Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2003; 35(2); 118-120; doi: 10.2746/042516403776114252

Strangles, bastard strangles, vives and glanders: archaeological relics in a genomic age.

Abstract: No abstract available
Publication Date: 2003-03-18 PubMed ID: 12638785DOI: 10.2746/042516403776114252Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comment
  • Editorial

Cite This Article

APA
Slater JD. (2003). Strangles, bastard strangles, vives and glanders: archaeological relics in a genomic age. Equine Vet J, 35(2), 118-120. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516403776114252

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 35
Issue: 2
Pages: 118-120

Researcher Affiliations

Slater, J D

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Bacterial Adhesion
    • Horse Diseases / immunology
    • Horse Diseases / microbiology
    • Horses
    • Phagocytosis
    • Streptococcal Infections / immunology
    • Streptococcal Infections / microbiology
    • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
    • Streptococcus equi / genetics
    • Streptococcus equi / pathogenicity
    • Streptococcus equi / physiology
    • Terminology as Topic

    Citations

    This article has been cited 6 times.
    1. Morris ERA, Wu J, Bordin AI, Lawhon SD, Cohen ND. Differences in the Accessory Genomes and Methylomes of Strains of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi and of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus Obtained from the Respiratory Tract of Horses from Texas.. Microbiol Spectr 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0076421.
      doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00764-21pubmed: 35019696google scholar: lookup
    2. Morris ERA, Boyle AG, Riihimäki M, Aspán A, Anis E, Hillhouse AE, Ivanov I, Bordin AI, Pringle J, Cohen ND. Differences in the genome, methylome, and transcriptome do not differentiate isolates of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi from horses with acute clinical signs from isolates of inapparent carriers.. PLoS One 2021;16(6):e0252804.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252804pubmed: 34125848google scholar: lookup
    3. Zhu Y, Chen S, Yi Z, Holyoak R, Wang T, Ding Z, Li J. Nasopharyngeal Microbiomes in Donkeys Shedding Streptococcus equi Subspecies equi in Comparison to Healthy Donkeys.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:645627.
      doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.645627pubmed: 33969039google scholar: lookup
    4. Cohen ND, Cywes-Bentley C, Kahn SM, Bordin AI, Bray JM, Wehmeyer SG, Pier GB. Vaccination of yearling horses against poly-N-acetyl glucosamine fails to protect against infection with Streptococcus equi subspecies equi.. PLoS One 2020;15(10):e0240479.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240479pubmed: 33057397google scholar: lookup
    5. Paillot R, Robinson C, Steward K, Wright N, Jourdan T, Butcher N, Heather Z, Waller AS. Contribution of each of four Superantigens to Streptococcus equi-induced mitogenicity, gamma interferon synthesis, and immunity.. Infect Immun 2010 Apr;78(4):1728-39.
      doi: 10.1128/IAI.01079-09pubmed: 20123710google scholar: lookup
    6. Hamilton A, Robinson C, Sutcliffe IC, Slater J, Maskell DJ, Davis-Poynter N, Smith K, Waller A, Harrington DJ. Mutation of the maturase lipoprotein attenuates the virulence of Streptococcus equi to a greater extent than does loss of general lipoprotein lipidation.. Infect Immun 2006 Dec;74(12):6907-19.
      doi: 10.1128/IAI.01116-06pubmed: 17015455google scholar: lookup