Analyze Diet
Connective tissue research2016; 57(6); 454-465; doi: 10.3109/03008207.2015.1117458

Tenogenesis of bone marrow-, adipose-, and tendon-derived stem cells in a dynamic bioreactor.

Abstract: Tendons are frequently damaged and fail to regenerate, leading to pain, loss of function, and reduced quality of life. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) possess clinically useful tissue-regenerative properties and have been exploited for use in tendon tissue engineering and cell therapy. However, MSCs exhibit phenotypic heterogeneity based on the donor tissue used, and the efficacy of cell-based treatment modalities may be improved by optimizing cell source based on relative differentiation capacity. Equine MSCs were isolated from bone marrow (BM), adipose (AD), and tendon (TN), expanded in monolayer prior to seeding on decellularized tendon scaffolds (DTS), and cell-laden constructs were placed in a bioreactor designed to mimic the biophysical environment of the tendon. It was hypothesized that TN MSCs would differentiate toward a tendon cell phenotype better than BM and AD MSCs in response to a conditioning period involving cyclic mechanical stimulation for 1 hour per day at 3% strain and 0.33 Hz. All cell types integrated into DTS adopted an elongated morphology similar to tenocytes, expressed tendon marker genes, and improved tissue mechanical properties after 11 days. TN MSCs expressed the greatest levels of scleraxis, collagen type-I, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein. Major histocompatibility class-II protein mRNA expression was not detected in any of the MSC types, suggesting low immunogenicity for allogeneic transplantation. The results suggest that TN MSCs are the ideal cell type for regenerative medicine therapies for tendinopathies, exhibiting the most mature tendon-like phenotype in vitro. When TN MSCs are unavailable, BM or AD MSCs may serve as robust alternatives.
Publication Date: 2016-03-30 PubMed ID: 27028488DOI: 10.3109/03008207.2015.1117458Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research seeks to identify the most suitable source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for repairing damaged tendons, which typically struggle to regenerate on their own. Findings show that MSCs derived from tendon (TN MSCs) are the most effective in adopting tendon-like characteristics while adjusting to a biomechanical environment that simulates real tendon conditions.

Objective and Hypothesis

  • The important goal of the research was to establish the most effective mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for use in tendon regeneration. The research focused on MSCs derived from sources like bone marrow (BM), adipose (AD), and tendon (TN).
  • The guiding hypothesis was that the TN MSCs would best adapt to a tendon-like state compared to the BM and AD MSCs. This is examined under the assumption that the cells are subjected to cyclic mechanical stimulation for an hour every day, at a frequency of 0.33 Hz at a strain of 3%.

Methodology

  • The study made use of equine MSCs from the BM, AD, and TN areas. After enlarging these in a monolayer, they were placed on de-cellularized tendon scaffolds (DTS).
  • Arranging these cell-laden constructs in a special bioreactor, the researchers endeavored to imitate the biomechanical setting of a tendon.

Findings

  • All types of MSCs successfully integrated into the DTS and morphed into an extended shape similar to tenocytes, which are typical tendon cells.
  • These cells also expressed genes that mark the presence of tendons while enhancing the mechanical properties of the tissue after 11 days.
  • It was found that the MSCs derived from tendons (TN MSCs) demonstrated the highest levels of scleraxis, collagen type-I, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, all of which are crucial for tendon formation and structure.
  • No traces of Major histocompatibility class-II protein mRNA expression were found in any type of MSCs indicating low possibilities for immunogenicity in case of allogenic transplantation.
  • The results hinted at the fact that TN MSCs, based on their ability to mature into a tendon-like phenotype in vitro, could be the ideal choice for regenerative treatment procedures for tendinopathies.
  • In scenarios where TN MSCs are not available, the scientists have suggested that AD or BM MSCs could serve as viable alternatives.

Cite This Article

APA
Youngstrom DW, LaDow JE, Barrett JG. (2016). Tenogenesis of bone marrow-, adipose-, and tendon-derived stem cells in a dynamic bioreactor. Connect Tissue Res, 57(6), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.3109/03008207.2015.1117458

Publication

ISSN: 1607-8438
NlmUniqueID: 0365263
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 57
Issue: 6
Pages: 454-465

Researcher Affiliations

Youngstrom, Daniel W
  • a Program in Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, Marion duPont Scott Equine Medical Center , Virginia Tech , Leesburg , VA , USA.
LaDow, Jade E
  • a Program in Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, Marion duPont Scott Equine Medical Center , Virginia Tech , Leesburg , VA , USA.
Barrett, Jennifer G
  • b Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Marion duPont Scott Equine Medical Center , Virginia Tech , Leesburg , VA , USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Adipose Tissue / cytology
  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Bioreactors
  • Bone Marrow Cells / cytology
  • Cattle
  • Cell Line
  • Collagen / metabolism
  • Colony-Forming Units Assay
  • Extracellular Matrix / metabolism
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Glycosaminoglycans / metabolism
  • Histocompatibility Antigens Class I / metabolism
  • Histocompatibility Antigens Class II / metabolism
  • Horses
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / cytology
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / metabolism
  • Organogenesis
  • Tendons / cytology
  • Tissue Engineering / methods
  • Tissue Scaffolds

Citations

This article has been cited 27 times.
  1. Wang Z, Liao Y, Wang C, Tang C, Fang C, Luo J, Liu H, Mo X, Wang Z, Shen L, Wang J, Chen X, Yin Z, Li J, Shen W. Stem cell-based therapeutic strategies for rotator cuff tendinopathy.. J Orthop Translat 2023 Sep;42:73-81.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2023.07.006pubmed: 37664079google scholar: lookup
  2. Yang Q, Li J, Su W, Yu L, Li T, Wang Y, Zhang K, Wu Y, Wang L. Electrospun aligned poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofiber yarns guiding 3D organization of tendon stem/progenitor cells in tenogenic differentiation and tendon repair.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:960694.
    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.960694pubmed: 36110313google scholar: lookup
  3. Chen Z, Chen P, Zheng M, Gao J, Liu D, Wang A, Zheng Q, Leys T, Tai A, Zheng M. Challenges and perspectives of tendon-derived cell therapy for tendinopathy: from bench to bedside.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2022 Sep 2;13(1):444.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03113-6pubmed: 36056395google scholar: lookup
  4. Wu SY, Kim W, Kremen TJ Jr. In Vitro Cellular Strain Models of Tendon Biology and Tenogenic Differentiation.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:826748.
    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.826748pubmed: 35242750google scholar: lookup
  5. Guo X, Lv H, Fan Z, Duan K, Liang J, Zou L, Xue H, Huang D, Wang Y, Tan M. Effects of hypoxia on Achilles tendon repair using adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells seeded small intestinal submucosa.. J Orthop Surg Res 2021 Sep 24;16(1):570.
    doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02713-xpubmed: 34579755google scholar: lookup
  6. Leonardi EA, Xiao M, Murray IR, Robinson WH, Abrams GD. Tendon-Derived Progenitor Cells With Multilineage Potential Are Present Within Human Patellar Tendon.. Orthop J Sports Med 2021 Aug;9(8):23259671211023452.
    doi: 10.1177/23259671211023452pubmed: 34435068google scholar: lookup
  7. Li ZJ, Yang QQ, Zhou YL. Basic Research on Tendon Repair: Strategies, Evaluation, and Development.. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:664909.
    doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.664909pubmed: 34395467google scholar: lookup
  8. Meeremans M, Van de Walle GR, Van Vlierberghe S, De Schauwer C. The Lack of a Representative Tendinopathy Model Hampers Fundamental Mesenchymal Stem Cell Research.. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:651164.
    doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.651164pubmed: 34012963google scholar: lookup
  9. De Pieri A, Rochev Y, Zeugolis DI. Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast.. NPJ Regen Med 2021 Mar 29;6(1):18.
    doi: 10.1038/s41536-021-00133-3pubmed: 33782415google scholar: lookup
  10. Wei B, Lu J. Characterization of Tendon-Derived Stem Cells and Rescue Tendon Injury.. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2021 Oct;17(5):1534-1551.
    doi: 10.1007/s12015-021-10143-9pubmed: 33651334google scholar: lookup
  11. Leek CC, Soulas JM, Sullivan AL, Killian ML. Using tools in mechanobiology to repair tendons.. Curr Tissue Microenviron Rep 2020 Jun;1(2):31-40.
    doi: 10.1007/s43152-020-00005-wpubmed: 33585822google scholar: lookup
  12. Yang F, Richardson DW. Comparative Analysis of Tenogenic Gene Expression in Tenocyte-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Response to Biochemical and Biomechanical Stimuli.. Stem Cells Int 2021;2021:8835576.
    doi: 10.1155/2021/8835576pubmed: 33510795google scholar: lookup
  13. Sheng R, Jiang Y, Backman LJ, Zhang W, Chen J. The Application of Mechanical Stimulations in Tendon Tissue Engineering.. Stem Cells Int 2020;2020:8824783.
    doi: 10.1155/2020/8824783pubmed: 33029149google scholar: lookup
  14. Janvier AJ, Canty-Laird E, Henstock JR. A universal multi-platform 3D printed bioreactor chamber for tendon tissue engineering.. J Tissue Eng 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2041731420942462.
    doi: 10.1177/2041731420942462pubmed: 32944210google scholar: lookup
  15. Ciardulli MC, Marino L, Lovecchio J, Giordano E, Forsyth NR, Selleri C, Maffulli N, Porta GD. Tendon and Cytokine Marker Expression by Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Hyaluronate/Poly-Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA)/Fibrin Three-Dimensional (3D) Scaffold.. Cells 2020 May 20;9(5).
    doi: 10.3390/cells9051268pubmed: 32443833google scholar: lookup
  16. Sigmarsdóttir Þ, McGarrity S, Rolfsson Ó, Yurkovich JT, Sigurjónsson ÓE. Current Status and Future Prospects of Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling to Optimize the Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:239.
    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00239pubmed: 32296688google scholar: lookup
  17. Qi F, Deng Z, Ma Y, Wang S, Liu C, Lyu F, Wang T, Zheng Q. From the perspective of embryonic tendon development: various cells applied to tendon tissue engineering.. Ann Transl Med 2020 Feb;8(4):131.
    doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.78pubmed: 32175424google scholar: lookup
  18. Su X, Wang J, Kang H, Bao G, Liu L. Effects of dynamic radial tensile stress on fibrocartilage differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.. Biomed Eng Online 2020 Feb 5;19(1):8.
    doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-0751-1pubmed: 32024525google scholar: lookup
  19. Yang F, Zhang A, Richardson DW. Regulation of the tenogenic gene expression in equine tenocyte-derived induced pluripotent stem cells by mechanical loading and Mohawk.. Stem Cell Res 2019 Aug;39:101489.
    doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101489pubmed: 31277043google scholar: lookup
  20. Shojaee A, Parham A. Strategies of tenogenic differentiation of equine stem cells for tendon repair: current status and challenges.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2019 Jun 18;10(1):181.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1291-0pubmed: 31215490google scholar: lookup
  21. Zarychta-Wiśniewska W, Burdzińska A, Zielniok K, Koblowska M, Gala K, Pędzisz P, Iwanicka-Nowicka R, Fogtman A, Aksamit A, Kulesza A, Zołocińska A, Pączek L. The Influence of Cell Source and Donor Age on the Tenogenic Potential and Chemokine Secretion of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.. Stem Cells Int 2019;2019:1613701.
    doi: 10.1155/2019/1613701pubmed: 31205472google scholar: lookup
  22. Roth SP, Schubert S, Scheibe P, Groß C, Brehm W, Burk J. Growth Factor-Mediated Tenogenic Induction of Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Is Altered by the Microenvironment of Tendon Matrix.. Cell Transplant 2018 Oct;27(10):1434-1450.
    doi: 10.1177/0963689718792203pubmed: 30251565google scholar: lookup
  23. Fitzsimmons REB, Mazurek MS, Soos A, Simmons CA. Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering.. Stem Cells Int 2018;2018:8031718.
    doi: 10.1155/2018/8031718pubmed: 30210552google scholar: lookup
  24. Brandt L, Schubert S, Scheibe P, Brehm W, Franzen J, Gross C, Burk J. Tenogenic Properties of Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells Are Compromised in an Inflammatory Environment.. Int J Mol Sci 2018 Aug 28;19(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms19092549pubmed: 30154348google scholar: lookup
  25. Testa S, Costantini M, Fornetti E, Bernardini S, Trombetta M, Seliktar D, Cannata S, Rainer A, Gargioli C. Combination of biochemical and mechanical cues for tendon tissue engineering.. J Cell Mol Med 2017 Nov;21(11):2711-2719.
    doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13186pubmed: 28470843google scholar: lookup
  26. Usuelli FG, Grassi M, Maccario C, Vigano' M, Lanfranchi L, Alfieri Montrasio U, de Girolamo L. Intratendinous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) injection provides a safe, efficacious treatment for Achilles tendinopathy: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a 6-month follow-up.. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018 Jul;26(7):2000-2010.
    doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4479-9pubmed: 28251260google scholar: lookup
  27. Burk J, Plenge A, Brehm W, Heller S, Pfeiffer B, Kasper C. Induction of Tenogenic Differentiation Mediated by Extracellular Tendon Matrix and Short-Term Cyclic Stretching.. Stem Cells Int 2016;2016:7342379.
    doi: 10.1155/2016/7342379pubmed: 27630718google scholar: lookup