Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record2018; 183(5); 159; doi: 10.1136/vr.104521

Survey of UK horse owners’ knowledge of equine arboviruses and disease vectors.

Abstract: Increased globalisation and climate change have led to concern about the increasing risk of arthropod-borne virus (arbovirus) outbreaks globally. An outbreak of equine arboviral disease in northern Europe could impact significantly on equine welfare, and result in economic losses. Early identification of arboviral disease by horse owners may help limit disease spread. In order to determine what horse owners understand about arboviral diseases of horses and their vectors, the authors undertook an open, cross-sectional online survey of UK horse owners. The questionnaire was distributed using social media and a press release and was active between May and July 2016. There were 466 respondents, of whom 327 completed the survey in full. High proportions of respondents correctly identified photographic images of biting midges (71.2 per cent) and mosquitoes (65.4 per cent), yet few were aware that they transmit equine infectious diseases (31.4 per cent and 35.9 per cent, respectively). Of the total number of respondents, only 7.4 per cent and 16.2 per cent correctly named a disease transmitted by biting midges and mosquitoes, respectively. Only 13.1 per cent and 12.5 per cent of participants identified specific clinical signs of African horse sickness (AHS) and West Nile virus (WNV), respectively. This study demonstrates that in the event of heightened disease risk educational campaigns directed towards horse owners need to be implemented, focussing on disease awareness, clinical signs and effective disease prevention strategies.
Publication Date: 2018-05-15 PubMed ID: 29764954PubMed Central: PMC6089202DOI: 10.1136/vr.104521Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research records the results of a survey designed to assess the knowledge UK horse owners have about viruses borne by arthropods and the vectors that spread these diseases. The study revealed that while horse owners are able to recognize dangerous insects, their awareness of the diseases these insects can spread and the symptoms of these diseases is significantly lower.

Methodology

  • The researchers used an open, cross-sectional online survey to collect data from UK horse owners.
  • This survey was distributed via social media and a press release and was active for a period spanned from May to July 2016.
  • The survey was completed by 327 out of the 466 respondents, forming the participant sample for the study.

Results

  • A large portion of the respondents identified photographic images of biting midges and mosquitoes correctly, with rates of 71.2% and 65.4% respectively.
  • However, few were aware that these insects can transmit equine infectious diseases, with only 31.4% and 35.9% respectively recognizing this fact.
  • Even lesser knew the specific diseases transmitted by these bugs. Only 7.4% and 16.2% of respondents correctly named a disease transmitted by biting midges and mosquitoes.
  • In addition to this, only 13.1% and 12.5% of participants identified specific clinical signs of African horse sickness (AHS) and West Nile virus (WNV) respectively.

Conclusion

  • These findings indicate that there is a lack of awareness among horse owners about arthropod-borne viruses and their symptoms.
  • The authors suggest that if there is an increased disease risk, educational campaigns should be directed towards horse owners.
  • These campaigns should focus on improving disease awareness, highlighting clinical signs, and imparting effective disease prevention strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Chapman GE, Baylis M, Archer DC. (2018). Survey of UK horse owners’ knowledge of equine arboviruses and disease vectors. Vet Rec, 183(5), 159. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.104521

Publication

ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 183
Issue: 5
Pages: 159

Researcher Affiliations

Chapman, Gail Elaine
  • Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Baylis, Matthew
  • Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Archer, Debra C
  • Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Adult
  • Animals
  • Arbovirus Infections / epidemiology
  • Arbovirus Infections / prevention & control
  • Arbovirus Infections / veterinary
  • Arbovirus Infections / virology
  • Arboviruses
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Disease Outbreaks / prevention & control
  • Disease Outbreaks / veterinary
  • Disease Vectors
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horse Diseases / virology
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Insect Bites and Stings / prevention & control
  • Insect Vectors / virology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Ownership
  • United Kingdom / epidemiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. Durand B, Lecollinet S, Beck C. Identification of hotspots in the European union for the introduction of four zoonotic arboviroses by live animal trade. PLoS One 2013;8:e70000.
  2. Medlock JM, Leach SA. Effect of climate change on vector-borne disease risk in the UK. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15:721–30.
    doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70091-5pubmed: 25808458google scholar: lookup
  3. Chapman GE, Archer D, Torr S. Potential vectors of equine arboviruses in the UK. Vet Rec 2017;180.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.103825pmc: PMC5284472pubmed: 27694545google scholar: lookup
  4. Robin M, Archer D, Garros C. The threat of midge-borne equine disease: investigation of Culicoides species on UK equine premises. Vet Rec 2014;174:301.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.102151pubmed: 24508765google scholar: lookup
  5. King B, O’Shea Brown T, Tarlinton R. Seroprevalence of Schmallenberg virus in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland: 2011-2013. Vet Microbiol 2015;180:36–40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.07.025pubmed: 26255555google scholar: lookup
  6. Sabirovic M, Lopez M, Patel K, et al. . African horse sickness: Potential risk factors and the likelihood for the introduction of the disease to the United Kingdom, 2008.
  7. Rodriguez M, Hooghuis H, Castaño M. African horse sickness in Spain. Vet Microbiol 1992;33:129–42.
    doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(92)90041-Qpubmed: 1481352google scholar: lookup
  8. Mellor PS. African horse sickness: transmission and epidemiology. Vet Res 1993;24:199–212.
    pubmed: 8102076
  9. Gosling JP, Hart A, Mouat DC. Quantifying experts' uncertainty about the future cost of exotic diseases. Risk Anal 2012;32:881–93.
  10. Robin M, Page P, Archer D. African horse sickness: The potential for an outbreak in disease-free regions and current disease control and elimination techniques. Equine Vet J 2016;48:659–69.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12600pubmed: 27292229google scholar: lookup
  11. Bessell PR, Robinson RA, Golding N. Quantifying the Risk of Introduction of West Nile Virus into Great Britain by Migrating Passerine Birds. Transbound Emerg Dis 2016;63:e347–e359.
    doi: 10.1111/tbed.12310pubmed: 25516263google scholar: lookup
  12. Pages H, Cipriani K, Chevallier M. Scientific report submitted to EFSA: Scientific review on mosquitoes and mosquito-borne diseases, 2009. .
  13. Schemann K, Firestone SM, Taylor MR. Horse owners’/managers’ perceptions about effectiveness of biosecurity measures based on their experiences during the 2007 equine influenza outbreak in Australia. Prev Vet Med 2012;106:97–107.
  14. Kung N, McLaughlin A, Taylor M. Hendra virus and horse owners--risk perception and management. PLoS One 2013;8:e80897.
  15. Manyweathers J, Field H, Jordan D. Risk Mitigation of Emerging Zoonoses: Hendra Virus and Non-Vaccinating Horse Owners. Transbound Emerg Dis 2017;64:1898–911.
    doi: 10.1111/tbed.12588pubmed: 28054443google scholar: lookup
  16. Thomas DR. A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. Am J Eval 2006;27:237–46.
    doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748google scholar: lookup
  17. Sergeant ES.nEpiTools epidemiological calculators. 2016. nhttp://epitools.ausvet.com.au (accessed 10 Jan 2016).
  18. Wise LN, Knowles DP, Rothschild CM. Chapter 56 – Piroplasmosis. Equine Infectious Diseases 2014:467–75.
  19. Wilson AD, Harwood LJ, Björnsdottir S. Detection of IgG and IgE serum antibodies to Culicoides salivary gland antigens in horses with insect dermal hypersensitivity (sweet itch). Equine Vet J 2001;33:707–13.
    doi: 10.2746/042516401776249363pubmed: 11770994google scholar: lookup
  20. McCaig J. A survey to establish the incidence of sweet itch in ponies in the United Kingdom. Vet Rec 1973;93:444–6.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.93.16.444pubmed: 4777484google scholar: lookup
  21. BHS. Guide to African horse sickness. 2014. nhttp://www.bhs.org.uk/welfare-and-care/horse-health-and-sickness/african-horse-sickness.
  22. DEFRA. African horse sickness: how to spot and report the disease: GOV.UK, 2014. nhttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/african-horse-sickness (accessed 30 Apr 2017).
  23. Dalton S.nStrategies for reducing mosquito-borne disease vulnerability in equine populations: a kentucky case study. 2006. nhttp://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/451/ (accessed 8 Jan 2017).
  24. MERIAL. Equine flu awareness. 2016. nhttp://www.equinefluawareness.com/PuttingEquineFluOnTheRadar1503.html (accessed 8 Jan 2017).
  25. Hotchkiss JW, Reid SW, Christley RM. A survey of horse owners in Great Britain regarding horses in their care. Part 1: horse demographic characteristics and management. Equine Vet J 2007;39:294–300.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X177538pubmed: 17722719google scholar: lookup
  26. Middleton D, Pallister J, Klein R. Hendra virus vaccine, a one health approach to protecting horse, human, and environmental health. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20:372-9.
    doi: 10.3201/eid2003.131159pmc: PMC3944873pubmed: 24572697google scholar: lookup
  27. Taylor M, Dhand NK, Toribio J-Al. Longitudinal cohort study of horse owners: HHALTER: Horse owners and Hendra virus: A longitudinal study To Evaluate Risk. RIRDC 2016:105.
  28. Palmer JS. Toxicologic effects of aerosols of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (deet) applied on skin of horses. Am J Vet Res 1969;30:1929–32.
    pubmed: 5347100
  29. Boehringer I. Centaura - Insect repellent for horse and rider. Brand Book 2010.
  30. Carpenter S, Mellor PS, Torr SJ. Control techniques for Culicoides biting midges and their application in the U.K. and northwestern Palaearctic. Med Vet Entomol 2008;22:175–87.
  31. Page PC. Investigation of methods for protection of horses in jet stalls against Culicoides biting midges. 2016.
  32. Okafor FC. Addressing the Problem of Non-Response and Response Bias. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics 2010;1:91–7.
  33. Boden LA, Parkin TD, Yates J. An online survey of horse-owners in Great Britain. BMC Vet Res 2013;9:188.
    doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-188pmc: PMC3850011pubmed: 24074003google scholar: lookup
  34. British Equine Trade Association. British Equestrian Trade Association - market information. 2015. nhttp://www.beta-uk.org/pages/industry-information/market-information.php (accessed 29 Apr 2017).
  35. Lupi E, Hatz C, Schlagenhauf P. The efficacy of repellents against Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and Ixodes spp. - a literature review. Travel Med Infect Dis 2013;11:374–411.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2013.10.005pubmed: 24201040google scholar: lookup
  36. Braverman DY, Chizov-Ginzburg A. Duration of repellency of various synthetic and plant-derived preparations for Culicoides imicola, the vector of African horse sickness virus : Mellor DPS, Baylis DM, Hamblin DC, Mertens D, Calisher P. African Horse Sickness. Vienna: Springer 1998:165–74.
    pubmed: 9785505
  37. González M, Venter GJ, López S. Laboratory and field evaluations of chemical and plant-derived potential repellents against Culicoides biting midges in northern Spain. Med Vet Entomol 2014;28:421–31.
    doi: 10.1111/mve.12081pubmed: 25079042google scholar: lookup
  38. Maia MF, Moore SJ. Plant-based insect repellents: a review of their efficacy, development and testing. Malar J 2011;10 Suppl 1:S11.
    doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-S1-S11pmc: PMC3059459pubmed: 21411012google scholar: lookup
  39. Trigg JK. Evaluation of a eucalyptus-based repellent against Culicoides impunctatus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in Scotland. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association-Mosquito News 1996;12:329–30.
    pubmed: 8827615
  40. Blackwell A, Evans KA, Strang RH. Toward development of neem-based repellents against the Scottish Highland biting midge Culicoides impunctatus. Med Vet Entomol 2004;18:449–52.
  41. Carpenter S, Eyres K, McEndrick I. Repellent efficiency of BayRepel against Culicoides impunctatus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Parasitol Res 2005;95:427–9.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-1298-6google scholar: lookup
  42. Papadopoulos E, Rowlinson M, Bartram D. Treatment of horses with cypermethrin against the biting flies Culicoides nubeculosus, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. Vet Parasitol 2010;169:165–71.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.12.023pubmed: 20074858google scholar: lookup