Analyze Diet
Reproduction (Cambridge, England)2009; 139(3); 575-585; doi: 10.1530/REP-09-0306

Successful transfer of day 10 horse embryos: influence of donor-recipient asynchrony on embryo development.

Abstract: A total of 78 day 10 horse embryos were transferred non-surgically to recipient mares that had ovulated 9, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 or 1 day after (negative asynchrony), on the same day (synchronous), or 2 or 4 days before (positive asynchrony) the donor (n=6 or 8 mares per group). Pregnancy rates between 100% (6/6) and 63% (5/8) were seen in recipient mares that were between +2 and -6 days asynchronous. Embryo survival to the heartbeat stage declined in recipients that were -7 days asynchronous and no embryos survived in recipients that were -9 days asynchronous. Irrespective of uterine asynchrony, cessation of embryo mobility and fixation at the base of a uterine horn occurred when the conceptus was approximately 17 days old. Conceptus growth and development was slowed when embryos were placed in negatively asynchronous uteri. At the greatest degree of negative asynchrony at which embryos survived to the heartbeat stage, i.e. -7 and -6 days, development of the embryo proper and allantois was retarded. Luteostasis was achieved in recipient mares when day 10 embryos were transferred to recipient mares at any stage of asynchrony between -9 and +2 days with respect to the donor. These results indicate that in the horse, there is a wide window for establishment of pregnancy following embryo transfer to asynchronous recipients. Although progesterone priming of the uterus to a stage equivalent to that of the transferred embryo does not appear to be a prerequisite for embryo survival, it does nonetheless influence embryonic development.
Publication Date: 2009-11-30 PubMed ID: 19948839DOI: 10.1530/REP-09-0306Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the effects of donor-recipient timing differences on the success of horse embryo transfers. The study concluded a broad window of time exists for successful pregnancy to be established in recipient mares via embryo transfer, despite timing differences, although these asynchronies may impact embryonic development.

Research Methodology

  • The study involved the transfer of 78 horse embryos, ten days old, into recipient mares.
  • These mares had ovulated either 9, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 day after the donor (negative asynchrony), on the same day(synchronous), or 2 or 4 days before the donor (positive asynchrony).
  • Six to eight mares were observed under each group condition.

Observed Pregnancy Rates

  • Successful pregnancy rates ranged between 63% to 100% in mares that ovulated 6 days after, to 2 days before, the donor.
  • These varied rates indicate a broad window for successful pregnancy after the embryo transfer.

Effects on Embryo Survival

  • The survival of embryos dipped when recipient mares ovulated seven days after the donor, and no embryos survived if recipients ovulated nine days after the donor.
  • However, the embryo’s motion ceased and anchored at the uterine horn base when the conceptus was about 17 days old, regardless of the asynchrony degree.

Impacts on Embryo Growth and Development

  • When the embryos were transferred into negatively asynchronous uteri, their growth and development were slowed down.
  • When the greatest negative asynchrony degree was reached, where embryos survived to the heartbeat stage (i.e., -7 and -6 days), it was observed that the embryo and the allantois’ development was delayed.

Influence on Progesterone Priming

  • Luteostasis was achieved in mares when the day 10 embryos were transferred under any asynchrony stage.
  • The study suggests that the uterus’ progesterone priming to a stage equivalent to that of the transferred embryo isn’t required for the embryo’s survival.
  • However, the progesterone stage does impact embryonic development.

Overall, while the synchronization between the donor and recipient does not entirely decide the success of the embryo transfer, its correlation with the developmental timeline of the embryo provides critical insights for maximizing successful outcomes in such procedures.

Cite This Article

APA
Wilsher S, Clutton-Brock A, Allen WR. (2009). Successful transfer of day 10 horse embryos: influence of donor-recipient asynchrony on embryo development. Reproduction, 139(3), 575-585. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-09-0306

Publication

ISSN: 1741-7899
NlmUniqueID: 100966036
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 139
Issue: 3
Pages: 575-585

Researcher Affiliations

Wilsher, Sandra
  • The Paul Mellon Laboratory of Equine Reproduction, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 9DE, UK (formerly The Equine Fertility Unit, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK). paulmellonlab@btconnect.com
Clutton-Brock, Amber
    Allen, W R

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Cell Survival
      • Cleavage Stage, Ovum / cytology
      • Cleavage Stage, Ovum / physiology
      • Cleavage Stage, Ovum / transplantation
      • Embryo Transfer / methods
      • Embryo Transfer / veterinary
      • Embryo, Mammalian
      • Embryonic Development / physiology
      • Estrus Synchronization / physiology
      • Female
      • Gestational Age
      • Horses / embryology
      • Horses / physiology
      • Pregnancy
      • Pregnancy Rate
      • Time Factors
      • Tissue Donors
      • Transplantation / physiology
      • Treatment Outcome

      Citations

      This article has been cited 13 times.
      1. Piotrowska-Tomala KK, Jonczyk AW, Szóstek-Mioduchowska A, Hojo T, Żebrowska E, Katila T, Ferreira-Dias G, Skarzynski DJ. Intrauterine devices influence prostaglandin secretion by equine uterus: in vitro and in vivo studies. BMC Vet Res 2024 Feb 3;20(1):46.
        doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03889-0pubmed: 38310284google scholar: lookup
      2. Newcombe JR, Cuervo-Arango J, Wilsher S. The Timing of the Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy Is Specific to Individual Mares. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 22;13(10).
        doi: 10.3390/ani13101718pubmed: 37238148google scholar: lookup
      3. Rajabi-Toustani R, Tsogtgerel M, Gao Y, Li C, Sakato M, Haneda S, Cheong SH, Nambo Y. First Kiso pony foal produced via transfer of long-distance shipped fresh embryo to Hokkaido native pony. J Reprod Dev 2023 Apr 3;69(2):125-128.
        doi: 10.1262/jrd.2022-125pubmed: 36724993google scholar: lookup
      4. Gibson C, de Ruijter-Villani M, Stout TAE. Insulin-like growth factor system components expressed at the conceptus-maternal interface during the establishment of equine pregnancy. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:912721.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.912721pubmed: 36176700google scholar: lookup
      5. Lawson EF, Grupen CG, Baker MA, Aitken RJ, Swegen A, Pollard CL, Gibb Z. Conception and early pregnancy in the mare: lipidomics the unexplored frontier. Reprod Fertil 2022 Jan 1;3(1):R1-R18.
        doi: 10.1530/RAF-21-0104pubmed: 35350651google scholar: lookup
      6. Klein C, Bruce P, Hammermueller J, Hayes T, Lillie B, Betteridge K. Transcriptional profiling of equine endometrium before, during and after capsule disintegration during normal pregnancy and after oxytocin-induced luteostasis in non-pregnant mares. PLoS One 2021;16(10):e0257161.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257161pubmed: 34614002google scholar: lookup
      7. Segabinazzi LGTM, Andrade LRP Jr, Alvarenga MA, Dell'Aqua JA Jr, Canisso IF. Use of Intravaginal Progesterone-Releasing Device Results in Similar Pregnancy Rates and Losses to Long-Acting Progesterone to Synchronize Acyclic Embryo Recipient Mares. Vet Sci 2021 Sep 10;8(9).
        doi: 10.3390/vetsci8090190pubmed: 34564584google scholar: lookup
      8. Swegen A. Maternal recognition of pregnancy in the mare: does it exist and why do we care?. Reproduction 2021 May 5;161(6):R139-R155.
        doi: 10.1530/REP-20-0437pubmed: 33957605google scholar: lookup
      9. Gibson C, de Ruijter-Villani M, Bauersachs S, Stout TAE. Asynchronous Embryo Transfer Followed by Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Conceptus Membranes and Endometrium Identifies Processes Important to the Establishment of Equine Pregnancy. Int J Mol Sci 2020 Apr 7;21(7).
        doi: 10.3390/ijms21072562pubmed: 32272720google scholar: lookup
      10. Smits K, Willems S, Van Steendam K, Van De Velde M, De Lange V, Ververs C, Roels K, Govaere J, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Peelman L, Deforce D, Van Soom A. Proteins involved in embryo-maternal interaction around the signalling of maternal recognition of pregnancy in the horse. Sci Rep 2018 Mar 27;8(1):5249.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23537-6pubmed: 29588480google scholar: lookup
      11. Aurich C, Budik S. Early pregnancy in the horse revisited - does exception prove the rule?. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2015;6:50.
        doi: 10.1186/s40104-015-0048-6pubmed: 26635959google scholar: lookup
      12. Ptak GE, Modlinski JA, Loi P. Embryonic diapause in humans: time to consider?. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2013 Sep 17;11:92.
        doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-92pubmed: 24044744google scholar: lookup
      13. Ptak GE, Tacconi E, Czernik M, Toschi P, Modlinski JA, Loi P. Embryonic diapause is conserved across mammals. PLoS One 2012;7(3):e33027.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033027pubmed: 22427933google scholar: lookup