Analyze Diet
Veterinary and animal science2026; 32; 100619; doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2026.100619

Starch Overload and Cecal Alkalinization: Impacts on the Intestinal Microbiota and Health of Horses.

Abstract: Starch overload induces dysbiosis primarily through a reduction in cecal pH. This study aimed to evaluate the cecal microbiota following excessive starch intake, with or without the administration of an intracecal buffering solution. We hypothesized that the buffering solution would mitigate changes in the intestinal microbiota and associated clinical signs. Ten horses were randomly assigned to two groups, each receiving distinct treatments (Group I: saline solution [WSa] and starch-buffer [SB]; Group II: buffer-water [WB] and starch-saline [SSa]). Following starch overload (17.6 g/kg body weight via nasogastric tube), clinical assessments and cecal content sampling were conducted at six time points (T0, T08, T12, T24, T48, T72), corresponding to 0, 8-, 12-, 24-, 48-, and 72-hours period. DNA was extracted, and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using the Illumina platform. Sequence data were processed using QIIME2. Statistical analysis was performed using the ExpDes package in R, with means compared via Tukey's test. Diversity analysis revealed decreased richness and evenness post-treatment in Group I, with reductions observed as early as T08 in the SB treatment. The relative abundance of significantly increased in the SB and SSa treatments between T08 and T24, whereas showed a concurrent decline. All horses receiving these treatments exhibited at least one clinical sign following starch overload, with the SB treatment associated with more severe and prolonged clinical manifestations. The administration of the buffering solution in combination with starch overload exacerbated alterations in the intestinal microbiota and clinical outcomes.
Publication Date: 2026-03-11 PubMed ID: 41868108PubMed Central: PMC13000721DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2026.100619Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigates how excessive starch intake affects the gut bacteria (microbiota) in horses and whether an intracecal buffering solution can protect against related negative health effects.
  • The researchers found that the buffer did not prevent microbiota disruption but instead worsened intestinal and clinical issues after starch overload.

Research Context and Objectives

  • Starch overload in horses is known to cause dysbiosis, a disruption of the normal balance of gut bacteria, largely due to a drop in the pH (increased acidity) in the cecum, a part of the large intestine.
  • The study aimed to explore how starch overload affects cecal microbiota composition over time and whether an intracecal buffering solution could reduce these effects.
  • The hypothesis was that alkalizing the cecal environment with a buffering solution would prevent or reduce changes in the intestinal microbiota and lessen clinical symptoms associated with starch overload.

Study Design

  • Ten horses were randomly split into two groups, each receiving two different treatments:
    • Group I: saline solution with starch buffer (WSa and SB)
    • Group II: buffer-water and starch-saline (WB and SSa)
  • Starch overload was administered via a nasogastric tube at a dose of 17.6 g/kg body weight to induce dysbiosis.
  • Clinical assessments and cecal content samples were collected at six time points — before treatment (T0) and at 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after (T08 to T72).
  • The V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA genes was sequenced using Illumina technology to characterize the bacterial communities present.
  • Bioinformatics analysis was performed using QIIME2 to process sequencing data.
  • Statistical tests (ExpDes package and Tukey’s test in R) were used to analyze differences in bacterial richness, evenness, and the relative abundance of key bacterial groups.

Key Findings

  • Diversity metrics:
    • Group I showed reduced bacterial richness (number of species) and evenness (balance of species abundance) after treatment, with signs as early as 8 hours post-starch overload in the starch buffer (SB) treatment.
  • Microbial composition changes:
    • Certain bacterial taxa significantly increased in abundance between 8 and 24 hours in both the SB (starch + buffer) and SSa (starch + saline) treatments.
    • Simultaneously, other bacterial groups declined, indicating a shift in microbial balance consistent with dysbiosis.
  • Clinical outcomes:
    • All horses exposed to starch overload treatments developed clinical signs (such as digestive disturbances), confirming the impact of starch overload on health.
    • The starch buffer (SB) group experienced more severe and longer-lasting clinical symptoms compared to other groups.
    • The administration of the intracecal buffer alongside starch overload paradoxically worsened both microbiota disruption and clinical health status.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Contrary to the initial hypothesis, the intracecal buffering solution did not protect the intestinal microbiota or reduce clinical signs following starch overload in horses.
  • Instead, the buffer exacerbated microbial imbalances and clinical symptoms, suggesting that cecal alkalinization in this context may be detrimental rather than beneficial.
  • This finding warns against the routine use of buffering agents during starch overload events in horses without further research on their effects.
  • The study highlights the complexity of manipulating intestinal pH and microbiota during dietary challenges and the need for careful management of starch intake in equine health.

Cite This Article

APA
Bustamante CC, Pereira PAM, Fernandes CC, Canola PA, Doria RGS, Costa MC, Valadão CAA. (2026). Starch Overload and Cecal Alkalinization: Impacts on the Intestinal Microbiota and Health of Horses. Vet Anim Sci, 32, 100619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2026.100619

Publication

ISSN: 2451-943X
NlmUniqueID: 101694897
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 32
Pages: 100619

Researcher Affiliations

Bustamante, Caio Carvalho
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical and Surgery, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Pereira, Pâmela A Maldaner
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical and Surgery, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
  • Department of Agricultural and Environmental Biotechnology, Multi-User Sequencing Laboratory, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Fernandes, Camila Cesáreo
  • Department of Agricultural and Environmental Biotechnology, Multi-User Sequencing Laboratory, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Canola, Paulo Alescio
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical and Surgery, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Doria, Renata G S
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP - University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Costa, Marcio C
  • Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Valadão, Carlos Augusto A
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical and Surgery, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.