FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Short-Term Impact of Dry Needling Treatment for Myofascial P...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(11); doi: 10.3390/ani15111517

Short-Term Impact of Dry Needling Treatment for Myofascial Pain on Equine Biomechanics Through Artificial Intelligence-Based Gait Analysis.

Abstract: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common source of musculoskeletal pain, characterized by trigger points (TrPs). In horses, MPS is frequently underdiagnosed, and evidence on DN effectiveness is limited. This study investigated whether DN can improve the biomechanics in horses using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based markerless smartphone application (app). Fourteen horses participated, including nine used in assisted therapy, four leisure horses, and one with mixed use. The presence of TrPs was evaluated in six muscles through manual palpation: brachiocephalicus, trapezius, gluteus medius, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and quadriceps femoris. The horses were divided into a treatment group (TG) (n = 7) and control group (CG) (n = 7). Biomechanical data were recorded in a straight line at a trot before the treatment (T0), immediately after the treatment (T1), and 72 h post-treatment (T72). The stride frequency (SF) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) at 72 h compared with both before and immediately after the treatment. The SF of the TG at 72 h was significantly lower than the SF of the CG at T1 (p < 0.05). Non-significant differences were observed for both the asymmetry push-off and impact phase variables, except for the forelimb head range of motion (FHROM) severity, which was significantly (p < 0.05) greater in the CG than in the TG. This study suggests that DN may enhance the gait quality in horses with MPS.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-05-22 PubMed ID: 40508982PubMed Central: PMC12153734DOI: 10.3390/ani15111517Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the impact of Dry Needling (DN) on horses suffering from musculoskeletal pain, using an AI-based application to perform gait analysis and monitor changes post-treatment. The study finds that there are potential benefits of DN on horses’ gait quality and biomechanics.

Introduction

The research focuses on horses suffering from Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), a common musculoskeletal disorder characterized by trigger points (TrPs). The applicability of Dry Needling (DN), a common physiotherapy technic, in horses is understudied and not fully understood. This study aims to rectify this gap and provide valuable evidence on the effectiveness of DN in improving the biomechanics of afflicted horses. In order to evaluate changes, a novel AI-based markerless smartphone application is utilized for gait analysis.

Method

  • Fourteen horses were involved in the study, nine of which were used in therapy, four kept for leisure and one multi-purpose horse.
  • Each horse was evaluated via manual palpation for the presence of TrPs in six different muscles including brachiocephalicus, trapezius, gluteus medius, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and quadriceps femoris.
  • The horses were then segregated into two groups: a treatment group (TG) that numbered 7 horses, and a control group (CG) with an equal count.
  • Using the smartphone application, all horses were recorded trotting in a straight line. This analysis was conducted at three intervals: before treatment (T0), immediately after (T1), and 72 hours post-treatment (T72).

Results

  • The stride frequency (SF) was observed to be significantly lower 72 hours after the treatment as compared to both the before and immediately after treatment times.
  • Further, the SF of the TG was noticeably lesser than that of the CG post 72 hours, indicating a possible impact of the DN treatment.
  • No significant differences were noted in the asymmetry during the impact and push-off phases, except for the Forelimb Head Range of Motion (FHROM) severity. This was observed to be significantly higher in the CG horses.

Conclusion

The research indicates that Dry Needling may have a positive impact on gait quality in horses suffering from MPS. Visible changes in stride frequency in treated horses, as indicated by AI-based gait analysis, provide promising evidence towards the potential benefits of DN treatment in managing musculoskeletal conditions in horses. Further research with larger sample sizes and more variables will help solidify these findings.

Cite This Article

APA
Resano-Zuazu M, Carmona JU, Argüelles D. (2025). Short-Term Impact of Dry Needling Treatment for Myofascial Pain on Equine Biomechanics Through Artificial Intelligence-Based Gait Analysis. Animals (Basel), 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111517

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 11

Researcher Affiliations

Resano-Zuazu, María
  • Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
Carmona, Jorge U
  • Grupo de Investigación Terapia Regenerativa, Departamento de Salud Animal, Universidad de Caldas, Calle 65 No 26-10, Manizales 170004, Colombia.
Argüelles, David
  • Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 47 references
  1. Lawin FJ, Byström A, Roepstorff C, Rhodin M, Almlöf M, Silva M, Andersen PH, Kjellström H, Hernlund E. Is Markerless More or Less? Comparing a Smartphone Computer Vision Method for Equine Lameness Assessment to Multi-Camera Motion Capture.. Animals 2023;13:390.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13030390pmc: PMC9913208pubmed: 36766279google scholar: lookup
  2. Ridgway KJ. Diagnosis and Treatment of Equine Musculo-Skeletal Pain. The Role of the Complementary Modalities: Acupuncture and Chiropractic.. AAEP Proc 2005;51:403–408.
  3. Janssens LA. Trigger points in 48 dogs with myofascial pain syndromes.. Vet. Surg. 1991;20:274–278.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1991.tb01263.xpubmed: 1949567google scholar: lookup
  4. Janssens LA. Trigger point therapy.. Probl. Vet. Med. 1992;4:117–124.
    pubmed: 1581647
  5. Frank EM. Myofascial trigger point diagnostic criteria in the dog.. J. Musculoskelet. Pain. 1999;7:231–237.
    doi: 10.1300/J094v07n01_22google scholar: lookup
  6. Ridgway K. Acupuncture as a treatment modality for back problems.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 1999;15:211–221.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30173-6pubmed: 10218251google scholar: lookup
  7. Rogers P. Acupuncture for Equine Paraspinal Myofascial Pain.. Am. J. Tradit. Chin. Vet. Med. 2012;7:69–75.
  8. Wall R. Introduction to myofascial trigger points in dogs.. Top. Companion Anim. Med. 2014;29:43–48.
    doi: 10.1053/j.tcam.2013.11.001pubmed: 25454375google scholar: lookup
  9. Bowen AG, Goff LM, McGowan CM. Investigation of myofascial trigger points in equine pectoral muscles and girth-aversion behavior.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;48:154–160.e1.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.04.095google scholar: lookup
  10. Sato NYS, Bastos BBB, Pereira MAA, Campos KDA, Ambrósio AM, Formenton MR, Fantoni DT. Myofascial Pain Syndrome, myofascial trigger points and trigger points in veterinary medicine: A review.. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 2020;57:e164351.
    doi: 10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2020.164351google scholar: lookup
  11. Formenton MR, Portier K, Gaspar BR, Gauthier L, Yeng LT, Fantoni DT. Location of Trigger Points in a Group of Police Working Dogs: A Preliminary Study.. Animals 2023;13:2836.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13182836pmc: PMC10526025pubmed: 37760236google scholar: lookup
  12. Macgregor J, Graf von Schweinitz D. Needle electromyographic activity of myofascial trigger points and control sites in equine cleidobrachialis muscle--an observational study.. Acupunct. Med. 2006;24:61–70.
    doi: 10.1136/aim.24.2.61pubmed: 16783281google scholar: lookup
  13. Simons D. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual.. .
  14. Dommerholt J, Gerwin R, Courtney C. Travell, Simons & Simons’ Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Volume 3.. 2019;pp. 2–28.
  15. Galasso A, Urits I, An D, Nguyen D, Borchart M, Yazdi C, Manchikanti L, Kaye RJ, Kaye AD, Mancuso KF. A comprehensive review of the treatment and management of myofascial pain syndrome.. Curr. Pain Headache reports 2020;24:43.
    doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00877-5pubmed: 32594264google scholar: lookup
  16. Money S. Pathophysiology of Trigger Points in Myofascial Pain Syndrome.. J. Pain Palliat. Care Pharmacother. 2017;31:158–159.
    doi: 10.1080/15360288.2017.1298688pubmed: 28379050google scholar: lookup
  17. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Dommerholt J. International Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria and Clinical Considerations of Myofascial Trigger Points: A Delphi Study.. Pain Med. 2018;19:142–150.
    doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx207pubmed: 29025044google scholar: lookup
  18. Romero-Morales C, Bravo-Aguilar M, Abuín-Porras V, Almazán-Polo J, Calvo-Lobo C, Martínez-Jiménez EM, López-López D, Navarro-Flores E. Current advances and novel research on minimal invasive techniques for musculoskeletal disorders.. Dis. Mon. 2021;67:101210.
    doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2021.101210pubmed: 34099238google scholar: lookup
  19. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Nijs J. Trigger point dry needling for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: Current perspectives within a pain neuroscience paradigm.. J. Pain Res. 2019;12:1899–1911.
    doi: 10.2147/JPR.S154728pmc: PMC6590623pubmed: 31354339google scholar: lookup
  20. Khan I, Ahmad A, Ahmed A, Sadiq S, Asim HM. Effects of dry needling in lower extremity myofascial trigger points.. JPMA J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2021;71:2596–2603.
    doi: 10.47391/JPMA.01398pubmed: 34783743google scholar: lookup
  21. Dach F, Ferreira KS. Tratamento da dor miofascial com agulhamento a seco: Uma revisão sistemática para as melhores práticas baseadas em evidências em lombalgia.. Arq. Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2024;81:1169–1178.
    pmc: PMC10756779pubmed: 38157883
  22. Mouloodi S, Rahmanpanah H, Gohari S, Burvill C, Tse KM, Davies HMS. What can artificial intelligence and machine learning tell us? A review of applications to equine biomechanical research.. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021;123:104728.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104728pubmed: 34412024google scholar: lookup
  23. Biau S, Barrey E. Relationship between stride characteristics and scores in dressage tests.. Pferdeheilkunde. 2004;20:140–144.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20040205google scholar: lookup
  24. Hobbs SJ, Serra Braganca FM, Rhodin M, Hernlund E, Peterson M, Clayton HM. Evaluating Overall Performance in High-Level Dressage Horse-Rider Combinations by Comparing Measurements from Inertial Sensors with General Impression Scores Awarded by Judges.. Animals 2023;13:2496.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13152496pmc: PMC10417551pubmed: 37570304google scholar: lookup
  25. Stebbins J, Harrington M, Stewart C. Clinical gait analysis 1973-2023: Evaluating progress to guide the future.. J. Biomech. 2023;160:111827.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111827pubmed: 37844470google scholar: lookup
  26. Bao T, Gao J, Wang J, Chen Y, Xu F, Qiao G, Li F. A global bibliometric and visualized analysis of gait analysis and artificial intelligence research from 1992 to 2022.. Front. Robot. AI. 2023;10:1265543.
    doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1265543pmc: PMC10691112pubmed: 38047061google scholar: lookup
  27. Molavian R, Fatahi A, Abbasi H, Khezri D. Artificial Intelligence Approach in Biomechanics of Gait and Sport: A Systematic Literature Review.. J. Biomed. Phys. Eng. 2023;13:383–402.
    doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2305-1621pmc: PMC10589692pubmed: 37868944google scholar: lookup
  28. Ben Chaabane N, Conze PH, Lempereur M, Quellec G, Rémy-Néris O, Brochard S, Cochener B, Lamard M. Quantitative gait analysis and prediction using artificial intelligence for patients with gait disorders.. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:23099.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49883-8pmc: PMC10754876pubmed: 38155189google scholar: lookup
  29. Iseki C, Hayasaka T, Yanagawa H, Komoriya Y, Kondo T, Hoshi M, Fukami T, Kobayashi Y, Ueda S, Kawamae K. Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes Pathological Gait: The Analysis of Markerless Motion Capture Gait Data Acquired by an iOS Application (TDPT-GT). Sensors 2023;23:6217.
    doi: 10.3390/s23136217pmc: PMC10346151pubmed: 37448065google scholar: lookup
  30. Egenvall A, Byström A, Lindsten A, Clayton HM. A Scoping Review of Equine Biomechanics Revisited.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022;113:103920.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.103920pubmed: 35257826google scholar: lookup
  31. Egan S, Brama P, McGrath D. Research trends in equine movement analysis, future opportunities and potential barriers in the digital age: A scoping review from 1978 to 2018.. Equine Vet. J. 2019;51:813–824.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13076pubmed: 30659639google scholar: lookup
  32. Feuser AK, Gesell-May S, Müller T, May A. Artificial Intelligence for Lameness Detection in Horses-A Preliminary Study.. Animals 2022;12:2804.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12202804pmc: PMC9597839pubmed: 36290189google scholar: lookup
  33. Pfau T, Landsbergen K, Davis BL, Kenny O, Kernot N, Rochard N, Porte-Proust M, Sparks H, Takahashi Y, Toth K. Comparing Inertial Measurement Units to Markerless Video Analysis for Movement Symmetry in Quarter Horses.. Sensors 2023;23:8414.
    doi: 10.3390/s23208414pmc: PMC10610735pubmed: 37896509google scholar: lookup
  34. Tabatabaei A, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Sarrafzadeh J, Salehi R. Could dry needling change the kinematics of gait in individuals with piriformis muscle syndromes? Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2024;37:323–327.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.058pubmed: 38432824google scholar: lookup
  35. Rajfur J, Rajfur K, Matusz T, Malarska M, Walewicz K, Ptaszkowski K, Dymarek R, Taradaj J. Dry Needling with the Use of FRSc Technique in Addition to Standard Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Both PROMs and Measurement Tools.. J. Pain Res. 2024;17:1041–1053.
    doi: 10.2147/JPR.S450119pmc: PMC10950681pubmed: 38510562google scholar: lookup
  36. Hong CZ. Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. The importance of the local twitch response.. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1994;73:256–263.
    doi: 10.1097/00002060-199407000-00006pubmed: 8043247google scholar: lookup
  37. Gerwin RD, Dommerholt J, Shah JP. An expansion of Simons’ integrated hypothesis of trigger point formation.. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2004;8:468–475.
    doi: 10.1007/s11916-004-0069-xpubmed: 15509461google scholar: lookup
  38. Bordoni B, Sugumar K, Varacallo M. Myofascial Pain.. 2023.
    pubmed: 30570965
  39. Byrne C, Twist C, Eston R. Neuromuscular function after exercise-induced muscle damage: Theoretical and applied implications.. Sports Med. 2004;34:49–69.
    doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00005pubmed: 14715039google scholar: lookup
  40. Mendonça T, Bienboire-Frosini C, Menuge F, Leclercq J, Lafont-Lecuelle C, Arroub S, Pageat P. The Impact of Equine-Assisted Therapy on Equine Behavioral and Physiological Responses.. Animals 2019;9:409.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9070409pmc: PMC6681086pubmed: 31266217google scholar: lookup
  41. Cagnie B, Dewitte V, Barbe T, Timmermans F, Delrue N, Meeus M. Physiologic effects of dry needling.. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2013;17:348.
    doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0348-5pubmed: 23801002google scholar: lookup
  42. Dyson S. Can lameness be graded reliably?. Equine Vet. J. 2011;43:379–382.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00391.xpubmed: 21631579google scholar: lookup
  43. Bowen AG, Tabor G, Labens R, Randle H. Visually Assessing Equine Quality of Movement: A Survey to Identify Key Movements and Patient-Specific Measures.. Animals 2023;13:2822.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13182822pmc: PMC10525514pubmed: 37760222google scholar: lookup
  44. Buchnefp H, Savelberg H, Schamhardt H, Barneveld A. Temporal stride patterns in horses with experimentally induced fore-or hindlimb lameness.. Equine Vet. J. 1995;27:161–165.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb04911.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  45. Denoix J-M. Biomechanics and Physical Training of the Horse.. 2014.
  46. van Loon J, Van Dierendonck MC. Objective pain assessment in horses (2014–2018). Vet. J. 2018;242:1–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.10.001pubmed: 30503538google scholar: lookup
  47. Gleerup K, Lindegaard C. Recognition and quantification of pain in horses: A tutorial review.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2016;28:47–57.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12383google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.