Analyze Diet
The British journal of nutrition2008; 100(3); 561-568; doi: 10.1017/S0007114508968227

Semi-quantitative analysis of Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Streptococcus bovis in the equine large intestine using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Abstract: There is a need to further our understanding of the role that the equine hindgut ecosystem plays in digestive processes and diseases. The aim of the present study was to utilise the real-time PCR technique to determine the abundance of candidate cellulolytic (Ruminococcus flavefaciens; Fibrobacter succinogenes) and non-cellulolytic (Streptococcus bovis) bacteria in lumen contents from the caecum, ventral and dorsal colon, and rectum of healthy horses (n 14). Total DNA was extracted from frozen and lyophilised lumen contents, and PCR primers and Taqman probes were designed based on 16S rDNA sequences for specific detection of candidate bacterial species. Overall, in frozen and lyophilised digesta, there were significantly (P F. succinogenes > S. bovis (P < 0.05), while in lyophilised digesta R. flavefaciens was present in significantly (P < 0.05) greater amounts than F. succinogenes and S. bovis. R. flavefaciens and F. succinogenes were abundant at significantly (P < 0.05) greater levels in lyophilised digesta v. frozen digesta, with no difference in S. bovis levels. These data indicate that for these bacteria at least, faeces are a suitable model for studying the bacterial ecosystem within the equine colon. The present study also indicates that the preservation method of digesta affects levels of bacteria detected.
Publication Date: 2008-04-01 PubMed ID: 18377691DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508968227Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper studies the presence and distribution of certain bacteria within the large intestine of horses, to further understand digestive processes and diseases among these creatures. The technique used is real-time PCR and the studied bacteria include Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Streptococcus bovis.

Approach Used:

  • The aim here is to determine the abundance of these bacteria in different parts of the horse’s large intestine – caecum, ventral and dorsal colon, as well as the rectum.
  • This study was performed on healthy horses, 14 in number. Total DNA was extracted from the contents of these parts of the intestine, which was frozen and lyophilised (freeze-dried) prior to the procedure.
  • The primers and Taqman probes for PCR were developed based on the 16S rDNA sequences of the bacteria under study. These tools allow for the specific detection of each type.

Results:

  • In both frozen and lyophilised digesta there was a higher presence of Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Fibrobacter succinogenes compared to Streptococcus bovis. Notably, R. flavefaciens was found in even larger proportions than F. succinogenes.
  • A significant finding is that there were greater levels of R. flavefaciens and F. succinogenes in lyophilised digesta compared to the frozen variety. The abundance of S. bovis did not show a difference between these two types of preparation.

Implications:

  • These results suggest that studying faeces can be an effective approach to learning about the bacterial ecosystem within the equine colon, at least for these three kinds of bacteria.
  • The study also indicates that the method of preserving the digesta plays a role in the levels of bacteria detected.

Cite This Article

APA
Hastie PM, Mitchell K, Murray JA. (2008). Semi-quantitative analysis of Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Streptococcus bovis in the equine large intestine using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Br J Nutr, 100(3), 561-568. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114508968227

Publication

ISSN: 1475-2662
NlmUniqueID: 0372547
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 100
Issue: 3
Pages: 561-568

Researcher Affiliations

Hastie, Peter M
  • Division of Veterinary Cell Sciences, Institute of Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden Road, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK. P.Hastie@vet.gla.ac.uk
Mitchell, Katherine
    Murray, Jo-Anne M D

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Cecum / microbiology
      • Colon / microbiology
      • Feces / microbiology
      • Fibrobacter / genetics
      • Horses / microbiology
      • Intestine, Large / microbiology
      • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / analysis
      • Rectum / microbiology
      • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
      • Ruminococcus / genetics
      • Streptococcus bovis / genetics

      Citations

      This article has been cited 15 times.
      1. Wunderlich G, Bull M, Ross T, Rose M, Chapman B. Understanding the microbial fibre degrading communities & processes in the equine gut. Anim Microbiome 2023 Jan 12;5(1):3.
        doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00224-6pubmed: 36635784google scholar: lookup
      2. Perricone V, Sandrini S, Irshad N, Comi M, Lecchi C, Savoini G, Agazzi A. The Role of Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Supporting Gut Health in Horses: An Updated Review on Its Effects on Digestibility and Intestinal and Fecal Microbiota. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 9;12(24).
        doi: 10.3390/ani12243475pubmed: 36552396google scholar: lookup
      3. Liu H, Han X, Zhao N, Hu L, Wang X, Luo C, Chen Y, Zhao X, Xu S. The Gut Microbiota Determines the High-Altitude Adaptability of Tibetan Wild Asses (Equus kiang) in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Front Microbiol 2022;13:949002.
        doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.949002pubmed: 35923394google scholar: lookup
      4. Froidurot A, Julliand V. Cellulolytic bacteria in the large intestine of mammals. Gut Microbes 2022 Jan-Dec;14(1):2031694.
        doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2031694pubmed: 35184689google scholar: lookup
      5. Muhonen S, Sadet-Bourgeteau S, Julliand V. Effects of Differences in Fibre Composition and Maturity of Forage-Based Diets on the Microbial Ecosystem and Its Activity in Equine Caecum and Colon Digesta and Faeces. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 8;11(8).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11082337pubmed: 34438794google scholar: lookup
      6. Kujawa TJ, van Doorn DA, Wambacq WA, Hesta M, Pellikaan WF. Evaluation of equine rectal inoculum as representative of the microbial activities within the horse hindgut using a fully automated in vitro gas production technique system. J Anim Sci 2020 Mar 1;98(3).
        doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa050pubmed: 32076715google scholar: lookup
      7. Salem SE, Maddox TW, Antczak P, Ketley JM, Williams NJ, Archer DC. Acute changes in the colonic microbiota are associated with large intestinal forms of surgical colic. BMC Vet Res 2019 Dec 21;15(1):468.
        doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2205-1pubmed: 31864369google scholar: lookup
      8. Lindenberg F, Krych L, Fielden J, Kot W, Frøkiær H, van Galen G, Nielsen DS, Hansen AK. Expression of immune regulatory genes correlate with the abundance of specific Clostridiales and Verrucomicrobia species in the equine ileum and cecum. Sci Rep 2019 Sep 3;9(1):12674.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49081-5pubmed: 31481726google scholar: lookup
      9. Bland SD, Venable EB, McPherson JL, Atkinson RL. Effects of liposomal-curcumin on five opportunistic bacterial strains found in the equine hindgut - preliminary study. J Anim Sci Technol 2017;59:15.
        doi: 10.1186/s40781-017-0138-4pubmed: 28638626google scholar: lookup
      10. Fernandes KA, Kittelmann S, Rogers CW, Gee EK, Bolwell CF, Bermingham EN, Thomas DG. Faecal microbiota of forage-fed horses in New Zealand and the population dynamics of microbial communities following dietary change. PLoS One 2014;9(11):e112846.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112846pubmed: 25383707google scholar: lookup
      11. Shepherd ML, Ponder MA, Burk AO, Milton SC, Swecker WS Jr. Fibre digestibility, abundance of faecal bacteria and plasma acetate concentrations in overweight adult mares. J Nutr Sci 2014;3:e10.
        doi: 10.1017/jns.2014.8pubmed: 25191602google scholar: lookup
      12. Lwin KO, Matsui H. Comparative analysis of the methanogen diversity in horse and pony by using mcrA gene and archaeal 16s rRNA gene clone libraries. Archaea 2014;2014:483574.
        doi: 10.1155/2014/483574pubmed: 24678264google scholar: lookup
      13. Schoster A, Arroyo LG, Staempfli HR, Weese JS. Comparison of microbial populations in the small intestine, large intestine and feces of healthy horses using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. BMC Res Notes 2013 Mar 12;6:91.
        doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-91pubmed: 23497580google scholar: lookup
      14. Froidurot A, Jacotot E, Julliand S, Grimm P, Julliand V. Fibrobacter sp. HC4, a newly isolated strain, demonstrates a high cellulolytic activity as revealed by enzymatic measurements and in vitro assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 2024 Aug 21;90(8):e0051424.
        doi: 10.1128/aem.00514-24pubmed: 39082812google scholar: lookup
      15. Liu H, Zhao X, Xu S, Zhao L, Han X, Xu X, Zhao N, Hu L, Luo C, Wang X, Zhang Q, Guo T. Multi-omics reveal the gut microbiota-mediated severe foraging environment adaption of small wild ruminants in the Three-River-Source National Park, China. Integr Zool 2025 Sep;20(5):916-935.
        doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12830pubmed: 38695096google scholar: lookup