FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Trop Anim Health Prod / Standardized body condition scoring system for tropical farm...
Tropical animal health and production2025; 57(2); 106; doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04328-4

Standardized body condition scoring system for tropical farm animals (large ruminants, small ruminants, and equines).

Abstract: In tropical regions, subject to significant fluctuations in feedstuffs, the body condition score (BCS) is a relevant indicator for monitoring body reserves status of farm animals. However, the most used BCS grids comes from temperate conditions and still not adapted for tropical species, which limits adoption and usefulness. The current work presents for the first time an original, low-cost, standardized BCS assessment system, suited to a large spectrum of tropical farm animals (zebu and/or crossbred cattle, buffaloes, camel, sheep, goats, horses and donkeys). Based on a rigorous set of uniform criteria for practical, easy-to-use on field conditions, the animal model used to calibrate and validate each grid is the adult female (except the male for horses and donkeys). A six-point BCS grid system is proposed (i.e., from very emaciated -0- to overweighed -5- body conditions), based on visual interpretation of the back and right-lateral sides of each animal. The overall BCS assessment criteria is built on three major anatomical regions (hindquarters; thorax and abdomen; shoulder and neck), and ten related anatomical landmarks, which provide a unique consensual global interpretation of the back and right views. On-field tests of the proposed BCS grids for each animal species revealed acceptable reproducibility with regard to the most conventional, established gold-standards BCS methods (r = 0.67-0.99). The proposed harmonized BCS is relatively simple and must facilitate the adoption of regular, accurate BCS assessment by adequately trained operators linked to tropical animal production environments.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-03-07 PubMed ID: 40053256PubMed Central: PMC11889029DOI: 10.1007/s11250-025-04328-4Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article introduces a new low-cost, standardized body condition scoring (BCS) system designed for a wide range of tropical farm animals like cattle, buffalo, camels, sheep, goats, horses, and donkey.

Background and Purpose of the Study

  • The researchers recognized the need for a relevant system to monitor the body reserves of farm animals in tropical regions. In these areas, there can be substantial variations in feedstuffs available for animals, therefore, their body condition becomes a crucial indicator of their health and wellbeing.
  • The existing BCS systems are mainly based on temperate conditions and are not well adapted to deal with species living in tropical regions. This study aims to create a standardized scoring system tailored specifically to the needs and conditions of tropical farm animals.

Methodology

  • The researchers created a rigorous, uniform set of criteria for assessing the body condition of a wide range of animal species. This new scoring system was meant to be practical and easy-to-use in real, on-field conditions.
  • The model used to calibrate and validate each grid was the adult female of the species, except in the case of horses and donkeys where the male was used.
  • The proposed BCS grid ranges from zero, indicating a very emaciated condition, to five, indicating overweight status.
  • The BCS assessments were based on visual evaluations of the back and right-lateral sides of each animal.
  • The assessment criteria took into account three major anatomical regions, namely: the hindquarters; thorax and abdomen; shoulder and neck. It also involved ten related anatomical landmarks, allowing for a comprehensive global interpretation of the animal’s condition.

Results and Conclusion

  • The proposed BCS grids for each animal species demonstrated acceptable reproducibility when compared with the most conventional, established gold-standard BCS methods. This was evidenced by correlation coefficients (r) ranging from 0.67-0.99.
  • The researchers concluded that the proposed harmonized BCS system was relatively simple and would facilitate the adoption of frequent, accurate BCS assessments by properly trained operators in tropical animal production environments.

Cite This Article

APA
Vall E, Blanchard M, Sib O, Cormary B, González-García E. (2025). Standardized body condition scoring system for tropical farm animals (large ruminants, small ruminants, and equines). Trop Anim Health Prod, 57(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04328-4

Publication

Tropical animal health and production
ISSN: 1573-7438
NlmUniqueID: 1277355
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 57
Issue: 2
Pages: 106
PII: 106

Researcher Affiliations

Vall, Eric
  • CIRAD, UMR SELMET, 34398, Montpellier, France. eric.vall@cirad.fr.
  • SELMET, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France. eric.vall@cirad.fr.
Blanchard, Mélanie
  • CIRAD, UMR SELMET, 34398, Montpellier, France.
  • SELMET, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Sib, Ollo
  • SELMET, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
  • CIRAD, UMR SELMET, Dakar, Senegal.
Cormary, Boris
  • SELMET, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
  • CIRAD, UMR SELMET, Camagüëy, Cuba.
González-García, Eliel
  • INRAE, UMR SELMET, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Female
  • Male
  • Tropical Climate
  • Body Composition
  • Ruminants
  • Goats
  • Horses / physiology
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Equidae / physiology
  • Sheep
  • Camelus / physiology
  • Animals, Domestic
  • Cattle / physiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent to publish: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

References

This article includes 65 references
  1. Blanchard M, Le Thi Thanh H, Vall E. Body condition scoring grid for yellow cattle (Vietnam). CIRAD Dataverse Draft version.
    doi: 10.18167/dvn1/3alnbugoogle scholar: lookup
  2. Blanchard M, Le Thi Thanh H, Vall E. Body condition scoring grid for buffaloes (Vietnam). CIRAD Dataverse Draft version.
    doi: 10.18167/dvn1/ykl19qgoogle scholar: lookup
  3. Comary B, González-García E, Vall E. Body condition scoring grid for crossbred Bos taurus × Bos indicus cuban dairy cattle. CIRAD Dataverse Draft version.
    doi: 10.18167/dvn1/mh2xaxgoogle scholar: lookup
  4. Sib O, Kouabenan KM, Kouadio E, Kouadja S, Vall E. Body Condition Scoring Grid for Ndama cattle (Ivory Coast). CIRAD Dataverse Draft version.
    doi: 10.18167/dvn1/gstazggoogle scholar: lookup
  5. Vall E. Body condition scoring grid for Barbe horse (Senegal). CIRAD Dataverse Draft version.
    doi: 10.18167/dvn1/ttfpbygoogle scholar: lookup
  6. Vall E. Body condition scoring grid for camel (Sahel and Saharan areas). CIRAD Dataverse Draft version.
    doi: 10.18167/dvn1/ksupq5google scholar: lookup
  7. Vall E. Body condition scoring grid for donkey (Sahel and Savannah areas). CIRAD Dataverse Draft version.
    doi: 10.18167/dvn1/kiih1hgoogle scholar: lookup
  8. Vall E. Body condition scoring grid for goat (Sahel and Savannah areas). CIRAD Dataverse Draft version.
    doi: 10.18167/dvn1/yyzdzqgoogle scholar: lookup
  9. Vall E. Body condition scoring grid for sheep (Sahel and Savannah areas). CIRAD Dataverse Draft version.
    doi: 10.18167/dvn1/bp2go8google scholar: lookup
  10. Vall E. Body Condition scoring grid for zebu cattle (Sahel and Savannah areas). CIRAD Dataverse Draft version.
    doi: 10.18167/dvn1/g5mwyrgoogle scholar: lookup
  11. Agabriel J, Giraud JM, Petit M. Détermination et utilisation de la note d’état d’engraissement en élevage allaitant. Bull Tech CRZV Inra Theix 66:43–50 (https://productions-animales.org/article/download/4204/12724/30951).
  12. Anitha A, Kapa SR, Jeepalyam S, Moorthy S, Kotilinga R. Veterinary science development of the body condition score system in Murrah buffaloes : validation through ultrasonic assessment of body fat reserves. J Vet Sci 11(1):1–8.
    pmc: PMC2833424pubmed: 20195058doi: 10.4142/jvs.2010.11.1.1google scholar: lookup
  13. Ayala-Burgos AJ, Honhold N, Delgado R, Magaña-Monforte J. A visual Condition scoring scheme for crossbreed cattle. Dual purpose cattle production research, Proceedings of the IFS/FMVZ-UADY International workshop, Mérida, Mexico pp 119–128.
    doi: 10.13140/rg.2.1.1698.8005google scholar: lookup
  14. Banse HE, McFarlane D. Comparison of three methods for evaluation of equine insulin regulation in horses of varied body condition score. J Equine Vet 34:742–748.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2014.01.001google scholar: lookup
  15. Battini M, Vieira A, Barbieri S, Ajuda I, Stilwell G, Mattiello S. Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats. J Dairy Sci 97:6625–6648.
    pubmed: 25242423doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7493google scholar: lookup
  16. Béchir AB, Grimaud P, Kaboré-Zoungrana C. Facteurs de variation du poids vif et de l’état corporel du zébu Arabe en zone soudanienne du Tchad. Sci Nat 7(2):143–153.
    doi: 10.4314/scinat.v7i2.59955google scholar: lookup
  17. Bell MJ, Maak M, Sorley M, Proud R. Comparison of methods for monitoring the body condition of dairy cows. Front Sustain Food Syst 2(80):1–7.
    doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2018.00080google scholar: lookup
  18. Bocquier F, Guillouet P, Barillet F, Chilliard Y. Comparison of three methods for the in vivo estimation of body composition in dairy ewes. Ann Zootech 48:297–308 (https://hal.science/hal-00889803v1).
  19. Buxton DAL. Dairy cattle condition scoring in farm production and practice. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Nouvelle-Zélande.
  20. Carrol CL, Huntington PJ. Body condition scoring and weight estimation of horses. Equine Vet J 20(1):41–45.
    pubmed: 3366105doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb01451.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  21. Carvalho-Delfino N, De Aragão F, Bulcão L, Ruiz Alba HD, da Silva Oliveira MX, Soares P, de Queiroz F, Pinto de Carvalho GG, Palma Rennó F, de Freitas Júnior JE. Influence of body condition score at calving on the metabolic status and production performance of Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) during the transition period. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 31(11):1756–1765.
    pmc: PMC6212752pubmed: 28728402doi: 10.5713/ajas.17.0223google scholar: lookup
  22. Cissé M. Grille de notation de l’état corporel du zébu Gobra. Dakar, Sénégal, ISRA, p 11. No internet link.
  23. Cissé M, Mbaye M, Sané I, Corréa A, Ndiaye I. Seasonal changes in body condition of Senegalese Sahel goat. Relationship with reproduction performances. Prod 2d biennial conference of the small ruminant African Reseach Network, AICC 7–11 December 1992, Arusha, Tanzania: 175–178.
  24. Croxton D, Stollard RJ. The use of condition scoring as a management aid in dairy and beef cattle. Anim Prod 22:146.
  25. Diaw M. La prise en charge du bien-être des équidés par les propriétaires d’équidés et les conducteurs de charrettes hippomobile dans le département de Bambey, Sénégal : état des lieux et perspectives. Diplôme d’ingénieur des travaux, spécialité élevage, Université de Thiès, Sénégal. http://www.biblio.uadb.edu.sn/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6284. Accessed 2013.
  26. Dugdale AHA, Grove-White D, Curtis GC, Harris PA, McG Argo C. Body condition scoring as a predictor of body fat in horses and ponies. Vet J 194:173–178.
    pubmed: 22578691doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.03.024google scholar: lookup
  27. Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 72(1):68–78.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79081-0google scholar: lookup
  28. Ezanno P. Modélisation de la relation entre l'état des réserves corporelles et la productivité des troupeaux bovins : cas des bovins N'Dama en milieu agro-pastoral extensif de zone tropicale humide (Kolda, Sénégal). Thèse de doctorat, ENSAM, Montpellier, France. https://publications.cirad.fr/une_notice.php?dk=512598. Accessed 2002.
  29. Ezenwa VO, Jolles AE, O’Brien MP. A reliable body condition scoring technique for estimating condition in African buffalo. Afr J Ecol 47:476–481.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.00960.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  30. Faye B, Bengoumi M, Messad S, Chillard Y. Estimation des réserves corporelles chez le dromadaire. Revue Élev Méd Vét Pays Trop 55(1):69–78.
    doi: 10.19182/remvt.9849google scholar: lookup
  31. Ferguson JD, Azzaro G, Licitra G. Body condition assessment using digital images. J Dairy Sci 89(10):3833–3841.
    pubmed: 16960058doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72425-0google scholar: lookup
  32. Ferguson JD, Galligan DT, Thornsen N. Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 77:2695–2703.
    pubmed: 7814740doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(94)77212-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  33. Frantz N. La mise au point d’une méthode visuelle d’estimation des réserves corporelles de la vache créole. Mémoire de fin d’étude, École Nationale d’Ingénieurs des Techniques Agricoles de Clermont-Ferrand, France. No internet link..
  34. Ghosh C, Datta S, Mandal D, Das AK, Roy DC, Tudu NK. Body condition scoring in goat: Impact and significance. J Entomol Zool Stud 7(2):554–560. https://www.entomoljournal.com/archives/2019/vol7issue2/PartJ/7-2-62-202.pdf. Accessed 2019.
  35. Halachmi I, Polak P, Roberts DJ, Klopcic M. Cow body shape and automation of condition scoring. J Dairy Sci 91:4444–4451.
    pubmed: 18946153doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0785google scholar: lookup
  36. Henneke DR, Polter GD, Kreider JL, Yeates BF. Short communications relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares. Equine Vet J 15(4):371–372.
    pubmed: 6641685doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01826.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  37. Hervieu J, Morand-Fehr P, Schmidely P, Fedele V, Delfa R. Variations des notes sternales, lombaires et caudales utilisées pour estimer l’état corporel des chèvres laitières. CIHEAM, Options Méditerranéennes 13 : 43–56. https://om.ciheam.org/om/pdf/a13/92605094.pdf. Accessed 1991.
  38. Honhold N, Petit H, Halliwell R. Condition scoring scheme for small east african goats in Zimbabwe. Trop Anim Health Prod 21:121–127.
    pubmed: 2749907doi: 10.1007/bf02236191google scholar: lookup
  39. Iglesias C, Navas F, Ciani E, Arando A, González A, Marín C, Nogales S, Delgado J. Zoometric characterization and body condition score in Canarian camel breed. Archivos de Zootecnia Archivos de Zootecnia 69:14–21.
    doi: 10.21071/az.v69i265.5034google scholar: lookup
  40. Imadine M. Mise au point d’une grille de notation de l’état corporel des caprins du Sahel. Mémoire dess productions animales en régions chaude. Cirad-Emvt, Maisons-Alfort, France. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/318024/.
  41. Kenyon PR, Maloney SK, Blache D. Review of sheep body condition score in relation to production characteristics. N Z J Agric Res 57(1):38–64.
    doi: 10.1080/00288233.2013.857698google scholar: lookup
  42. Lowman BG, Scott NA, Somervalle SH. Condition scoring of cattle. East of Escotland College of Agriculture, Edinburgh, 1–13.
  43. Mendizabal JA, Delfa R, Arana A, Purroy A. Body condition score and fat mobilization as management tools for goats on native pastures. Small Rumin Res 98:121–127.
    doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.03.029google scholar: lookup
  44. Nicholson M, Sayers A. Repeatability, reproducibility and sequential use of condition scoring of Bos Indicus cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod 19:127–135.
    pubmed: 3660445doi: 10.1007/bf02239705google scholar: lookup
  45. Nicholson MJ., Butterworth MH. Grille de notation de l'état d'engraissement des bovins zébus. Centre international pour l'élevage en Afrique, Addis-Abeba, Ethiopie. https://books.google.fr/books?id=8rhIDD8XRBkC&lpg=PA11&ots=f8YmzvHd2X&dq=Nicholson%20MJ.%2C%20Butterworth%20MH%20(1989)&lr&hl=fr&pg=PA8#v=onepage&q=Nicholson%20MJ.,%20Butterworth%20MH%20(1989)&f=false. Accessed 1989.
  46. Pearson RA, Ouassat M. A guide to live weight estimation and body conditions scoring of donkeys. Centre for tropical veterinary medicine, University of Edinburgh, Scotland; Institut Agronomique et Veterinaire, Hassan II, Rabat, Morocco. https://www.gov.uk/research-for-development-outputs/a-guide-to-live-weight-estimation-and-body-condition-scoring-of-donkeys. Accessed 2000.
  47. Poisot F. Méthode d’appréciation des réserves corporelles des caprins créoles de Guadeloupe. Mémoire de fin d’étude, École Nationale d’Ingénieurs des Techniques Agricoles de Clermont-Ferrand, France. No internet link.
  48. Pullan NB. Condition scoring of White Fulani cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod 10:118–120.
    pubmed: 664012doi: 10.1007/bf02235322google scholar: lookup
  49. Richard D (Dir. Scientifique). Ovins Doc : Système multimédia sur la production et la pathologie ovine en Afrique tropicale. AUPELF-UREF, CIRAD, Montpellier, France, CD Rom. No internet link.
  50. Roche JR, Dillon PG, Stockdale CR, Baumgard LH, VanBaale MJ. Relationships among international body condition scoring systems. J Dairy Sci 87:3076–3079.
    pubmed: 15375071doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73441-4google scholar: lookup
  51. Roche JR, Friggens NC, Kay JK, Fisher MW, Stafford KJ, Berry DP. Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. J Dairy Sci 92:5769–5801.
    pubmed: 19923585doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2431google scholar: lookup
  52. Russel AJF, Doney JM, Gunn RG. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. J Agric Sci 72(3):451–454.
    doi: 10.1017/s0021859600024874google scholar: lookup
  53. Santucci PM, Branca A, Napoleone M, Bouche R, Aumont G, Poisot F, Alexandre G. Body condition scoring of goats in extensive conditions. Goat Nutrition. Morand-Fehr P (Ed.). EAAP Publication n° 46. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands 240–255.
  54. Schroder U, Staufenbiel R. Invited review: methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of backfat thickness. J Dairy Sci 89(1):1–14.
    pubmed: 16357263doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72064-1google scholar: lookup
  55. Soto-Barrientos N, Chan-Pérez JI, España-España E, Novelo-Chi LK, Palma-Avila I, Ceballos-Mendoza A, Sarabia-Hernandez J, Santos-Ricalde R, Camara-Sarmiento R, Torres-Acosta J. Comparing body condition score and FAMACHA © to identify hair-sheep ewes with high faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal nematodes in farms under hot tropical conditions. Small Rumin Res 167:92–99.
    doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.08.011google scholar: lookup
  56. Tariq M, Younas M, Basit Khan A, Schlecht E. Body measurements and body condition scoring as basis for estimation of live weight in Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Pak Vet J 33:325–329.
  57. Vall E, Bayala I. Note d'état corporel des zébus soudaniens. CIRDES Fiche technique n°8, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/531084/. Accessed 2004.
  58. Vall E, Ebangi AL, Abakar O. Mise au point d’une grille de notation de l’état corporel des ânes de trait au Nord Cameroun. Revue Élev Méd Vét Pays Trop 54(3–4):255–262.
    doi: 10.19182/remvt.9782google scholar: lookup
  59. Vall E, Meyer C, Abakar O, Dongmo Ngoutsop AL. Notes d’état corporel des zébus de trait. Un outil simple pour piloter leur alimentation. Fiche technique traction animale n° 13, PRASAC, N’djaména, Tchad. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/514399/. Accessed 2002 .
  60. Valle E, Raspa F, Giribaldi M, Barbero R, Bergagna S, Antoniazzi S, Lean AKM, Minero M, Cavallarin L. A functional approach to the body condition assessment of lactating donkeys as a tool for welfare evaluation. PeerJ .
    pmc: PMC5372837pubmed: 28367363doi: 10.7717/peerj.3001google scholar: lookup
  61. Van Der Merve BJ, Stewart PG. Condition scoring of dairy cows. KwaZulu-Natal Dairy https://www.kzndard.gov.za/images/Documents/RESOURCE_CENTRE/GUIDELINE_DOCUMENTS/PRODUCTION_GUIDELINES/Dairying_in_KwaZulu-Natal/Cover_DAIRYING%20IN%20kWAZULU-NATAL.pdf. Accessed 1995.
  62. Van Niekerk A. The effect of body condition as influenced by winter nutrition on the reproductive performance of the beef cow. S Afr J Anim Set 12:383–387.
  63. Vieira A, Brandão S, Monteiro A, Ajuda I, Stilwell G. Development and validation of a visual body condition scoring system for dairy goats with picture-based training. J Dairy Sci 98:6597–6608.
    pubmed: 26162790doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9428google scholar: lookup
  64. Westervelt RG, Stouffer JR, Hintz HF, Schryver HF. Estimating fatness in horses and ponies. J Anim Sci 43(4):781–785.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1976.434781xgoogle scholar: lookup
  65. Yilmaz M, Altin T, Karaca O, Cemal I, Bardakcioglu HE, Yilmaz O, Turgay Taskin T. Effect of body condition score at mating on the reproductive performance of Kivircik sheep under an extensive production system. Trop Anim Health Prod 43:1555–1560.
    pubmed: 21465101doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9841-1google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.