Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2025; 55(2); 383-395; doi: 10.1111/vsu.70021

Tenoscopically guided proximal digital annular ligament desmotomy for the treatment of proximal digital annular ligament desmitis.

Abstract: To describe a tenoscopically guided technique for desmotomy of the proximal digital annular ligament (PDAL). Methods: Ex vivo study and clinical case series. Methods: A total of 10 normal cadaver equine hindlimbs and five clinical cases of PDAL desmitis. Methods: The digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) was approached via a lateral basisesamoid portal and a palmar/plantar annular ligament (PAL) desmotomy was performed to improve maneuverability in the DFTS. Additional proximolateral and distal midline instrument portals were created to facilitate transection of the proximolateral attachment, the distal body and proximal body of the PDAL under tenoscopic guidance. Cadaver limbs were dissected to assess completeness of the PDAL desmotomy and iatrogenic damage. Follow up of clinical cases was obtained via telephone conversations. Results: The proximolateral attachment and distal body of the PDAL were fully transected in each cadaver. The proximal body of the PDAL was never completely transected in cadaver limbs. Iatrogenic damage to the superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) occurred in four cadaver limbs. Four clinical cases were sound and returned to their previous levels of exercise following surgery. The final horse showed immediate improvement but was euthanized due to synovial sepsis 3 weeks postoperatively. Conclusions: There are limitations of tenoscopically guided PDAL desmotomy in the cadaver model but the technique was transferrable to clinical cases of PDAL desmitis with a good prognosis for a return to soundness. Conclusions: PDAL desmitis when diagnosed should be considered a significant finding and PDAL desmotomy provides a viable treatment option for these cases.
Publication Date: 2025-09-16 PubMed ID: 40955800DOI: 10.1111/vsu.70021Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study developed and evaluated a tenoscopically guided surgical technique to treat proximal digital annular ligament (PDAL) desmitis in horses.
  • The technique was tested on cadaver limbs and applied in clinical cases, showing promising outcomes despite some technical challenges.

Background

  • The proximal digital annular ligament (PDAL) is a band of connective tissue around the horse’s digital flexor tendons.
  • Desmitis refers to inflammation and damage of a ligament, in this case the PDAL, causing lameness and reduced performance in horses.
  • Traditional surgical treatments for PDAL desmitis involve desmotomy, which means cutting the ligament to relieve pressure.
  • Tenoscopy is a minimally invasive technique using a small camera inside the tendon sheath to guide precise ligament cutting.

Objectives

  • To describe and evaluate a tenoscopically guided technique for performing desmotomy of the PDAL in horses.
  • To assess the completeness of the ligament transection and look for any surgical damage in cadaver limbs.
  • To report clinical outcomes of horses with PDAL desmitis treated using this technique.

Methods

  • Ex vivo testing:
    • Ten normal equine hindlimbs from cadavers were used to practice and investigate the procedure.
    • Access to the digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) was obtained via a lateral basisesamoid portal.
    • A palmar/plantar annular ligament (PAL) desmotomy was performed first to improve maneuverability.
    • Additional portals were created proximolaterally and distally in the midline to facilitate cutting different parts of the PDAL under tenoscopic visualization.
    • The limbs were then dissected to examine if the PDAL had been completely transected and to check for unintended damage, particularly to nearby tendons like the superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT).
  • Clinical evaluation:
    • Five clinical cases of horses diagnosed with PDAL desmitis underwent the described tenoscopic desmotomy procedure.
    • Follow-up involved telephone conversations to evaluate soundness and return to exercise.

Results

  • Cadaver limb findings:
    • The proximolateral attachment and distal body of the PDAL were completely transected in all 10 limbs.
    • The proximal body of the PDAL was not fully cut in any cadaver limb, indicating some technical limitations.
    • In 4 limbs, accidental damage was observed to the superficial digital flexor tendon, which is a potential complication.
  • Clinical case outcomes:
    • Four of the five horses returned to their previous levels of exercise and soundness after surgery.
    • One horse showed immediate postoperative improvement but later developed synovial sepsis, a severe joint infection, and was euthanized after 3 weeks.

Conclusions

  • The technique of tenoscopically guided PDAL desmotomy shows promise but has limitations in completely cutting the proximal body of the ligament in cadaver models.
  • The procedure can cause inadvertent damage to nearby tendons and requires careful surgical skill.
  • Despite challenges seen in cadaver limbs, the technique transferred well to live clinical cases with generally good outcomes and prognoses.
  • Diagnosis of PDAL desmitis should be considered significant as it affects performance, and this minimally invasive surgical option provides an effective treatment approach.
  • Further refinement and evaluation may improve completeness of ligament cutting and reduce risks of iatrogenic injury.

Cite This Article

APA
Wood AD, Parker RA. (2025). Tenoscopically guided proximal digital annular ligament desmotomy for the treatment of proximal digital annular ligament desmitis. Vet Surg, 55(2), 383-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70021

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 55
Issue: 2
Pages: 383-395

Researcher Affiliations

Wood, Andrew D
  • Liphook Equine Hospital, Liphook, UK.
Parker, Russell A
  • Liphook Equine Hospital, Liphook, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Cadaver
  • Female
  • Male
  • Ligaments / surgery
  • Hindlimb / surgery
  • Tenotomy / veterinary
  • Tenotomy / methods

References

This article includes 15 references
  1. Schramme MC, Smith RKW. Diseases of the digital synovial sheath, palmar annular ligament, and digital annular ligaments. Elsevier Inc; 2003:674‐684.
  2. Albanese V, Wilhite D, Caldwell F. Proximal digital annular ligament desmotomy in horses: a cadaveric study. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34(5):647‐650.
  3. O'Brien EJO, McAlpine JM, Schramme MC. Avulsion of the proximal digital annular ligament in five hindlimbs. Equine Vet Educ 2018;30(8):427‐432.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12861google scholar: lookup
  4. Dik KJ, Dyson SJ, Vail TB. Aseptic tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendon sheath, fetlock and pastern annular ligament constriction. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1995;11(2):151‐162.
  5. Dik K, Boroffka S, Stolk P. Ultrasonographic assessment of the proximal digital annular ligament in the equine forelimb. Equine Vet J 1994;26(1):59‐64.
  6. Wood AD, Parker RA, Marcatili M, Anderson J, Robinson N, Stack JD. Outcome of tenoscopically guided palmar/plantar annular ligament desmotomy for the treatment of palmar/plantar annular ligament constriction without concurrent intrathecal soft‐tissue injury in a UK horse population. Vet Surg 2024;53(5):893‐903.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.14120google scholar: lookup
  7. Arensburg L, Wilderjans H, Simon O, Dewulf J, Boussauw B. Nonseptic tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendon sheath caused by longitudinal tears in the digital flexor tendons: a retrospective study of 135 tenoscopic procedures. Equine Vet J 2011;43(6):660‐668.
  8. McIlwraith CW, Nixon AJ, Wright IM. Tenoscopy. Elsevier; 2015:344‐386.
  9. McIlwraith CW, Nixon AJ, Wright IM. General technique and diagnostic arthroscopy. Elsevier; 2015:28‐44.
  10. Wyn‐Jones G. Equine Lameness. Blackwell Scientific; 1988.
  11. Owen KR, Dyson SJ, Parkin TDH, Singer ER, Kristoffersen M, Mair TS. Retrospective study of palmar/plantar annular ligament injury in 71 horses: 2001–2006. Equine Vet J 2008;40(3):237‐244.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408x271217google scholar: lookup
  12. Findley JA, De Oliveira F, Bladon B. Tenoscopic surgical treatment of tears of the manica flexoria in 53 horses. Vet Surg 2012;41(8):924‐930.
  13. Cohen JM, Schneider RK, Zubrod CJ, Sampson SN, Tucker RL. Desmitis of the distal digital annular ligament in seven horses: MRI diagnosis and surgical treatment. Vet Surg 2008;37(4):336‐344.
  14. Cender AN, Mählmann K, Ehrle A, Merle R, Pieper L, Lischer CJ. Diagnosis and outcome following tenoscopic surgery of the digital flexor tendon sheath in German sports and pleasure horses. Equine Vet J 2023;55(1):48‐58.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13856google scholar: lookup
  15. Hague BA, Honnas CM, Simpson RB, Peloso JG. Evaluation of skin bacterial flora before and after aseptic preparation of clipped and nonclipped arthrocentesis sites in horses. Vet Surg 1997;26(2):121‐125.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.