-defined runs of homozygosity in Europeans.. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19(15):2927–2935.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq198pubmed: 20462934google scholar: lookup
  17. Nalls M, Guerreiro R, Simon-Sanchez J, Bras J, Traynor B, Gibbs J, Launer L, Hardy J, Singleton A. Extended tracts of homozygosity identify novel candidate genes associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease.. Neurogenetics 2009;10(3):183–190.
    doi: 10.1007/s10048-009-0182-4pmc: PMC2908484pubmed: 19271249google scholar: lookup
  18. Alkuraya FS. The application of next-generation sequencing in the autozygosity mapping of human recessive diseases.. Hum Genet 2013;132(11):1197–1211.
    doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1344-xpubmed: 23907654google scholar: lookup
  19. Lencz T, Lambert C, DeRosse P, Burdick KE, Morgan TV, Kane JM, Kucherlapati R, Malhotra AK. Runs of homozygosity reveal highly penetrant recessive loci in schizophrenia.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104(50):19942–19947.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710021104pmc: PMC2148402pubmed: 18077426google scholar: lookup
  20. Qanbari S, Pausch H, Jansen S, Somel M, Strom TM, Fries R, Nielsen R, Simianer H. Classic selective sweeps revealed by massive sequencing in cattle.. PLoS Genet 2014;10(2):e1004148.
  21. Ai H, Huang L, Ren J. Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and selection signatures in Chinese and Western pigs revealed by genome-wide SNP markers.. PLoS ONE 2013;8(2):e56001.
  22. Boyko AR, Quignon P, Li L, Schoenebeck JJ, Degenhardt JD, Lohmueller KE, Zhao K, Brisbin A, Parker HG, Cargill M. A simple genetic architecture underlies morphological variation in dogs.. PLoS Biol 2010;8(8):e1000451.
  23. Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt M-L, Maqbool K, Webster MT, Perloski M, Liberg O, Arnemo JM, Hedhammar Å, Lindblad-Toh K. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet.. Nature 2013;495(7441):360–364.
    doi: 10.1038/nature11837pubmed: 23354050google scholar: lookup
  24. Pfahler S, Distl O. Effective Population Size, Extended Linkage Disequilibrium and Signatures of Selection in the Rare Dog Breed Lundehund.. PLoS ONE 2015;10(4):e0122680.
  25. Ferenčaković M, Hamzić E, Gredler B, Solberg TR, Klemetsdal G, Curik I, Sölkner J. Estimates of autozygosity derived from runs of homozygosity: empirical evidence from selected cattle populations.. J Anim Breed Genet 2013;130(4):286–293.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12012pubmed: 23855630google scholar: lookup
  26. Ferencakovic M, Hamzic E, Gredler B, Curik I, Sölkner J. Runs of homozygosity reveal genome-wide autozygosity in the Austrian Fleckvieh cattle.. Agric. Conspec. Sci. 2011;76(4):325–329.
  27. Qanbari S, Gianola D, Hayes B, Schenkel F, Miller S, Moore S, Thaller G, Simianer H. Application of site and haplotype-frequency based approaches for detecting selection signatures in cattle.. BMC Genomics 2011;12(1):318.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-318pmc: PMC3146955pubmed: 21679429google scholar: lookup
  28. Qanbari S, Pimentel E, Tetens J, Thaller G, Lichtner P, Sharifi A, Simianer H. A genome-wide scan for signatures of recent selection in Holstein cattle.. Anim Genet 2010;41(4):377–389.
    pubmed: 20096028
  29. Kim E-S, Cole JB, Huson H, Wiggans GR, Van Tassell CP, Crooker BA, Liu G, Da Y, Sonstegard TS. Effect of artificial selection on runs of homozygosity in US Holstein cattle.. PLoS ONE 2013;8(11):e80813.
  30. MacEachern S, Hayes B, McEwan J, Goddard M. An examination of positive selection and changing effective population size in Angus and Holstein cattle populations (Bos taurus) using a high density SNP genotyping platform and the contribution of ancient polymorphism to genomic diversity in Domestic cattle.. BMC Genomics 2009;10(1):181.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-181pmc: PMC2681480pubmed: 19393053google scholar: lookup
  31. MacLeod IM, Larkin DM, Lewin HA, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Inferring demography from runs of homozygosity in whole-genome sequence, with correction for sequence errors.. Mol Biol Evol 2013;30(9):2209–2223.
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst125pmc: PMC3748359pubmed: 23842528google scholar: lookup
  32. Aberle KS, Hamann H, Drögemüller C, Distl O. Genetic diversity in German draught horse breeds compared with a group of primitive, riding and wild horses by means of microsatellite DNA markers.. Anim Genet 2004;35(4):270–277.
  33. Cunningham E, Dooley J, Splan R, Bradley D. Microsatellite diversity, pedigree relatedness and the contributions of founder lineages to thoroughbred horses.. Anim Genet 2001;32(6):360–364.
  34. Khanshour A, Conant E, Juras R, Cothran EG. Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity and population structure of Arabian horse populations.. J Hered 2013;104(3):386–98.
    doi: 10.1093/jhered/est003pubmed: 23450090google scholar: lookup
  35. Mavrogiannis LA, Antonopoulou I, Baxová A, Kutílek S, Kim CA, Sugayama SM, Salamanca A, Wall SA, Morriss-Kay GM, Wilkie AO. Haploinsufficiency of the human homeobox gene ALX4 causes skull ossification defects.. Nat Genet 2001;27(1):17–18.
    doi: 10.1038/83703pubmed: 11137991google scholar: lookup
  36. Kayserili H, Uz E, Niessen C, Vargel I, Alanay Y, Tuncbilek G, Yigit G, Uyguner O, Candan S, Okur H. ALX4 dysfunction disrupts craniofacial and epidermal development.. Hum Mol Genet 2009;18(22):4357–4366.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp391pubmed: 19692347google scholar: lookup
  37. Foos TM, Wu J-Y. The role of taurine in the central nervous system and the modulation of intracellular calcium homeostasis.. Neurochem Res 2002;27(1–2):21–26.
    doi: 10.1023/A:1014890219513pubmed: 11926272google scholar: lookup
  38. Wang Y, Paramasivam M, Thomas A, Bai J, Kaminen-Ahola N, Kere J, Voskuil J, Rosen G, Galaburda A, Loturco J. DYX1C1 functions in neuronal migration in developing neocortex.. Neuroscience 2006;143(2):515–522.
  39. Taipale M, Kaminen N, Nopola-Hemmi J, Haltia T, Myllyluoma B, Lyytinen H, Muller K, Kaaranen M, Lindsberg PJ, Hannula-Jouppi K. A candidate gene for developmental dyslexia encodes a nuclear tetratricopeptide repeat domain protein dynamically regulated in brain.. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003;100(20):11553–11558.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1833911100pmc: PMC208796pubmed: 12954984google scholar: lookup
  40. Ishibashi K, Kanno E, Itoh T, Fukuda M. Identification and characterization of a novel Tre2/Bub2/Cdc16 (TBC) protein that possesses Rab3A GAP activity.. Genes Cells 2009;14(1):41–52.
  41. O’Brien AMP, Utsunomiya YT, Mészáros G, Bickhart DM, Liu GE, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, Da Silva MV, Garcia JF, Sölkner J. Assessing signatures of selection through variation in linkage disequilibrium between taurine and indicine cattle.. Genet Sel Evol 2014;46(1):19.
    doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-19pmc: PMC4014805pubmed: 24592996google scholar: lookup
  42. Drgonova J, Zimonjic DB, Hall FS, Uhl GR. Effect of KEPI (Ppp1r14c) deletion on morphine analgesia and tolerance in mice of different genetic backgrounds: when a knockout is near a relevant quantitative trait locus.. Neuroscience 2010;165(3):882–895.
  43. Gong J-P, Liu Q-R, Zhang P-W, Wang Y, Uhl G. Mouse brain localization of the protein kinase C-enhanced phosphatase 1 inhibitor KEPI (kinase C-enhanced PP1 inhibitor). Neuroscience 2005;132(3):713–727.
  44. Newgard CB, Brady MJ, O’Doherty RM, Saltiel AR. Organizing glucose disposal: emerging roles of the glycogen targeting subunits of protein phosphatase-1.. Diabetes 2000;49(12):1967–1977.
    doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.12.1967pubmed: 11117996google scholar: lookup
  45. Dymek EE, Smith EF. A conserved CaM-and radial spoke–associated complex mediates regulation of flagellar dynein activity.. J Cell Biol 2007;179(3):515–526.
    doi: 10.1083/jcb.200703107pmc: PMC2064796pubmed: 17967944google scholar: lookup
  46. Urbanska P, Song K, Joachimiak E, Krzemien-Ojak L, Koprowski P, Hennessey T, Jerka-Dziadosz M, Fabczak H, Gaertig J, Nicastro D. The CSC proteins FAP61 and FAP251 build the basal substructures of radial spoke 3 in cilia.. Mol Biol Cell 2015;26(8):1463–1475.
    doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-11-1545pmc: PMC4395127pubmed: 25694453google scholar: lookup
  47. Liang Y, Dong Y, Zhao J, Li W. YES1 activation elicited by heat stress is anti-apoptotic in mouse pachytene spermatocytes.. Biol Reprod 2013;89(6):131.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.112235pubmed: 24132961google scholar: lookup
  48. Zhou Y, Qin D, Tang A, Zhou D, Qin J, Yan B, Diao R, Jiang Z, Cai Z, Gui Y. Developmental expression pattern of a novel gene, TSG23/Tsg23, suggests a role in spermatogenesis.. Mol Hum Reprod 2009;15(4):223–230.
    doi: 10.1093/molehr/gap015pubmed: 19240080google scholar: lookup
  49. Petrou P, Chiotaki R, Dalezios Y, Chalepakis G. Overlapping and divergent localization of Frem1 and Fras1 and its functional implications during mouse embryonic development.. Exp Cell Res 2007;313(5):910–920.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.12.008pubmed: 17240369google scholar: lookup
  50. Hunt MC, Rautanen A, Westin MA, Svensson LT, Alexson SE. Analysis of the mouse and human acyl-CoA thioesterase (ACOT) gene clusters shows that convergent, functional evolution results in a reduced number of human peroxisomal ACOTs.. FASEB J 2006;20(11):1855–1864.
    doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6042compubmed: 16940157google scholar: lookup
  51. Watkins PA, Maiguel D, Jia Z, Pevsner J. Evidence for 26 distinct acyl-coenzyme A synthetase genes in the human genome.. J Lipid Res 2007;48(12):2736–2750.
    doi: 10.1194/jlr.M700378-JLR200pubmed: 17762044google scholar: lookup
  52. Nastasi T, Bongiovanni A, Campos Y, Mann L, Toy JN, Bostrom J, Rottier R, Hahn C, Conaway JW, Harris AJ. Ozz-E3, a muscle-specific ubiquitin ligase, regulates β-catenin degradation during myogenesis.. Dev Cell 2004;6(2):269–282.
    doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00020-6pubmed: 14960280google scholar: lookup
  53. Gahlmann R, Kedes L. Cloning, structural analysis, and expression of the human fast twitch skeletal muscle troponin C gene.. J Biol Chem 1990;265(21):12520–12528.
    pubmed: 2373703
  54. Mirotsou M, Zhang Z, Deb A, Zhang L, Gnecchi M, Noiseux N, Mu H, Pachori A, Dzau V. Secreted frizzled related protein 2 (Sfrp2) is the key Akt-mesenchymal stem cell-released paracrine factor mediating myocardial survival and repair.. Proc Natl Acad Sc 2007;104(5):1643–1648.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610024104pmc: PMC1785280pubmed: 17251350google scholar: lookup
  55. Fan G-C, Gregory KN, Zhao W, Park WJ, Kranias EG. Regulation of myocardial function by histidine-rich, calcium-binding protein.. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004;287(4):H1705–H1711.
    doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01211.2003pubmed: 15191886google scholar: lookup
  56. Gregory KN, Ginsburg KS, Bodi I, Hahn H, Marreez YM, Song Q, Padmanabhan PA, Mitton BA, Waggoner JR, Del Monte F. Histidine-rich Ca binding protein: a regulator of sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium sequestration and cardiac function.. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2006;40(5):653–665.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.02.003pubmed: 16600288google scholar: lookup
  57. Metzger J, Tonda R, Beltran S, Agueda L, Gut M, Distl O. Next generation sequencing gives an insight into the characteristics of highly selected breeds versus non-breed horses in the course of domestication.. BMC Genomics 2014;15(1):562.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-562pmc: PMC4097168pubmed: 24996778google scholar: lookup
  58. Hamann H, Jude R, Sieme H, Mertens U, Töpfer‐Petersen E, Distl O, Leeb T. A polymorphism within the equine CRISP3 gene is associated with stallion fertility in Hanoverian warmblood horses.. Anim Genet 2007;38(3):259–264.
  59. Matsui Y, Zsebo KM, Hogan BL. Embryonic expression of a haematopoietic growth factor encoded by the SI locus and the ligand for c-kit.. Nature 1990;347(6294):667–669.
    doi: 10.1038/347667a0pubmed: 1699134google scholar: lookup
  60. Seitz JJ, Schmutz SM, Thue TD, Buchanan FC. A missense mutation in the bovine MGF gene is associated with the roan phenotype in Belgian Blue and Shorthorn cattle.. Mamm Genome 1999;10(7):710–712.
    doi: 10.1007/s003359901076pubmed: 10384045google scholar: lookup
  61. Wilkinson S, Lu ZH, Megens H-J, Archibald AL, Haley C, Jackson IJ, Groenen MA, Crooijmans RP, Ogden R, Wiener P. Signatures of diversifying selection in European pig breeds.. 2013.
    pmc: PMC3636142pubmed: 23637623
  62. Wehrle-Haller B. The role of Kit-ligand in melanocyte development and epidermal homeostasis.. Pigment Cell Res 2003;16(3):287–296.
  63. Beechey C, Loutit J, Searle A. Panda, a new steel allele.. Mouse News Lett 1986;74(92):52.
  64. Huang EJ, Manova K, Packer AI, Sanchez S, Bachvarova RF, Besmer P. The murine steel panda mutation affects kit ligand expression and growth of early ovarian follicles.. Dev Biol 1993;157(1):100–109.
    doi: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1115pubmed: 7683280google scholar: lookup
  65. Galan J, De Felici M, Buch B, Rivero M, Segura A, Royo J, Cruz N, Real L, Ruiz A. Association of genetic markers within the KIT and KITLG genes with human male infertility.. Hum Reprod 2006;21(12):3185–3192.
    doi: 10.1093/humrep/del313pubmed: 16905672google scholar: lookup
  66. Mau C, Poncet PA, Bucher B, Stranzinger G, Rieder S. Genetic mapping of dominant white (W), a homozygous lethal condition in the horse (Equus caballus). J Anim Breed Genet 2004;121:374–383.
  67. Andrews S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data.. Reference Source 2010.
  68. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform.. Bioinformatics 2010;26(5):589–595.
  69. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools.. Bioinformatics 2009;25(16):2078–2079.
  70. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.. Genome Res 2010;20(9):1297–1303.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110pmc: PMC2928508pubmed: 20644199google scholar: lookup
  71. Cingolani P, Platts A, le Wang L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3.. Fly (Austin) 2012;6(2):80–92.
    doi: 10.4161/fly.19695pmc: PMC3679285pubmed: 22728672google scholar: lookup
  72. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST. The variant call format and VCFtools.. Bioinformatics 2011;27(15):2156–2158.
  73. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.. Am J Hum Genet 2007;81(3):559–575.
    doi: 10.1086/519795pmc: PMC1950838pubmed: 17701901google scholar: lookup
  74. Korneliussen TS, Moltke I, Albrechtsen A, Nielsen R. Calculation of Tajima’s D and other neutrality test statistics from low depth next-generation sequencing data.. BMC Bioinformatics 2013;14(1):289.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-289pmc: PMC4015034pubmed: 24088262google scholar: lookup
  75. Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences.. Genome Biol 2010;11(8):R86.
    doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86pmc: PMC2945788pubmed: 20738864google scholar: lookup
  76. Blankenberg D, Kuster GV, Coraor N, Ananda G, Lazarus R, Mangan M, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J. Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists.. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2010;Chapter 19:Unit 19.10:1–21.
    pmc: PMC4264107pubmed: 20069535
  77. Giardine B, Riemer C, Hardison RC, Burhans R, Elnitski L, Shah P, Zhang Y, Blankenberg D, Albert I, Taylor J. Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis.. Genome Res 2005;15(10):1451–1455.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.4086505pmc: PMC1240089pubmed: 16169926google scholar: lookup
  78. Reimand J, Kull M, Peterson H, Hansen J, Vilo J. g: Profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments.. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35(suppl 2):W193–W200.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm226pmc: PMC1933153pubmed: 17478515google scholar: lookup
  79. Reimand J, Arak T, Vilo J. g:Profiler--a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2011 update). Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39(Web Server issue):W307–315.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr378pmc: PMC3125778pubmed: 21646343google scholar: lookup
  80. Mi H, Muruganujan A, Thomas PD. PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees.. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41(D1):D377–386.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1118pmc: PMC3531194pubmed: 23193289google scholar: lookup
  81. Warde-Farley D, Donaldson SL, Comes O, Zuberi K, Badrawi R, Chao P, Franz M, Grouios C, Kazi F, Lopes CT. The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function.. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38(suppl 2):W214–W220.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq537pmc: PMC2896186pubmed: 20576703google scholar: lookup
  82. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm.. Nat Protoc 2009;4(7):1073–1081.
    doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.86pubmed: 19561590google scholar: lookup
  83. McLaren W, Pritchard B, Rios D, Chen Y, Flicek P, Cunningham F. Deriving the consequences of genomic variants with the Ensembl API and SNP Effect Predictor.. Bioinformatics 2010;26(16):2069–2070.

Citations

This article has been cited 72 times.
  1. Chessari G, Reich P, Criscione A, Falker-Gieske C, Mastrangelo S, Tumino S, Bordonaro S, Marletta D, Tetens J. Comparison between SNP array and imputed data to estimate population structure and ROH hotspots in horse breeds. BMC Genomics 2025 Nov 29;26(1):1086.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-12256-8pubmed: 41318401google scholar: lookup
  2. Duderstadt S, Distl O. Insights into Genomic Patterns of Homozygosity in the Endangered Dülmen Wild Horse Population. Genes (Basel) 2025 Sep 8;16(9).
    doi: 10.3390/genes16091054pubmed: 41009997google scholar: lookup
  3. Belanger JM, Gershony LC, Bell JS, Hytönen MK, Lohi H, Lindblad-Toh K, Tengvall K, Sell E, Famula TR, Oberbauer AM. Measures of Homozygosity and Relationship to Genetic Diversity in the Bearded Collie Breed. Genes (Basel) 2025 Mar 27;16(4).
    doi: 10.3390/genes16040378pubmed: 40282338google scholar: lookup
  4. Sievers J, Distl O. Genomic Patterns of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in the Rhenish German Draught Horse. Genes (Basel) 2025 Mar 11;16(3).
    doi: 10.3390/genes16030327pubmed: 40149478google scholar: lookup
  5. Duderstadt S, Distl O. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Dülmen Wild, Liebenthal and Polish Konik Horses in Comparison with Przewalski, Sorraia, German Draught and Riding Horses. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 31;14(15).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14152221pubmed: 39123746google scholar: lookup
  6. Kolpakov V, Ruchay A, Kosyan D, Bukareva E. Analysis of Runs of Homozygosity in Aberdeen Angus Cattle. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 24;14(15).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14152153pubmed: 39123679google scholar: lookup
  7. Gmel AI, Mikko S, Ricard A, Velie BD, Gerber V, Hamilton NA, Neuditschko M. Using high-density SNP data to unravel the origin of the Franches-Montagnes horse breed. Genet Sel Evol 2024 Jul 10;56(1):53.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00922-6pubmed: 38987703google scholar: lookup
  8. Li X, Lan F, Chen X, Yan Y, Li G, Wu G, Sun C, Yang N. Runs of homozygosity and selection signature analyses reveal putative genomic regions for artificial selection in layer breeding. BMC Genomics 2024 Jun 26;25(1):638.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10551-4pubmed: 38926812google scholar: lookup
  9. Zhang X, Yang L, Xie Z, Gan J, Zhu P, Song J, Kang H, Zhang Z, Liu L, Xiang H, Li H. Genetic assessment and candidate genes identification for breed-specific characteristics of Qingyuan partridge chicken based on runs of homozygosity. BMC Genomics 2024 Jun 10;25(1):577.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10492-ypubmed: 38858651google scholar: lookup
  10. Amandykova M, Akhatayeva Z, Kozhakhmet A, Kapassuly T, Orazymbetova Z, Yergali K, Khamzin K, Iskakov K, Dossybayev K. Distribution of Runs of Homozygosity and Their Relationship with Candidate Genes for Productivity in Kazakh Meat-Wool Sheep Breed. Genes (Basel) 2023 Oct 25;14(11).
    doi: 10.3390/genes14111988pubmed: 38002931google scholar: lookup
  11. Lindsay-McGee V, Sanchez-Molano E, Banos G, Clark EL, Piercy RJ, Psifidi A. Genetic characterisation of the Connemara pony and the Warmblood horse using a within-breed clustering approach. Genet Sel Evol 2023 Aug 17;55(1):60.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00827-wpubmed: 37592264google scholar: lookup
  12. Mousavi SF, Razmkabir M, Rostamzadeh J, Seyedabadi HR, Naboulsi R, Petersen JL, Lindgren G. Genetic diversity and signatures of selection in four indigenous horse breeds of Iran. Heredity (Edinb) 2023 Aug;131(2):96-108.
    doi: 10.1038/s41437-023-00624-7pubmed: 37308718google scholar: lookup
  13. Mastrangelo S, Ben-Jemaa S, Perini F, Cendron F, Biscarini F, Lasagna E, Penasa M, Cassandro M. Genome-wide mapping of signatures of selection using a high-density array identified candidate genes for growth traits and local adaptation in chickens. Genet Sel Evol 2023 Mar 23;55(1):20.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00790-6pubmed: 36959552google scholar: lookup
  14. Gao C, Du W, Tian K, Wang K, Wang C, Sun G, Kang X, Li W. Analysis of Conservation Priorities and Runs of Homozygosity Patterns for Chinese Indigenous Chicken Breeds. Animals (Basel) 2023 Feb 8;13(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13040599pubmed: 36830386google scholar: lookup
  15. Fatma R, Chauhan W, Afzal M. The coefficients of inbreeding revealed by ROH study among inbred individuals belonging to each type of the first cousin marriage: A preliminary report from North India. Genes Genomics 2023 Jun;45(6):813-825.
    doi: 10.1007/s13258-023-01367-9pubmed: 36807878google scholar: lookup
  16. Gmel AI, Guichard M, Dainat B, Williams GR, Eynard S, Vignal A, Servin B, Neuditschko M. Identification of runs of homozygosity in Western honey bees (Apis mellifera) using whole-genome sequencing data. Ecol Evol 2023 Jan;13(1):e9723.
    doi: 10.1002/ece3.9723pubmed: 36694553google scholar: lookup
  17. Chen Y, Wu X, Wang J, Hou Y, Liu Y, Wang B, Hu X, Zheng X, Zhang X, Ding Y, Yin Z. Detection of Selection Signatures in Anqing Six-End-White Pigs Based on Resequencing Data. Genes (Basel) 2022 Dec 8;13(12).
    doi: 10.3390/genes13122310pubmed: 36553577google scholar: lookup
  18. Berghöfer J, Khaveh N, Mundlos S, Metzger J. Simultaneous testing of rule- and model-based approaches for runs of homozygosity detection opens up a window into genomic footprints of selection in pigs. BMC Genomics 2022 Aug 6;23(1):564.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08801-4pubmed: 35933356google scholar: lookup
  19. Colpitts J, McLoughlin PD, Poissant J. Runs of homozygosity in Sable Island feral horses reveal the genomic consequences of inbreeding and divergence from domestic breeds. BMC Genomics 2022 Jul 12;23(1):501.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08729-9pubmed: 35820826google scholar: lookup
  20. Dong H, Dong Z, Wang F, Wang G, Luo X, Lei C, Chen J. Whole Genome Sequencing Provides New Insights Into the Genetic Diversity and Coat Color of Asiatic Wild Ass and Its Hybrids. Front Genet 2022;13:818420.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.818420pubmed: 35646088google scholar: lookup
  21. Criscione A, Mastrangelo S, D'Alessandro E, Tumino S, Di Gerlando R, Zumbo A, Marletta D, Bordonaro S. Genome-wide survey on three local horse populations with a focus on runs of homozygosity pattern. J Anim Breed Genet 2022 Sep;139(5):540-555.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12680pubmed: 35445758google scholar: lookup
  22. Laseca N, Molina A, Ramón M, Valera M, Azcona F, Encina A, Demyda-Peyrás S. Fine-Scale Analysis of Runs of Homozygosity Islands Affecting Fertility in Mares. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:754028.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.754028pubmed: 35252415google scholar: lookup
  23. Petrelli S, Buglione M, Maselli V, Troiano C, Larson G, Frantz L, Manin A, Ricca E, Baccigalupi L, Wright D, Pietri C, Fulgione D. Population genomic, olfactory, dietary, and gut microbiota analyses demonstrate the unique evolutionary trajectory of feral pigs. Mol Ecol 2022 Jan;31(1):220-237.
    doi: 10.1111/mec.16238pubmed: 34676935google scholar: lookup
  24. Liu D, Chen Z, Zhao W, Guo L, Sun H, Zhu K, Liu G, Shen X, Zhao X, Wang Q, Ma P, Pan Y. Genome-wide selection signatures detection in Shanghai Holstein cattle population identified genes related to adaption, health and reproduction traits. BMC Genomics 2021 Oct 15;22(1):747.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08042-xpubmed: 34654366google scholar: lookup
  25. Selli A, Ventura RV, Fonseca PAS, Buzanskas ME, Andrietta LT, Balieiro JCC, Brito LF. Detection and Visualization of Heterozygosity-Rich Regions and Runs of Homozygosity in Worldwide Sheep Populations. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 15;11(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11092696pubmed: 34573664google scholar: lookup
  26. Wu X, Zhou R, Zhang W, Cao B, Xia J, Wang C, Zhang X, Chu M, Yin Z, Ding Y. Genome-wide scan for runs of homozygosity identifies candidate genes in Wannan Black pigs. Anim Biosci 2021 Dec;34(12):1895-1902.
    doi: 10.5713/ab.20.0679pubmed: 33705632google scholar: lookup
  27. Laseca N, Anaya G, Peña Z, Pirosanto Y, Molina A, Demyda Peyrás S. Impaired Reproductive Function in Equines: From Genetics to Genomics. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 3;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020393pubmed: 33546520google scholar: lookup
  28. Kumar S, Deng CH, Hunt M, Kirk C, Wiedow C, Rowan D, Wu J, Brewer L. Homozygosity Mapping Reveals Population History and Trait Architecture in Self-Incompatible Pear (Pyrus spp.). Front Plant Sci 2020;11:590846.
    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.590846pubmed: 33469460google scholar: lookup
  29. Peng Q, Ehlers CL. Long tracks of homozygosity predict the severity of alcohol use disorders in an American Indian population. Mol Psychiatry 2021 Jun;26(6):2200-2211.
    doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-00989-9pubmed: 33398086google scholar: lookup
  30. Biscarini F, Mastrangelo S, Catillo G, Senczuk G, Ciampolini R. Insights into Genetic Diversity, Runs of Homozygosity and Heterozygosity-Rich Regions in Maremmana Semi-Feral Cattle Using Pedigree and Genomic Data. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 3;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122285pubmed: 33287320google scholar: lookup
  31. Talebi R, Szmatoła T, Mészáros G, Qanbari S. Runs of Homozygosity in Modern Chicken Revealed by Sequence Data. G3 (Bethesda) 2020 Dec 3;10(12):4615-4623.
    doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401860pubmed: 33077478google scholar: lookup
  32. Zhao G, Zhang T, Liu Y, Wang Z, Xu L, Zhu B, Gao X, Zhang L, Gao H, Liu GE, Li J, Xu L. Genome-Wide Assessment of Runs of Homozygosity in Chinese Wagyu Beef Cattle. Animals (Basel) 2020 Aug 14;10(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10081425pubmed: 32824035google scholar: lookup
  33. Mancin E, Ablondi M, Mantovani R, Pigozzi G, Sabbioni A, Sartori C. Genetic Variability in the Italian Heavy Draught Horse from Pedigree Data and Genomic Information. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jul 30;10(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10081310pubmed: 32751586google scholar: lookup
  34. Asadollahpour Nanaei H, Esmailizadeh A, Ayatollahi Mehrgardi A, Han J, Wu DD, Li Y, Zhang YP. Comparative population genomic analysis uncovers novel genomic footprints and genes associated with small body size in Chinese pony. BMC Genomics 2020 Jul 20;21(1):496.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06887-2pubmed: 32689947google scholar: lookup
  35. Ablondi M, Dadousis C, Vasini M, Eriksson S, Mikko S, Sabbioni A. Genetic Diversity and Signatures of Selection in a Native Italian Horse Breed Based on SNP Data. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 8;10(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061005pubmed: 32521830google scholar: lookup
  36. Aramburu O, Ceballos F, Casanova A, Le Moan A, Hemmer-Hansen J, Bekkevold D, Bouza C, Martínez P. Genomic Signatures After Five Generations of Intensive Selective Breeding: Runs of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in Representative Domestic and Wild Populations of Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Front Genet 2020;11:296.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00296pubmed: 32346384google scholar: lookup
  37. Todd ET, Hamilton NA, Velie BD, Thomson PC. The effects of inbreeding on covering success, gestation length and foal sex ratio in Australian thoroughbred horses. BMC Genet 2020 Apr 8;21(1):41.
    doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00847-1pubmed: 32268877google scholar: lookup
  38. He S, Di J, Han B, Chen L, Liu M, Li W. Genome-Wide Scan for Runs of Homozygosity Identifies Candidate Genes Related to Economically Important Traits in Chinese Merino. Animals (Basel) 2020 Mar 20;10(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10030524pubmed: 32245132google scholar: lookup
  39. Han H, McGivney BA, Farries G, Katz LM, MacHugh DE, Randhawa IAS, Hill EW. Selection in Australian Thoroughbred horses acts on a locus associated with early two-year old speed. PLoS One 2020;15(2):e0227212.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227212pubmed: 32049967google scholar: lookup
  40. Salek Ardestani S, Aminafshar M, Zandi Baghche Maryam MB, Banabazi MH, Sargolzaei M, Miar Y. Whole-Genome Signatures of Selection in Sport Horses Revealed Selection Footprints Related to Musculoskeletal System Development Processes. Animals (Basel) 2019 Dec 26;10(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10010053pubmed: 31888018google scholar: lookup
  41. Ablondi M, Eriksson S, Tetu S, Sabbioni A, Viklund Å, Mikko S. Genomic Divergence in Swedish Warmblood Horses Selected for Equestrian Disciplines. Genes (Basel) 2019 Nov 27;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/genes10120976pubmed: 31783652google scholar: lookup
  42. Guo J, Zhong J, Li L, Zhong T, Wang L, Song T, Zhang H. Comparative genome analyses reveal the unique genetic composition and selection signals underlying the phenotypic characteristics of three Chinese domestic goat breeds. Genet Sel Evol 2019 Nov 26;51(1):70.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0512-4pubmed: 31771503google scholar: lookup
  43. Xu L, Zhao G, Yang L, Zhu B, Chen Y, Zhang L, Gao X, Gao H, Liu GE, Li J. Genomic Patterns of Homozygosity in Chinese Local Cattle. Sci Rep 2019 Nov 18;9(1):16977.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53274-3pubmed: 31740716google scholar: lookup
  44. Megdiche S, Mastrangelo S, Ben Hamouda M, Lenstra JA, Ciani E. A Combined Multi-Cohort Approach Reveals Novel and Known Genome-Wide Selection Signatures for Wool Traits in Merino and Merino-Derived Sheep Breeds. Front Genet 2019;10:1025.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01025pubmed: 31708969google scholar: lookup
  45. Raudsepp T, Finno CJ, Bellone RR, Petersen JL. Ten years of the horse reference genome: insights into equine biology, domestication and population dynamics in the post-genome era. Anim Genet 2019 Dec;50(6):569-597.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12857pubmed: 31568563google scholar: lookup
  46. Ablondi M, Viklund Å, Lindgren G, Eriksson S, Mikko S. Signatures of selection in the genome of Swedish warmblood horses selected for sport performance. BMC Genomics 2019 Sep 18;20(1):717.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6079-1pubmed: 31533613google scholar: lookup
  47. Fawcett JA, Sato F, Sakamoto T, Iwasaki WM, Tozaki T, Innan H. Genome-wide SNP analysis of Japanese Thoroughbred racehorses. PLoS One 2019;14(7):e0218407.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218407pubmed: 31339891google scholar: lookup
  48. Kvist L, Niskanen M, Mannermaa K, Wutke S, Aspi J. Genetic variability and history of a native Finnish horse breed. Genet Sel Evol 2019 Jul 1;51(1):35.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0480-8pubmed: 31262246google scholar: lookup
  49. Grilz-Seger G, Neuditschko M, Ricard A, Velie B, Lindgren G, Mesarič M, Cotman M, Horna M, Dobretsberger M, Brem G, Druml T. Genome-Wide Homozygosity Patterns and Evidence for Selection in a Set of European and Near Eastern Horse Breeds. Genes (Basel) 2019 Jun 28;10(7).
    doi: 10.3390/genes10070491pubmed: 31261764google scholar: lookup
  50. Schurink A, Shrestha M, Eriksson S, Bosse M, Bovenhuis H, Back W, Johansson AM, Ducro BJ. The Genomic Makeup of Nine Horse Populations Sampled in the Netherlands. Genes (Basel) 2019 Jun 25;10(6).
    doi: 10.3390/genes10060480pubmed: 31242710google scholar: lookup
  51. Mastrangelo S, Bahbahani H, Moioli B, Ahbara A, Al Abri M, Almathen F, da Silva A, Belabdi I, Portolano B, Mwacharo JM, Hanotte O, Pilla F, Ciani E. Novel and known signals of selection for fat deposition in domestic sheep breeds from Africa and Eurasia. PLoS One 2019;14(6):e0209632.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209632pubmed: 31199810google scholar: lookup
  52. Grilz-Seger G, Druml T, Neuditschko M, Mesarič M, Cotman M, Brem G. Analysis of ROH patterns in the Noriker horse breed reveals signatures of selection for coat color and body size. Anim Genet 2019 Aug;50(4):334-346.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12797pubmed: 31199540google scholar: lookup
  53. Wang L, Mu Y, Xu L, Li K, Han J, Wu T, Liu L, Gao Q, Xia Y, Hou G, Yang S, He X, Liu GE, Feng S. Genomic Analysis Reveals Specific Patterns of Homozygosity and Heterozygosity in Inbred Pigs. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jun 1;9(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9060314pubmed: 31159442google scholar: lookup
  54. Velie BD, Solé M, Fegraeus KJ, Rosengren MK, Røed KH, Ihler CF, Strand E, Lindgren G. Genomic measures of inbreeding in the Norwegian-Swedish Coldblooded Trotter and their associations with known QTL for reproduction and health traits. Genet Sel Evol 2019 May 27;51(1):22.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0465-7pubmed: 31132983google scholar: lookup
  55. Gmel AI, Druml T, von Niederhäusern R, Leeb T, Neuditschko M. Genome-Wide Association Studies Based on Equine Joint Angle Measurements Reveal New QTL Affecting the Conformation of Horses. Genes (Basel) 2019 May 14;10(5).
    doi: 10.3390/genes10050370pubmed: 31091839google scholar: lookup
  56. Nolte W, Thaller G, Kuehn C. Selection signatures in four German warmblood horse breeds: Tracing breeding history in the modern sport horse. PLoS One 2019;14(4):e0215913.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215913pubmed: 31022261google scholar: lookup
  57. Gurgul A, Jasielczuk I, Semik-Gurgul E, Pawlina-Tyszko K, Stefaniuk-Szmukier M, Szmatoła T, Polak G, Tomczyk-Wrona I, Bugno-Poniewierska M. A genome-wide scan for diversifying selection signatures in selected horse breeds. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0210751.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210751pubmed: 30699152google scholar: lookup
  58. Hunt SE, McLaren W, Gil L, Thormann A, Schuilenburg H, Sheppard D, Parton A, Armean IM, Trevanion SJ, Flicek P, Cunningham F. Ensembl variation resources. Database (Oxford) 2018 Jan 1;2018.
    doi: 10.1093/database/bay119pubmed: 30576484google scholar: lookup
  59. Goszczynski D, Molina A, Terán E, Morales-Durand H, Ross P, Cheng H, Giovambattista G, Demyda-Peyrás S. Runs of homozygosity in a selected cattle population with extremely inbred bulls: Descriptive and functional analyses revealed highly variable patterns. PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0200069.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200069pubmed: 29985951google scholar: lookup
  60. Metzger J, Rau J, Naccache F, Bas Conn L, Lindgren G, Distl O. Genome data uncover four synergistic key regulators for extremely small body size in horses. BMC Genomics 2018 Jun 25;19(1):492.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4877-5pubmed: 29940849google scholar: lookup
  61. Todd ET, Ho SYW, Thomson PC, Ang RA, Velie BD, Hamilton NA. Founder-specific inbreeding depression affects racing performance in Thoroughbred horses. Sci Rep 2018 Apr 18;8(1):6167.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24663-xpubmed: 29670190google scholar: lookup
  62. Alberto FJ, Boyer F, Orozco-terWengel P, Streeter I, Servin B, de Villemereuil P, Benjelloun B, Librado P, Biscarini F, Colli L, Barbato M, Zamani W, Alberti A, Engelen S, Stella A, Joost S, Ajmone-Marsan P, Negrini R, Orlando L, Rezaei HR, Naderi S, Clarke L, Flicek P, Wincker P, Coissac E, Kijas J, Tosser-Klopp G, Chikhi A, Bruford MW, Taberlet P, Pompanon F. Convergent genomic signatures of domestication in sheep and goats. Nat Commun 2018 Mar 6;9(1):813.
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03206-ypubmed: 29511174google scholar: lookup
  63. Peripolli E, Stafuzza NB, Munari DP, Lima ALF, Irgang R, Machado MA, Panetto JCDC, Ventura RV, Baldi F, da Silva MVGB. Assessment of runs of homozygosity islands and estimates of genomic inbreeding in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle. BMC Genomics 2018 Jan 9;19(1):34.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4365-3pubmed: 29316879google scholar: lookup
  64. Serres-Armero A, Povolotskaya IS, Quilez J, Ramirez O, Santpere G, Kuderna LFK, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Fernandez-Callejo M, Gomez-Sanchez D, Freedman AH, Fan Z, Novembre J, Navarro A, Boyko A, Wayne R, Vilà C, Lorente-Galdos B, Marques-Bonet T. Similar genomic proportions of copy number variation within gray wolves and modern dog breeds inferred from whole genome sequencing. BMC Genomics 2017 Dec 19;18(1):977.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4318-xpubmed: 29258433google scholar: lookup
  65. Blant A, Kwong M, Szpiech ZA, Pemberton TJ. Weighted likelihood inference of genomic autozygosity patterns in dense genotype data. BMC Genomics 2017 Dec 1;18(1):928.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4312-3pubmed: 29191164google scholar: lookup
  66. Mercenaro L, Nieddu G, Porceddu A, Pezzotti M, Camiolo S. Sequence Polymorphisms and Structural Variations among Four Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Cultivars Representing Sardinian Agriculture. Front Plant Sci 2017;8:1279.
    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01279pubmed: 28775732google scholar: lookup
  67. Gorla E, Cozzi MC, Román-Ponce SI, Ruiz López FJ, Vega-Murillo VE, Cerolini S, Bagnato A, Strillacci MG. Genomic variability in Mexican chicken population using copy number variants. BMC Genet 2017 Jul 3;18(1):61.
    doi: 10.1186/s12863-017-0524-4pubmed: 28673234google scholar: lookup
  68. Metzger J, Nolte A, Uhde AK, Hewicker-Trautwein M, Distl O. Whole genome sequencing identifies missense mutation in MTBP in Shar-Pei affected with Autoinflammatory Disease (SPAID). BMC Genomics 2017 May 4;18(1):348.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3737-zpubmed: 28472921google scholar: lookup
  69. de Castro-Miró M, Tonda R, Escudero-Ferruz P, Andrés R, Mayor-Lorenzo A, Castro J, Ciccioli M, Hidalgo DA, Rodríguez-Ezcurra JJ, Farrando J, Pérez-Santonja JJ, Cormand B, Marfany G, Gonzàlez-Duarte R. Novel Candidate Genes and a Wide Spectrum of Structural and Point Mutations Responsible for Inherited Retinal Dystrophies Revealed by Exome Sequencing. PLoS One 2016;11(12):e0168966.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168966pubmed: 28005958google scholar: lookup
  70. Metzger J, Gast AC, Schrimpf R, Rau J, Eikelberg D, Beineke A, Hellige M, Distl O. Whole-genome sequencing reveals a potential causal mutation for dwarfism in the Miniature Shetland pony. Mamm Genome 2017 Apr;28(3-4):143-151.
    doi: 10.1007/s00335-016-9673-4pubmed: 27942904google scholar: lookup
  71. Friedenberg SG, Meurs KM, Mackay TF. Evaluation of artificial selection in Standard Poodles using whole-genome sequencing. Mamm Genome 2016 Dec;27(11-12):599-609.
    doi: 10.1007/s00335-016-9660-9pubmed: 27510710google scholar: lookup
  72. Metzger J, Pfahler S, Distl O. Variant detection and runs of homozygosity in next generation sequencing data elucidate the genetic background of Lundehund syndrome. BMC Genomics 2016 Aug 2;17:535.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2844-6pubmed: 27485430google scholar: lookup