Analyze Diet
Journal of food protection2002; 65(9); 1381-1387; doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.9.1381

Selection of recently isolated colicinogenic Escherichia coli strains inhibitory to Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Abstract: Escherichia coli strains were screened for their ability to inhibit E. coli O157:H7. An initial evaluation of 18 strains carrying previously characterized colicins determined that only colicin E7 inhibited all of the E. coli O157:H7 strains tested. A total of 540 strains that had recently been isolated from humans and nine different animal species (cats, cattle, chickens, deer, dogs, ducks, horses, pigs, and sheep) were tested by a flip-plating technique. Approximately 38% of these strains were found to inhibit noncolicinogenic E. coli K12 strains. The percentage of potentially colicinogenic E. coli per animal species ranged from 14% for horse isolates to 64% for sheep strains. Those isolates that inhibited E. coli K12 were screened against E. coli O157:H7, and 42 strains were found to be capable of inhibiting all 22 pathogenic strains tested. None of these 42 strains produced bacteriophages, and only 24 isolates inhibited serotype O157:H7 in liquid culture. The inhibitory activity of these strains was completely eliminated by treatment with proteinase K. When mixtures of these 24 colicinogenic strains were grown in anaerobic continuous culture, the four-strain E. coli O157:H7 population was reduced at a rate of 0.25 log10 cells per ml per h, which was fivefold faster than the washout rate. Two strains originally isolated from cat feces (F16) and human feces (H30) were identified by repetitive sequences polymerase chain reaction as the predominant isolates in continuous cultures. The results of this work indicate that animal species other than cattle can be sources of anti-O157 colicinogenic strains, and these results also lead to the identification of at least two isolates that could potentially be used in preharvest control strategies.
Publication Date: 2002-09-18 PubMed ID: 12233846DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.9.1381Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research aims to identify Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains capable of inhibiting the growth of the harmful E. coli O157:H7 strain. It emphasizes the role of colicinogenic strains in targeting the harmful strain and concluded that animals other than cattle can possess anti-O157 colicinogenic strains, identifying two isolates for potential use in preharvest control strategies.

Methods and Materials

  • The study began with screening 18 E. coli strains carrying previously characterized colicins for their ability to inhibit E. coli O157:H7. The researchers determined that only colicin E7 inhibited all tested E. coli O157:H7 strains.
  • The researchers then tested a larger pool of 540 E. coli strains, recently isolated from humans and several animal species using a flip-plating technique. This technique involves inverting a plate to allow for counting colonies and detection of species able to inhibit the growth of the target species.

Results

  • Outcomes from the large-scale testing revealed that approximately 38% of these strains could inhibit E. coli K12 strains which are noncolicinogenic. Variation existed between the different hosts, with horse isolates exhibiting only 14% potential colicinogenicity while sheep strains exhibited a much higher rate at 64%.
  • These restrictive strains were further tested against E. coli O157:H7, with 42 successfully inhibiting all 22 pathogenic strains tested. Out of these 42 strains, 24 demonstrated inhibitory activity in liquid culture, which was eliminated entirely by treatment with proteinase K, indicating the protein-based nature of the inhibitory mechanism.
  • The researchers explored the impact of colicinogenic strains on the O157:H7 population rate, combining these strains in anaerobic continuous culture. The resultant population decrease of O157:H7 was far quicker than the washout rate, reflecting the potential application for control strategies using these strains.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Two isolates, F16 and H30, originally sourced from cat and human feces respectively, were identified as the principal isolates in continuous cultures via repetitive sequences polymerase chain reaction method.
  • The study concludes that animal species other than cattle can serve as sources of anti-O157 colicinogenic strains. It also highlights the potential of at least two identified isolates that could be used strategically in preharvest control to contain the spread of harmful E. coli O157:H7.

Cite This Article

APA
Schamberger GP, Diez-Gonzalez F. (2002). Selection of recently isolated colicinogenic Escherichia coli strains inhibitory to Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Food Prot, 65(9), 1381-1387. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-65.9.1381

Publication

ISSN: 0362-028X
NlmUniqueID: 7703944
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 65
Issue: 9
Pages: 1381-1387

Researcher Affiliations

Schamberger, Gerry P
  • Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108, USA.
Diez-Gonzalez, Francisco

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Animals, Domestic
    • Colicins / biosynthesis
    • Colony Count, Microbial
    • Disease Reservoirs
    • Endopeptidase K / metabolism
    • Escherichia coli / metabolism
    • Escherichia coli / physiology
    • Escherichia coli O157 / growth & development
    • Food Microbiology
    • Humans
    • Oxygen
    • Species Specificity
    • Time Factors

    Citations

    This article has been cited 21 times.
    1. Kayongo A, Robertson NM, Siddharthan T, Ntayi ML, Ndawula JC, Sande OJ, Bagaya BS, Kirenga B, Mayanja-Kizza H, Joloba ML, Forslund SK. Airway microbiome-immune crosstalk in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Front Immunol 2022;13:1085551.
      doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1085551pubmed: 36741369google scholar: lookup
    2. Khan I, Bai Y, Zha L, Ullah N, Ullah H, Shah SRH, Sun H, Zhang C. Mechanism of the Gut Microbiota Colonization Resistance and Enteric Pathogen Infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021;11:716299.
      doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.716299pubmed: 35004340google scholar: lookup
    3. Nawrocki EM, Mosso HM, Dudley EG. A Toxic Environment: a Growing Understanding of How Microbial Communities Affect Escherichia coli O157:H7 Shiga Toxin Expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020 Nov 24;86(24).
      doi: 10.1128/AEM.00509-20pubmed: 32358004google scholar: lookup
    4. Baumgartner M, Bayer F, Pfrunder-Cardozo KR, Buckling A, Hall AR. Resident microbial communities inhibit growth and antibiotic-resistance evolution of Escherichia coli in human gut microbiome samples. PLoS Biol 2020 Apr;18(4):e3000465.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000465pubmed: 32310938google scholar: lookup
    5. Chiu L, Bazin T, Truchetet ME, Schaeverbeke T, Delhaes L, Pradeu T. Protective Microbiota: From Localized to Long-Reaching Co-Immunity. Front Immunol 2017;8:1678.
      doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01678pubmed: 29270167google scholar: lookup
    6. Lucas C, Barnich N, Nguyen HTT. Microbiota, Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2017 Jun 20;18(6).
      doi: 10.3390/ijms18061310pubmed: 28632155google scholar: lookup
    7. Rolhion N, Chassaing B. When pathogenic bacteria meet the intestinal microbiota. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2016 Nov 5;371(1707).
      doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0504pubmed: 27672153google scholar: lookup
    8. Callaway TR, Sheridan TG. Smarter arrow now available in the food safety quiver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12230-1.
      doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516670112pubmed: 26401021google scholar: lookup
    9. Bennet SM, Ohman L, Simren M. Gut microbiota as potential orchestrators of irritable bowel syndrome. Gut Liver 2015 May 23;9(3):318-31.
      doi: 10.5009/gnl14344pubmed: 25918261google scholar: lookup
    10. Kaiko GE, Stappenbeck TS. Host-microbe interactions shaping the gastrointestinal environment. Trends Immunol 2014 Nov;35(11):538-48.
      doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.08.002pubmed: 25220948google scholar: lookup
    11. Abdel-Azeim S, Chermak E, Vangone A, Oliva R, Cavallo L. MDcons: Intermolecular contact maps as a tool to analyze the interface of protein complexes from molecular dynamics trajectories. BMC Bioinformatics 2014;15 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S1.
      doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-S5-S1pubmed: 25077693google scholar: lookup
    12. Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 2014 Mar 27;157(1):121-41.
      doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011pubmed: 24679531google scholar: lookup
    13. Kamada N, Chen GY, Inohara N, Núñez G. Control of pathogens and pathobionts by the gut microbiota. Nat Immunol 2013 Jul;14(7):685-90.
      doi: 10.1038/ni.2608pubmed: 23778796google scholar: lookup
    14. Budič M, Rijavec M, Petkovšek Z, Zgur-Bertok D. Escherichia coli bacteriocins: antimicrobial efficacy and prevalence among isolates from patients with bacteraemia. PLoS One 2011;6(12):e28769.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028769pubmed: 22205967google scholar: lookup
    15. Toshima H, Yoshimura A, Arikawa K, Hidaka A, Ogasawara J, Hase A, Masaki H, Nishikawa Y. Enhancement of Shiga toxin production in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 by DNase colicins. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007 Dec;73(23):7582-8.
      doi: 10.1128/AEM.01326-07pubmed: 17933918google scholar: lookup
    16. Cutler SA, Lonergan SM, Cornick N, Johnson AK, Stahl CH. Dietary inclusion of colicin e1 is effective in preventing postweaning diarrhea caused by F18-positive Escherichia coli in pigs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007 Nov;51(11):3830-5.
      doi: 10.1128/AAC.00360-07pubmed: 17724148google scholar: lookup
    17. Rijavec M, Budic M, Mrak P, Müller-Premru M, Podlesek Z, Zgur-Bertok D. Prevalence of ColE1-like plasmids and colicin K production among uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains and quantification of inhibitory activity of colicin K. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007 Feb;73(3):1029-32.
      doi: 10.1128/AEM.01780-06pubmed: 17122402google scholar: lookup
    18. Toshima H, Hachio M, Ikemoto Y, Ogasawara J, Hase A, Takahashi K, Masaki H, Nishikawa Y. Prevalence of enteric bacteria that inhibit growth of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 in humans. Epidemiol Infect 2007 Jan;135(1):110-7.
      doi: 10.1017/S0950268806006510pubmed: 16740195google scholar: lookup
    19. Schamberger GP, Phillips RL, Jacobs JL, Diez-Gonzalez F. Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 populations in cattle by addition of colicin E7-producing E. coli to feed. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004 Oct;70(10):6053-60.
    20. Stahl CH, Callaway TR, Lincoln LM, Lonergan SM, Genovese KJ. Inhibitory activities of colicins against Escherichia coli strains responsible for postweaning diarrhea and edema disease in swine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004 Aug;48(8):3119-21.
    21. Boucher L, Leduc L, Leclère M, Costa MC. Current Understanding of Equine Gut Dysbiosis and Microbiota Manipulation Techniques: Comparison with Current Knowledge in Other Species. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 28;14(5).
      doi: 10.3390/ani14050758pubmed: 38473143google scholar: lookup