FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Transl Anim Sci / Technical Note: The use of iSperm technology for on-farm mea...
Translational animal science2019; 3(4); 1513-1520; doi: 10.1093/tas/txz115

Technical Note: The use of iSperm technology for on-farm measurement of equine sperm motility and concentration.

Abstract: The iSperm is a newly released semen analysis tool from Aidmics Biotechnology Co. LTD, which allows an iPad Mini to be transformed into a handheld microscope with objective semen analysis software for equine available through the Apple Store (version 4.5.2). The aim of this study was to compare iSperm values for sperm motility and sperm concentration to current acceptable methods for semen analysis and to determine the agreement with these methods using statistical methods. Two ejaculates from each of five Standardbred stallions were used to compare sperm motility (computer-assisted semen analysis [CASA] vs. iSperm) and concentration (NucleoCounter SP-100 [NC] vs. hemocytometer vs. iSperm). Data were analyzed by first testing for the differences between the means of each method using a linear mixed-effects model. The agreement between the two continuous measurements for each method was then investigated by computing Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), with a value of 1 indicating perfect agreement between methods. Results are reported as the CCC with the associated 95% confidence interval in parentheses. Means for both total motility (TM) and progressive motility (PM) were equal between CASA and iSperm values (P = 0.0741 and P = 0.725, respectively). However, means for all velocity measurements were significantly different between CASA and iSperm readings (P < 0.001). For concentration, means were equal between NC and iSperm values (P = 0.748) and for hemocytometer and iSperm values (P = 0.953). The CCC for TM was 0.871 (0.788, 0.923) and for PM was 0.916 (0.847, 0.955) indicating good agreement between methods. Low levels of agreement were observed for all velocity measurements. Finally, the CCC for concentration compared by iSperm and NC was 0.970 (0.949, 0.982) and for iSperm and hemocytometer it was 0.962 (0.934, 0.978), both close to the line of perfect concordance. Although more work is needed to improve the iSperm software for velocity measurements to be acceptable by research standards, in its present form the iSperm will introduce a low-cost and affordable method for on-farm semen analysis (TM, PM, concentration) for breeders and veterinarians. As a result, more farms will have access to accurate sperm analysis tools which will help to standardize semen processing procedures leading to better overall quality of semen used for artificial insemination.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2019-08-15 PubMed ID: 32704914PubMed Central: PMC7200496DOI: 10.1093/tas/txz115Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study explores the efficacy of the iSperm tool, a newly developed technology, in assessing sperm motility and concentration in stallions. The findings indicate good agreement between the iSperm and traditional semen analysis methods for these parameters, suggesting that the tool may be a low-cost and practical alternative for on-farm semen analysis.

Study Objectives

The aim of the study was to:

  • Compare the values produced by iSperm for sperm motility and concentration against those obtained through other accepted semen analysis methods.
  • Determine the statistical agreement between iSperm measurements and those from traditional methods.

Research Methodology

The researchers:

  • Collected two ejaculates from each of five Standardbred stallions.
  • Compared iSperm measurements of sperm motility and concentration against those from two other methods: computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) and NucleoCounter SP-100 (NC) for motility, and hemocytometer for concentration.
  • Used a statistical approach involving a linear mixed-effects model to test for differences between the means of each method.
  • Calculated Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) to indicate the level of agreement between the measurements for each method.

Key Findings

The significant outcomes of the study were:

  • The means for both total motility (TM) and progressive motility (PM) were equal between CASA and iSperm values.
  • All velocity measurements showed a significant difference between CASA and iSperm readings.
  • The means for sperm concentration were equal between NC and iSperm, and between hemocytometer and iSperm.
  • The CCC for TM and PM indicated good agreement between methods.
  • Low levels of agreement were observed for velocity measurements.
  • The CCC for sperm concentration determined by iSperm and NC, as well as by iSperm and hemocytometer, nearly reached the line of perfect concordance.

Conclusion

The research suggests that while more work is needed to improve the iSperm software for velocity measurements, the tool’s current form can be used as a low-cost, convenient method for semen analysis, specifically for assessing TM, PM and sperm concentration. The iSperm technology could improve access to accurate sperm analysis tools, contributing to the standardization of semen processing procedures and improving the quality of semen used for artificial insemination.

Cite This Article

APA
Moraes CR, Runcan EE, Blawut B, Coutinho da Silva MA. (2019). Technical Note: The use of iSperm technology for on-farm measurement of equine sperm motility and concentration. Transl Anim Sci, 3(4), 1513-1520. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz115

Publication

Translational animal science
ISSN: 2573-2102
NlmUniqueID: 101738705
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 3
Issue: 4
Pages: 1513-1520

Researcher Affiliations

Moraes, Christa R
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Runcan, Erin E
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Blawut, Bryan
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Coutinho da Silva, Marco A
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

References

This article includes 19 references
  1. Amann RP, Waberski D. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments. Theriogenology 81:5–17.e1.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.004pubmed: 24274405google scholar: lookup
  2. Anzar M, Kroetsch T, Buhr MM. Comparison of different methods for assessment of sperm concentration and membrane integrity with bull semen. J Androl 30:661–668.
    doi: 10.2164/jandrol.108.007500pubmed: 19478330google scholar: lookup
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67: 1–48.
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01google scholar: lookup
  4. Brito LFC, Althouse GC, Aurich C, Chenoweth PJ, Eilts BE, Love CC, Luvoni GC, Mitchell JR, Peter AT, Pugh DG. Andrology laboratory review: evaluation of sperm concentration. Theriogenology 85:1507–1527.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.01.002pubmed: 27045626google scholar: lookup
  5. Camus A, Camugli S, Lévêque C, Schmitt E, Staub C. Is photometry an accurate and reliable method to assess boar semen concentration?. Theriogenology 75:577–583.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.09.025pubmed: 21074835google scholar: lookup
  6. Crabtree JR, Hawes AR, Morgan L, Burton KL, Statham JME, Matson TRV. Validation and application of a tablet app for equine semen analysis. Equine Vet J 50(S52):20 (Abstr.).
    doi: 10.1111/evj.34_13008google scholar: lookup
  7. Darr CR, Varner DD, Teague S, Cortopassi GA, Datta S, Meyers SA. Lactate and pyruvate are major sources of energy for stallion sperm with dose effects on mitochondrial function, motility, and ROS production. Biol Reprod 95:34.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.140707pubmed: 27335066google scholar: lookup
  8. Kanakasabapathy MK, Sadasivam M, Singh A, Preston C, Thirumalaraju P, Venkataraman M, Bormann CL, Draz MS, Petrozza JC, Shafiee H. An automated smartphone-based diagnostic assay for point-of-care semen analysis. Sci Transl Med 9(382).
    doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai7863pmc: PMC5701517pubmed: 28330865google scholar: lookup
  9. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw 82:1–26.
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.il3google scholar: lookup
  10. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268.
    pubmed: 2720055
  11. Love C. Modern techniques for semen evaluation. Vet Clin Equine 32:531–546.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cevq.2016.07.006pubmed: 27810038google scholar: lookup
  12. Plaza Davila M, Martin Muñoz P, Tapia JA, Ortega Ferrusola C, Balao da Silva CC, Peña FJ. Inhibition of mitochondrial complex I leads to decreased motility and membrane integrity related to increased hydrogen peroxide and reduced ATP production, while the inhibition of glycolysis has less impact on sperm motility. PLos One 10:e0138777.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138777pmc: PMC4583303pubmed: 26407142google scholar: lookup
  13. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. .
  14. Schoeller SF, Keaveny EE. From flagellar undulations to collective motion: predicting the dynamics of sperm suspensions. J R Soc Interface 15:20170834.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0834pmc: PMC5908526pubmed: 29563245google scholar: lookup
  15. Stevenson M, Nunes T, Sanchez J, Thornton R, Reiczigel J, Robison-Cox J, Sebastiani P. EpiR: an R package for the analysis of epidemiological data. Version 1.0-2. 9–43.
  16. Tseng D, Mudanyali O, Oztoprak C, Isikman SO, Sencan I, Yaglidere O, Ozcan A. Lensfree microscopy on a cellphone. Lab Chip 10:1787–1792.
    doi: 10.1039/c003477kpmc: PMC2941438pubmed: 20445943google scholar: lookup
  17. Verstegen J, Iguer-Ouada M, Onclin K. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 57:149–179.
    pubmed: 11775967
  18. Watson PF, Petrie A. Method agreement analysis: a review of correct methodology. Theriogenology 73:1167–1179.
    pubmed: 20138353doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.003google scholar: lookup
  19. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. .

Citations

This article has been cited 11 times.
  1. Boni R, Ruggiero R, De Luca F, Serritella ML, Di Palma T, Cecchini Gualandi S. Repeatability of Selected Parameters Related to Stallion Sperm Quality and Cryotolerance. Animals (Basel) 2025 Sep 26;15(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15192805pubmed: 41096400google scholar: lookup
  2. Hsu W, Lin T, Chang S, Lin M, Huang C, Shen P, Chou C, Peng S. Optimization of Black Boar Sperm Cryopreservation Efficiency with Antioxidant-Rich Plant Extracts from Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum). Animals (Basel) 2025 Jun 18;15(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15121798pubmed: 40564349google scholar: lookup
  3. Lin SS, Chen CY, Lin CM, Chiang TC, Tang YS, Yeh CC, Hsu WF, Wo AM. A Mobile Sperm Analyzer with User-Friendly Microfluidic Chips for Rapid On-Farm Semen Evaluation. Biosensors (Basel) 2025 Jun 18;15(6).
    doi: 10.3390/bios15060394pubmed: 40558476google scholar: lookup
  4. Barth A, Perry VEA, Hamilton LE, Sutovsky P, Oko R. Assessing Bovine Male Fertility in a Technological Age. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 2025;240:297-329.
    doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-70126-9_7pubmed: 40272592google scholar: lookup
  5. Brito LFC. Sperm Motility Evaluation in Stallion Fresh, Cooled and Frozen Semen Using a Portable Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis System. Reprod Domest Anim 2025 Mar;60(3):e70052.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.70052pubmed: 40111150google scholar: lookup
  6. Camus A, Rouillon C, Gavin-Plagne L, Schmitt E. The Motility Ratio method as a novel approach to qualify semen assessment. Sci Rep 2024 Nov 14;14(1):27932.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79500-1pubmed: 39537973google scholar: lookup
  7. Zhu L, Tillquist N, Scatolin G, Gately R, Kawaida M, Reiter A, Reed S, Zinn S, Govoni K, Jiang Z. Maternal restricted- and over- feeding during gestation perturb offspring sperm epigenome in sheep. Reproduction 2023 Nov 1;166(5):311-322.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-23-0074pubmed: 37647207google scholar: lookup
  8. Sevilla F, Soler C, Araya-Zúñiga I, Barquero V, Roldan ERS, Valverde A. Are There Differences between Methods Used for the Objective Estimation of Boar Sperm Concentration and Motility?. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 12;13(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13101622pubmed: 37238052google scholar: lookup
  9. Medica AJ, Lambourne S, Aitken RJ. Predicting the Outcome of Equine Artificial Inseminations Using Chilled Semen. Animals (Basel) 2023 Mar 30;13(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071203pubmed: 37048459google scholar: lookup
  10. Domain G, Banchi P, Ali Hassan H, Eilers A, Lannoo J, Wydooghe E, Niżański W, Van Soom A. Sperm Gone Smart: A Portable Device (iSperm(®)) to Assess Semen Concentration and Motility in Dogs. Animals (Basel) 2022 Mar 4;12(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12050652pubmed: 35268220google scholar: lookup
  11. Bulkeley E, Collins C, Foutouhi A, Gonzales K, Power H, Meyers S. Assessment of an iPad-based sperm motility analyzer for determination of canine sperm motility. Transl Anim Sci 2021 Apr;5(2):txab066.
    doi: 10.1093/tas/txab066pubmed: 34124591google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.