FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / EFSA J / Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an esse...
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2023; 21(3); e07875; doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7875

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil from the leaves of Laurus nobilis L. (laurel leaf oil) for all animal species (FEFANA asbl).

Abstract: Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of an essential oil from the leaves of L. (laurel leaf oil), when used as a sensory additive for all animal species. The additive contains up to 4% methyleugenol. The use of the additive at 2 mg/kg complete feed in dogs and cats was considered of low concern. For other long-living and reproductive animals, the use of the additive at 10 mg/kg was considered of concern. For short-living animals, the Panel had no safety concern when the additive is used at 10 mg/kg complete feed for turkeys for fattening, piglets and other growing Suidae, pigs for fattening, veal calves (milk replacer), cattle for fattening and other growing ruminants, horses and rabbits for meat production, salmonids and other fin fish; and at 8.5 mg/kg for chickens for fattening, other growing poultry and other minor species for fattening. The use of laurel leaf oil up to the highest level in feed which was considered of no concern for target animals was also expected to be of no concern for consumers. The additive should be considered as irritant to skin and eyes and the respiratory tract. Due to the high concentration of methyleugenol (≥ 1%), the additive was classified by the applicant as suspected of causing genetic defects and of causing cancer and should be handled accordingly. The use of the additive under the proposed conditions of use was not expected to pose a risk for the environment. Since the leaves of and their preparations were recognised to flavour food and their function in feed would be the same, no further demonstration of efficacy was considered necessary.
© 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-03-09 PubMed ID: 36908566PubMed Central: PMC9996239DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7875Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper examines the safety and efficacy of an essential oil from the leaves of Laurel (Laurus nobilis L), as a feed additive for various animal species. The use of the additive was considered low concern for dogs and cats, but raised concerns in long-living and reproductive animals. For short-living animals, no safety concerns were noted under certain conditions. The additive poses no risk to the environment or consumers, but could be a skin and eye irritant and available data suggests it may cause genetic defects and cancer.

Safety Evaluation of the Feed Additive

  • The research was carried out by the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), following a request from the European Commission.
  • The feed additive evaluated was an essential oil from Laurel leaves (Laurus nobilis), which contains up to 4% methyleugenol.
  • The additive was tested on a variety of animal species to assess its effects. Concerns were raised when the additive was used at 10 mg/kg in long-living and reproductive animals.
  • For dogs and cats, the additive was considered of little concern when used at 2 mg/kg.

Concerns for Short-Living Animals and Consumers

  • No safety concerns were identified for short-living animals like turkeys, piglets, veal calves, cattle, horses, rabbits and various fish when the additive was used at 10mg/kg. However, for chickens and other poultry, the safe limit was slightly lower at 8.5mg/kg.
  • The additive was deemed of no concern for consumers when used up to the highest level in feed.

Health Risks and Environmental Impact

  • The additive was noted to be an irritant to skin, eyes, and the respiratory tract.
  • Due to the presence of methyleugenol (≥ 1%), the feed additive was viewed as potentially causing genetic defects and cancer, meaning it should be handled with caution.
  • The study found no expected risk to the environment when the additive was used under the proposed conditions.

Effectiveness of the Additive

  • The leaves of the Laurel tree are known to flavor food. As their function as an additive in feed would be the same, no additional proof of efficacy was deemed necessary.

Cite This Article

APA
Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Schlatter J, Schrenk D, Westendorf J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. (2023). Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil from the leaves of Laurus nobilis L. (laurel leaf oil) for all animal species (FEFANA asbl). EFSA J, 21(3), e07875. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7875

Publication

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
NlmUniqueID: 101642076
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 3
Pages: e07875
PII: e07875

Researcher Affiliations

Bampidis, Vasileios
    Azimonti, Giovanna
      Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
        Christensen, Henrik
          Durjava, Mojca
            Kouba, Maryline
              López-Alonso, Marta
                López Puente, Secundino
                  Marcon, Francesca
                    Mayo, Baltasar
                      Pechová, Alena
                        Petkova, Mariana
                          Ramos, Fernando
                            Sanz, Yolanda
                              Villa, Roberto Edoardo
                                Woutersen, Ruud
                                  Brantom, Paul
                                    Chesson, Andrew
                                      Schlatter, Josef
                                        Schrenk, Dieter
                                          Westendorf, Johannes
                                            Manini, Paola
                                              Pizzo, Fabiola
                                                Dusemund, Birgit

                                                  References

                                                  This article includes 70 references
                                                  1. Burdock GA. Fenaroli's handbook of flavor ingredients. 6th Edition, CRC press. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. 1066–1068 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.1201/9781439847503google scholar: lookup
                                                  2. Burkey JL, Sauer JM, McQueen CA, Sipes IG. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of methyleugenol and related congeners-- a mechanism of activation for methyleugenol.. Mutat Res 2000 Sep 20;453(1):25-33.
                                                    doi: 10.1016/S0027-5107(00)00070-1pubmed: 11006409google scholar: lookup
                                                  3. Chan VS, Caldwell J. Comparative induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis in cultured rat hepatocytes by allylbenzenes and their 1'-hydroxy metabolites.. Food Chem Toxicol 1992 Oct;30(10):831-6.
                                                    doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(92)90047-Opubmed: 1427504google scholar: lookup
                                                  4. Court MH, Greenblatt DJ. Molecular basis for deficient acetaminophen glucuronidation in cats. An interspecies comparison of enzyme kinetics in liver microsomes.. Biochem Pharmacol 1997 Apr 4;53(7):1041-7.
                                                    doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00072-5pubmed: 9174118google scholar: lookup
                                                  5. Cramer GM, Ford RA, Hall RL. Estimation of toxic hazard--a decision tree approach.. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1978 Jun;16(3):255-76.
                                                    doi: 10.1016/s0015-6264(76)80522-6pubmed: 357272google scholar: lookup
                                                  6. EFSA. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food on a request from Commission on Flavouring Group Evaluation 87, (FGE.87) bicyclic secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters. EFSA Journal 2008;6(12):918, 109 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.918google scholar: lookup
                                                  7. EFSA. Compendium of botanicals reported to contain naturally occurring substances of possible concern for human health when used in food and food supplements. EFSA Journal 2012;10(5):2663, 60 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2663google scholar: lookup
                                                  8. EFSA CEF Panel. Flavouring Group Evaluation 01, Revision 2 (FGE.01Rev2): Branched‐chain aliphatic saturated aldehydes, carboxylic acids and related esters of primary alcohols and branched‐chain carboxylic acids from chemical groups 1 and 2. EFSA Journal 2010;8(11):1843, 46 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1843google scholar: lookup
                                                  9. EFSA CEF Panel. Guidance on the data required for the risk assessment of flavourings. EFSA Journal 2010;8(6):1623, 38 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2093/j.efsa.2010.1623google scholar: lookup
                                                  10. EFSA CEF Panel. Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 59, Revision 1 (FGE.59Rev1): Consideration of aliphatic and aromatic ethers evaluated by JECFA (61st meeting and 63rd meeting) structurally related to aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives evaluated by EFSA in FGE.23 Rev2 (2010). EFSA Journal 2011;9(5):2158, 32 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2158google scholar: lookup
                                                  11. EFSA CEF Panel. Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 25, Revision 2 (FGE.25Rev2): Aliphatic hydrocarbons from chemical group 31. EFSA Journal 2011;9(6):2177, 126 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2177google scholar: lookup
                                                  12. EFSA CEF Panel. Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 82, Revision 1 (FGE.82Rev1): Consideration of Epoxides evaluated by the JECFA (65th meeting). EFSA Journal 2014;12(6):3708, 32 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3708google scholar: lookup
                                                  13. EFSA CEF Panel. Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 25, Revision 3 (FGE.25Rev3): Aliphatic hydrocarbons from chemical group 31. EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4069, 116 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4069google scholar: lookup
                                                  14. EFSA CEF Panel. Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 78, Revision 2 (FGE.78Rev2): Consideration of aliphatic and alicyclic and aromatic hydrocarbons evaluated by JECFA (63rd meeting) structurally related to aliphatic hydrocarbons evaluated by EFSA in FGE.25Rev3. EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4067, 72 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4067google scholar: lookup
                                                  15. Silano V, Bolognesi C, Castle L, Cravedi JP, Engel KH, Fowler P, Franz R, Grob K, Husøy T, Kärenlampi S, Mennes W, Milana MR, Penninks A, Smith A, de Fátima Tavares Poças M, Tlustos C, Wölfle D, Zorn H, Zugravu CA, Binderup ML, Marcon F, Marzin D, Mosesso P, Anastassiadou M, Carfì M, Saarma S, Gürtler R. Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 208 Revision 2 (FGE.208Rev2): Consideration of genotoxicity data on alicyclic aldehydes with α,β-unsaturation in ring/side-chain and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.2 of FGE.19.. EFSA J 2017 May;15(5):e04766.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4766pmc: PMC7010107pubmed: 32625478google scholar: lookup
                                                  16. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Statement on the use of feed additives authorised/applied for use in feed when supplied via water. EFSA Journal 2010;8(12):1956, 9 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1956google scholar: lookup
                                                  17. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2011;9(12):2440, 14 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2440google scholar: lookup
                                                  18. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of branched‐chain primary aliphatic alcohols/aldehydes/acids, acetals and esters with esters containing branched‐chain alcohols and acetals containing branched‐chain aldehydes (chemical group 2) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(10):2927, 26 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2927google scholar: lookup
                                                  19. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic saturated and unsaturated tertiary alcohols and esters with esters containing tertiary alcohols ethers (chemical group 6) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(11):2966, 25 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2966google scholar: lookup
                                                  20. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and alicyclic ethers (chemical group 16) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(11):2967, 17 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2967google scholar: lookup
                                                  21. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of benzyl alcohols, aldehydes, acids, esters and acetals (chemical group 23) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(7):2785, 30 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2785google scholar: lookup
                                                  22. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives (chemical group 26) when used as feed additives for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(5):2678, 19 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2678google scholar: lookup
                                                  23. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for sensory additives. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2534, 26 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2534google scholar: lookup
                                                  24. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2539, 5 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2539google scholar: lookup
                                                  25. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of straight‐chain primary aliphatic alcohols/aldehydes/acids, acetals and esters with esters containing saturated alcohols and acetals containing saturated aldehydes (chemical group 01) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2013;11(4):3169, 35 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3169google scholar: lookup
                                                  26. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of saturated and unsaturated aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and esters with esters containing secondary alcohols belonging chemical group 5 when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2015;13(11):4268, 21 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4268google scholar: lookup
                                                  27. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (chemical group 31) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4053, 22 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4053google scholar: lookup
                                                  28. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Gregoretti L, Manini P, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of 26 compounds belonging to chemical group 3 (α,β-unsaturated straight-chain and branched-chain aliphatic primary alcohols, aldehydes, acids and esters) when used as flavourings for all animal species and categories.. EFSA J 2019 Mar;17(3):e05654.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4512pmc: PMC7009239pubmed: 32626273google scholar: lookup
                                                  29. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of non‐conjugated and accumulated unsaturated straight‐chain and branched‐chain aliphatic primary alcohols, aldehydes, acids, acetals and esters belonging to chemical group 4 when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2016;14(8):4559, 22 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4559google scholar: lookup
                                                  30. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of secondary alicyclic saturated and unsaturated alcohols, ketones, ketals and esters with ketals containing alicyclic alcohols or ketones and esters containing secondary alicyclic alcohols from chemical group 8 when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2016;14(6):4475, 26 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4475google scholar: lookup
                                                  31. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (chemical Group 31) when used as flavourings for all animal species and categories. EFSA Journal 2016;14(1):4339, 17 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4339google scholar: lookup
                                                  32. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López Puente S, López-Alonso M, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Brantom P, Dusemund B, Hogstrand C, Van Beelen P, Westendorf J, Gregoretti L, Manini P, Chesson A. Safety and efficacy of aryl-substituted primary alcohol, aldehyde, acid, ester and acetal derivatives belonging to chemical group 22 when used as flavourings for all animal species.. EFSA J 2017 Feb;15(2):e04672.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4672pmc: PMC7010084pubmed: 32625398google scholar: lookup
                                                  33. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML. Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05023.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5023pmc: PMC7010039pubmed: 32625313google scholar: lookup
                                                  34. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05021.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5021pmc: PMC7009839pubmed: 32625311google scholar: lookup
                                                  35. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Dujardin B, Galobart J, Innocenti ML. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05022.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5022pmc: PMC7009902pubmed: 32625312google scholar: lookup
                                                  36. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives.. EFSA J 2018 May;16(5):e05274.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5274pmc: PMC7009555pubmed: 32625911google scholar: lookup
                                                  37. Bampidis V, Bastos M, Christensen H, Dusemund B, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brock T, de Knecht J, Kolar B, van Beelen P, Padovani L, Tarrés-Call J, Vettori MV, Azimonti G. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the environment.. EFSA J 2019 Apr;17(4):e05648.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5648pmc: PMC7009194pubmed: 32626279google scholar: lookup
                                                  38. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Kouba M, Fašmon Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Galobart J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of feed additives consisting of expressed lemon oil and its fractions from Citrus limon (L.) Osbeck and of lime oil from Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).. EFSA J 2021 Apr;19(4):e06548.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6548pmc: PMC8085978pubmed: 33968248google scholar: lookup
                                                  39. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. General approach to assess the safety for the target species of botanical preparations which contain compounds that are genotoxic and/or carcinogenic. .
                                                  40. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Fašmon Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil from the flowers of Cananga odorata (Lam.) Hook.f. & Thomson (ylang ylang oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).. EFSA J 2022 Feb;20(2):e07159.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7159pmc: PMC8867525pubmed: 35233254google scholar: lookup
                                                  41. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Fašmon Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Edoardo Villa R, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an extract of olibanum from Boswellia serrata Roxb. ex Colebr. for use in dogs and horses (FEFANA asbl).. EFSA J 2022 Mar;20(3):e07158.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7158pmc: PMC8900119pubmed: 35281639google scholar: lookup
                                                  42. EFSA SC. Guidance on safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use as ingredients in food supplements, on request of EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009;7(9):1249, 19 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.2093/j.efsa.2009.1249google scholar: lookup
                                                  43. Hardy A, Benford D, Halldorsson T, Jeger MJ, Knutsen KH, More S, Mortensen A, Naegeli H, Noteborn H, Ockleford C, Ricci A, Rychen G, Silano V, Solecki R, Turck D, Aerts M, Bodin L, Davis A, Edler L, Gundert-Remy U, Sand S, Slob W, Bottex B, Abrahantes JC, Marques DC, Kass G, Schlatter JR. Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.. EFSA J 2017 Jan;15(1):e04658.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658pmc: PMC7009819pubmed: 32625254google scholar: lookup
                                                  44. More SJ, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bennekou SH, Bragard C, Halldorsson TI, Hernández-Jerez AF, Koutsoumanis K, Naegeli H, Schlatter JR, Silano V, Nielsen SS, Schrenk D, Turck D, Younes M, Benfenati E, Castle L, Cedergreen N, Hardy A, Laskowski R, Leblanc JC, Kortenkamp A, Ragas A, Posthuma L, Svendsen C, Solecki R, Testai E, Dujardin B, Kass GE, Manini P, Jeddi MZ, Dorne JC, Hogstrand C. Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals.. EFSA J 2019 Mar;17(3):e05634.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5634pmc: PMC7009070pubmed: 32626259google scholar: lookup
                                                  45. More S, Bampidis V, Benford D, Boesten J, Bragard C, Halldorsson T, Hernandez-Jerez A, Hougaard-Bennekou S, Koutsoumanis K, Naegeli H, Nielsen SS, Schrenk D, Silano V, Turck D, Younes M, Aquilina G, Crebelli R, Gürtler R, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Mosesso P, Nielsen E, Solecki R, Carfì M, Martino C, Maurici D, Parra Morte J, Schlatter J. Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures.. EFSA J 2019 Jan;17(1):e05519.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5519pmc: PMC7009058pubmed: 32626066google scholar: lookup
                                                  46. More SJ, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bragard C, Halldorsson TI, Hernández-Jerez AF, Hougaard Bennekou S, Koutsoumanis KP, Machera K, Naegeli H, Nielsen SS, Schlatter JR, Schrenk D, Silano V, Turck D, Younes M, Gundert-Remy U, Kass GEN, Kleiner J, Rossi AM, Serafimova R, Reilly L, Wallace HM. Guidance on the use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach in food safety assessment.. EFSA J 2019 Jun;17(6):e05708.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5708pmc: PMC7009090pubmed: 32626331google scholar: lookup
                                                  47. EMA. Lauri folii aetheroleum. EMA/MRL/564/99‐FINAL. March 1999.
                                                  48. EMA. Public statement on the use of herbal medicinal products containing methyleugenol. Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC). EMEA/HMPC/138363/2005.
                                                  49. EMA. Public statement on the use of herbal medicinal products containing estragole. Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC). EMA/HMPC/137212/2005 Rev 1.
                                                  50. European Commission. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on Estragole (1‐allyl‐4‐methoxybenzene) – 583 SCF/CS/FLAV/FLAVOUR/6 ADD 2 Final. European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate‐General, 26.09.2001, pp. 1–10.
                                                  51. Herrmann K, Schumacher F, Engst W, Appel KE, Klein K, Zanger UM, Glatt H. Abundance of DNA adducts of methyleugenol, a rodent hepatocarcinogen, in human liver samples.. Carcinogenesis 2013 May;34(5):1025-30.
                                                    doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt013pubmed: 23334163google scholar: lookup
                                                  52. Herrmann K, Engst W, Meinl W, Florian S, Cartus AT, Schrenk D, Appel KE, Nolden T, Himmelbauer H, Glatt H. Formation of hepatic DNA adducts by methyleugenol in mouse models: drastic decrease by Sult1a1 knockout and strong increase by transgenic human SULT1A1/2.. Carcinogenesis 2014 Apr;35(4):935-41.
                                                    doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt408pubmed: 24318996google scholar: lookup
                                                  53. Honda H, Minegawa K, Fujita Y, Yamaguchi N, Oguma Y, Glatt H, Nishiyama N, Kasamatsu T. Modified Ames test using a strain expressing human sulfotransferase 1C2 to assess the mutagenicity of methyleugenol.. Genes Environ 2016;38:1.
                                                    doi: 10.1186/s41021-016-0028-xpmc: PMC4918123pubmed: 27350821google scholar: lookup
                                                  54. Howes AJ, Chan VS, Caldwell J. Structure-specificity of the genotoxicity of some naturally occurring alkenylbenzenes determined by the unscheduled DNA synthesis assay in rat hepatocytes.. Food Chem Toxicol 1990 Aug;28(8):537-42.
                                                    doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(90)90152-dpubmed: 2242826google scholar: lookup
                                                  55. IARC. IARC Monographs 101. Methyleugenol. .
                                                  56. Kerckaert GA, Brauninger R, LeBoeuf RA, Isfort RJ. Use of the Syrian hamster embryo cell transformation assay for carcinogenicity prediction of chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program in rodent bioassays.. Environ Health Perspect 1996 Oct;104 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1075-84.
                                                    doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s51075pmc: PMC1469685pubmed: 8933057google scholar: lookup
                                                  57. Lautz LS, Jeddi MZ, Girolami F, Nebbia C, Dorne JLCM. Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of pharmaceuticals in cats (Felix sylvestris catus) and implications for the risk assessment of feed additives and contaminants.. Toxicol Lett 2021 Mar 1;338:114-127.
                                                    doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.11.014pubmed: 33253781google scholar: lookup
                                                  58. Miller EC, Swanson AB, Phillips DH, Fletcher TL, Liem A, Miller JA. Structure-activity studies of the carcinogenicities in the mouse and rat of some naturally occurring and synthetic alkenylbenzene derivatives related to safrole and estragole.. Cancer Res 1983 Mar;43(3):1124-34.
                                                    pubmed: 6825084
                                                  59. . NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Methyleugenol (CAS NO. 93-15-2) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Studies).. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser 2000 Jul;491:1-412.
                                                    pubmed: 12563349
                                                  60. Phillips DH, Reddy MV, Randerath K. 32P-post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. II. Newborn male B6C3F1 mice.. Carcinogenesis 1984 Dec;5(12):1623-8.
                                                    doi: 10.1093/carcin/5.12.1623pubmed: 6499113google scholar: lookup
                                                  61. Randerath K, Haglund RE, Phillips DH, Reddy MV. 32P-post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. I. Adult female CD-1 mice.. Carcinogenesis 1984 Dec;5(12):1613-22.
                                                    doi: 10.1093/carcin/5.12.1613pubmed: 6499112google scholar: lookup
                                                  62. Suparmi S, Ginting AJ, Mariyam S, Wesseling S, Rietjens IMCM. Levels of methyleugenol and eugenol in instant herbal beverages available on the Indonesian market and related risk assessment.. Food Chem Toxicol 2019 Mar;125:467-478.
                                                    doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.02.001pubmed: 30721739google scholar: lookup
                                                  63. Tisserand, Young. Essential oil safety. A Guide for Health Care Professionals. 2nd Edition. Chapter 13. Essential oil profiles. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam. 323–324 pp.
                                                    doi: 10.1016/C2009-0-52351-3google scholar: lookup
                                                  64. Türkez H, Toğar B. Aluminum phosphide-induced genetic and oxidative damages in rats: attenuation by Laurus nobilis leaf extract.. Toxicol Ind Health 2013 Aug;29(7):579-83.
                                                    doi: 10.1177/0748233711433942pubmed: 22294441google scholar: lookup
                                                  65. Turkez H, Geyikoglu F. The effect of laurel leaf extract against toxicity induced by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in cultured rat hepatocytes.. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2011 Dec;62(4):309-15.
                                                    doi: 10.2478/10004-1254-62-2011-2118pubmed: 22202464google scholar: lookup
                                                  66. . Abstracts from the FEBS EMBO 2014 Conference, 30 August-4 September, 2014, Paris, France.. FEBS J 2014 Sep;281 Suppl 1:1-784.
                                                    doi: 10.1111/febs.12914pubmed: 25160986google scholar: lookup
                                                  67. van den Berg SJ, Punt A, Soffers AE, Vervoort J, Ngeleja S, Spenkelink B, Rietjens IM. Physiologically based kinetic models for the alkenylbenzene elemicin in rat and human and possible implications for risk assessment.. Chem Res Toxicol 2012 Nov 19;25(11):2352-67.
                                                    doi: 10.1021/tx300239zpubmed: 22992039google scholar: lookup
                                                  68. . Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Forty-ninth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1999;884:i-viii, 1-96.
                                                    pubmed: 10079756
                                                  69. . Evaluation of certain food additives. Fifty-first report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000;891:i-viii, 1-168.
                                                    pubmed: 10876377
                                                  70. Zhou GD, Moorthy B, Bi J, Donnelly KC, Randerath K. DNA adducts from alkoxyallylbenzene herb and spice constituents in cultured human (HepG2) cells.. Environ Mol Mutagen 2007 Dec;48(9):715-21.
                                                    doi: 10.1002/em.20348pubmed: 17948277google scholar: lookup

                                                  Citations

                                                  This article has been cited 4 times.
                                                  1. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Schlatter J, Westendorf J, Dirven Y, Manini P, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from the fruit of Illicium verum Hook.f. (star anise oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).. EFSA J 2023 Jul;21(7):e08182.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8182pubmed: 37529619google scholar: lookup
                                                  2. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Schlatter J, Westendorf J, Dirven Y, Manini P, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of feed additives consisting of essential oils derived from the flower buds or the leaves of Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & L.M. Perry (clove bud oil and clove leaf oils) for all animal species (FEFANA asbl).. EFSA J 2023 Jul;21(7):e08183.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8183pubmed: 37522096google scholar: lookup
                                                  3. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Schlatter J, Westendorf J, Manini P, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil from the seeds of Myristica fragrans Houtt. (nutmeg oil) for all animal species (FEFANA asbl).. EFSA J 2023 Jun;21(6):e08066.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8066pubmed: 37333988google scholar: lookup
                                                  4. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of feed additives obtained from the fruit of Pimpinella anisum L.: anise oil for use in poultry and horses and anise tincture for use in poultry, dogs, cats and horses (FEFANA asbl).. EFSA J 2023 Apr;21(4):e07976.
                                                    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7976pubmed: 37089173google scholar: lookup
                                                  Subscribe to our newsletter
                                                  Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.