Technique for assessing respiratory health hazards from hay and other source materials.
Abstract: This paper describes and compares three techniques of categorisation of hay, straw and other feeds and beddings collected from stables. A hand-held sampler was used to categorise samples according to the presence of plant material, fungal spores and dust mites. An Andersen sampler was used to categorise samples according to the thermotolerances of fungi and actinomycetes. An aerodynamic particle sizer was used to categorise samples according to respirable particle release rates. The highest burden of respirable particles was associated with the presence of thermophilic and thermotolerant actinomycetes and fungi. The portable slit sampler proved to be an accurate, quick and simple semiquantitative method of assessing the mould contamination of source materials. This latter technique requires only a microscope and the sampler, and is thus ideal for veterinary practices and small diagnostic laboratories.
Publication Date: 1987-09-01 PubMed ID: 3678187DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1987.tb02639.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study investigates three methods to classify hay, straw, and other feeds and beddings from stables based on various factors such as the presence of plant material, fungal spores, dust mites, and the rate of respirable particle release. The research finds that materials containing heat-resistant actinomycetes and fungi have the highest burden of respirable particles, and concludes that the portable slit sampler is the most quick and simple method to detect mold contamination of the source materials.
Research Objectives and Methodology
- The research aimed to evaluate and compare three techniques used for categorising hay, straw, and other similar materials often found in stables.
- These techniques rated the materials based on different attributes such as the presence of plant material, fungal spores, dust mites, the thermotolerance of fungi and actinomycetes, and the release rate of respirable particles.
- The techniques involved a hand-held sampler, an Andersen sampler and an aerodynamic particle sizer.
Findings of the Study
- The researchers found that source materials which contained thermophilic (heat-loving) and thermotolerant actinomycetes and fungi had the highest burden of respirable particles.
- Respirable particles are airborne particles small enough to be inhaled into the lungs, which can pose health risks to humans and animals in the stables, particularly respiratory diseases.
- This discovery emphasizes the importance of assessing and mitigating the risk posed by these organisms in stables.
Evaluation of the Techniques
- The authors determined that the portable slit sampler was especially useful due to its speed, simplicity, and accuracy in measuring mould contamination in the materials assessed.
- Compared to the other two methods, the portable slit sampler only requires a microscope and the sampler itself, making it a practical choice for veterinary practices and smaller diagnostic labs that may not have access to more complex equipment or techniques.
- The successful implementation of this technique could therefore lead to more frequent and accessible testing for mould contamination in source materials, contributing to improved respiratory health in stables.
Cite This Article
APA
Clarke AF, Madelin T.
(1987).
Technique for assessing respiratory health hazards from hay and other source materials.
Equine Vet J, 19(5), 442-447.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1987.tb02639.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Bristol, Langford.
MeSH Terms
- Actinomycetales / growth & development
- Air Microbiology
- Air Pollutants / analysis
- Animal Feed
- Animals
- Dust
- Fungi / growth & development
- Horse Diseases / etiology
- Horses
- Housing, Animal
- Mites
- Respiratory Tract Diseases / etiology
- Respiratory Tract Diseases / veterinary
- Spores, Fungal
Citations
This article has been cited 5 times.- Intemann S, Reckels B, Schubert D, Wolf P, Kamphues J, Visscher C. The Hygienic Status of Different Forage Types for Horses-A Retrospective Study on Influencing Factors and Associations with Anamnestic Reports. Vet Sci 2022 May 6;9(5).
- Sheats MK, Davis KU, Poole JA. Comparative Review of Asthma in Farmers and Horses. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2019 Oct 10;19(11):50.
- Couëtil LL, Cardwell JM, Gerber V, Lavoie JP, Léguillette R, Richard EA. Inflammatory Airway Disease of Horses--Revised Consensus Statement. J Vet Intern Med 2016 Mar-Apr;30(2):503-15.
- Naylor JM, Clark EG, Clayton HM. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Usefulness of clinical signs, bronchoalveolar lavage, and lung biopsy as diagnostic and prognostic aids. Can Vet J 1992 Sep;33(9):591-8.
- Bouverat VMA, Pradervand N, Wichert BA, Greim E, Dolf GJ, Gerber V. Sensory Assessment of Hay Samples: Abnormal Odor Predicts Increased Dust Levels and Impurities Suggest Microbiological Contamination. Animals (Basel) 2025 Sep 14;15(18).
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists