Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2011; 43(6); 686-694; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00334.x

The difference in kinematics of horses walking, trotting and cantering on a flat and banked 10 m circle.

Abstract: Locomotion adaptation mechanisms have been observed in horses, but little information is available in relation to banked and nonbanked curve locomotion, which might be important to optimise training environments. Objective: To determine if adaptation mechanisms in horses existed when moving on a banked compared to a flat curve and whether adaptation was similar in different gaits. Methods: Eight infrared cameras were positioned on the outside of a 10 m lungeing circle and calibrated. Retroreflective markers were used to define left and right metacarpus (McIII) and proximal phalanges (P1), metatarsus (MtIII), head and sacrum. Data were recorded at 308 Hz from 6 horses lunged at walk, trot and canter on a flat and 10° banked circle in a crossover design. Measurements extracted were speed, stride length, McIII inclination, MtIII inclination, relative body inclination and duty factor. Data were smoothed with a fourth order Butterworth filter with 30 Hz cut-off. ANOVA was used to determine differences between conditions and limbs. Results: Adaptation mechanisms were influenced by gait. At canter inside forelimb duty factor was significantly longer (P<0.05) on a flat curve compared to a banked curve; at walk this was reversed. McIII inclination, MtIII inclination and relative body inclination were significantly greater (P<0.05) at trot and canter on a flat curve, so more inward tilt was found relative to the bearing surface. Conclusions: Adaptation to curved motion is gait specific. At faster gaits it appears that horses negotiate a banked curve with limb posture closer to body posture and probably with demands on the musculoskeletal system more similar to straight canter.
Publication Date: 2011-03-04 PubMed ID: 21496095DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00334.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article studies how the movement of horses varies when they walk, trot or canter on a flat surface versus a banked curve. The study utilizes infrared cameras and reflective markers to track movement and compares adaptation mechanisms in several gaits.

Objective

The key goal of this research is to determine whether horses exhibit changes in their gait and movement when traversing a flat surface compared to a banked curve, and if these adaptations vary depending on whether they are walking, trotting or cantering.

Methodology

  • The study used a 10-meter lungeing circle with both flat and banked (10-degree) sections.
  • Eight infrared cameras were arranged around the circle to monitor the animal’s movements.
  • Reflectors were placed on key areas of the horse – left and right metacarpus (McIII) and proximal phalanges (P1), metatarsus (MtIII), head, and sacrum.
  • Six horses were studied, each made to walk, trot and canter on both the flat and banked parts of the circle.
  • The cameras recorded at a rate of 308 frames per second, providing detailed motion data.
  • The data were then processed and smoothed via a fourth-order Butterworth filter with a 30 Hz cut-off.
  • Aspects such as speed, stride length, body inclinations and the duty factor (amount of time a foot is on the ground versus in the air during each stride) were measured and analyzed using ANOVA to find differences in the horse’s movements under different conditions.

Results

  • The researchers found that the gait did influence the adaptation mechanisms of the horses.
  • During a canter, the duty factor for the inside forelimb was significantly longer on a flat curve than on a banked one. However, this was reversed at a walk.
  • As for the tilt of the body, McIII inclination, MtIII inclination, and relative body inclination were all found to be greater during a trot and canter on a flat curve.

Conclusion

Adaptation in horses to curved motion is specific to the gait. The research found that at faster gaits, horses move along a banked curve with limb positions more closely aligned to their body posture. This suggests that their musculoskeletal system demands while cantering on a banked curve might be similar to a straight canter. This understanding could be crucial for optimizing training environments for horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Hobbs SJ, Licka T, Polman R. (2011). The difference in kinematics of horses walking, trotting and cantering on a flat and banked 10 m circle. Equine Vet J, 43(6), 686-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00334.x

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 43
Issue: 6
Pages: 686-694

Researcher Affiliations

Hobbs, S J
  • University of Central Lancashire, Centre for Applied Sport and Exercise Sciences, Preston University of Edinburgh, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, UK. sjhobbs1@uclan.ac.uk
Licka, T
    Polman, R

      MeSH Terms

      • Adaptation, Physiological / physiology
      • Animals
      • Biomechanical Phenomena
      • Gait / physiology
      • Horses / physiology
      • Locomotion / physiology