Technique-associated outcomes in horses following large colon resection.
Abstract: To compare survival and complications in horses undergoing large colon resection with either sutured end-to-end or stapled functional end-to-end anastomoses. Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Twenty-six client-owned horses with gastrointestinal disease. Methods: Retrospective data were retrieved from the medical records of 26 horses undergoing colectomy, including 14 horses with sutured end-to-end and 12 horses with stapled functional end-to-end anastomoses, between 2003 and 2016. Records were evaluated for signalment, medical and surgical treatments, and survival to hospital discharge. Long-term follow-up was obtained through owner contact. Continuous variables were compared with Mann-Whitney tests. Fisher's exact testing was used to compare survival to hospital discharge. Survival time was compared by constructing Kaplan-Meier survival curves and performing log-rank curve comparison testing. Results: Mean age of horses undergoing colectomy was 13 years. Reason for colectomy was prophylaxis (12) or salvage (14). Mean surgical time was 169 minutes. Mean hospitalization time was 9 days, which did not differ with anastomosis type (P = .62). Nine of 12 horses undergoing stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis and 12 of 14 horses undergoing sutured end-to-end anastomosis survived to hospital discharge (P = .63). Survival time did not differ with anastomosis technique (P = .35). Conclusions: Short- and long-term survival outcomes are not different between sutured end-to-end or stapled functional end-to-end anastomoses in horses undergoing colectomy.
© 2017 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Publication Date: 2017-10-07 PubMed ID: 28987065DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12725Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research compares the survival rates and complications in horses that undergo two different types of surgery for large colon resection due to gastrointestinal disease. The findings show no significant difference in either short-term or long-term survival outcomes between the two surgical methods: sutured end-to-end and stapled functional end-to-end colon resection.
Study Methodology
- The study is retrospective in nature and analyzed data from medical records of 26 client-owned horses treated for gastrointestinal disease.
- These horses underwent large colon resection between 2003 and 2016, with 14 of them having sutured end-to-end and 12 with stapled functional end-to-end anastomoses.
- The researchers focused on different factors such as type of treatment, survival until discharge from the hospital, surgical time, hospitalization period, and underlying reason for performing the colectomy—either as a preventative measure or for salvage.
- To evaluate continuous variables, the team used Mann-Whitney tests, while Fisher’s exact testing was used to compare survival to hospital discharge.
- They constructed Kaplan-Meier survival curves to compare survival time, carrying out log-rank curve comparison testing for the same.
Key Findings
- The average age of the horses undergoing colectomy was 13 years.
- The average surgical time across all operations was 169 minutes and the mean hospitalization time was 9 days.
- There was no difference in hospitalization time based on the type of anastomosis technique employed (P = .62).
- Of the 12 horses that underwent the stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis, 9 survived to hospital discharge. Similarly, 12 of the 14 horses that underwent sutured end-to-end anastomosis survived to hospital discharge. The difference here was found to be non-significant (P = .63).
- Furthermore, there was no significant difference in survival time when comparing the two anastomosis techniques (P = .35).
Conclusion
- Results show that there are comparable survival rates and postoperative complications between horses undergoing sutured end-to-end or stapled functional end-to-end anastomoses for large colon resection.
- The research ultimately suggests that the choice between these two surgical techniques can be largely based on surgeons’ preference or comfort, as both techniques are equally ineffective in significantly improving survival outcomes.
Cite This Article
APA
Pezzanite LM, Hackett ES.
(2017).
Technique-associated outcomes in horses following large colon resection.
Vet Surg, 46(8), 1061-1067.
https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12725 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
MeSH Terms
- Anastomosis, Surgical / veterinary
- Animals
- Cohort Studies
- Colectomy / methods
- Colectomy / veterinary
- Colorado / epidemiology
- Female
- Horse Diseases / surgery
- Horses
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate
- Male
- Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
- Postoperative Complications / etiology
- Postoperative Complications / veterinary
- Retrospective Studies
- Treatment Outcome
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists