FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Hum Mov Sci / Specificity and variability of trunk kinematics on a mechani...
Human movement science2018; 63; 82-95; doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.11.007

Specificity and variability of trunk kinematics on a mechanical horse.

Abstract: As perturbation training is gaining popularity, it is important to better understand postural control during complex three-dimensional stimuli. One clinically relevant and commonly used three-dimensional stimulus is found in hippotherapy and simulated hippotherapy on a mechanical horse. We tested nine healthy participants on a horse simulator, measured head and trunk kinematics, and characterized data in time (root-mean-square and variability) and frequency (amplitude spectra, gains, and phases) domains. We addressed three fundamental questions: 1) What is the specificity of postural responses to the simulator? 2) Which plane of motion is associated with the most and least variability (repeatable movements across repeated stimuli and across participants)? 3) To what extent are postural responses influenced by different degrees of stability (addition of pelvis straps and trunk support)? We found head and trunk responses were highly specific to the three-dimensional simulator perturbation direction and frequency. Frontal plane responses had the least variability across repetitions and participants whereas transverse motion was most variable. Head motion was more variable than the trunk at low frequencies and exhibited a marked decrease in tilt in the sagittal plane. Finally, the inclusion of pelvis straps had minimal effect on kinematics at low frequencies but altered higher frequencies; whereas added trunk support reduced head and trunk responses to perturbations and altered timing characteristics in all three planes. In conclusion, the present study suggests that frontal plane motion was under a high level of control, and results support the idea that specific head and trunk postural responses can be elicited from a complex three-dimensional stimuli, such as those found in hippotherapy. Researchers and clinicians can use results from this study to help interpret variability, implement mechanical adjustments to stability, and assess responses in pathological populations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2018-11-30 PubMed ID: 30503985PubMed Central: PMC6342638DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.11.007Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates how the body specifically the head and trunk, reacts to the simulated movements of a mechanical horse. The study aims to provide a greater understanding of postural control during intricate, three-dimensional stimuli, which is particularly relevant to popular treatment methods like hippotherapy.

Approach to Research

The researchers conducted their study using nine healthy participants as subjects. These individuals were required to ride a horse simulator while their head and trunk movements were measured and examined.

  • The data was categorised into two domains: time (root-mean-square and variability) and frequency (amplitude spectra, gains, and phases).
  • The study aspired to answer three critical questions relating to the specificity of postural responses to the simulator, the plane of motion associated with most and least variability, and the extent to which postural responses are influenced by different degrees of stability.

Study Findings

The results of the study were remarkably significant and diverse, relaying many aspects of human postural response to the stimuli created by the mechanical horse.

  • Head and trunk responses were found to be highly specific to the three-dimensional simulator perturbation direction and frequency.
  • Frontal plane responses displayed the least variability across repetitions and participants, while transverse motion proved to be the most variable.
  • Head motion was more variable than the trunk at low frequencies and showed a significant decrease in tilt in the sagittal plane.
  • The addition of pelvis straps had a minimal effect on kinematics at low frequencies but modified higher frequencies, while added trunk support limited head and trunk responses to perturbations and altered timing characteristics in all three planes.

Conclusion

The study concluded that frontal plane motion was under a high level of control, and the results support the idea that specific head and trunk postural responses can be elicited from a complex three-dimensional stimuli, like the one found in hippotherapy. These results are useful not only for researchers but also for clinicians. They can now better interpret variability, implement mechanical adjustments to stability, and assess responses in pathological populations, thus improving treatments like hippotherapy.

Cite This Article

APA
Goodworth AD, Barrett C, Rylander J, Garner B. (2018). Specificity and variability of trunk kinematics on a mechanical horse. Hum Mov Sci, 63, 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2018.11.007

Publication

Human movement science
ISSN: 1872-7646
NlmUniqueID: 8300127
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 63
Pages: 82-95
PII: S0167-9457(18)30331-2

Researcher Affiliations

Goodworth, Adam D
  • University of Hartford, 200 Bloomfield Avenue, West Hartford, CT 06117, United States. Electronic address: goodworth@hartford.edu.
Barrett, Cody
  • Baylor University, One Bear Place #97356, Waco, TX 76798, United States.
Rylander, Jonathan
  • Baylor University, One Bear Place #97356, Waco, TX 76798, United States.
Garner, Brian
  • Baylor University, One Bear Place #97356, Waco, TX 76798, United States.

MeSH Terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena / physiology
  • Equine-Assisted Therapy
  • Female
  • Head Movements / physiology
  • Healthy Volunteers
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pelvis / physiology
  • Postural Balance / physiology
  • Posture / physiology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Torso / physiology
  • Young Adult

Grant Funding

  • R03 DC013858 / NIDCD NIH HHS

Conflict of Interest Statement

Conflict of interest. Dr. Brian Garner is the inventor and developer of the mechanical horse-riding simulator that was used in this study. In consultation with the technology transfer and business acceleration resources of Baylor University, Dr. Garner has founded a company, Chariot Innovations, Inc., with the mission of making the mechanical horse and similar technologies available in the broader marketplace. For the remaining authors, no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared.

References

This article includes 62 references
  1. Benoit H. Designing, Constructing, and Testing a Second-Generation Prototype Mechanical Hippotherapy Horse. 2011; Master’s Thesis, Baylor University, USA.
  2. Bingham JT, Choi JT, Ting LH. Stability in a frontal plane model of balance requires coupled changes to postural configuration and neural feedback control.. J Neurophysiol 2011 Jul;106(1):437-48.
    pmc: PMC3129728pubmed: 21543754doi: 10.1152/jn.00010.2011google scholar: lookup
  3. Boonstra TA, Schouten AC, van der Kooij H. Identification of the contribution of the ankle and hip joints to multi-segmental balance control.. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013 Feb 22;10:23.
    pmc: PMC3662596pubmed: 23433148doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-23google scholar: lookup
  4. Bronson C, Brewerton K, Ong J, Palanca C, Sullivan SJ. Does hippotherapy improve balance in persons with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010 Sep;46(3):347-53.
    pubmed: 20927000
  5. Buchanan JJ, Horak FB. Transitions in a postural task: do the recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom stabilize posture?. Exp Brain Res 2001 Aug;139(4):482-94.
    pubmed: 11534873doi: 10.1007/s002210100798google scholar: lookup
  6. Butler PB, Saavedra S, Sofranac M, Jarvis SE, Woollacott MH. Refinement, reliability, and validity of the segmental assessment of trunk control.. Pediatr Phys Ther 2010 Fall;22(3):246-57.
    pmc: PMC2927393pubmed: 20699770doi: 10.1097/pep.0b013e3181e69490google scholar: lookup
  7. Carpenter MG, Frank JS, Silcher CP, Peysar GW. The influence of postural threat on the control of upright stance.. Exp Brain Res 2001 May;138(2):210-8.
    pubmed: 11417462doi: 10.1007/s002210100681google scholar: lookup
  8. Cenciarini M, Peterka RJ. Stimulus-dependent changes in the vestibular contribution to human postural control.. J Neurophysiol 2006 May;95(5):2733-50.
    pubmed: 16467429doi: 10.1152/jn.00856.2004google scholar: lookup
  9. Chen S, Lach J, Lo B, Yang GZ. Toward Pervasive Gait Analysis With Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review.. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2016 Nov;20(6):1521-1537.
    pubmed: 28113185doi: 10.1109/jbhi.2016.2608720google scholar: lookup
  10. Cordo PJ, Nashner LM. Properties of postural adjustments associated with rapid arm movements.. J Neurophysiol 1982 Feb;47(2):287-302.
    pubmed: 7062101doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.47.2.287google scholar: lookup
  11. De Vito L, Postolache O, Rapuano S. Measurements and sensors for motion tracking in motor rehabilitation. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine 2014;17(3):30–38.
  12. Dewar R, Love S, Johnston LM. Exercise interventions improve postural control in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015 Jun;57(6):504-20.
    pubmed: 25523410doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12660google scholar: lookup
  13. Earhart GM, Jones GM, Horak FB, Block EW, Weber KD, Fletcher WA. Forward versus backward walking: transfer of podokinetic adaptation.. J Neurophysiol 2001 Oct;86(4):1666-70.
    pubmed: 11600630doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1666google scholar: lookup
  14. Edwards S, Austin AP, Bird SP. The Role of the Trunk Control in Athletic Performance of a Reactive Change-of-Direction Task.. J Strength Cond Res 2017 Jan;31(1):126-139.
    pubmed: 27227792doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001488google scholar: lookup
  15. Faisal AA, Selen LP, Wolpert DM. Noise in the nervous system.. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303.
    pmc: PMC2631351pubmed: 18319728doi: 10.1038/nrn2258google scholar: lookup
  16. Garner BA, Rigby BR. Human pelvis motions when walking and when riding a therapeutic horse.. Hum Mov Sci 2015 Feb;39:121-37.
    pubmed: 25436916doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.011google scholar: lookup
  17. Gawthrop P, Loram I, Lakie M, Gollee H. Intermittent control: a computational theory of human control.. Biol Cybern 2011 Feb;104(1-2):31-51.
    pubmed: 21327829doi: 10.1007/s00422-010-0416-4google scholar: lookup
  18. Genthon N, Vuillerme N, Monnet JP, Petit C, Rougier P. Biomechanical assessment of the sitting posture maintenance in patients with stroke.. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007 Nov;22(9):1024-9.
    pubmed: 17850939doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.07.011google scholar: lookup
  19. Goodworth AD, Peterka RJ. Contribution of sensorimotor integration to spinal stabilization in humans.. J Neurophysiol 2009 Jul;102(1):496-512.
    pmc: PMC2712260pubmed: 19403751doi: 10.1152/jn.00118.2009google scholar: lookup
  20. Goodworth AD, Peterka RJ. Influence of bilateral vestibular loss on spinal stabilization in humans.. J Neurophysiol 2010 Apr;103(4):1978-87.
    pmc: PMC2853278pubmed: 20147413doi: 10.1152/jn.01064.2009google scholar: lookup
  21. Goodworth AD, Paquette C, Jones GM, Block EW, Fletcher WA, Hu B, Horak FB. Linear and angular control of circular walking in healthy older adults and subjects with cerebellar ataxia.. Exp Brain Res 2012 May;219(1):151-61.
    pmc: PMC3968905pubmed: 22447250doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3074-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  22. Goodworth AD, Wu YH, Felmlee D, Dunklebarger E, Saavedra S. A Trunk Support System to Identify Posture Control Mechanisms in Populations Lacking Independent Sitting.. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2017 Jan;25(1):22-30.
    pmc: PMC5035563pubmed: 27046877doi: 10.1109/tnsre.2016.2541021google scholar: lookup
  23. Goodworth AD, Peterka RJ. Identifying mechanisms of stance control: A single stimulus multiple output model-fit approach.. J Neurosci Methods 2018 Feb 15;296:44-56.
    pmc: PMC5817028pubmed: 29277721doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.015google scholar: lookup
  24. Harel NY, Asselin PK, Fineberg DB, Pisano TJ, Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Adaptation of computerized posturography to assess seated balance in persons with spinal cord injury.. J Spinal Cord Med 2013 Mar;36(2):127-33.
    pmc: PMC3595960pubmed: 23809527doi: 10.1179/2045772312y.0000000053google scholar: lookup
  25. Horak FB, Henry SM, Shumway-Cook A. Postural perturbations: new insights for treatment of balance disorders.. Phys Ther 1997 May;77(5):517-33.
    pubmed: 9149762doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.5.517google scholar: lookup
  26. Hwang S, Agada P, Kiemel T, Jeka JJ. Dynamic reweighting of three modalities for sensor fusion.. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e88132.
    pmc: PMC3909337pubmed: 24498252doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088132google scholar: lookup
  27. Jámbor P, Bokor Á, Stefler J. Influence of equine conformation on linear and hippotherapeutical kinematic variables in free walk. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis 2009;17(1):16–27.
  28. Janura M, Peham C, Dvorakova T, Elfmark M. An assessment of the pressure distribution exerted by a rider on the back of a horse during hippotherapy.. Hum Mov Sci 2009 Jun;28(3):387-93.
    pubmed: 19406498doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.04.001google scholar: lookup
  29. Kiemel T, Elahi AJ, Jeka JJ. Identification of the plant for upright stance in humans: multiple movement patterns from a single neural strategy.. J Neurophysiol 2008 Dec;100(6):3394-406.
    pmc: PMC2604857pubmed: 18829854doi: 10.1152/jn.01272.2007google scholar: lookup
  30. Karthikbabu S, Chakrapani M, Ganeshan S, Rakshith KC, Nafeez S, Prem V. A review on assessment and treatment of the trunk in stroke: A need or luxury.. Neural Regen Res 2012 Sep 5;7(25):1974-7.
    pmc: PMC4298892pubmed: 25624827doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.25.008google scholar: lookup
  31. Komar J, Seifert L, Thouvarecq R. What variability tells us about motor expertise: measurements and perspectives from a complex system approach. Movement & Sport Sciences – Science & Motricité 2015;89:65–77.
    doi: 10.1051/sm/2015020google scholar: lookup
  32. Kubota M, Nagasaki M, Tokudome M, Shinomiya Y, Ozawa T, Sato Y. Mechanical horseback riding improves insulin sensitivity in elder diabetic patients.. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006 Feb;71(2):124-30.
    pubmed: 16105705doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.06.012google scholar: lookup
  33. Kuo A. Stabilization of lateral motion in passive dynamic walking. The International Journal of Robotic Research 1999;18(9):917–930.
  34. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G. Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability.. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2002 Jan;30(1):26-31.
    pubmed: 11800496doi: 10.1097/00003677-200201000-00006google scholar: lookup
  35. Lechner HE, Kakebeeke TH, Hegemann D, Baumberger M. The effect of hippotherapy on spasticity and on mental well-being of persons with spinal cord injury.. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007 Oct;88(10):1241-8.
    pubmed: 17908564doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.015google scholar: lookup
  36. Loram ID, Maganaris CN, Lakie M. The passive, human calf muscles in relation to standing: the non-linear decrease from short range to long range stiffness.. J Physiol 2007 Oct 15;584(Pt 2):661-75.
    pmc: PMC2277155pubmed: 17823209doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.140046google scholar: lookup
  37. Maetzler W, Mancini M, Liepelt-Scarfone I, Müller K, Becker C, van Lummel RC, Ainsworth E, Hobert M, Streffer J, Berg D, Chiari L. Impaired trunk stability in individuals at high risk for Parkinson's disease.. PLoS One 2012;7(3):e32240.
    pmc: PMC3311622pubmed: 22457713doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032240google scholar: lookup
  38. Magill RA. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. 2014; (10th Ed.), Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  39. Mansfield A, Wong JS, Bryce J, Knorr S, Patterson KK. Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls? Systematic review and meta-analysis of preliminary randomized controlled trials.. Phys Ther 2015 May;95(5):700-9.
    pubmed: 25524873doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140090google scholar: lookup
  40. Mayhew PM, Thomas CD, Clement JG, Loveridge N, Beck TJ, Bonfield W, Burgoyne CJ, Reeve J. Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk.. Lancet 2005 Jul 9-15;366(9480):129-35.
    pubmed: 16005335doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66870-5google scholar: lookup
  41. McAndrew PM, Wilken JM, Dingwell JB. Dynamic stability of human walking in visually and mechanically destabilizing environments.. J Biomech 2011 Feb 24;44(4):644-9.
    pmc: PMC3042508pubmed: 21094944doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.007google scholar: lookup
  42. Mokhtarinia HR, Sanjari MA, Chehrehrazi M, Kahrizi S, Parnianpour M. Trunk coordination in healthy and chronic nonspecific low back pain subjects during repetitive flexion-extension tasks: Effects of movement asymmetry, velocity and load.. Hum Mov Sci 2016 Feb;45:182-92.
    pubmed: 26684726doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.11.007google scholar: lookup
  43. Moore Dally, Agur AM. Chapter 4: Back in Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 2010; Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  44. Mergner T, Schweigart G, Maurer C, Blümle A. Human postural responses to motion of real and virtual visual environments under different support base conditions.. Exp Brain Res 2005 Dec;167(4):535-56.
    pubmed: 16132969doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0065-3google scholar: lookup
  45. Newell KM, Corcos DM. Variability and motor control. 1993; Champain, IL: Human kinetics; NIH (2018).
  46. Park JH, You JSH. Innovative robotic hippotherapy improves postural muscle size and postural stability during the quiet stance and gait initiation in a child with cerebral palsy: A single case study.. NeuroRehabilitation 2018;42(2):247-253.
    pubmed: 29562564doi: 10.3233/nre-172290google scholar: lookup
  47. Peterka RJ. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.. J Neurophysiol 2002 Sep;88(3):1097-118.
    pubmed: 12205132doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1097google scholar: lookup
  48. Pozzo T, Levik Y, Berthoz A. Head and trunk movements in the frontal plane during complex dynamic equilibrium tasks in humans.. Exp Brain Res 1995;106(2):327-38.
    pubmed: 8566197doi: 10.1007/bf00241128google scholar: lookup
  49. Preuss R, Fung J. Musculature and biomechanics of the trunk in the maintenance of upright posture.. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008 Oct;18(5):815-28.
    pubmed: 17449280doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.03.003google scholar: lookup
  50. Rachwani J, Santamaria V, Saavedra SL, Woollacott MH. The development of trunk control and its relation to reaching in infancy: a longitudinal study.. Front Hum Neurosci 2015;9:94.
    pmc: PMC4338766pubmed: 25759646doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00094google scholar: lookup
  51. Reisman DS, Block HJ, Bastian AJ. Interlimb coordination during locomotion: what can be adapted and stored?. J Neurophysiol 2005 Oct;94(4):2403-15.
    pubmed: 15958603doi: 10.1152/jn.00089.2005google scholar: lookup
  52. Ribeiro MF, Espindula AP, Bevilacqua Júnior DE, Tolentino JA, Silva CFRD, Araújo MF, Ferreira AA, Teixeira VPA. Activation of lower limb muscles with different types of mount in hippotherapy.. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2018 Jan;22(1):52-56.
    pubmed: 29332757doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.03.020google scholar: lookup
  53. Saavedra SL, Woollacott MH. Segmental Contributions to Trunk Control in Children With Moderate-to-Severe Cerebral Palsy.. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015 Jun;96(6):1088-97.
    pmc: PMC4457569pubmed: 25656342doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.016google scholar: lookup
  54. Schmidt RA. Motor schema theory after 27 years: reflections and implications for a new theory.. Res Q Exerc Sport 2003 Dec;74(4):366-75.
    pubmed: 14768837doi: 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609106google scholar: lookup
  55. Seelen HA, Potten YJ, Huson A, Spaans F, Reulen JP. Impaired balance control in paraplegic subjects.. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1997 Jun;7(2):149-60.
    pubmed: 20719700doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(97)88884-0google scholar: lookup
  56. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Chapter 5, Constraints on motor control in Motor Control: Translating Research Into Clinical Practice. 2017; 5th Ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  57. Torres-Oviedo G, Ting LH. Muscle synergies characterizing human postural responses.. J Neurophysiol 2007 Oct;98(4):2144-56.
    pubmed: 17652413doi: 10.1152/jn.01360.2006google scholar: lookup
  58. van der Kooij H, Peterka RJ. Non-linear stimulus-response behavior of the human stance control system is predicted by optimization of a system with sensory and motor noise.. J Comput Neurosci 2011 Jun;30(3):759-78.
    pmc: PMC3108015pubmed: 21161357doi: 10.1007/s10827-010-0291-ygoogle scholar: lookup
  59. Vogt L, Portscher M, Brettmann K, Pfeifer K, Banzer W. Cross-validation of marker configurations to measure pelvic kinematics in gait.. Gait Posture 2003 Dec;18(3):178-84.
    pubmed: 14667951doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00095-4google scholar: lookup
  60. Whittle M, Levine D. Three-dimensional relationships between the movements of the pelvis and lumbar spine during normal gait. Human Movement Science 1999;18:681–692.
  61. Wright WG, Gurfinkel VS, Nutt J, Horak FB, Cordo PJ. Axial hypertonicity in Parkinson's disease: direct measurements of trunk and hip torque.. Exp Neurol 2007 Nov;208(1):38-46.
    pmc: PMC2144734pubmed: 17692315doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.07.002google scholar: lookup
  62. Wu YH, Duncan K, Saavedra S, Goodworth A. Segmental trunk and head dynamics during frontal plane tilt stimuli in healthy sitting adults.. J Biomech 2016 Sep 6;49(13):2831-2837.
    pmc: PMC5056133pubmed: 27395757doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.023google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Collado-Mateo D, Lavín-Pérez AM, Fuentes García JP, García-Gordillo MÁ, Villafaina S. Effects of Equine-Assisted Therapies or Horse-Riding Simulators on Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Medicina (Kaunas) 2020 Aug 31;56(9).
    doi: 10.3390/medicina56090444pubmed: 32878327google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.