Analyze Diet
Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition2014; 99(1); 132-138; doi: 10.1111/jpn.12210

The effect of three different head-neck positions on the average EMG activity of three important neck muscles in the horse.

Abstract: The Knowledge of muscle activity in common head-neck positions (HNPs) is a necessary precondition for making judgements on HNPs. The aim of the study was to record the surface electromyography activities of important muscles of the horse's neck in various HNPs. The electrical activities of the m. splenius, brachiocephalicus and trapezius were recorded on both sides. Five horses, both with and without a rider, were examined in all three gaits on both hands in three different HNPs: a 'free' position, a 'gathered' (head higher, neck more flexed) position with the noseline in front of the vertical and a 'hyperflexed' position. Averages of ten consecutive gait cycles in each HNP were evaluated and compared by standard statistical methods. No difference between ridden and unridden horses could be detected. The m. brachiocephalicus was in the hyperflexed position in all gaits significantly (p < 0.01) more active than in the gathered and free position, which were not significantly different. By contrast, the m. splenius was in the hyperflexed position less active than in the free position (p < 0.02), in which it always showed the highest activity. In walking, the muscle activities in the free and gathered positions deviated significantly (p < 0.01). The m. trapezius was in the hyperflexed posture during walking significantly less active than in the free (p < 0.01) and gathered (p < 0.01) positions with the strongest activities in the free position. Again, the free and gathered positions differed significantly (p < 0.01). In trot, the same pattern occured, although the gathered and hyperflexed positions did not differ significantly. In the canter, the activities of the m. trapezius showed no differences between HNPs. In HNPs with the noseline in front of the vertical, the muscles of the topline (m. splenius, m. trapezius) are activated and trained. In the hyperflexed position, however, a major muscle of the lower topline (m. brachiocephalicus) is activated and trained.
Publication Date: 2014-06-23 PubMed ID: 24954642DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12210Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper investigates how different head-neck positions affect the muscle activity in horses. It finds varying levels of electromyographic activity in three essential neck muscles in a horse according to the different positions – free, gathered (head higher, neck more flexed), and hyperflexed.

Research Purpose and Methodology

  • The paper aimed to understand the muscular activity of horses while changing their head-neck positions (HNPs). This knowledge is crucial for making reasonable judgements on HNPs and their implications on the horses’ health and performance.
  • The study utilized surface electromyography to record the electrical activities of three major neck muscles of a horse – m. splenius, brachiocephalicus, and trapezius.
  • Five horses were included in the study. They were examined in three different gaits on both hands, both with and without a rider.
  • The recordings were made in three different HNPs – a ‘free’ position, a ‘gathered’ position, and a ‘hyperflexed’ position.
  • The averages of ten consecutive gait cycles in each HNP were evaluated and compared using standard statistical methods.

Research Findings

  • The research found no significant difference in muscle activity between the ridden and unridden horses.
  • In the hyperflexed position, the m. brachiocephalicus was significantly more active than in the free and gathered positions.
  • The m. splenius was less active in the hyperflexed position than in the free position, which had the highest activity.
  • The muscle activity in the free and gathered positions significantly deviated during walking.
  • The m. trapezius was least active in the hyperflexed posture during walking compared to the free and gathered positions.
  • The pattern was the same during trotting; however, there was no significant difference between the gathered and hyperflexed positions.
  • In cantering, the m. trapezius showed no palpable differences during different HNPs.

Conclusions

  • The research concludes that when the horse’s noseline is in front of the vertical, the muscles of the topline (m. splenius, m. trapezius) are stimulated and trained.
  • However, when in a hyperflexed position, a major muscle of the lower topline (m. brachiocephalicus) gets activated and trained.
  • The findings give insight into how riders can optimize their handling depending on the desired muscular engagement of their horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Kienapfel K. (2014). The effect of three different head-neck positions on the average EMG activity of three important neck muscles in the horse. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl), 99(1), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12210

Publication

ISSN: 1439-0396
NlmUniqueID: 101126979
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 99
Issue: 1
Pages: 132-138

Researcher Affiliations

Kienapfel, K
  • Department of Animal Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Electromyography / veterinary
  • Horses / physiology
  • Male
  • Muscle, Skeletal / physiology
  • Neck / physiology
  • Posture / physiology

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
  1. Faithfull R, Lewis K, Drury E, McBride S. Influences of Double Versus Snaffle Bridles on Equine Behaviour at Dressage Competitions and Factors That Interact with Their Effect. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jun 17;15(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15121782pubmed: 40564336google scholar: lookup
  2. König von Borstel U, Kienapfel K, McLean A, Wilkins C, McGreevy P. Hyperflexing the horse's neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2024 Oct 2;14(1):22886.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72766-5pubmed: 39358404google scholar: lookup
  3. Bonilla Lemos Pizzi GL, Holz K, Kowalski ÉA, Fonseca Ribeiro P, Blake R, Ferreira Martins C. 2D Kinematic Analysis of the Esbarrada and Volta Sobre Patas Manoeuvres of Criollo Breed Horses Competing in Freio de Ouro. Animals (Basel) 2024 Aug 20;14(16).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14162410pubmed: 39199944google scholar: lookup
  4. Takahashi Y, Takahashi T, Mukai K, Ebisuda Y, Ohmura H. Effect of speed and leading or trailing limbs on surface muscle activities during canter in Thoroughbred horses. PLoS One 2023;18(5):e0286409.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286409pubmed: 37235556google scholar: lookup
  5. Pasquiet B, Biau S, Trébot Q, Debril JF, Durand F, Fradet L. Detection of Horse Locomotion Modifications Due to Training with Inertial Measurement Units: A Proof-of-Concept. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Jul 1;22(13).
    doi: 10.3390/s22134981pubmed: 35808476google scholar: lookup
  6. Rankins EM, Manso Filho HC, Malinowski K, McKeever KH. Muscular tension as an indicator of acute stress in horses. Physiol Rep 2022 Mar;10(6):e15220.
    doi: 10.14814/phy2.15220pubmed: 35307975google scholar: lookup
  7. Zellner A, Bockstahler B, Peham C. The effects of Kinesio Taping on the trajectory of the forelimb and the muscle activity of the Musculus brachiocephalicus and the Musculus extensor carpi radialis in horses. PLoS One 2017;12(11):e0186371.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186371pubmed: 29166657google scholar: lookup
  8. Valentin S, Zsoldos RR. Surface electromyography in animal biomechanics: A systematic review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2016 Jun;28:167-83.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.12.005pubmed: 26763600google scholar: lookup
  9. Kienapfel K, Link Y, König V Borstel U. Prevalence of different head-neck positions in horses shown at dressage competitions and their relation to conflict behaviour and performance marks. PLoS One 2014;9(8):e103140.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103140pubmed: 25090242google scholar: lookup