FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / EFSA J / Safety and efficacy of propyl gallate for all animal species...
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2020; 18(4); e06069; doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6069

Safety and efficacy of propyl gallate for all animal species.

Abstract: Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of propyl gallate as feed additive for all animal species. Propyl gallate is neither genotoxic nor carcinogenic. Propyl gallate a is safe for veal calves, cattle for fattening, dairy cows, sheep, goats, sows, horses and salmonids at the proposed maximum use level of 40 mg/kg and for ornamental fish at the proposed maximum use level of 100 mg/kg. The following concentrations (mg/kg complete feed) are considered safe for the other target species: 15 for chickens for fattening; 20 for turkeys for fattening, laying hens and rabbits; 27 for piglets and pigs for fattening and 71 for dogs. The Panel cannot conclude on a safe level for cats. The exposure of the consumer to propyl gallate and its metabolites cannot be estimated owing to the absence of reliable data on residues of propyl gallate and its metabolites in edible tissues and products. Therefore, the FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the safety for the consumer of propyl gallate, when used as a feed additive for all food-producing animal species. Propyl gallate is irritant to skin and eyes and a dermal sensitiser. Exposure via inhalation is possible and it is considered a hazard. The use of the additive in animal nutrition does not pose a risk for the environment. The FEEDAP Panel concludes that propyl gallate has the potential to act as an antioxidant in feedingstuffs. The Panel did not see a reason for the use of propyl gallate as an antioxidant in water for drinking.
© 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-04-30 PubMed ID: 32874281PubMed Central: PMC7447890DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6069Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article deals with the study of the safety and efficacy of using propyl gallate as a feed additive for various animal species, facilitated by the European Commission’s FEEDAP panel. While it was deemed safe for several species, the lack of reliable data on residual propyl gallate in edible tissues made it difficult to estimate consumer exposure and to consequently establish its safety for humans.

Introduction

  • The research was conducted at the request of the European Commission by the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), focusing on the safety and usefulness of propyl gallate as a feed additive for all kinds of animals.
  • The study explored the genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of propyl gallate, in addition to mapping its safe levels for different animal types.

Findings

  • The research determined that propyl gallate is neither genotoxic nor carcinogenic.
  • It is safe for consumption by various animals including veal calves, cattle for fattening, dairy cows, sheep, goats, sows, horses, salmonids, and ornamental fish.
  • Safe concentrations for other target species were also established, with different maximum use levels proposed for different animals.
  • However, the research was unable to conclude on a safe level of propyl gallate for cats due to lack of reliable data.

Impact on Humans and Environmental Concerns

  • Another crucial issue was the impact on human consumers due to residual propyl gallate and its metabolites in edible animal tissues and products. The absence of reliable data made it impossible to estimate consumer exposure, preventing the Panel from concluding its safety for human consumption.
  • Propyl gallate was found to cause irritation to skin and eyes and is considered a dermal sensitiser. Its possible inhalation might be hazardous.
  • On an environmental level, the research found that propyl gallate used in animal nutrition does not pose a risk to the environment.

Efficacy of Propyl Gallate

  • FEEDAP panel highlights the potential of propyl gallate as an antioxidant in animal feed.
  • The panel, however, did not see a compelling reason to employ propyl gallate as an antioxidant in drinking water for animals.

Cite This Article

APA
Bampidis V, Azimonti G, de Lourdes Bastos M, Christensen H, Dusemund B, Kos Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Aquilina G, Bories G, Gropp J, Nebbia C, Innocenti ML. (2020). Safety and efficacy of propyl gallate for all animal species. EFSA J, 18(4), e06069. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6069

Publication

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
NlmUniqueID: 101642076
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 18
Issue: 4
Pages: e06069
PII: e06069

Researcher Affiliations

Bampidis, Vasileios
    Azimonti, Giovanna
      de Lourdes Bastos, Maria
        Christensen, Henrik
          Dusemund, Birgit
            Kos Durjava, Mojca
              Kouba, Maryline
                López-Alonso, Marta
                  López Puente, Secundino
                    Marcon, Francesca
                      Mayo, Baltasar
                        Pechová, Alena
                          Petkova, Mariana
                            Ramos, Fernando
                              Sanz, Yolanda
                                Villa, Roberto Edoardo
                                  Woutersen, Ruud
                                    Aquilina, Gabriele
                                      Bories, Georges
                                        Gropp, Jürgen
                                          Nebbia, Carlo
                                            Innocenti, Matteo Lorenzo

                                              References

                                              This article includes 40 references
                                              1. Abdo KM, Huff JE, Haseman JK, Dieter MP, Boorman GA, Hildebrandt P, Prejean JD, Farnell DR. Carcinogenesis bioassay of propyl gallate in F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Journal of the American College of Toxicology 1983;2:425–433.
                                              2. Amadasi A, Mozzarelli A, Meda C, Maggi A, Cozzini P. Identification of xenoestrogens in food additives by an integrated in silico and in vitro approach.. Chem Res Toxicol 2009 Jan;22(1):52-63.
                                                pmc: PMC2758355pubmed: 19063592doi: 10.1021/tx800048mgoogle scholar: lookup
                                              3. . Final report on the amended safety assessment of Propyl Gallate.. Int J Toxicol 2007;26 Suppl 3:89-118.
                                                pubmed: 18080874doi: 10.1080/10915810701663176google scholar: lookup
                                              4. Court MH. Feline drug metabolism and disposition: pharmacokinetic evidence for species differences and molecular mechanisms.. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2013 Sep;43(5):1039-54.
                                                pmc: PMC3811070pubmed: 23890237doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2013.05.002google scholar: lookup
                                              5. Dacre JC. Long-term toxicity study of n-propyl gallate in mice.. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1974 Feb;12(1):125-9.
                                                pubmed: 4459224doi: 10.1016/0015-6264(74)90328-9google scholar: lookup
                                              6. Bibra WG. Propyl gallate. Toxicity profile 1989a.
                                              7. Bibra WG. Octyl gallate. Toxicity profile 1989b.
                                              8. Bibra WG. Dodecyl gallate. Toxicity profile 1989c.
                                              9. EFSA ANS Panel. Scientific opinion on the re‐evaluation of propyl gallate (E 310) as a food additive. EFSA Journal 2014;12(4):3642.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3642google scholar: lookup
                                              10. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for technological additives. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2528.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2528google scholar: lookup
                                              11. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2539.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2539google scholar: lookup
                                              12. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05021.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5021pmc: PMC7009839pubmed: 32625311google scholar: lookup
                                              13. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Dujardin B, Galobart J, Innocenti ML. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05022.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5022pmc: PMC7009902pubmed: 32625312google scholar: lookup
                                              14. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives.. EFSA J 2018 May;16(5):e05274.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5274pmc: PMC7009555pubmed: 32625911google scholar: lookup
                                              15. Bampidis V, Bastos M, Christensen H, Dusemund B, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brock T, de Knecht J, Kolar B, van Beelen P, Padovani L, Tarrés-Call J, Vettori MV, Azimonti G. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the environment.. EFSA J 2019 Apr;17(4):e05648.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5648pmc: PMC7009194pubmed: 32626279google scholar: lookup
                                              16. Grzesik M, Bartosz G, Stefaniuk I, Pichla M, Namieśnik J, Sadowska-Bartosz I. Dietary antioxidants as a source of hydrogen peroxide.. Food Chem 2019 Apr 25;278:692-699.
                                                pubmed: 30583431doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.109google scholar: lookup
                                              17. Fossi MC, Lari L, Casini S. Interspecies variation of "B" esterases in birds: the influence of size and feeding habits.. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1996 Nov;31(4):525-32.
                                                pubmed: 8975825doi: 10.1007/bf00212436google scholar: lookup
                                              18. Fujita H, Nakano M, Sasaki M. Mutagenicity test for food additives using Salmonella typhimurium TA97 and TA102. Annual Report of Tokyo Metropolitan Research Laboratory of Public Health 1988;39:343–350.
                                              19. Ishidate M Jr, Hayashi M, Sawada M, Matsuoka A, Yoshikawa K, Ono M, Nakadate M. [Cytotoxicity test on medical drugs--chromosome aberration tests with Chinese hamster cells in vitro (author's transl)].. Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku 1978;(96):55-61.
                                                pubmed: 750044
                                              20. . Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Forty-first report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1993;837:1-53.
                                                pubmed: 8266711
                                              21. JECFA. Gallates (Propyl‐, Octyl‐ and dodecyl‐). Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. WHO Food Additives Series 1997;46th Report.
                                              22. JECFA. Propyl Gallate. Combined Compendium of Food Additive specifications 2006.
                                              23. Kawachi T, Komatsu T, Kada T, Ishidate M, Sasaki M, Sugiyama T, Tazima Y. Results of recent studies on the relevance of various short‐term screening tests in japan, in: the predictive value of short‐term screening tests in carcinogenicity evaluation. Applied Methods Oncology 1980;3:253–267.
                                              24. LEHMAN AJ, FITZHUGH OG, NELSON AA, WOODARD G. The pharmacological evaluation of antioxidants.. Adv Food Res 1951;3:197-208.
                                                pubmed: 24540849doi: 10.1016/s0065-2628(08)60261-xgoogle scholar: lookup
                                              25. Li SN, Fan DF. Activity of esterases from different tissues of freshwater fish and responses of their isoenzymes to inhibitors.. J Toxicol Environ Health 1997 Jun 6;51(2):149-57.
                                                pubmed: 9176555doi: 10.1080/00984109708984018google scholar: lookup
                                              26. McGregor DB, Brown A, Cattanach P, Edwards I, McBride D, Riach C, Caspary WJ. Responses of the L5178Y tk+/tk- mouse lymphoma cell forward mutation assay: III. 72 coded chemicals.. Environ Mol Mutagen 1988;12(1):85-154.
                                                pubmed: 3383842doi: 10.1002/em.2860120111google scholar: lookup
                                              27. Nahar S, Rashid M. Tissue specific esterase isozyme variation in ocellated Pufferfish. Tetraodon cutcutia. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2013;1:38–42.
                                              28. Orten JM, Kuyper AC, Smith AH. Studies on the toxicity of propyl gallate and of antioxidant mixtures containing propyl gallate. Food Technology 1948;2:308–316.
                                              29. Pop A, Berce C, Bolfa P, Nagy A, Catoi C, Dumitrescu IB, Silaghi‐Dumitrescu L, Loghin F. Evaluation of the possible endocrine disruptive effect of butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene and propyl gallate in immature female rats. Farmacia 2013;61:202–211.
                                              30. Pop A, Drugan T, Gutleb AC, Lupu D, Cherfan J, Loghin F, Kiss B. Estrogenic and anti-estrogenic activity of butylparaben, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene and propyl gallate and their binary mixtures on two estrogen responsive cell lines (T47D-Kbluc, MCF-7).. J Appl Toxicol 2018 Jul;38(7):944-957.
                                                pubmed: 29460325doi: 10.1002/jat.3601google scholar: lookup
                                              31. Salamastrakis SS, Haritos AA. Physicochemical characterization and tissue distribution of multiple molecular forms of fish (Trachurus trachurus) esterases.. Comp Biochem Physiol B 1988;91(4):741-50.
                                                pubmed: 3224511doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(88)90202-7google scholar: lookup
                                              32. Sasaki M, Sugimura K, Yoshida MA, Abe S. Cytogenic effects of 60 chemicals on cultured human and chinese hamster cells. Senshokutai 1980;20:574–584.
                                              33. SCF. Gallates ‐ Propyl‐, octyl‐, dodecyl‐. Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food (Twenty‐second series). 1989.
                                              34. Shelby MD, Erexson GL, Hook GJ, Tice RR. Evaluation of a three-exposure mouse bone marrow micronucleus protocol: results with 49 chemicals.. Environ Mol Mutagen 1993;21(2):160-79.
                                                pubmed: 8444144doi: 10.1002/em.2850210210google scholar: lookup
                                              35. Speijers GJA, Janssen GB, Wallbrink‐de Drieu Y, van Leeuwen FXR, van Loenen HA, KrajncFranken MAM, Vaessen HAMG, Wester PW. Subchronic toxicity of propyl‐gallate. RIVM Report No. 618311002 (Draft) Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieuhygiëne 1993.
                                              36. Tayama S, Nakagawa Y. Cytogenetic effects of propyl gallate in CHO-K1 cells.. Mutat Res 2001 Nov 15;498(1-2):117-27.
                                                pubmed: 11673077doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00272-8google scholar: lookup
                                              37. ter Veld MG, Schouten B, Louisse J, van Es DS, van der Saag PT, Rietjens IM, Murk AJ. Estrogenic potency of food-packaging-associated plasticizers and antioxidants as detected in ERalpha and ERbeta reporter gene cell lines.. J Agric Food Chem 2006 Jun 14;54(12):4407-16.
                                                pubmed: 16756374doi: 10.1021/jf052864fgoogle scholar: lookup
                                              38. van der Heijden CA, Janssen PJ, Strik JJ. Toxicology of gallates: a review and evaluation.. Food Chem Toxicol 1986 Oct-Nov;24(10-11):1067-70.
                                                pubmed: 3542759doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(86)90290-5google scholar: lookup
                                              39. Vimala V, Rajaiah V. Tissue esterase polymorphism of Cyprinus carpio and Puntius sarana of cypriniformes order. International Journal of Current Microbiology Applied Science 2014;3:851–858.
                                              40. Walker CH, Mackness MI. "A" esterases and their role in regulating the toxicity of organophosphates.. Arch Toxicol 1987;60(1-3):30-3.
                                                pubmed: 3304214doi: 10.1007/bf00296942google scholar: lookup

                                              Citations

                                              This article has been cited 5 times.
                                              1. Othón-Díaz ED, Fimbres-García JO, Flores-Sa컚 M, Silva-Espinoza BA, López-Martínez LX, Bernal-Mercado AT, Ayala-Zavala JF. Antioxidants in Oak (Quercus sp.): Potential Application to Reduce Oxidative Rancidity in Foods. Antioxidants (Basel) 2023 Apr 2;12(4).
                                                doi: 10.3390/antiox12040861pubmed: 37107236google scholar: lookup
                                              2. Abbas MA, Lee EB, Boby N, Biruhanu BT, Park SC. A pharmacodynamic investigation to assess the synergism of orbifloxacin and propyl gallate against Escherichia coli. Front Pharmacol 2022;13:989395.
                                                doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.989395pubmed: 36188537google scholar: lookup
                                              3. Gulcin İ. Antioxidants: a comprehensive review. Arch Toxicol 2025 May;99(5):1893-1997.
                                                doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-03997-2pubmed: 40232392google scholar: lookup
                                              4. Esazadeh K, Ezzati Nazhad Dolatabadi J, Andishmand H, Mohammadzadeh-Aghdash H, Mahmoudpour M, Naemi Kermanshahi M, Roosta Y. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of tert-butylhydroquinone, butylated hydroxyanisole and propyl gallate as synthetic food antioxidants. Food Sci Nutr 2024 Oct;12(10):7004-7016.
                                                doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4373pubmed: 39479655google scholar: lookup
                                              5. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Durjava M, Dusemund B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Galobart J, Innocenti M, Bories G, Gropp J. Safety of a feed additive consisting of propyl gallate for all animal species (FEFANA ABL). EFSA J 2024 Feb;22(2):e8638.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8638pubmed: 38425417google scholar: lookup
                                              Subscribe to our newsletter
                                              Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.