FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Systematic Analysis of Breed, Methodological, and Geographic...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(11); 3088; doi: 10.3390/ani11113088

Systematic Analysis of Breed, Methodological, and Geographical Impact on Equine Sperm Progressive Motility.

Abstract: Over the past five decades, there has been increasing evidence to indicate global declines in human semen quality. Parallel adverse trends measured in male animals indicate a potential environmental aetiology. This study evaluated the progressive motility (PM) of stallion ejaculate through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 696 estimates of equine PM from 280 studies, which collected semen samples between the years 1990 and 2018, were collated for meta-analysis. The method of motility analysis, breed, season of collection, and geographical location were extracted. Simple linear regression determined temporal trends in stallion PM. Studies using microscopy estimated PM to be significantly greater compared to computer-automated methods ( ≤ 0.001). For Arabian breeds, PM was consistently higher than other breeds. Over time, there was a significant decline in PM for studies from Europe ( = 267) but a significant increase for studies from North America ( = 259). Temporal trends indicate the fertilising capacity of equine ejaculate has remained consistently high in the last three decades. That being so, variations observed suggest methodological, geographical, and individual stallion differences may significantly influence actual and reported stallion fertility potential.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-10-29 PubMed ID: 34827820PubMed Central: PMC8614490DOI: 10.3390/ani11113088Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research evaluates the progressive motility of stallion ejaculate, with influences from method of analysis, breed, geographical location and collection season considered. A notable shift in semen quality over time was observed, varying based on region.

Methodology

  • The researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis which pooled data from 280 studies carried out between 1990 and 2018. In total, 696 estimates of equine progressive motility were gathered.
  • The team recorded the method of motility analysis used in each study, the breed of the stallion, the season in which the semen sample was collected, and the geographical location of the study.
  • A simple linear regression was used to determine temporal trends in stallion progressive motility.

Findings

  • The studies that used microscopy to analyze motility reported significantly greater progressive motility estimates than those that used computer-automated methods.
  • In terms of breed, Arabian stallions consistently showed higher progressive motility rates than other breeds.
  • A significant temporal trend was observed. Research originating from Europe showed a decline in progressive motility over time. Conversely, studies from North America showed an increase in progressive motility.

Implications

  • The results demonstrate that the fertilizing capacity of equine ejaculate has remained consistently high in the past three decades. This conflicts with parallel adverse trends measured in human and other animal male semen quality.
  • The variations observed indicate that factors such as methodological differences, geographical location, and individual stallion differences could significantly influence both the actual and reported fertility potential of stallions. This could guide future research and methodology in equine fertility studies.

Cite This Article

APA
Perrett J, Harris IT, Maddock C, Farnworth M, Pyatt AZ, Sumner RN. (2021). Systematic Analysis of Breed, Methodological, and Geographical Impact on Equine Sperm Progressive Motility. Animals (Basel), 11(11), 3088. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113088

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 11
PII: 3088

Researcher Affiliations

Perrett, Jodie
  • Hartpury University and Hartpury College, Hartpury House, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Harris, Imogen Thea
  • Hartpury University and Hartpury College, Hartpury House, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Maddock, Christy
  • Hartpury University and Hartpury College, Hartpury House, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Farnworth, Mark
  • The Jeanne Marchig International Centre for Animal Welfare Education, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
Pyatt, Alison Z
  • International Office, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Addlestone KT15 3LS, UK.
Sumner, Rebecca Nicole
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 53 references
  1. World Health Organisation. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. World Health Organisation; Geneva, Switzerland: 2010.
  2. Wang C, Swerdloff RS. Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests.. Fertil Steril 2014 Dec;102(6):1502-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.021pmc: PMC4254491pubmed: 25458617google scholar: lookup
  3. Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years.. BMJ 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):609-13.
    doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.609pmc: PMC1883354pubmed: 1393072google scholar: lookup
  4. Wahl RL, Reif JS. Temporal trends in bull semen quality: a comparative model for human health?. Environ Res 2009 Apr;109(3):273-80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.10.012pubmed: 19181314google scholar: lookup
  5. Lea RG, Byers AS, Sumner RN, Rhind SM, Zhang Z, Freeman SL, Moxon R, Richardson HM, Green M, Craigon J, England GC. Environmental chemicals impact dog semen quality in vitro and may be associated with a temporal decline in sperm motility and increased cryptorchidism.. Sci Rep 2016 Aug 9;6:31281.
    doi: 10.1038/srep31281pmc: PMC4977511pubmed: 27503122google scholar: lookup
  6. Levine H, Jørgensen N, Martino-Andrade A, Mendiola J, Weksler-Derri D, Mindlis I, Pinotti R, Swan SH. Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.. Hum Reprod Update 2017 Nov 1;23(6):646-659.
    doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx022pmc: PMC6455044pubmed: 28981654google scholar: lookup
  7. Serrano T, Chevrier C, Multigner L, Cordier S, Jégou B. International geographic correlation study of the prevalence of disorders of male reproductive health.. Hum Reprod 2013 Jul;28(7):1974-86.
    doi: 10.1093/humrep/det111pubmed: 23670171google scholar: lookup
  8. Olsen GW, Bodner KM, Ramlow JM, Ross CE, Lipshultz LI. Have sperm counts been reduced 50 percent in 50 years? A statistical model revisited.. Fertil Steril 1995 Apr;63(4):887-93.
    doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57498-6pubmed: 7890079google scholar: lookup
  9. Cooper TG, Handelsman DJ. Falling sperm counts and global oestrogenic pollution: postscript.. Asian J Androl 2013 Mar;15(2):208-11.
    doi: 10.1038/aja.2013.17pmc: PMC3739167pubmed: 23416896google scholar: lookup
  10. Pacey AA. Are sperm counts declining? Or did we just change our spectacles?. Asian J Androl 2013 Mar;15(2):187-90.
    doi: 10.1038/aja.2012.165pmc: PMC3739163pubmed: 23353722google scholar: lookup
  11. Swan SH, Elkin EP, Fenster L. Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.. Environ Health Perspect 1997 Nov;105(11):1228-32.
    doi: 10.1289/ehp.971051228pmc: PMC1470335pubmed: 9370524google scholar: lookup
  12. Swan SH, Elkin EP, Fenster L. The question of declining sperm density revisited: an analysis of 101 studies published 1934-1996.. Environ Health Perspect 2000 Oct;108(10):961-6.
    doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108961pmc: PMC1240129pubmed: 11049816google scholar: lookup
  13. Mendiola J, Jørgensen N, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Sarabia-Cos L, López-Espín JJ, Vivero-Salmerón G, Ruiz-Ruiz KJ, Fernández MF, Olea N, Swan SH, Torres-Cantero AM. Sperm counts may have declined in young university students in Southern Spain.. Andrology 2013 May;1(3):408-13.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00058.xpubmed: 23307495google scholar: lookup
  14. Le Moal J, Rolland M, Goria S, Wagner V, De Crouy-Chanel P, Rigou A, De Mouzon J, Royère D. Semen quality trends in French regions are consistent with a global change in environmental exposure.. Reproduction 2014;147(4):567-74.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-13-0499pubmed: 24567426google scholar: lookup
  15. Jørgensen N, Vierula M, Jacobsen R, Pukkala E, Perheentupa A, Virtanen HE, Skakkebaek NE, Toppari J. Recent adverse trends in semen quality and testis cancer incidence among Finnish men.. Int J Androl 2011 Aug;34(4 Pt 2):e37-48.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2010.01133.xpmc: PMC3170483pubmed: 21366607google scholar: lookup
  16. Multigner L, Magistrini M, Ducot B, Spira A. Secular sperm trends in stallions between 1981 and 1996.. J Androl 1999 Nov-Dec;20(6):763-8.
    doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1999.tb03383.xpubmed: 10591616google scholar: lookup
  17. Multigner L, Magistrini M, Ducot B, Spira A. [Environment and secular sperm trend. Stallion's semen quality during the last two decades].. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2000 Aug;48 Suppl 2:2S72-8.
    pubmed: 10992112
  18. Lemazurier E, Moslemi S, Sourdaine P, Desjardins I, Plainfosse B, Seralini GE. Free and conjugated estrogens and androgens in stallion semen.. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2002 Feb 1;125(2):272-82.
    doi: 10.1006/gcen.2001.7747pubmed: 11884073google scholar: lookup
  19. Colenbrander B, Gadella BM, Stout TA. The predictive value of semen analysis in the evaluation of stallion fertility.. Reprod Domest Anim 2003 Aug;38(4):305-11.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00451.xpubmed: 12887569google scholar: lookup
  20. Hinrichs K. Assisted reproductive techniques in mares.. Reprod Domest Anim 2018 Sep;53 Suppl 2:4-13.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.13259pubmed: 30238661google scholar: lookup
  21. Claes A, Cuervo-Arango J, van den Broek J, Galli C, Colleoni S, Lazzari G, Deelen C, Beitsma M, Stout TA. Factors affecting the likelihood of pregnancy and embryonic loss after transfer of cryopreserved in vitro produced equine embryos.. Equine Vet J 2019 Jul;51(4):446-450.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13028pubmed: 30269336google scholar: lookup
  22. Squires E. Current Reproductive Technologies Impacting Equine Embryo Production.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020 Jun;89:102981.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102981pubmed: 32563442google scholar: lookup
  23. Griffin RA, Swegen A, Baker M, Aitken RJ, Skerrett-Byrne DA, Silva Rodriguez A, Martín-Cano FE, Nixon B, Peña FJ, Delehedde M, Sergeant N, Gibb Z. Mass spectrometry reveals distinct proteomic profiles in high- and low-quality stallion spermatozoa.. Reproduction 2020 Nov;160(5):695-707.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-20-0284pubmed: 32805711google scholar: lookup
  24. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.. JAMA 2000 Apr 19;283(15):2008-12.
    doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008pubmed: 10789670google scholar: lookup
  25. Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Welch V. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 6.2. Cochrane, Online 2021.
  26. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.. Int J Surg 2014 Dec;12(12):1500-24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014pubmed: 25046751google scholar: lookup
  27. Houghton C, Murphy K, Meehan B, Thomas J, Brooker D, Casey D. From screening to synthesis: using nvivo to enhance transparency in qualitative evidence synthesis.. J Clin Nurs 2017 Mar;26(5-6):873-881.
    doi: 10.1111/jocn.13443pubmed: 27324875google scholar: lookup
  28. Gottschalk M, Sieme H, Martinsson G, Distl O. Analysis of breed effects on semen traits in light horse, warmblood, and draught horse breeds.. Theriogenology 2016 May;85(8):1375-81.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.11.030pubmed: 26893165google scholar: lookup
  29. Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians.. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2012 Spring;10(2):486-9.
    doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505pmc: PMC3693611pubmed: 23843808google scholar: lookup
  30. Jasko DJ, Little TV, Lein DH, Foote RH. Comparison of spermatozoal movement and semen characteristics with fertility in stallions: 64 cases (1987-1988).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992 Apr 1;200(7):979-85.
    pubmed: 1577655
  31. Love CC, Noble JK, Standridge SA, Bearden CT, Blanchard TL, Varner DD, Cavinder CA. The relationship between sperm quality in cool-shipped semen and embryo recovery rate in horses.. Theriogenology 2015 Dec;84(9):1587-1593.e4.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.08.008pubmed: 26363735google scholar: lookup
  32. Broekhuijse ML, Soštarić E, Feitsma H, Gadella BM. Additional value of computer assisted semen analysis (CASA) compared to conventional motility assessments in pig artificial insemination.. Theriogenology 2011 Nov;76(8):1473-86.e1.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.05.040pubmed: 21872316google scholar: lookup
  33. Proctor JG, William MHA, Boone R, Lee H, Iii H, Boone WR. Comparison of the Manual, IVOS, and SCA Methods for Semen Analysis Reporting. J. Clin. Embryol. 2009;12:5–7.
  34. Iguer-ouada M, Verstegen JP. Evaluation of the "Hamilton Thorn computer-based automated system" for dog semen analysis.. Theriogenology 2001 Feb 1;55(3):733-49.
    doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00440-Xpubmed: 11245262google scholar: lookup
  35. Jasko D, Moran D, Farlin M, Squires E. Effect of seminal plasma dilution or removal on spermatozoal motion characteristics of cooled stallion semen. Theriogenology 1991;35:1059–1068.
    doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(91)90354-Ggoogle scholar: lookup
  36. Brinsko SP, Rowan KR, Varner DD, Blanchard TL. Effects of transport container and ambient storage temperature on motion characteristics of equine spermatozoa.. Theriogenology 2000 May;53(8):1641-55.
    doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00304-6pubmed: 10883850google scholar: lookup
  37. Gottschalk M, Metzger J, Martinsson G, Sieme H, Distl O. Genome-wide association study for semen quality traits in German Warmblood stallions.. Anim Reprod Sci 2016 Aug;171:81-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.06.002pubmed: 27334685google scholar: lookup
  38. Gottschalk M, Sieme H, Martinsson G, Distl O. Heritability of semen traits in German Warmblood stallions.. Anim Reprod Sci 2016 Jul;170:10-4.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.03.004pubmed: 27080493google scholar: lookup
  39. Dowsett KF, Knott LM. The influence of age and breed on stallion semen.. Theriogenology 1996 Aug;46(3):397-412.
    doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(96)00162-8pubmed: 16727908google scholar: lookup
  40. Krakowski L, Obara J, Wąchocka A, Piech T, Bartoszek P, Kostro K, Tatara MR. Assessment of extent of apoptosis and DNA defragmentation in chilled semen of stallions during the breeding season.. Reprod Domest Anim 2013 Oct;48(5):826-32.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.12170pubmed: 23531092google scholar: lookup
  41. Gurgul A, Jasielczuk I, Semik-Gurgul E, Pawlina-Tyszko K, Stefaniuk-Szmukier M, Szmatoła T, Polak G, Tomczyk-Wrona I, Bugno-Poniewierska M. A genome-wide scan for diversifying selection signatures in selected horse breeds.. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0210751.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210751pmc: PMC6353161pubmed: 30699152google scholar: lookup
  42. Gómez MD, Sánchez MJ, Bartolomé E, Cervantes I, Poyato-Bonilla J, Demyda-Peyrás S, Valera M. Phenotypic and genetic analysis of reproductive traits in horse populations with different breeding purposes.. Animal 2020 Jul;14(7):1351-1361.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731120000087pubmed: 32026801google scholar: lookup
  43. Splingart C, Frapsauce C, Veau S, Barthélémy C, Royère D, Guérif F. Semen variation in a population of fertile donors: evaluation in a French centre over a 34-year period.. Int J Androl 2012 Jun;35(3):467-74.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01229.xpubmed: 22150270google scholar: lookup
  44. Chang S, Nazem TG, Gounko D, Lee J, Bar-Chama N, Shamonki JM, Antonelli C, Copperman AB. Eleven year longitudinal study of U.S. sperm donors demonstrates declining sperm count and motility. Fertil. Steril. 2018;110:e54–e55.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.170google scholar: lookup
  45. Swan SH, Brazil C, Drobnis EZ, Liu F, Kruse RL, Hatch M, Redmon JB, Wang C, Overstreet JW. Geographic differences in semen quality of fertile U.S. males.. Environ Health Perspect 2003 Apr;111(4):414-20.
    doi: 10.1289/ehp.5927pmc: PMC1241421pubmed: 12676592google scholar: lookup
  46. Joffe M. Semen quality analysis and the idea of normal fertility.. Asian J Androl 2010 Jan;12(1):79-82.
    doi: 10.1038/aja.2009.3pmc: PMC3739676pubmed: 20111085google scholar: lookup
  47. Sumner RN, Harris IT, Van der Mescht M, Byers A, England GCW, Lea RG. The dog as a sentinel species for environmental effects on human fertility.. Reproduction 2020 May;159(6):R265-R276.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-20-0042pubmed: 32213655google scholar: lookup
  48. Cimenci O, Vandevijvere S, Goscinny S, Van Den Bergh MA, Hanot V, Vinkx C, Bolle F, Van Loco J. Dietary exposure of the Belgian adult population to non-dioxin-like PCBs.. Food Chem Toxicol 2013 Sep;59:670-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.06.020pubmed: 23811102google scholar: lookup
  49. Monnolo A, Clausi MT, Mercogliano R, Fusco G, Fiorentino ML, Buono F, Lama A, Ferrante MC. Levels of polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides in donkey milk: Correlation with the infection level by intestinal strongyles.. Chemosphere 2020 Nov;258:127287.
    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127287pubmed: 32535446google scholar: lookup
  50. Mullen KR, Rivera BN, Tidwell LG, Ivanek R, Anderson KA, Ainsworth DM. Environmental surveillance and adverse neonatal health outcomes in foals born near unconventional natural gas development activity.. Sci Total Environ 2020 Aug 20;731:138497.
    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138497pmc: PMC7430053pubmed: 32434096google scholar: lookup
  51. Whitesell K, Stefanovski D, McDonnell S, Turner R. Evaluation of the effect of laboratory methods on semen analysis and breeding soundness examination (BSE) classification in stallions.. Theriogenology 2020 Jan 15;142:67-76.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.09.035pubmed: 31581045google scholar: lookup
  52. Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, Haugen TB, Kruger T, Wang C, Mbizvo MT, Vogelsong KM. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.. Hum Reprod Update 2010 May-Jun;16(3):231-45.
    doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp048pubmed: 19934213google scholar: lookup
  53. Dillon P, Snijders S, Buckley F, Harris B, O’Connor P, Mee JF. A comparison of different dairy cow breeds on a seasonal grass-based system of milk production: 2. Reproduction and survival. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003;83:35–42.
    doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00042-3google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Gan M, Jing Y, Xie Z, Ma J, Chen L, Zhang S, Zhao Y, Niu L, Wang Y, Li X, Zhu L, Shen L. Potential Function of Testicular MicroRNAs in Heat-Stress-Induced Spermatogenesis Disorders. Int J Mol Sci 2023 May 16;24(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms24108809pubmed: 37240155google scholar: lookup
  2. Harris IT, Maddock C, Farnworth M, Nankervis K, Perrett J, Pyatt AZ, Blanchard RN. Temporal trends in equine sperm progressive motility: a systematic review and meta-regression. Reproduction 2023 Jun 1;165(6):M1-M10.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-22-0490pubmed: 37000597google scholar: lookup
  3. Prasinou P, De Amicis I, Fusaro I, Bucci R, Cavallini D, Parrillo S, Caputo M, Gramenzi A, Carluccio A. The Lipidomics of Spermatozoa and Red Blood Cells Membrane Profile of Martina Franca Donkey: Preliminary Evaluation. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 20;13(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13010008pubmed: 36611618google scholar: lookup
  4. Wysokińska A. Animal Reproduction: Semen Quality Assessment. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 23;12(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212905pubmed: 36359028google scholar: lookup
  5. Dziekońska A, Szczepańska A, Wysokińska A. Effect of Season on the Characteristics of Warmblood Stallion Spermatozoa Stored in a Liquid State at 5 °C. Animals (Basel) 2025 Apr 3;15(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15071035pubmed: 40218428google scholar: lookup
  6. Hackerova L, Pilsova A, Pilsova Z, Zelenkova N, Tymich Hegrova P, Klusackova B, Chmelikova E, Sedmikova M, Simonik O, Postlerova P. Boar Sperm Motility Assessment Using Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis: Current Practices, Limitations, and Methodological Challenges. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 22;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030305pubmed: 39943075google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,075 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.