Surgical treatment for epiglottic entrapment in horses: 51 cases (1981-1992).
Abstract: Medical records of 51 horses with epiglottic entrapment were reviewed, and the outcome after surgical treatment was evaluated by use of results from a survey of owners and from race records. Horses with epiglottic entrapment and no additional problem (uncomplicated) of the nares, nasal passages, pharynx, or larynx (upper airway) that were treated by transoral axial division (group 1) or resection via laryngotomy (group 2), and horses with epiglottic entrapment complicated by an additional upper airway abnormality (group 3) were compared. The cost of treatment, duration of hospitalization, time to first race start after surgery, and complication rate were significantly (P < 0.05) less in horses in group 1, compared with those in horses of group 2. Owner survey indicated that a significantly greater percentage (82%) of horses in group 1 had a successful outcome after transoral axial division, compared with that (27%) of horses in group 2. Analysis of race records indicated that performance was similar between horses in groups 1 and 2, and significantly more horses with an additional upper airway lesion (group 3) failed to return to racing than did horses with uncomplicated epiglottic entrapment (groups 1 and 2). Transoral axial division of the ary-epiglottic fold is recommended as an appropriate treatment for uncomplicated epiglottic entrapment. Resection via laryngotomy should be reserved for treatment of epiglottic entrapment associated with excessively thick and scarred aryepiglottic folds and for intermittent epiglottic entrapment in horses for which surgical correction is deemed appropriate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Publication Date: 1994-09-01 PubMed ID: 7989244
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study evaluates the outcomes of two surgical treatments for horses with epiglottic entrapment, a common respiratory condition, with and without additional upper airway abnormalities. The results suggest that transoral axial division is more cost-effective, requires shorter hospitalization, and achieves higher success rates for uncomplicated cases, while resection via laryngotomy appears more suitable for more complex cases.
Research Methods
- The researchers looked at the medical records of 51 horses diagnosed with epiglottic entrapment from 1991-1992. The outcomes after surgical treatment were then assessed through a survey of the horse owners and race records.
- The participating horses were divided into three categories: those with uncomplicated epiglottic entrapment treated by transoral axial division (group 1) or treated by resection via laryngotomy (group 2), and those with epiglottic entrapment along with an additional abnormality in the upper airway (group 3).
Findings
- Group 1 had significantly lower costs for treatment, shorter hospital stays, faster returns to racing, and fewer complications than Group 2.
- About 82% of horses in Group 1 experienced a successful outcome from transoral axial division, while only around 27% in Group 2 had a successful outcome.
- Performance analysis from race records showed no significant difference between groups 1 and 2. However, group 3, which had an additional upper airway lesion, had significantly more horses fail to return to racing compared to groups 1 and 2.
Conclusion
- The results suggest that transoral axial division is a highly effective treatment for horses with uncomplicated epiglottic entrapment. This surgical procedure would be the recommended choice due to its cost-effectiveness, shorter recovery period, and higher success rates compared to the alternative.
- For more complicated cases with additional upper airway abnormalities, resection via laryngotomy is suggested. These would typically include scenarios where the horse’s aryepiglottic folds are excessively thick and scarred.
- The researchers recommend future studies to provide more comprehensive insights into the topic.
Cite This Article
APA
Lumsden JM, Stick JA, Caron JP, Nickels FA.
(1994).
Surgical treatment for epiglottic entrapment in horses: 51 cases (1981-1992).
J Am Vet Med Assoc, 205(5), 729-735.
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Epiglottis / surgery
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Horse Diseases / surgery
- Horses
- Laryngeal Diseases / surgery
- Laryngeal Diseases / veterinary
- Larynx / surgery
- Male
- Retrospective Studies
- Sports
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Treatment Outcome
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists