Analyze Diet
Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition2013; 98(1); 107-118; doi: 10.1111/jpn.12053

The effect of very low food intake on digestive physiology and forage digestibility in horses.

Abstract: Equid digestion is often conceptualized as a high-throughput/low-efficiency system, in particular compared with ruminants. It is commonly assumed that ruminants have an advantage when resources are limited; the effect of low food intake on digestive physiology of horses has, however, not been explored to our knowledge. We used four adult ponies [initial body mass (BM) 288 ± 65 kg] in two subsequent trials with grass hay-only diets [in dry matter (DM): hay1, mid-early cut, crude protein (CP) 10.5%, neutral detergent fibre (NDF) 67.6%; hay2, late cut, CP 5.8%, NDF 69.5%], each fed subsequently at four different dry matter intake (DMI) levels: ad libitum and at 75, 55 and 30 g/kg(0.75) /day. We particularly expected digesta mean retention times (MRT) to increase, and hence fibre digestibility to increase, with decreasing DMI. Ponies maintained BM on the first, but lost BM and body condition on DMI55 and DMI30. MRTs were negatively correlated to DMI and ranged (for particles <2 mm) from 23/31 h (hay1/2) on the ad libitum to 38/48 h on DMI30. Digestibilities of DM, nutrients and fibre components decreased from DMI75 to DMI30; apparent digestibilities of organic matter and NDF (hay1/2) dropped from 47/43% and 42/37%, respectively, on the ad libitum DMI to 35/35% and 30/28% on DMI30. Additional differences evident between the two hays included a higher estimated 'true' protein digestibility for hay1 and finer faecal particles on hay2; there were no differences in faecal particle size between intake levels. The results suggest that below a certain food intake threshold, the major digestive constraint is not fermentation time but nutrient supply to gut bacteria. The threshold for such an effect probably varies between feeds and might differ between ruminants and equids.
Publication Date: 2013-02-13 PubMed ID: 23402587DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12053Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research is about exploring the impact of restricted food intake on the digestive physiology and forage digestibility in horses, a previously uninvestigated area. The study reveals that lower food intake does not enhance the horse’s digestive efficiency as previously assumed, pointing out a distinctive threshold wherein nutrient supply to gut bacteria becomes the primary concern.

Study Details and Methodology

  • The study involved four adult ponies with an average initial body weight of 288kg. Two trials were performed using different types of grass hay diets, one mid-early cut with crude protein of 10.5% and neutral detergent fiber of 67.6% (hay1), and the other late-cut hay with crude protein of 5.8% and neutral detergent fiber of 69.5% (hay2).
  • The ponies were given these diets at four different dry matter intake levels: ‘ad libitum’ (as much as they wanted) and at restrained rates of 75g, 55g and 30g per kg(0.75)/day.
  • The research focused on investigating how digesta mean retention times (MRTs) and fiber digestibility varied with reduced dry matter intake levels

Observations and Findings

  • Ponies managed to maintain their body mass on the unrestricted (‘ad libitum’) intake level, but experienced weight loss and deteriorated body condition when intake was limited to 55g and 30g per kg(0.75)/day.
  • MRTs, particularly of particles smaller than 2mm, were found to be inversely proportional to the dry matter intake (DMI), varying from 23 to 31 hours on the ad libitum intake to 38 to 48 hours on DMI30.
  • There was a decrease in digestibilities of dry matter, nutrients and fiber components when the intake levels dropped from DMI75 to DMI30. Apparent digestibilities of organic matter and NDF respectively dropped from 47/43% and 42/37% on the ad libitum intake to 35/35% and 30/28% on DMI30.
  • Differences observed between the two hay diets included higher estimated ‘true’ protein digestibility for hay1 and finer fecal particles on hay2, with no differences in fecal particle size between intake levels.

Conclusion

The study concludes that there is a certain food intake threshold in equids below which the primary digestion constraint shifts from fermentation time to nutrient supply to gut bacteria. This threshold and its effects might vary between feeds and could potentially indicate differences between ruminants and equids.

Cite This Article

APA
Clauss M, Schiele K, Ortmann S, Fritz J, Codron D, Hummel J, Kienzle E. (2013). The effect of very low food intake on digestive physiology and forage digestibility in horses. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl), 98(1), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12053

Publication

ISSN: 1439-0396
NlmUniqueID: 101126979
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 98
Issue: 1
Pages: 107-118

Researcher Affiliations

Clauss, M
  • Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Schiele, K
    Ortmann, S
      Fritz, J
        Codron, D
          Hummel, J
            Kienzle, E

              MeSH Terms

              • Animal Feed / analysis
              • Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
              • Animals
              • Diet / veterinary
              • Digestion / physiology
              • Female
              • Food Deprivation
              • Horses / physiology
              • Male
              • Weight Loss / physiology

              Citations

              This article has been cited 9 times.
              1. Schwarm A, Clauss M, Ortmann S, Jensen RB. No size-dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses.. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2022 Nov;106(6):1356-1363.
                doi: 10.1111/jpn.13757pubmed: 35894118google scholar: lookup
              2. Pollaris E, Broeckx BJG, Rajasekharan S, Cauwels R, Vlaminck L. Fracture Resistance of Equine Cheek Teeth With and Without Occlusal Fissures: A Standardized ex vivo Model.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:699940.
                doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.699940pubmed: 34557539google scholar: lookup
              3. Fernandes KA, Gee EK, Rogers CW, Kittelmann S, Biggs PJ, Bermingham EN, Bolwell CF, Thomas DG. Seasonal Variation in the Faecal Microbiota of Mature Adult Horses Maintained on Pasture in New Zealand.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 4;11(8).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11082300pubmed: 34438757google scholar: lookup
              4. Findeisen E, Südekum KH, Fritz J, Hummel J, Clauss M. Increasing food intake affects digesta retention, digestibility and gut fill but not chewing efficiency in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).. J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol 2021 Aug;335(7):614-622.
                doi: 10.1002/jez.2505pubmed: 34254468google scholar: lookup
              5. Grev AM, Hathaway MR, Sheaffer CC, Wells MS, Reiter AS, Martinson KL. Apparent digestibility, fecal particle size, and mean retention time of reduced lignin alfalfa hay fed to horses.. J Anim Sci 2021 Jul 1;99(7).
                doi: 10.1093/jas/skab158pubmed: 34013333google scholar: lookup
              6. Saastamoinen M, Särkijärvi S. Effect of Linseed (Linum usitatissimum) Groats-Based Mixed Feed Supplements on Diet Nutrient Digestibility and Blood Parameters of Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 10;10(2).
                doi: 10.3390/ani10020272pubmed: 32050686google scholar: lookup
              7. Borges RM, Mendes A, Nogueira SSC, Bindelle J, Nogueira-Filho SLG. Protein requirements of collared peccary (Pecari tajacu).. Trop Anim Health Prod 2017 Oct;49(7):1353-1359.
                doi: 10.1007/s11250-017-1333-5pubmed: 28623602google scholar: lookup
              8. Nogueira-Filho SL, Bastos Ida H, Mendes A, Nogueira SS. Protein requirements of finishing paca (Cuniculus paca).. Trop Anim Health Prod 2016 Jun;48(5):1005-11.
                doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1053-2pubmed: 27026234google scholar: lookup
              9. Dittmann MT, Runge U, Ortmann S, Lang RA, Moser D, Galeffi C, Schwarm A, Kreuzer M, Clauss M. Digesta retention patterns of solute and different-sized particles in camelids compared with ruminants and other foregut fermenters.. J Comp Physiol B 2015 Jul;185(5):559-73.
                doi: 10.1007/s00360-015-0904-xpubmed: 25921796google scholar: lookup