Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology2011; 185(1); 32-44; doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.012

Sustainable equine parasite control: perspectives and research needs.

Abstract: Clinically important equine parasites are ubiquitous in managed horse populations. The traditional approach to parasite control is frequent administration of anthelmintics to all horses on a farm. However, increasing levels of anthelmintic resistance is forcing horse owners and veterinarians to shift this control paradigm. Treatment regimens involving routine deworming of all horses throughout the year are now being replaced by more sustainable approaches, which take in to account the importance of maintaining adequate parasite refugia. The selective therapy principle has been recommended for more than 15 years, but there is limited experience with this approach. The relative magnitude of the faecal egg count for an individual horse is a consistent trait, and this provides a reliable basis for selective therapy. But no studies have evaluated the consequences of selective therapy in the long-term, and such studies are strongly needed to validate this approach. Importantly, it remains unclear how selective therapy may affect the prevalence and intensity of other parasites of significant pathogenic potential (e.g. Strongylus vulgaris), which have become uncommon due to years of intensive chemotherapy. Consequently, a selective approach requires vigilant surveillance of the parasite fauna and intensity. This places a demands for reliable diagnostic tools. Also noteworthy is the fact that the majority of equine nematode parasites are more pathogenic during their larval stages, when they cannot be detected by traditional egg counting techniques. Consequently, parasite-specific diagnostic tools capable of assessing prepatent parasite burdens, and able to differentiate between strongyle species of different pathogenic potentials, would be of great value to the equine clinician. Tools for detecting infections with the tapeworm Anoplocephala perfoliata are laborious, difficult to interpret, and at present there is no established method to evaluate treatment efficacy. Thus, better diagnostic tools are needed for tapeworms as well. Biological control, especially the predacious fungi have demonstrated good potential as an adjunct for strongyle control and such a product could easily have a market in equine establishments. In summary, there is general agreement that the traditional treat-all at frequent interval approach should be abandoned, and that optimal parasite control can be maintained with far fewer anthelmintic treatments. But better diagnostic techniques and more evidence documenting the long-term consequences of selective therapy programs are needed to develop and validate systems for sustainable equine parasite control.
Publication Date: 2011-10-18 PubMed ID: 22055611DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.012Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study discusses the need for a shift from traditionally frequent anthelmintic treatment for horse parasites to more sustainable methods. The longstanding approach is showing increasing resistance, justifying the need for more sustainable techniques such as selective treatment based on the individual horse’s faecal egg count. However, an urgent need exists for research into the long-term implications of this method, the effects of selective treatment on other parasites, and the development of better diagnostic tools.

Traditional method and its challenges

  • The paper opens drawing attention to the ubiquity of clinically important equine parasites in managed horse populations.
  • Traditionally, all horses on a farm were frequently administered with anthelmintics – drugs that expel parasitic worms from the body.
  • However, increasing levels of resistance to anthelmintics among parasites is causing a shift in this approach.

Selective Therapy approach

  • An alternative to the year-round deworming approach is selective therapy, a method that is more sustainable and considers the importance of maintaining an adequate count of parasite refugia.
  • Additionally, the paper describes how the faecal egg count for a horse is a consistent trait, and thus provides a reliable basis for implementing selective therapy.
  • Despite these positive aspects, there is limited practical experience with selective therapy and no studies evaluating its long-term consequences, leading the authors to strongly call for more research in this area.

Improving Diagnostic Tools

  • The researchers also urge a vigilant approach in monitoring the population and intensity of parasites due to uncertainty about the possible effects of selective therapy on the prevalence and intensity of other significant pathogens.
  • The paper also highlights the challenge that most equine nematode parasites pose more danger during their larval stages when traditional egg counting techniques cannot detect them.
  • Therefore, the authors suggest the development of parasite-specific diagnostic tools that can assess prepatent parasite burdens and differentiate between strongyle species of differing pathogenic potentials.
  • The authors also call for improved methods for detecting infections with the tapeworm Anoplocephala perfoliata, stating that current techniques are laborious and difficult to interpret with no established method to evaluate treatment efficacy.

Biological Control as the Future?

  • Another alternative presented in the paper is biological control, primarily predatory fungi, that have shown potential as useful for controlling strongyles.
  • According to the authors, these could be readily accepted and applied in equine establishments acknowledging the potential market feasibility.

Conclusion

  • In conclusion, the paper advocates for abandoning the traditional approach of treating all horses at regular intervals.
  • It proposes that optimal parasite control could potentially be maintained with far fewer anthelmintic treatments.
  • Nevertheless, the authors insist that improved diagnostics and further research into selective therapy’s long-term effects need to be conducted to establish systems for sustainable equine parasite control.

Cite This Article

APA
Nielsen MK. (2011). Sustainable equine parasite control: perspectives and research needs. Vet Parasitol, 185(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.012

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2550
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 185
Issue: 1
Pages: 32-44

Researcher Affiliations

Nielsen, M K
  • Department of Large Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark. martin.nielsen@uky.edu

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anthelmintics / economics
  • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
  • Helminthiasis, Animal / diagnosis
  • Helminthiasis, Animal / drug therapy
  • Helminthiasis, Animal / parasitology
  • Helminthiasis, Animal / prevention & control
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horses
  • Research / trends
  • Veterinary Medicine / economics
  • Veterinary Medicine / trends

Citations

This article has been cited 18 times.
  1. Ullah A, Geng M, Chen W, Zhu Q, Shi L, Zhang X, Akhtar MF, Wang C, Khan MZ. Effect of Parasitic Infections on Hematological Profile, Reproductive and Productive Performance in Equines. Animals (Basel) 2025 Nov 14;15(22).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15223294pubmed: 41302002google scholar: lookup
  2. do Carmo TA, Fonseca JDS, Braga FR, Paz-Silva A, de Soutello RVG, de Araújo JV. Exploring the Use of Helminthophagous Fungi in the Control of Helminthoses in Horses: A Review. Animals (Basel) 2025 Mar 18;15(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15060864pubmed: 40150393google scholar: lookup
  3. Kuzmina TA, Königová A, Antipov A, Kuzmin Y, Kharchenko V, Syrota Y. Changes in equine strongylid communities after two decades of annual anthelmintic treatments at the farm level. Parasitol Res 2024 Nov 25;123(11):394.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-024-08417-5pubmed: 39585485google scholar: lookup
  4. Domshy KA, Whitehead AE, Poissant J, Goldsmith DA, Legge C, Knight CG, Zachar EK, Loch SS, Davies JL. A retrospective study of the prevalence in equine postmortems of cranial mesenteric arteritis caused by Strongylus vulgaris in Alberta (2010 to 2022). Can Vet J 2024 Jun;65(6):587-593.
    pubmed: 38827589
  5. Hamad MH, Islam SI, Jitsamai W, Chinkangsadarn T, Naraporn D, Ouisuwan S, Taweethavonsawat P. Patterns of Equine Small Strongyle Species Infection after Ivermectin Intervention in Thailand: Egg Reappearance Period and Nemabiome Metabarcoding Approach. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 8;14(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14040574pubmed: 38396542google scholar: lookup
  6. Fesseha H, Aliye S, Mathewos M, Nigusie K. Prevalence and risk factors associated with donkey gastrointestinal parasites in Shashemane and Suburbs, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Heliyon 2022 Dec;8(12):e12244.
    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12244pubmed: 36578399google scholar: lookup
  7. Živković S, Pavlović I, Mijatović B, Trailović I, Trailović D. Prevalence, Intensity and Risks Involved in Helminth Infections in Domestic Mountain Pony and Balkan Donkey in Nature Park Stara Planina, Serbia. Iran J Parasitol 2021 Apr-Jun;16(2):318-326.
    doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v16i2.6283pubmed: 34557248google scholar: lookup
  8. Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Petkevičius S. Anthelmintic resistance of horse strongyle nematodes to ivermectin and pyrantel in Lithuania. Acta Vet Scand 2021 Jan 25;63(1):5.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-021-00569-zpubmed: 33494770google scholar: lookup
  9. Ramalho Sousa S, Anastácio S, Nóvoa M, Paz-Silva A, Madeira de Carvalho LM. Gastrointestinal Parasitism in Miranda Donkeys: Epidemiology and Selective Control of Strongyles Infection in the Northeast of Portugal. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 11;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010155pubmed: 33440886google scholar: lookup
  10. Cunningham J, Thuijsman F, Peeters R, Viossat Y, Brown J, Gatenby R, Staňková K. Optimal control to reach eco-evolutionary stability in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. PLoS One 2020;15(12):e0243386.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243386pubmed: 33290430google scholar: lookup
  11. Arfuso F, Bazzano M, Brianti E, Gaglio G, Passantino A, Tesei B, Laus F. Nutritional Supplements Containing Cardus mariano, Eucalyptus globulus, Gentiana lutea, Urtica urens, and Mallotus philippinensis Extracts Are Effective in Reducing Egg Shedding in Dairy Jennies (Equus asinus) Naturally Infected by Cyathostomins. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:556270.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.556270pubmed: 33251253google scholar: lookup
  12. Tydén E, Enemark HL, Franko MA, Höglund J, Osterman-Lind E. Prevalence of Strongylus vulgaris in horses after ten years of prescription usage of anthelmintics in Sweden. Vet Parasitol X 2019 Nov;2:100013.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vpoa.2019.100013pubmed: 32904767google scholar: lookup
  13. Tinkler SH. Preventive chemotherapy and anthelmintic resistance of soil-transmitted helminths - Can we learn nothing from veterinary medicine?. One Health 2020 Jun;9:100106.
    doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2019.100106pubmed: 31956691google scholar: lookup
  14. Saeed MA, Beveridge I, Abbas G, Beasley A, Bauquier J, Wilkes E, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, El-Hage C, O'Handley R, Hurley J, Cudmore L, Carrigan P, Walter L, Tennent-Brown B, Nielsen MK, Jabbar A. Systematic review of gastrointestinal nematodes of horses from Australia. Parasit Vectors 2019 Apr 29;12(1):188.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3445-4pubmed: 31036059google scholar: lookup
  15. Molena RA, Peachey LE, Di Cesare A, Traversa D, Cantacessi C. Cyathostomine egg reappearance period following ivermectin treatment in a cohort of UK Thoroughbreds. Parasit Vectors 2018 Jan 25;11(1):61.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2638-6pubmed: 29370872google scholar: lookup
  16. Sallé G, Cortet J, Bois I, Dubès C, Guyot-Sionest Q, Larrieu C, Landrin V, Majorel G, Wittreck S, Woringer E, Couroucé A, Guillot J, Jacquiet P, Guégnard F, Blanchard A, Leblond A. Risk factor analysis of equine strongyle resistance to anthelmintics. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2017 Dec;7(3):407-415.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2017.10.007pubmed: 29149701google scholar: lookup
  17. Schneider S, Pfister K, Becher AM, Scheuerle MC. Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses - a risk assessment. BMC Vet Res 2014 Nov 12;10:262.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0262-zpubmed: 25387542google scholar: lookup
  18. Kuzmina TA, Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Dzeverin II, Kharchenko VA. Fecundity of various species of strongylids (Nematoda: Strongylidae)--parasites of domestic horses. Parasitol Res 2012 Dec;111(6):2265-71.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-3077-5pubmed: 22903448google scholar: lookup