Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2022; 12(20); doi: 10.3390/ani12202845

The Effect of Chiropractic Treatment on Limb Lameness and Concurrent Axial Skeleton Pain and Dysfunction in Horses.

Abstract: Chiropractic care is a common treatment modality used in equine practice to manage back pain and stiffness but has limited evidence for treating lameness. The objective of this blinded, controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of chiropractic treatment on chronic lameness and concurrent axial skeleton pain and dysfunction. Two groups of horses with multiple limb lameness (polo) or isolated hind limb lameness (Quarter Horses) were enrolled. Outcome measures included subjective and objective measures of lameness, spinal pain and stiffness, epaxial muscle hypertonicity, and mechanical nociceptive thresholds collected on days 0, 14, and 28. Chiropractic treatment was applied on days 0, 7, 14, and 21. No treatment was applied to control horses. Data was analyzed by a mixed model fit separately for each response variable (p < 0.05) and was examined within each group of horses individually. Significant treatment effects were noted in subjective measures of hind limb and whole-body lameness scores and vertebral stiffness. Limited or inconsistent therapeutic effects were noted in objective lameness scores and other measures of axial skeleton pain and dysfunction. The lack of pathoanatomical diagnoses, multilimb lameness, and lack of validated outcome measures likely had negative impacts on the results.
Publication Date: 2022-10-19 PubMed ID: 36290230PubMed Central: PMC9597761DOI: 10.3390/ani12202845Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article evaluates the effects of chiropractic treatment on horses with chronic lameness issues and back pain. The study utilized controlled, blinded clinical trial methods and the results indicated that while there were some measurable positive effects on subjective matters, the findings regarding objective issues were inconsistent.

Research Methodology

  • The study employed a blinded and controlled clinical trial. This means that neither the horses’ handlers nor the researchers knew which animals were receiving treatment and which were not. This approach minimizes the chances of bias influencing the results.
  • The horses were divided into two groups: those with multiple limb lameness (Polo horses) and those with isolated hind limb lameness (Quarter Horses).
  • The effects of chiropractic treatment were evaluated using various measures such as analysis of lameness, level of spinal pain and stiffness, epaxial muscle hypertonicity (abnormal tension of back muscles), and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (detection of pain caused by mechanical pressure or threat).

Treatment Schedule

  • The horses in the treatment group received chiropractic treatment on four different intervals – on days 0, 7, 14, and 21.
  • Control horses did not receive any treatment.
  • The outcome measures were collected on three different time points – days 0, 14, and 28.

Results

  • Results showed that the chiropractic treatment had several significant effects, notably on subjective measures such as hind limb and whole-body lameness scores and vertebral stiffness.
  • However, the results were inconsistent when it came to objective lameness scores and other measures of axial skeleton pain and dysfunction.

Limitations

  • The lack of pathoanatomical diagnoses was mentioned as a significant limitation. This means no detailed diagnosis was given regarding the exact anatomical location and nature of the horses’ conditions which could have affected the interpretation of results.
  • The presence of multilimb lameness in some of the horses likely complicated the assessment of the chiropractic treatment’s effectiveness.
  • There was also a lack of validated outcome measures which could have impacted the results.

In summary, the study suggests that chiropractic treatment may be beneficial for managing some aspects of lameness and back dysfunction in horses but more research is needed, and it emphasizes the need for validated, reliable outcome measures in this area.

Cite This Article

APA
Maldonado MD, Parkinson SD, Story MR, Haussler KK. (2022). The Effect of Chiropractic Treatment on Limb Lameness and Concurrent Axial Skeleton Pain and Dysfunction in Horses. Animals (Basel), 12(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202845

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 20

Researcher Affiliations

Maldonado, Mikaela D
  • Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Parkinson, Samantha D
  • Department of Veterinary Preventative Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Story, Melinda R
  • Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Haussler, Kevin K
  • Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Grant Funding

  • na / This research was funded by the Colorado Racing Commission Funds and the Young Investigator Award Program in the Center for Companion Animal Studies, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 80 references
  1. Slater J. Findings from the National Equine Health Survey, 2013. Vet. Rec. 2014;175:271–272.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.g4982pubmed: 25234456google scholar: lookup
  2. Jordana M, Martens A, Duchateau L, Haspeslagh M, Vanderperren K, Oosterlinck M, Pille F. Diffusion of mepivacaine to adjacent synovial structures after intrasynovial analgesia of the digital flexor tendon sheath. Equine Vet. J. 2016;48:326–330.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12447pubmed: 25827158google scholar: lookup
  3. Miagkoff L, Bonilla AG. Desensitisation of the distal forelimb following intrathecal anaesthesia of the carpal sheath in horses. Equine Vet. J. 2021;53:167–176.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13269pubmed: 32301518google scholar: lookup
  4. Pilsworth R, Dyson S. Where does it hurt? Problems with interpretation of regional and intra-synovial diagnostic analgesia. Equine Vet. Educ. 2015;27:595–603.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12392google scholar: lookup
  5. Byam-Cook KL, Singer ER. Is there a relationship between clinical presentation, diagnostic and radiographic findings and outcome in horses with osteoarthritis of the small tarsal joints?. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:118–123.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X345107pubmed: 19418738google scholar: lookup
  6. Zimmerman M, Dyson S, Murray R. Close, impinging and overriding spinous processes in the thoracolumbar spine: The relationship between radiological and scintigraphic findings and clinical signs. Equine Vet. J. 2012;44:178–184.
  7. Broster CE, Burn CC, Barr ARS, Whay HR. The range and prevalence of pathological abnormalities associated with lameness in working horses from developing countries. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:474–481.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X373907pubmed: 19642408google scholar: lookup
  8. Swor TM, Dabareiner RM, Honnas CM, Cohen ND, Black JB. Musculoskeletal problems associated with lameness and poor performance in cutting horses: 200 cases (2007–2015). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2019;254:619–625.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.254.5.619pubmed: 30779625google scholar: lookup
  9. Gorgas D, Luder P, Lang J, Doherr MG, Ueltschi G, Kircher P. Scintigraphic and radiographic appearance of the sacroiliac region in horses with gait abnormalities or poor performance. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2009;50:208–214.
  10. Bentz B. How to evaluate clinically indistinct gait deficits to differentiate musculoskeletal and neurological causes. Proc. Am. Assoc. Equine Pract. 2009;56:50–56.
  11. Dyson S. Evaluation of poor performance in competition horses: A musculoskeletal perspective. Part 2: Further investigation. Equine Vet. Educ. 2016;28:379–387.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12498google scholar: lookup
  12. Dyson S. The interrelationships between back pain and lameness: A diagnostic challenge. Proc. Congr. Br. Equine Vet. Assoc. 2005;44:137–138.
  13. Landman MA, de Blaauw JA, van Weeren PR, Hofland LJ. Field study of the prevalence of lameness in horses with back problems. Vet. Rec. 2004;155:165–168.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.155.6.165pubmed: 15357376google scholar: lookup
  14. Steckel RR, Kraus-Hansen AE, Fackelman GE, Mitchell SM. Scintigraphic diagnosis of thoracolumbar spinal disease in horses: A review of 50 cases. Proc. Am. Assoc. Equine Pract. 1991;37:583–591.
  15. Girodroux M, Dyson S, Murray R. Osteoarthritis of the thoracolumbar synovial intervertebral articulations: Clinical and radiographic features in 77 horses with poor performance and back pain. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:130–138.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X345099pubmed: 19418740google scholar: lookup
  16. Sullivan HM, Acutt EV, Barrett MF, Salman MD, Ellis KL, King MR. Influence of chronic lameness on thoracolumbar musculus multifidus structure in the horse. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022;117:104053.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104053pubmed: 35753637google scholar: lookup
  17. Keegan KG, Messer NT, Reed SK, Wilson DA, Kramer J. Effectiveness of administration of phenylbutazone alone or concurrent administration of phenylbutazone and flunixin meglumine to alleviate lameness in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2008;69:167–173.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.69.2.167pubmed: 18241011google scholar: lookup
  18. Smit Y, Marais HJ, Thompson PN, Mahne AT, Goddard A. Clinical findings, synovial fluid cytology and growth factor concentrations after intra-articular use of a platelet-rich product in horses with osteoarthritis. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2019;90:e1–e9.
    doi: 10.4102/jsava.v90i0.1721pmc: PMC6556911pubmed: 31170778google scholar: lookup
  19. Magri C, Schramme M, Febre M, Cauvin E, Labadie F, Saulnier N, François I, Lechartier A, Aebischer D, Moncelet A-S. Comparison of efficacy and safety of single versus repeated intra-articular injection of allogeneic neonatal mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of osteoarthritis of the metacarpophalangeal/metatarsophalangeal joint in horses: A clinical pilot study. PLoS ONE 2019;14:e0221317.
  20. McIlwraith CW. The use of intra-articular corticosteroids in the horse: What is known on a scientific basis?. Equine Vet. J. 2010;42:563–571.
  21. Davis JL. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug associated right dorsal colitis in the horse. Equine Vet. Educ. 2017;29:104–113.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12454google scholar: lookup
  22. Sullivan KA, Hill AE, Haussler KK. The effects of chiropractic, massage and phenylbutazone on spinal mechanical nociceptive thresholds in horses without clinical signs. Equine Vet. J. 2008;40:14–20.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X240456pubmed: 18083655google scholar: lookup
  23. Xie H, Colahan P, Ott EA. Evaluation of electroacupuncture treatment of horses with signs of chronic thoracolumbar pain. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2005;227:281–286.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.281pubmed: 16047667google scholar: lookup
  24. Driessen B, Zarucco L. Treatment of acute and dhronic pain in horses. In: Egger CM, Love LTD, editors. Pain Management in Veterinary Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2013. pp. 323–348.
  25. Lange CD, Flammer SA, Gerber V, Kindt D, Koch C. Complementary and alternative medicine for the management of orthopaedic problems in Swiss Warmblood horses. Vet. Med. Sci. 2017;3:125–133.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.64pmc: PMC5645843pubmed: 29067209google scholar: lookup
  26. Davies L. Equine rehabilitation. In: Egger CM, Love LTD, editors. Pain Management in Veterinary Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2013. pp. 147–154.
  27. Haussler KK. Back problems. Chiropractic evaluation and management. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 1999;15:195–209.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30172-4pubmed: 10218250google scholar: lookup
  28. Haussler KK. Equine manual therapies in sport horse practice. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2018;34:375–389.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2018.04.005pubmed: 29857966google scholar: lookup
  29. Haussler KK, Hesbach AL, Romano L, Goff L, Bergh A. A systematic review of musculoskeletal mobilization and manipulation techniques used in veterinary medicine. Animals 2021;11:2787.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102787pmc: PMC8532674pubmed: 34679808google scholar: lookup
  30. Acutt EV, le Jeune SS, Pypendop BH. Evaluation of the effects of chiropractic on static and dynamic muscle variables in sport horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;73:84–90.
  31. Gomez Alvarez CB, L’Ami JJ, Moffat D, Back W, van Weeren PR. Effect of chiropractic manipulations on the kinematics of back and limbs in horses with clinically diagnosed back problems. Equine Vet. J. 2008;40:153–159.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X250292pubmed: 18089466google scholar: lookup
  32. Keegan KG, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF, Dent EV, Kellerman TE, Wilson DA, Reed SK. Assessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor-based lameness evaluation system for horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2011;72:1156–1163.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.72.9.1156pubmed: 21879972google scholar: lookup
  33. Hoerdemann M, Smith RL, Hosgood G. Duration of action of mepivacaine and lidocaine in equine palmar digital perineural blocks in an experimental lameness model. Vet. Surg. 2017;46:986–993.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12689pubmed: 28703891google scholar: lookup
  34. Rettig MJ, Leelamankong P, Rungsri P, Lischer CJ. Effect of sedation on fore- and hindlimb lameness evaluation using body-mounted inertial sensors. Equine Vet. J. 2016;48:603–607.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12463pubmed: 26032237google scholar: lookup
  35. Keegan KG, MacAllister CG, Wilson DA, Gedon CA, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF. Comparison of an inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2012;73:368–374.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.3.368pubmed: 22369528google scholar: lookup
  36. Mayaki AM, Razak ISA, Adzahan NM, Mazlan M, Rasedee A. Clinical assessment and grading of back pain in horses. J. Vet. Sci. 2020;21:10.
    doi: 10.4142/jvs.2020.21.e82pmc: PMC7710460pubmed: 33263229google scholar: lookup
  37. Munroe GA. Clinical examination. In: Henson FMD, editor. Equine Neck and Back Pathology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2018. pp. 81–94.
    doi: 10.1002/9781118974520.ch6google scholar: lookup
  38. Haussler KK, Manchon PT, Donnell JR, Frisbie DD. Effects of low-level laser therapy and chiropractic care on back pain in Quarter Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;86:102891.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102891pubmed: 32067657google scholar: lookup
  39. Stubbs NC, Kaiser LJ, Hauptman J, Clayton HM. Dynamic mobilisation exercises increase cross sectional area of musculus multifidus. Equine Vet. J. 2011;43:522–529.
  40. Clayton HM, Kaiser LJ, Lavagnino M, Stubbs NC. Dynamic mobilisations in cervical flexion: Effects on intervertebral angulations. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 2010;42:688–694.
  41. Haussler KK, Erb HN. Mechanical nociceptive thresholds in the axial skeleton of horses. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38:70–75.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406775374315pubmed: 16411590google scholar: lookup
  42. Haussler KK, Hill AE, Puttlitz CM, McIlwraith CW. Effects of vertebral mobilization and manipulation on kinematics of the thoracolumbar region. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2007;68:508–516.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.508pubmed: 17472450google scholar: lookup
  43. Haussler KK, Martin CE, Hill AE. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilisation on trunk flexibility and stiffness in horses: A randomised clinical trial. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 2010;38:695–702.
  44. Van de Water E, Oosterlinck M, Korthagen NM, Duchateau L, Dumoulin M, van Weeren PR, Olijve J, van Doorn DA, Pille F. The lipopolysaccharide model for the experimental induction of transient lameness and synovitis in Standardbred horses. Vet. J. 2021;270:105626.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105626pubmed: 33641810google scholar: lookup
  45. Rhodin M, Persson-Sjödin E, Egenvall A, Serra Braganca FM, Pfau T, Roepstorff L, Weishaupt MA, Thomsen MH, van Weeren PR, Hernlund E. Vertical movement symmetry of the withers in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness at trot. Equine Vet. J. 2018;50:818–824.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12844pmc: PMC6175082pubmed: 29658147google scholar: lookup
  46. Wennerstrand J, Gomez Alvarez CB, Meulenbelt R, Johnston C, van Weeren PR, Roethlisberger-Holm K, Drevemo S. Spinal kinematics in horses with induced back pain. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2009;22:448–454.
    doi: 10.3415/VCOT-08-09-0088pubmed: 19876520google scholar: lookup
  47. Haussler KK, Erb HN. Pressure algometry for the detection of induced back pain in horses: A preliminary study. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38:76–81.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406775374225pubmed: 16411591google scholar: lookup
  48. Murray RC, Walters JM, Snart H, Dyson SJ, Parkin TD. Identification of risk factors for lameness in dressage horses. Vet. J. 2010;184:27–36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.020pubmed: 19369100google scholar: lookup
  49. Pfau T, Parkes RS, Burden ER, Bell N, Fairhurst H, Witte TH. Movement asymmetry in working polo horses. Equine Vet. J. 2016;48:517–522.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12467pubmed: 26037947google scholar: lookup
  50. Elmeua González M, Šarabon N. Shock attenuation and electromyographic activity of advanced and novice equestrian riders’ trunk. Appl. Sci. 2021;11:2304.
    doi: 10.3390/app11052304google scholar: lookup
  51. Lagarde J, Peham C, Licka T, Kelso JAS. Coordination dynamics of the horse-rider system. J. Mot. Behav. 2005;37:418–424.
    doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.6.418-424pmc: PMC1821095pubmed: 16280312google scholar: lookup
  52. Meneses CS, Müller HY, Herzberg DE, Uberti B, Werner MP, Bustamante HA. Microglia and astrocyte activation in the spinal cord of lame horses. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2018;45:92–102.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2017.10.001pubmed: 29223561google scholar: lookup
  53. Story MR, Nout-Lomas YS, Aboellail TA, Selberg KT, Barrett MF, McLlwraith CW, Haussler KK. Dangerous behavior and intractable axial skeletal pain in performance horses: A possible role for ganglioneuritis (14 cases; 2014–2019). Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;8:734218.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.734218pmc: PMC8702524pubmed: 34957274google scholar: lookup
  54. Keegan KG. The Biomechanics of Multiple Limb Lameness: Separating Secondary from Compensatory. [(accessed on 10 August 2022)]. Available online: https://equinosis.com/multiple-limb-lameness-separating-secondary-from-compensatory/.
  55. Serra Bragança FM, Broomé S, Rhodin M, Björnsdóttir S, Gunnarsson V, Voskamp JP, Persson-Sjodin E, Back W, Lindgren G, Novoa-Bravo M. Improving gait classification in horses by using inertial measurement unit (IMU) generated data and machine learning. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:17785.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73215-9pmc: PMC7576586pubmed: 33082367google scholar: lookup
  56. Greve L, Dyson S, Pfau T. Alterations in thoracolumbosacral movement when pain causing lameness has been improved by diagnostic analgesia. Vet. J. 2017;224:55–63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.03.009pubmed: 28697877google scholar: lookup
  57. Pfau T, Scott WM, Sternberg Allen T. Upper body movement symmetry in reining quarter horses during trot in-hand, on the lunge and during ridden exercise. Animals 2022;12:596.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12050596pmc: PMC8909210pubmed: 35268165google scholar: lookup
  58. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential rotational movement and symmetry values of the thoracolumbosacral region in high-level dressage horses when trotting. PLoS ONE 2021;16:e0251144.
  59. Wennerstrand J, Johnston C, Roethlisberger-Holm K, Erichsen C, Eksell P, Drevemo S. Kinematic evaluation of the back in the sport horse with back pain. Equine Vet. J. 2004;36:707–711.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044848226pubmed: 15656501google scholar: lookup
  60. Pfau T, Noordwijk K, Sepulveda Caviedes MF, Persson-Sjodin E, Barstow A, Forbes B, Rhodin M. Head, withers and pelvic movement asymmetry and their relative timing in trot in racing Thoroughbreds in training. Equine Vet. J. 2018;50:117–124.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12705pmc: PMC5724686pubmed: 28548349google scholar: lookup
  61. Bystrom A, Egenvall A, Roepstorff L, Rhodin M, Braganca FS, Hernlund E, van Weeren R, Weishaupt MA, Clayton HM. Biomechanical findings in horses showing asymmetrical vertical excursions of the withers at walk. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0204548.
  62. Goff LM, Jasiewicz J, Jeffcott LB, Condie P, McGowan TW, McGowan CM. Movement between the equine ilium and sacrum: In vivo and in vitro studies. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 2006;36:457–461.
  63. Ricardi G, Dyson SJ. Forelimb lameness associated with radiographic abnormalities of the cervical vertebrae. Equine Vet. J. 1993;25:422–426.
  64. Dyson SJ. Lesions of the equine neck resulting in lameness or poor performance. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2011;27:417–437.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2011.08.005pubmed: 22100038google scholar: lookup
  65. Merrifield-Jones M, Tabor G, Williams J. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of soft tissue palpation scoring in the equine thoracic epaxial region. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;83:102812.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102812pubmed: 31791525google scholar: lookup
  66. Martin BB Jr, Klide AM. Physical examination of horses with back pain. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 1999;15:61–70.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30163-3pubmed: 10218241google scholar: lookup
  67. Haussler KK, Erb HN. Pressure algometry: Objective assessment of back pain and effects of chiropractic treatment. Proc. Am. Assoc. Equine Pract. 2003;49:66–70.
  68. Wakeling JM, Barnett K, Price S, Nankervis K. Effects of manipulative therapy on the longissimus dorsi in the equine back. Equine Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2006;3:153–160.
    doi: 10.1017/ECP200693google scholar: lookup
  69. Long K, McGowan CM, Hyytiäinen HK. Effect of caudal traction on mechanical nociceptive thresholds of epaxial and pelvic musculature on a group of horses with signs of back pain. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;93:103197.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103197pubmed: 32972678google scholar: lookup
  70. Parkinson SD, Zanotto GM, Maldonado MD, King MR, Haussler KK. The effect of capacitive-resistive electrical therapy on neck pain and dysfunction in horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022;117:104091.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104091pubmed: 35908601google scholar: lookup
  71. de Oliveira K, Soutello RVG, da Fonseca R, Costa C, de L Meirelles PR, Fachiolli DF, Clayton HM. Gymnastic training and dynamic mobilization exercises improve stride quality and increase epaxial muscle size in therapy horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015;35:888–893.
  72. Onifer SM, Sozio RS, DiCarlo DM, Li Q, Donahue RR, Taylor BK, Long CR. Spinal manipulative therapy reduces peripheral neuropathic pain in the rat. Neuroreport 2018;29:191–196.
  73. Sullivan K, Hill A, Haussler KK. Effect of different treatment modalities on spinal nociceptive thresholds in horses. Proc. Am. Assoc. Equine Pract. 2007;53:58–59.
  74. Bathe AP. Lameness in the three day event horse. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, editors. Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse. 2nd ed. Elsevier Inc.; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2011. pp. 1123–1137.
  75. Jorgensen HS, Proschowsky H, Falk-Ronne J, Willeberg R, Hesselholt M. The significance of routine radiographic findings with respect to subsequent racing performance and longevity in Standardbred trotters. Equine Vet. J. 1997;29:55–59.
  76. Cohen ND, Carter GK, Watkins JP, O’Conor MS. Association of racing performance with specific abnormal radiographic findings in Thoroughbred yearlings sold in Texas. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2006;26:462–474.
  77. van Loon JPAM, Back W, Hellebrekers LJ, van Weeren PR. Application of a composite pain scale to objectively monitor horses with somatic and visceral pain under hospital conditions. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2010;30:641–649.
  78. van Loon JPAM, Van Dierendonck MC. Objective pain assessment in horses (2014–2018). Vet. J. 2018;242:1–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.10.001pubmed: 30503538google scholar: lookup
  79. van Loon JPAM, Macri L. Objective assessment of chronic pain in horses using the Horse Chronic Pain Scale (HCPS): A scale-construction study. Animals 2021;11:1826.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061826pmc: PMC8234780pubmed: 34207290google scholar: lookup
  80. Lopes MAF, Eleuterio A, Mira MC. Objective detection and quantification of irregular gait with a portable inertial sensor-based system in horses during an endurance race—A preliminary assessment. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018;70:123–129.