FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pasture...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2019; 9(1); doi: 10.3390/ani9010014

Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses.

Abstract: We explore how herd composition and management factors correlate with frequencies of social interactions in horse groups. Since the welfare of horses correlates with low aggression levels and social contact opportunities, information of this kind is important. The data are a collection of records of social interactions of 426 Icelandic horses in 20 groups of at least eight horses. The complexities and limitations of the data prohibit useful statistical modelling so the results are presented descriptively. Interesting and informative patterns emerge which can be of use both in management and in future studies. Of special interest are the low levels of agonistic behaviours in breeding groups where one stallion was present. The horses were less agonistic when in groups with young foals and where group membership was stable. Unfamiliar yearlings in peer groups were especially aggressive. Allogrooming was most frequent in groups with relatively more young horses and in unstable and small groups. Interestingly, the horses allogroomed more if they had few preferred allogrooming partners. The findings show that composition (age/sex) and stability of groups are of great importance with respect to aggression levels and opportunities for establishing bonds.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2019-01-05 PubMed ID: 30621272PubMed Central: PMC6356279DOI: 10.3390/ani9010014Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores the relationship between herd composition, management factors, and social interactions among pastured horses, with a focus on the impact of these factors on horse welfare. The study, conducted on 426 Icelandic horses in 20 groups, finds that factors such as age, sex, presence of young foals, and stability of groups significantly influence aggression levels and social bonding opportunities.

Research Methodology and Data Collection

  • The research was based on a comprehensive collection of records of social interactions among 426 Icelandic horses, divided into 20 groups of a minimum of eight horses each.
  • These interactions provided insights into how these herd animals relate with one another within their groups and under varying circumstances.

Key Findings

  • The research reports on various interesting patterns that emerged from the study, albeit presented in a descriptive manner due to the complexities and limitations of the data.
  • Of the findings, low levels of aggressive behaviors (agonistic behaviours) in breeding groups with one stallion was particularly noteworthy. This gave an indication that the presence of a stallion had a calming effect on the group.
  • The study revealed that horses were less aggressive when placed in stable groups with young foals. This could be attributed to the protective and nurturing nature of horses towards their young.
  • However, unfamiliar yearlings (young horses between 1 and 2 years of age) in peer groups recorded markedly higher aggression levels. This can imply a challenging dynamics or competition in establishing their places within the group.
  • Similarly, social grooming behavior (allogrooming) was observed most frequently in groups with young horses and in unstable or small groups. The horses were found to groom more if they had fewer preferred grooming partners.

Implications

  • The findings from this study provide valuable insights that are useful in managing horse groups for optimum welfare. By understanding which variables decrease aggression and increase social opportunities, managers can create conditions conducive to horse wellbeing.
  • This research can also serve as a guide in conducting future studies to further understand the dynamics of social behaviors among horses.
  • The research highlights that composition (age/sex) and stability of groups play a significant role in determining aggression levels in horses, as well as their bonding opportunities.

Cite This Article

APA
Sigurjónsdóttir H, Haraldsson H. (2019). Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses. Animals (Basel), 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9010014

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 1

Researcher Affiliations

Sigurjónsdóttir, Hrefna
  • Faculty of Subject Teacher Education, School of Education, University of Iceland, Stakkahlíð, R105 Reykjavík, Iceland. hrefnas@hi.is.
Haraldsson, Hans
  • Educational Research Institute, School of Education, University of Iceland, Stakkahlíð, R105 Reykjavík, Iceland. haha@hi.is.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 47 references
  1. . Equine Report Removing the Blinkers The Health and Welfare of Equidae in 2015. 122p [(accessed on 11 December 2018)]; Available online: http://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/wp-content/uploads/EU-Equine-Report-Removing-the-Blinkers.pdf.
  2. Minero M, Canali E. Welfare issues of horses: An overview and practical recommendations. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 2009;8 (Supppl. S1):219–230.
    doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.219google scholar: lookup
  3. Van Dierendonck M.C., Spruijt B.M.. Coping in groups of domestic horses—Review from a social and neurobiological perspective. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;138:194–202.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.007google scholar: lookup
  4. Brubaker L., Udell M.A.. Cognition and learning in horses (Equus caballus): What we know and why we should ask more. Behav. Process. 2016;2016:121–131.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.017pubmed: 27018202google scholar: lookup
  5. Krueger K., Marr I., Farmer K.. Equine Cognition. Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior 2017. pp. 1–13.
  6. Feh C.. Relationships and communication in socially natural horse herds. The Domestic Horse: The Origins, Development, and Management of its Behaviour 2005. pp. 83–93.
  7. Feh C., de Mazières J.. Grooming at a preferred site reduces heart rate in horses. Anim. Behav. 1993;46:1191–1194.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1309google scholar: lookup
  8. McDonnell S.M.. A Practical Field Guide to Horse Behaviour—The Equid Ethogram. The Bloodhorse, Inc.; Hong Kong, China: 2003.
  9. Sigurjónsdóttir H., van Dierendonck M.C., Snorrason S., Thórhallsdóttir A.G.. Social relationships in a group of horses without a mature stallion. Behaviour 2003;140:783–804.
  10. Wolter R., Stefanski V., Krueger K.. Parameters for the Analysis of Social Bonds in Horses. Animals 2018;8:191.
    doi: 10.3390/ani8110191pmc: PMC6262610pubmed: 30373257google scholar: lookup
  11. Seyfarth R., Cheney D.. The Evolutionary Origins of Friendship. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2012;63:153–177.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100337pubmed: 21740224google scholar: lookup
  12. Massen J.M., Sterck E.H.M., de Vos H.. Close social associations in animals and humans: Functions and mechanisms of friendship. Behaviour 2010;147:1379–1412.
    doi: 10.1163/000579510X528224google scholar: lookup
  13. Hartmann E., Søndergaard E., Keeling L.J.. Keeping horses in groups: A review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;136:77–87.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.004google scholar: lookup
  14. Proops L., McComb K., Reby D.. Cross modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2009;106:947–951.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809127105pmc: PMC2630083pubmed: 19075246google scholar: lookup
  15. Sankey C., Richard-Yris M.A., Leroya H., Henry S., Hausberger M.. Positive interactions lead to lasting positive memories in horses, Equus caballus. Anim. Behav. 2010;79:869–875.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.037google scholar: lookup
  16. Basile M., Boivin S., Boutin A., Blois-Heulin C., Hausberger M., Lemasson A.. Socially dependent auditory laterality in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim. Cogn. 2009;12:611–619.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0220-5pubmed: 19283416google scholar: lookup
  17. Lemasson A., Boutin A., Boivin S., Blois-Heulin C., Hausberger M.. Horse (Equus caballus) Whinnies: A source of social information. Anim. Cogn. 2009;12:693–704.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0229-9pubmed: 19449192google scholar: lookup
  18. Krueger K., Heinze J.. Horse sense: Social status of horses (Equus caballus) affects their likelihood of copying other horses’ behaviour. Anim. Cogn. 2008;11:431–439.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0133-0pubmed: 18183432google scholar: lookup
  19. Cozzi A., Sighieri C., Gazzano A., Nicol C.J., Baragli P.. Post-conflict friendly reunion in a permanent group of horses (Equus caballus). Behav. Process. 2010;85:185–190.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.007pubmed: 20659538google scholar: lookup
  20. Rutberg A.T., Greenberg S.A.. Dominance, aggression frequencies and modes of aggressive competition in feral pony mares. Anim. Behav. 1990;40:322–331.
    doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80927-3google scholar: lookup
  21. Waring G.. Horse Behavior. 2nd ed. Noyes/William Andrew Publishing; Norwich, UK: 2003.
  22. Stanley C.R., Mettke-Hofmann C., Hager R., Shultz S.. Social stability in semi-feral ponies: Networks show inter-annual stability alongside seasonal flexibility. Anim. Behav. 2018;136:175–184.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.04.013google scholar: lookup
  23. Granquist S.M., Thorhallsdottir A.G., Sigurjonsdottir H.. The effect of stallions on social interactions in domestic and semi feral harems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;141:49–56.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.07.001google scholar: lookup
  24. Hartmann E., Keeling L.J., Rundgren M.. Social interactions of unfamiliar horses during paired encounters: Effect of pre-exposure on aggression level and so risk of injury. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;121:214–221.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.10.004google scholar: lookup
  25. Fureix C., Bourjade M., Henry S., Sankey C., Hausberger M.. Exploring aggression regulation in managed groups of horses Equus caballus. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;138:216–228.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.009google scholar: lookup
  26. Berger J.. Organizational systems and dominance in feral horses in the Grand Canyon. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1977;2:131–146.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00361898google scholar: lookup
  27. Dunbar R.I.. Functional significance of social grooming in primates. Folia Primatol. 1991;57:121–131.
    doi: 10.1159/000156574google scholar: lookup
  28. Aureli F., de Waal F.B.M.. Natural Conflict Resolution. University of California Press, Ltd.; London, UK: 2000.
  29. Keiper R.R.. Social interactions of the Przewalski horse (Equus przewalskii Poliakow, 1881) herd at the Munich Zoo. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988;21:89–97.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90102-5google scholar: lookup
  30. Bourjade M., Moulinot M., Henry S., Richard-Yris M.-A.H.M.. Could adults be used to improve social skills of young horses, Equus caballus?. Ethology 2008;50:408–417.
    doi: 10.1002/dev.20301pubmed: 18393282google scholar: lookup
  31. Sih A., Hanser S.F., McHugh K.A.. Social network theory: New insights and issues for behavioral ecologists. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2009;63:975–988.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-009-0725-6google scholar: lookup
  32. Pike T.W., Samanta M., Lindstrom J., Royle N.J.. Behavioural phenotype affects social interactions in an animal network. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2008;275:2515–2520.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0744pmc: PMC2603202pubmed: 18647713google scholar: lookup
  33. Ingolfsdottir H.B., Sigurjonsdottir H.. The benefits of high rank in the wintertime: A study of the Icelandic horse. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;114:485–491.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.04.014google scholar: lookup
  34. Sigurjónsdottir H., Thorhallsdottir A.G., Hafthorsdottir H.M., Granquist S.. The behaviour of stallions in a semi-feral herd in Iceland: Time-budgets, home-ranges and interactions. Int. J. Zool. 2012;2012:1–7.
    doi: 10.1155/2012/162982google scholar: lookup
  35. Van Dierendonck M.C., Sigurjonsdottir H., Colenbrander B., Thorhallsdottir A.G.. Differences in social behaviour between late pregnant, post-partum and barren mares in a herd of Icelandic horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004;89:283–297.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.06.010google scholar: lookup
  36. Van Dierendonck M.C., de Vries H., Schilder M.B.H., Colenbrander B., Thorhallsdottir A.G., Sigurjonsdottir H.. Interventions in social behaviour in a herd of mares and geldings. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;116:67–73.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.07.003google scholar: lookup
  37. Vervaecke H., Jeroen M., Stevens G., Vandemoortele H., Sigurjonsdottir H., DeVries H.. Aggression and dominance in matched groups of subadult Icelandic horses (Equus caballus). J. Ethol. 2007;25:239–248.
    doi: 10.1007/s10164-006-0019-7google scholar: lookup
  38. Lehner P.N.. Handbook of Ethological Methods. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1996.
  39. Kallajoki I.. Social Characteristics of a Stable and a Temporary Group of Icelandic Horses. Bachelor’s Dissertation. University of Iceland; Reykjavik, Iceland: 2010. [(accessed on 11 December 2018)]. Social Characteristics of a Stable and a Temporary Group of Icelandic Horses. How do Horses Cope in New Social Circumstances? Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/1946/5536.
  40. Van Dierendonck M.C., De Vries H., Schilder M.B.H.. An analysis of dominance, its behavioral parameters and possible determinants in a herd of Icelandic horses in captivity. Neth. J. Zool. 1995;45:362–385.
  41. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2018. [(accessed on 11 December 2018)]. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/.
  42. Christensen J.W., Zharkikh T., Ladewig J., Yasinetskaya N.. Social behaviour in stallion groups (Equus przewalskii and Equus caballus) kept under natural and domestic conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;76:11–20.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00208-8google scholar: lookup
  43. Houpt K.A., Law K., Martinisi V.. Dominance hierarchies in domestic horses. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1978;4:273–283.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-3762(78)90117-7google scholar: lookup
  44. Briefer Freymond S., Briefer E.F., Niederhäusern R.V., Bachmann I.. Pattern of Social Interactions after Group Integration: A Possibility to Keep Stallions in Group. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e54688.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054688pmc: PMC3559779pubmed: 23382940google scholar: lookup
  45. Heitor F., do Mar Oom M., Vicente L.. Social relationships in a herd of Sorraia horses: Part II. Factors affecting affiliative relationships and sexual behaviours. Behav. Process. 2006;73:231–239.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.005pubmed: 16828984google scholar: lookup
  46. Keiper R.R., Sambraus H.H.. The stability of equine dominance hierarchies and the effects of kinship, proximity and foaling status on hierarchy rank. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1986;16:121–130.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(86)90104-8google scholar: lookup
  47. Smith A.V., Wilson C., McComb K., Proops L.. Domestic horses (Equus caballus) prefer to approach humans displaying a submissive body posture rather than a dominant body posture. Anim. Cogn. 2016.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1140-4pmc: PMC5818628pubmed: 29030725google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.