Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2009; 41(5); 423-427; doi: 10.2746/042516409x371387

The effect of rising and sitting trot on back movements and head-neck position of the horse.

Abstract: During trot, the rider can either rise from the saddle during every stride or remain seated. Rising trot is used frequently because it is widely assumed that it decreases the loading of the equine back. This has, however, not been demonstrated in an objective study. Objective: To determine the effects of rising and sitting trot on the movements of the horse. Objective: Sitting trot has more extending effect on the horse's back than rising trot and also results in a higher head and neck position. Methods: Twelve horses and one rider were used. Kinematic data were captured at trot during over ground locomotion under 3 conditions: unloaded, rising trot and sitting trot. Back movements were calculated using a previously described method with a correction for trunk position. Head-neck position was xpressed as extension and flexion of C1, C3 and C6, and vertical displacement of C1 and the bit. Results: Sitting trot had an overall extending effect on the back of horses when compared to the unloaded situation. In rising trot: the maximal flexion of the back was similar to the unloaded situation, while the maximal extension was similar to sitting trot; lateral bending of the back was larger than during the unloaded situation and sitting trot; and the horses held their heads lower than in the other conditions. The angle of C6 was more flexed in rising than in sitting trot. Conclusions: The back movement during rising trot showed characteristics of both sitting trot and the unloaded condition. As the same maximal extension of the back is reached during rising and sitting trot, there is no reason to believe that rising trot was less challenging for the back.
Publication Date: 2009-08-01 PubMed ID: 19642400DOI: 10.2746/042516409x371387Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on observing the effects of two trotting styles – rising and sitting – on a horse’s back movement and head-neck position. Through experiments, the research concludes that the rising trot doesn’t seem to have less of an impact on a horse’s back than the sitting trot.

Research Objective

The main purpose of this research was to determine the impacts, specifically the stresses, of the two common trotting techniques, namely the rising trot and the sitting trot, on horses. Despite common belief that the rising trot decreases the load on the equine back, there hasn’t been any objective research to back this assumption. Therefore, the study was aimed at determining the effects of both rising and sitting trot on a horse’s back movements and head-neck position.

Research Methods

  • The research was conducted using 12 horses and one rider.
  • The horses’ movements were recorded kinematically during trot under three conditions: unloaded, rising trot, and sitting trot.
  • The back movements were calculated using a previously established method with a correction for trunk position.
  • The head-neck position was measured in terms of extension and flexion at the first, third, and sixth cervical vertebrae (C1, C3, and C6) and the vertical displacement of the first cervical vertebra and the bit.

Research Findings

The research findings concluded that the sitting trot had more of an extending effect on the horse’s back compared to the rising trot. Additionally, sitting trot also resulted in a higher head and neck position. During rising trot:

  • The maximum flexion of the back was similar to the unloaded situation
  • The maximum extension was similar to sitting trot
  • Lateral bending of the back was larger than both during the unloaded situation and sitting trot
  • The horses held their heads lower than in the other conditions
  • The angle of the sixth cervical vertebra (C6) was more flexed in rising than in sitting trot

Research Conclusions

The study concluded that the rising trot showed characteristics of both sitting trot and the unloaded condition. However, the research challenges existing notions by suggesting that the rising trot does not seem to be less challenging for a horse’s back as the same level of back extension is observed in both rising and sitting trots. This points to a need for revisiting conventional wisdom about trotting techniques and their impact on equine health and performance.

Cite This Article

APA
De Cocq P, Prinsen H, Springer NC, van Weeren PR, Schreuder M, Muller M, van Leeuwen JL. (2009). The effect of rising and sitting trot on back movements and head-neck position of the horse. Equine Vet J, 41(5), 423-427. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516409x371387

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 41
Issue: 5
Pages: 423-427

Researcher Affiliations

De Cocq, P
  • Experimental Zoology, Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen UR, PO Box 338, NL 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Prinsen, H
    Springer, N C N
      van Weeren, P R
        Schreuder, M
          Muller, M
            van Leeuwen, J L

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Back / physiology
              • Biomechanical Phenomena
              • Female
              • Gait / physiology
              • Head
              • Horses / physiology
              • Humans
              • Male
              • Movement / physiology
              • Neck
              • Posture

              Citations

              This article has been cited 5 times.
              1. Krueger K, Schwarz S, Marr I, Farmer K. Laterality in Horse Training: Psychological and Physical Balance and Coordination and Strength Rather Than Straightness.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 16;12(8).
                doi: 10.3390/ani12081042pubmed: 35454288google scholar: lookup
              2. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential rotational movement and symmetry values of the thoracolumbosacral region in high-level dressage horses when trotting.. PLoS One 2021;16(5):e0251144.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251144pubmed: 33956858google scholar: lookup
              3. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential Rotational Movement of the Thoracolumbosacral Spine in High-Level Dressage Horses Ridden in a Straight Line, in Sitting Trot and Seated Canter Compared to In-Hand Trot.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 20;11(3).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11030888pubmed: 33804702google scholar: lookup
              4. MacKechnie-Guire R, MacKechnie-Guire E, Fairfax V, Fisher D, Fisher M, Pfau T. The Effect of Tree Width on Thoracolumbar and Limb Kinematics, Saddle Pressure Distribution, and Thoracolumbar Dimensions in Sports Horses in Trot and Canter.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Oct 21;9(10).
                doi: 10.3390/ani9100842pubmed: 31640213google scholar: lookup
              5. Hobbs SJ, Baxter J, Broom L, Rossell LA, Sinclair J, Clayton HM. Posture, flexibility and grip strength in horse riders.. J Hum Kinet 2014 Sep 29;42:113-25.
                doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0066pubmed: 25414745google scholar: lookup