Analyze Diet
Research in veterinary science2026; 212; 106416; doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106416

Seroprevalence and associated epidemiological drivers of glanders in horses: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2002-2026).

Abstract: Glanders (malleus), a highly contagious zoonotic disease caused by Burkholderia mallei, remains an important transboundary disease of equids despite extensive control efforts in many countries. However, its epidemiological patterns and associated drivers have not been comprehensively synthesized. This study aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of glanders in horses and identify key epidemiological drivers based on studies published up to April 27, 2026. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for prevalence studies. Random-effects meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and publication bias assessments were performed using RStudio version 4.4.3. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled seroprevalence of glanders in horses was estimated at 3.02% (95% CI: 0.82-6.36). Glanders was reported predominantly in South Asia and South America, with the highest prevalence estimates observed in French Guiana and Iraq. ELISA was the most frequently employed diagnostic method. Higher prevalence estimates were observed during the rainy season and in animals with poor body condition. Meta-regression analysis revealed a temporally increasing trend in glanders seroprevalence in horses. Strengthened surveillance, harmonised diagnostics, and targeted control strategies are essential to reduce the disease burden and mitigate further re-emergence.
Publication Date: 2026-09-21 PubMed ID: 42772043DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106416Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research article systematically reviews and analyzes the prevalence of glanders, a contagious disease in horses, by examining studies conducted between 2002 and 2026.
  • It also identifies epidemiological factors influencing the disease’s spread and highlights the need for improved surveillance and control strategies.

Background and Objective

  • Glanders, caused by the bacterium Burkholderia mallei, is a zoonotic disease primarily affecting equids (horses, mules, donkeys).
  • The disease is highly contagious and remains a transboundary issue despite extensive control efforts worldwide.
  • There has been no comprehensive synthesis of the epidemiological patterns or factors driving glanders in horses.
  • The research aims to estimate the overall seroprevalence (proportion of horses with antibodies indicating infection) and identify key epidemiological drivers based on published studies up to April 2026.

Methodology

  • The study follows PRISMA 2020 guidelines for systematic reviews to ensure rigor and transparency.
  • Databases searched include PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, and Google Scholar.
  • Inclusion criteria required studies to report on glanders seroprevalence in horses.
  • Quality assessment of studies was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for prevalence studies, which evaluates risk of bias and study robustness.
  • Statistical analyses involved:
    • Random-effects meta-analyses to pool seroprevalence estimates accounting for study variation.
    • Subgroup analyses to evaluate prevalence differences across regions, seasons, and animal condition.
    • Meta-regression to explore temporal trends and other influencing factors.
    • Publication bias assessments to determine if the results might be skewed by selective reporting.
  • These analyses were performed using RStudio software version 4.4.3.

Key Findings

  • Twenty studies satisfied inclusion criteria for the review and meta-analysis.
  • The pooled global seroprevalence of glanders in horses was estimated at approximately 3.02%, with a confidence interval ranging from 0.82% to 6.36%, indicating variability and uncertainty.
  • Geographical distribution showed glanders was mainly reported in South Asia and South America.
  • The highest prevalence rates were observed in specific locations such as French Guiana and Iraq.
  • ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) was the most commonly used diagnostic method across studies, reflecting its importance in detecting glanders antibodies.
  • Environmental and animal-specific factors influenced prevalence:
    • Higher seroprevalence was noted during the rainy season, possibly due to environmental conditions favoring the bacteria’s survival or transmission.
    • Animals with poor body condition showed higher infection rates, suggesting that weaker or immunocompromised horses might be more susceptible.
  • Meta-regression showed an increasing temporal trend in glanders seroprevalence, indicating that the disease may be re-emerging or spreading over time despite control efforts.

Implications and Recommendations

  • These findings highlight the ongoing public and animal health threat posed by glanders, particularly in endemic regions.
  • The study suggests that current surveillance and control measures need strengthening to effectively monitor and reduce the disease burden.
  • Standardizing diagnostic approaches, such as wider use of ELISA with validated protocols, could improve detection accuracy and comparability across regions.
  • Targeted control strategies taking into account seasonal and animal health factors could aid in reducing transmission.
  • The study underscores the importance of coordinated international efforts to prevent further resurgence and to protect equids as well as humans at risk from this zoonotic pathogen.

Cite This Article

APA
Purnama MTE, Firdausy LW, Fikri F, Wicaksono AP, Maslamama ST. (2026). Seroprevalence and associated epidemiological drivers of glanders in horses: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2002-2026). Res Vet Sci, 212, 106416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106416

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2661
NlmUniqueID: 0401300
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 212
Pages: 106416
PII: S0034-5288(26)00370-X

Researcher Affiliations

Purnama, Muhammad Thohawi Elziyad
  • Division of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Health and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia; Research Group of Animal Biomedical and Conservation, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia; Division of Zoology, Department of Biology, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Türkiye. Electronic address: thohawi@fkh.unair.ac.id.
Firdausy, Lintang Winantya
  • Division of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Health and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia; Research Group of Animal Biomedical and Conservation, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Fikri, Faisal
  • Division of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Health and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia; Research Group of Animal Biomedical and Conservation, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Wicaksono, Arya Pradana
  • Animal Health Division, Indonesian Horse Veterinarian Association, Indonesia.
Maslamama, Salipudin Tasil
  • Agricultural Biotechnology Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Türkiye.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.