Sustainable equine parasite control: perspectives and research needs.
Abstract: Clinically important equine parasites are ubiquitous in managed horse populations. The traditional approach to parasite control is frequent administration of anthelmintics to all horses on a farm. However, increasing levels of anthelmintic resistance is forcing horse owners and veterinarians to shift this control paradigm. Treatment regimens involving routine deworming of all horses throughout the year are now being replaced by more sustainable approaches, which take in to account the importance of maintaining adequate parasite refugia. The selective therapy principle has been recommended for more than 15 years, but there is limited experience with this approach. The relative magnitude of the faecal egg count for an individual horse is a consistent trait, and this provides a reliable basis for selective therapy. But no studies have evaluated the consequences of selective therapy in the long-term, and such studies are strongly needed to validate this approach. Importantly, it remains unclear how selective therapy may affect the prevalence and intensity of other parasites of significant pathogenic potential (e.g. Strongylus vulgaris), which have become uncommon due to years of intensive chemotherapy. Consequently, a selective approach requires vigilant surveillance of the parasite fauna and intensity. This places a demands for reliable diagnostic tools. Also noteworthy is the fact that the majority of equine nematode parasites are more pathogenic during their larval stages, when they cannot be detected by traditional egg counting techniques. Consequently, parasite-specific diagnostic tools capable of assessing prepatent parasite burdens, and able to differentiate between strongyle species of different pathogenic potentials, would be of great value to the equine clinician. Tools for detecting infections with the tapeworm Anoplocephala perfoliata are laborious, difficult to interpret, and at present there is no established method to evaluate treatment efficacy. Thus, better diagnostic tools are needed for tapeworms as well. Biological control, especially the predacious fungi have demonstrated good potential as an adjunct for strongyle control and such a product could easily have a market in equine establishments. In summary, there is general agreement that the traditional treat-all at frequent interval approach should be abandoned, and that optimal parasite control can be maintained with far fewer anthelmintic treatments. But better diagnostic techniques and more evidence documenting the long-term consequences of selective therapy programs are needed to develop and validate systems for sustainable equine parasite control.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2011-10-18 PubMed ID: 22055611DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.012Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Anthelmintic Resistance
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic Technique
- Disease Diagnosis
- Disease Management
- Disease Surveillance
- Disease Treatment
- Equine Diseases
- Equine Health
- Equine Science
- Fecal Egg Count
- Horses
- Infection
- Infectious Disease
- Nematodes
- Parasites
- Strongyles
- Tapeworms
- Veterinary Care
- Veterinary Medicine
- Veterinary Research
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The study discusses the need for a shift from traditionally frequent anthelmintic treatment for horse parasites to more sustainable methods. The longstanding approach is showing increasing resistance, justifying the need for more sustainable techniques such as selective treatment based on the individual horse’s faecal egg count. However, an urgent need exists for research into the long-term implications of this method, the effects of selective treatment on other parasites, and the development of better diagnostic tools.
Traditional method and its challenges
- The paper opens drawing attention to the ubiquity of clinically important equine parasites in managed horse populations.
- Traditionally, all horses on a farm were frequently administered with anthelmintics – drugs that expel parasitic worms from the body.
- However, increasing levels of resistance to anthelmintics among parasites is causing a shift in this approach.
Selective Therapy approach
- An alternative to the year-round deworming approach is selective therapy, a method that is more sustainable and considers the importance of maintaining an adequate count of parasite refugia.
- Additionally, the paper describes how the faecal egg count for a horse is a consistent trait, and thus provides a reliable basis for implementing selective therapy.
- Despite these positive aspects, there is limited practical experience with selective therapy and no studies evaluating its long-term consequences, leading the authors to strongly call for more research in this area.
Improving Diagnostic Tools
- The researchers also urge a vigilant approach in monitoring the population and intensity of parasites due to uncertainty about the possible effects of selective therapy on the prevalence and intensity of other significant pathogens.
- The paper also highlights the challenge that most equine nematode parasites pose more danger during their larval stages when traditional egg counting techniques cannot detect them.
- Therefore, the authors suggest the development of parasite-specific diagnostic tools that can assess prepatent parasite burdens and differentiate between strongyle species of differing pathogenic potentials.
- The authors also call for improved methods for detecting infections with the tapeworm Anoplocephala perfoliata, stating that current techniques are laborious and difficult to interpret with no established method to evaluate treatment efficacy.
Biological Control as the Future?
- Another alternative presented in the paper is biological control, primarily predatory fungi, that have shown potential as useful for controlling strongyles.
- According to the authors, these could be readily accepted and applied in equine establishments acknowledging the potential market feasibility.
Conclusion
- In conclusion, the paper advocates for abandoning the traditional approach of treating all horses at regular intervals.
- It proposes that optimal parasite control could potentially be maintained with far fewer anthelmintic treatments.
- Nevertheless, the authors insist that improved diagnostics and further research into selective therapy’s long-term effects need to be conducted to establish systems for sustainable equine parasite control.
Cite This Article
APA
Nielsen MK.
(2011).
Sustainable equine parasite control: perspectives and research needs.
Vet Parasitol, 185(1), 32-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.012 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Large Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark. martin.nielsen@uky.edu
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Anthelmintics / economics
- Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
- Helminthiasis, Animal / diagnosis
- Helminthiasis, Animal / drug therapy
- Helminthiasis, Animal / parasitology
- Helminthiasis, Animal / prevention & control
- Horse Diseases / diagnosis
- Horse Diseases / drug therapy
- Horse Diseases / parasitology
- Horse Diseases / prevention & control
- Horses
- Research / trends
- Veterinary Medicine / economics
- Veterinary Medicine / trends
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists