Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2011; 72(6); 727-735; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.72.6.727

Sole depth and weight-bearing characteristics of the palmar surface of the feet of feral horses and domestic Thoroughbreds.

Abstract: To determine solar load-bearing structures in the feet of feral horses and investigate morphological characteristics of the sole in feral horses and domestic Thoroughbreds. Methods: Forelimbs from cadavers of 70 feral horses and 20 domestic Thoroughbreds in Australia. Methods: Left forefeet were obtained from 3 feral horse populations from habitats of soft substrate (SS [n = 10 horses]), hard substrate (HS [10]), and a combination of SS and HS (10) and loaded in vitro. Pressure distribution was measured with a pressure plate. Sole depth was measured at 12 points across the solar plane in feet obtained from feral horses from SS (n = 20 horses) and HS (20) habitats and domestic Thoroughbreds (20). Results: Feet of feral horses from HS habitats loaded the periphery of the sole and hoof wall on a flat surface. Feral horses from HS or SS habitats had greater mean sole depth than did domestic Thoroughbreds. Sole depth was greatest peripherally and was correlated with the loading pattern. Conclusions: The peripheral aspect of the sole in the feet of feral horses had a load-bearing function. Because of the robust nature of the tissue architecture, the hoof capsule of feral horses may be less flexible than that of typical domestic horses. The application of narrow-web horseshoes may not take full advantage of the load-bearing and force-dissipating properties of the peripheral aspect of the sole. Further studies are required to understand the effects of biomechanical stimulation on the adaptive responses of equine feet.
Publication Date: 2011-06-02 PubMed ID: 21627516DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.72.6.727Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research studied the sole depth and weight-bearing characteristics of wild and domestic horses’ feet, finding differences that suggest wild horses’ hooves have a load-bearing function and are less flexible than domestic horses’ due to their robust architecture.

Study Purpose and Methodology

  • The research aimed to determine the load-bearing structures found in the soles of wild horses, and to identify morphological distinctions between the paw pads of wild and domestic Thoroughbred horses.
  • For this purpose, researchers used forelimbs from cadavers of 70 wild horses and 20 domestic Thoroughbreds in Australia.
  • The left forefeet were selected from three wild horse populations found in soft substrate (SS), hard substrate (HS), and a mixture of the two. These feet were loaded in a lab setting to simulate the forces they would experience in real life.
  • The distribution of pressure on the feet was measured using a pressure plate, while the depth of the sole was measured at 12 different points across the solar plane.

Key Findings

  • Findings indicated that the feet of wild horses from hard substrate environments loaded the periphery of the sole and the hoof wall on a flat surface, suggesting a load-bearing role of the peripheral aspect of the foot.
  • The research established that wild horses from both hard and soft substrates tended to have a greater mean sole depth than domestic Thoroughbreds.
  • The depth of the horse’s sole was greatest at the periphery, and this depth was correlated with the loading pattern. This implies that where the depth was pronounced, the pressure exerted was also more substantial.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The study concluded that the peripheral part of the sole in wild horses carries a load-bearing function. These findings suggest that the hoof capsule of wild horses might be less flexible than that of typical domestic horses due to the robust nature of the tissue structure.
  • Furthermore, the findings raised questions on the application of narrow-web horseshoes often used for domestic horses, suggesting they may not maximize the load-bearing and force-dissipating properties of the hoof’s peripheral aspect.
  • The study proposed further studies should be conducted to understand how biomechanical stimulation affects the feet of horses and how their hooves adapt to these stimuli.

Cite This Article

APA
Hampson BA, Connelley AD, de Laat MA, Mills PC, Pollitt CC. (2011). Sole depth and weight-bearing characteristics of the palmar surface of the feet of feral horses and domestic Thoroughbreds. Am J Vet Res, 72(6), 727-735. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.72.6.727

Publication

ISSN: 1943-5681
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 72
Issue: 6
Pages: 727-735

Researcher Affiliations

Hampson, Brian A
  • Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. b.hampson1@uq.edu.au
Connelley, Alexandra D
    de Laat, Melody A
      Mills, Paul C
        Pollitt, Chris C

          MeSH Terms

          • Adaptation, Physiological
          • Animals
          • Australia
          • Biomechanical Phenomena
          • Environment
          • Female
          • Forelimb / anatomy & histology
          • Forelimb / physiology
          • Hoof and Claw / anatomy & histology
          • Hoof and Claw / physiology
          • Horses / anatomy & histology
          • Horses / physiology
          • Male
          • Pedigree
          • Pressure
          • Weight-Bearing

          Citations

          This article has been cited 5 times.
          1. Harvey AM, Ramp D, Mellor DJ. Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 1;12(23).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12233385pubmed: 36496906google scholar: lookup
          2. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
          3. Dadone L, Foxworth S, Aruho R, Schilz A, Joyet A, Barrett M, Morkel P, Crooks G, Fennessy J, Johnston MS. Foot shape and radiographs of free-ranging Nubian giraffe in Uganda. PLoS One 2021;16(12):e0252929.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252929pubmed: 34914724google scholar: lookup
          4. Dadone L, Foxworth S, Goedhals J, Han S, Bapodra-Villaverde P, Yap SW, Radile T, Deacon F. Anatomy and baseline histology of the hoof capsule, corium, and digital cushion in free-ranging southern giraffe (Giraffa giraffa). PLoS One 2025;20(12):e0339972.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339972pubmed: 41468417google scholar: lookup
          5. Mellish MA, Lucas Z, Lancaster L, Stull JW, Floyd A. Visual and morphometric description of feral horse hooves from Sable Island National Park Reserve. Can Vet J 2023 Nov;64(11):1028-1034.
            pubmed: 37915781