FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2022; 12(9); 1077; doi: 10.3390/ani12091077

Social Box: Influence of a New Housing System on the Social Interactions of Stallions When Driven in Pairs.

Abstract: In order to improve the housing conditions of stallions in individual boxes, we tested a so-called “social box” allowing increased physical contact between neighbouring horses. This study investigated whether housing stallions in social boxes changes the number of social interactions during carriage driving. We hypothesised that the stay in social boxes would decrease the number of unwanted social interactions between stallions when driven in pairs. Eight Franches-Montagnes breeding stallions were observed when driven in pairs with a “neutral” stallion housed in a so-called “conventional box”, strongly limiting physical contact. They were driven on a standardised route over the course of four days before, during, and after being housed in social boxes. The type and frequency of behaviours of the pairs and the interventions of the groom and the driver during the test drives were assessed live and using video recordings. Results from linear mixed-effect models show that unwanted social interactions decreased during and after the stallions were housed in the social box (p < 0.001). Stallions’ interactions also decreased over the four days (p < 0.01), suggesting a habituation to the test conditions by learning not to interact, or by subtly settling dominance. The social box tended to decrease unwanted social behaviours of stallions driven in pairs and could therefore be used as an environmental enrichment for horses.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-04-21 PubMed ID: 35565503PubMed Central: PMC9099530DOI: 10.3390/ani12091077Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores how a new housing system referred to as the “social box” may affect the social interactions of stallions when driven in pairs. The analysis indicates that using such housing can significantly reduce unwanted behaviors among stallions, suggesting potential benefits as an environmental enrichment tool.

Introduction and Hypothesis

  • The research focuses on the evaluation of a new housing system for stallions known as the “social box”. This was designed to allow increased physical contact between neighboring horses.
  • The investigation aimed to determine if using these social boxes changed the number of social interactions between stallions while carriage driving.
  • The hypothesis suggested that the use of social boxes would decrease unwanted social interactions when stallions are driven in pairs.

Methodology

  • The experiment involved eight Franches-Montagnes breeding stallions. These horses were observed when driven in pairs with a third, “neutral” horse.
  • This “neutral” horse was housed separately, in a traditional “conventional box”, which has limited physical contact opportunities.
  • All horses were driven on a standardized route across four days before, during, and after they were housed in the social boxes.
  • Behaviours and types of interactions as well as any interventions by the groom or driver during the testing drives were closely monitored, both live and via video recordings.

Results and Conclusion

  • The results indicated that unwanted social interactions reduced significantly during and after the horses were placed in the social boxes.
  • Not only interactions reduced as a result of new housing, but also in the four-day period suggesting that stallions adapted to the testing conditions by learning not to interact or subtly establishing dominance.
  • Overall, the social box seems to decrease unwanted social behaviors among stallions when driven in pairs. The study, therefore, suggests it can serve as an environmental enrichment for horses, improving their housing conditions.

Cite This Article

APA
Gmel AI, Zollinger A, Wyss C, Bachmann I, Briefer Freymond S. (2022). Social Box: Influence of a New Housing System on the Social Interactions of Stallions When Driven in Pairs. Animals (Basel), 12(9), 1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091077

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 9
PII: 1077

Researcher Affiliations

Gmel, Annik Imogen
  • Agroscope, Swiss National Stud Farm, Les Longs Prés, CH-1580 Avenches, Switzerland.
Zollinger, Anja
  • Agroscope, Swiss National Stud Farm, Les Longs Prés, CH-1580 Avenches, Switzerland.
Wyss, Christa
  • Agroscope, Swiss National Stud Farm, Les Longs Prés, CH-1580 Avenches, Switzerland.
Bachmann, Iris
  • Agroscope, Swiss National Stud Farm, Les Longs Prés, CH-1580 Avenches, Switzerland.
Briefer Freymond, Sabrina
  • Agroscope, Swiss National Stud Farm, Les Longs Prés, CH-1580 Avenches, Switzerland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 30 references
  1. Salter R, Hudson R. Social organization of feral horses in western Canada. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1982;8:207–223.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-3762(82)90205-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  2. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ. Tests for cooperative behaviour between stallions.. Anim Behav 2000 Dec;60(6):731-743.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1525pubmed: 11124871google scholar: lookup
  3. Yarnell K, Hall C, Royle C, Walker SL. Domesticated horses differ in their behavioural and physiological responses to isolated and group housing.. Physiol Behav 2015 May 1;143:51-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.040pubmed: 25725117google scholar: lookup
  4. Christensen JW, Ladewig J, Sondergaard E, Malmkvist J. Effects of individual versus group stabling on social behaviour in domestic stallions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;75:233–248.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00196-4google scholar: lookup
  5. Werhahn H, Hessel EF, Van den Weghe HFA. Competition Horses Housed in Single Stalls (II): Effects of Free Exercise on the Behavior in the Stable, the Behavior during Training, and the Degree of Stress. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2012;32:22–31.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2011.06.009google scholar: lookup
  6. Ruet A, Lemarchand J, Parias C, Mach N, Moisan MP, Foury A, Briant C, Lansade L. Housing Horses in Individual Boxes Is a Challenge with Regard to Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Aug 28;9(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090621pmc: PMC6770668pubmed: 31466327google scholar: lookup
  7. Schwarz A, Gazzarin C. How Economical Is the Pension House for Horses? An Analysis of Three Types of Farms on the Basis of Case Studies. ART-Berichte Ettenhausen, Switzerland: 2013.
  8. Ladewig J, Søndergaard E, Christensen J. The Domestic Horse, the Evolution, Development and Management of Its Behaviour. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2005. Ontogeny: Preparing the young horse for its adult life; pp. 139–149.
  9. Briefer Freymond S, Briefer EF, Von Niederhäusern R, Bachmann I. Pattern of social interactions after group integration: a possibility to keep stallions in group.. PLoS One 2013;8(1):e54688.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054688pmc: PMC3559779pubmed: 23382940google scholar: lookup
  10. Tilson RL, Sweeny KA, Binczik GA, Reindl NJ. Buddies and bullies: Social structure of a bachelor group of Przewalski horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988;21:169–185.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90106-2google scholar: lookup
  11. McDonnell SM, Haviland JCS. Agonistic ethogram of the equid bachelor band. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995;43:147–188.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)00550-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  12. McDonnell SM, Poulin A. Equid play ethogram. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. Equine Behav. 2002;78:263–290.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00112-0google scholar: lookup
  13. Søndergaard E, Halekoh U. Young horses’ reactions to humans in relation to handling and social environment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003;84:265–280.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.08.011google scholar: lookup
  14. Goodwin D. Horse Behaviour: Evolution, Domestication and Feralisation. In: Waran N., editor. The Welfare of Horses. Kluwer; Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: 2002. pp. 1–18.
  15. Rivera E, Benjamin S, Nielsen B, Shelle J, Zanella A. Behavioral and physiological responses of horses to initial training: The comparison between pastured versus stalled horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:235–252.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00091-6google scholar: lookup
  16. Søndergaard E, Ladewig J. Group housing exerts a positive effect on the behaviour of young horses during training. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004;87:105–118.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.12.010google scholar: lookup
  17. Fureix C, Bourjade M, Henry S, Sankey C, Hausberger M. Exploring aggression regulation in managed groups of horses Equus caballus. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;138:216–228.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.009google scholar: lookup
  18. Hartmann E, Sondergaard E, Keeling LJ. Keeping horses in groups: A review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;136:77–87.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.004google scholar: lookup
  19. Fédération Equestre Internationale. Rules for International Combined Driving Events. 10th ed. Fédération Equestre Internationale; Lausanne, Switzerland: 2009.
  20. McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. J. Vet. Behav. 2010;5:187–195.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.04.002google scholar: lookup
  21. Zollinger A, Wyss C, Bardou D, Bachmann I. Social box: A new housing system increases social interactions between stallions. Animals 2022 in preparation.
  22. Van Cann R, Jansen S, Brinkkemper S. Noldus Information Technology Palgrave Macmillan Book: Software Business Start-Up Memories. Springer; London, UK: 2013. pp. 57–65.
  23. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2013.
  24. Revelle W. Installing R and the Psych Package. Department of Psychology, Northwestern University; Evanston, IL, USA: 2013.
  25. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2000.
  26. Hartig F. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level/Mixed) Regression Models. University of Regensburg; Regensburg, Germany: 2018. R package v0.2.0.
  27. Halekoh U, Højsgaard S. A Kenward-Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models the R package pbkrtest. J. Stat. Softw. 2014;59:1–32.
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v059.i09pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  28. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
    doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104google scholar: lookup
  29. Christensen JW, Zharkikh T, Ladewig J, Yasinetskaya N. Social behaviour in stallion groups (Equus przewalskii and Equus caballus) kept under natural and domestic conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;76:11–20.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00208-8google scholar: lookup
  30. McLean AN, Christensen JW. The application of learning theory in horse training. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:18–27.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.020google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Zollinger A, Wyss C, Bardou D, Bachmann I. Social Box: A New Housing System Increases Social Interactions among Stallions. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 20;13(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13081408pubmed: 37106974google scholar: lookup
  2. Stallones L, McManus P, McGreevy P. Sustainability and the Thoroughbred Breeding and Racing Industries: An Enhanced One Welfare Perspective. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 31;13(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13030490pubmed: 36766378google scholar: lookup
  3. Robertson T, Thomas E, Starbuck G, Yarnell K. Global distribution and gap analysis of equine housing research: The findings so far and where to go next. Anim Welf 2024;33:e58.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.64pubmed: 39703212google scholar: lookup
  4. Rachinas-Lopes P, Rocha IC, Dias T, Tavares M, Neto R, Flanagan C, Neves J. The Effects of Enrichment on Zoo-Housed Scarlet Ibis Behavior. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jun 27;14(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14131903pubmed: 38998015google scholar: lookup
  5. Fikri F, Hendrawan D, Wicaksono AP, Purnomo A, Khairani S, Chhetri S, Purnama MTE, Çalışkan H. Colic incidence, risk factors, and therapeutic management in a working horse population in Tuban, Indonesia. Vet World 2024 May;17(5):963-972.
    doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.963-972pubmed: 38911082google scholar: lookup
  6. Dai F, Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Briant C. Does housing system affect horse welfare? The AWIN welfare assessment protocol applied to horses kept in an outdoor group-housing system: The 'parcours'. Anim Welf 2023;32:e22.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.9pubmed: 38487418google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,850 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.