Analyze Diet
Parasites & vectors2014; 7; 48; doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-48

The effectiveness of faecal removal methods of pasture management to control the cyathostomin burden of donkeys.

Abstract: The level of anthelmintic resistance within some cyathostomin parasite populations has increased to the level where sole reliance on anthelmintic-based control protocols is not possible. Management-based nematode control methods, including removal of faeces from pasture, are widely recommended for use in association with a reduction in anthelmintic use to reduce selection pressure for drug resistance; however, very little work has been performed to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of such methods. Methods: We analysed data obtained from 345 donkeys at The Donkey Sanctuary (Devon, UK), managed under three different pasture management techniques, to investigate the effectiveness of faeces removal in strongyle control in equids. The management groups were as follows: no removal of faeces from pasture, manual, twice-weekly removal of faeces from pasture and automatic, twice-weekly removal of faeces from pasture (using a mechanical pasture sweeper). From turn-out onto pasture in May, monthly faecal egg counts were obtained for each donkey and the dataset subjected to an auto regressive moving average model. Results: There was little to no difference in faecal egg counts between the two methods of faecal removal; both resulted in significantly improved cyathostomin control compared to the results obtained from the donkeys that grazed pasture from which there was no faecal removal. Conclusions: This study represents a valuable and unique assessment of the effectiveness of the removal of equine faeces from pasture, and provides an evidence base from which to advocate twice-weekly removal of faeces from pasture as an adjunct for equid nematode control. Widespread adoption of this practice could substantially reduce anthelmintic usage, and hence reduce selection pressure for nematode resistance to the currently effective anthelmintic products.
Publication Date: 2014-01-24 PubMed ID: 24460700PubMed Central: PMC3904009DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-48Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research evaluates the impact of different fecal removal processes on controlling cyathostomin parasites in donkeys. It found that manual twice-weekly and automatic twice-weekly fecal removal from pastures effectively reduced the parasite burden compared to no removal, potentially reducing the need for drug treatments.

Methodology

  • The study analysed data from 345 donkeys at The Donkey Sanctuary in Devon, UK. The donkeys were divided into three groups, each maintained under different pasture management techniques.
  • The first group’s pasture had no removal of faeces, the second group had manual, twice-weekly removal of faeces, and the third group had automatic, twice-weekly removal of faeces using a mechanical sweeper.
  • Starting in May, the researchers performed monthly faecal egg count tests for each donkey to assess the presence and amount of cyathostomin.
  • The dataset was then subjected to an auto regressive moving average model for detailed analysis.

Results

  • The findings revealed negligible differences between the effect of manual and automatic methods of faecal removal on the frequency of cyathostomin in donkeys.
  • The major conclusion was that both removal methods resulted in much better cyathostomin control when compared to no faeces removal scenarios.

Conclusion & Recommendations

  • The research provides valuable quantitative assessment of the efficacy of faecal removal from paddocks for managing nematode parasites in equines.
  • It supports the recommendation for twice-weekly faecal removal to aid in controlling these parasites.
  • The adoption of this practice could reduce reliance and overuse of anthelmintic drugs, thereby reducing the selection pressure for nematode resistance to these drugs.

Cite This Article

APA
Corbett CJ, Love S, Moore A, Burden FA, Matthews JB, Denwood MJ. (2014). The effectiveness of faecal removal methods of pasture management to control the cyathostomin burden of donkeys. Parasit Vectors, 7, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-48

Publication

ISSN: 1756-3305
NlmUniqueID: 101462774
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 7
Pages: 48

Researcher Affiliations

Corbett, Christopher J
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK. c.corbett.1@research.gla.ac.uk.
Love, Sandy
    Moore, Anna
      Burden, Faith A
        Matthews, Jacqui B
          Denwood, Matthew J

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Anthelmintics / pharmacology
            • Equidae / parasitology
            • Female
            • Male
            • Nematoda / drug effects
            • Nematode Infections / prevention & control
            • Nematode Infections / veterinary

            Grant Funding

            • 095831 / Wellcome Trust

            References

            This article includes 48 references
            1. von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Anthelmintic resistance in equine parasites - detection, potential clinical relevance and implications for control.. Vet Parasitol 2012 Apr 19;185(1):2-8.
              doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.010pubmed: 22100141google scholar: lookup
            2. Nielsen MK, Vidyashankar AN, Olsen SN, Monrad J, Thamsborg SM. Strongylus vulgaris associated with usage of selective therapy on Danish horse farms-is it reemerging?. Vet Parasitol 2012 Oct 26;189(2-4):260-6.
              doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.04.039pubmed: 22703964google scholar: lookup
            3. Brady HA, Nichols WT. Drug resistance in equine parasites: an emerging global problem.. J Equine Vet Sci 2009;29:285–295.
            4. Love S, Duncan JL. Could the worms have turned?. Equine Vet J 1991 May;23(3):152-4.
            5. Kaplan RM. Anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of horses.. Vet Res 2002 Sep-Oct;33(5):491-507.
              doi: 10.1051/vetres:2002035pubmed: 12387486google scholar: lookup
            6. Trawford AF, Burden FA. Drug resistant cyathostomins in donkey herds; lessons in management for All equids.. J Equine Vet Sci 2012;32:43.
            7. Herd RP. Control strategies for ruminant and equine parasites to counter resistance, encystment, and ecotoxicity in the USA.. Vet Parasitol 1993 Jun;48(1-4):327-36.
              doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(93)90166-Kpubmed: 8346646google scholar: lookup
            8. Earle CG, Kington HA, Coles GC. Helminth control used by trainers of thoroughbreds in England.. Vet Rec 2002 Mar 30;150(13):405-8.
              doi: 10.1136/vr.150.13.405pubmed: 11999277google scholar: lookup
            9. Relf VE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. A questionnaire study on parasite control practices on UK breeding Thoroughbred studs.. Equine Vet J 2012 Jul;44(4):466-71.
            10. Relf VE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. Helminth egg excretion with regard to age, gender and management practices on UK Thoroughbred studs.. Parasitology 2013 Apr;140(5):641-52.
              doi: 10.1017/S0031182012001941pubmed: 23351718google scholar: lookup
            11. Wood EL, Matthews JB, Stephenson S, Slote M, Nussey DH. Variation in fecal egg counts in horses managed for conservation purposes: individual egg shedding consistency, age effects and seasonal variation.. Parasitology 2013 Jan;140(1):115-28.
              doi: 10.1017/S003118201200128Xpubmed: 22894917google scholar: lookup
            12. Sréter T, Molnár V, Kassai T. The distribution of nematode egg counts and larval counts in grazing sheep and their implications for parasite control.. Int J Parasitol 1994 Feb;24(1):103-8.
              pubmed: 8021097doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(94)90063-9google scholar: lookup
            13. Nielsen MK, Haaning N, Olsen SN. Strongyle egg shedding consistency in horses on farms using selective therapy in Denmark.. Vet Parasitol 2006 Feb 18;135(3-4):333-5.
              doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.09.010pubmed: 16226379google scholar: lookup
            14. Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Drudge JH. Historical perspective of cyathostomes: prevalence, treatment and control programs.. Vet Parasitol 1999 Aug 31;85(2-3):97-111; discussion 111-2, 215-25.
              doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00091-6pubmed: 10485357google scholar: lookup
            15. Matthews JB. An update on cyathostomins: anthelmintic resistance and worm control.. Equine Vet Educ 2008;20:552–560.
              doi: 10.2746/095777308X363912google scholar: lookup
            16. Molento MB, Antunes J, Bentes RN, Coles GC. Anthelmintic resistant nematodes in Brazilian horses.. Vet Rec 2008 Mar 22;162(12):384-5.
              doi: 10.1136/vr.162.12.384pubmed: 18359933google scholar: lookup
            17. Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin KH, Clausen PH. A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management.. Parasitol Res 2011 Dec;109(6):1625-35.
              doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2434-0pubmed: 21559764google scholar: lookup
            18. Krecek RC, Waller PJ. Towards the implementation of the "basket of options" approach to helminth parasite control of livestock: emphasis on the tropics/subtropics.. Vet Parasitol 2006 Jul 31;139(4):270-82.
              doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.04.018pubmed: 16764993google scholar: lookup
            19. Francisco R, Paz-Silva A, Francisco I, Cortiñas FJ, Miguélez S, Suárez JL, Cazapal-Monteiro CF, Arias MS, Sánchez-Andrade R. Preliminary analysis of the results of selective therapy against strongyles in pasturing horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 2012;32:274–280.
            20. Nielsen MK, Kaplan RM, Thamsborg SM, Monrad J, Olsen SN. Climatic influences on development and survival of free-living stages of equine strongyles: implications for worm control strategies and managing anthelmintic resistance.. Vet J 2007 Jul;174(1):23-32.
              doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.05.009pubmed: 16815051google scholar: lookup
            21. Ramsey YH, Christley RM, Matthews JB, Hodgkinson JE, McGoldrick J, Love S. Seasonal development of Cyathostominae larvae on pasture in a northern temperate region of the United Kingdom.. Vet Parasitol 2004 Feb 6;119(4):307-18.
              doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.11.014pubmed: 15154595google scholar: lookup
            22. Ogbourne CP. Survival on herbage plots of infective larvae of strongylid nematodes of the horse.. J Helminthol 1973;47(1):9-16.
              doi: 10.1017/S0022149X00023695pubmed: 4702890google scholar: lookup
            23. Matthee S, Krecek RC, Milne SA, Boshoff M, Guthrie AJ. Impact of management interventions on helminth levels, and body and blood measurements in working donkeys in South Africa.. Vet Parasitol 2002 Jul 29;107(1-2):103-13.
              doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00113-9pubmed: 12072218google scholar: lookup
            24. Paraud C, Hoste H, Lefrileux Y, Pommaret A, Paolini V, Pors I, Chartier C. Administration of Duddingtonia flagrans chlamydospores to goats to control gastro-intestinal nematodes: dose trials.. Vet Res 2005 Mar-Apr;36(2):157-66.
              doi: 10.1051/vetres:2004060pubmed: 15720969google scholar: lookup
            25. Waller PJ. International approaches to the concept of integrated control of nematode parasites of livestock.. Int J Parasitol 1999 Jan;29(1):155-64; discussion 183-4.
              doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00178-7pubmed: 10048828google scholar: lookup
            26. Matthews JB, Burden FA. Common helminth infections of donkeys and their control in temperate regions.. Equine Vet Educ 2013;25(9):461–467.
              doi: 10.1111/eve.12018google scholar: lookup
            27. MAFF. Manual of veterinary parasitological laboratory techniques.. London: HMSO; 1986. p. 166.
            28. Jorgensen RJ. Isolation of infective Dictyocaulus Larvae from herbage.. Vet Parasitol 1975;1:61–67.
            29. Plummer M. Just Another Gibbs Sampler (JAGS). 2008.
            30. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.. 2013.
            31. Denwood MJ. runjags: Run Bayesian MCMC models in the BUGS syntax from within R.. 2013.
            32. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit.. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Statistical Methodol) 2002;64:583–639.
              doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00353google scholar: lookup
            33. Herd RP. Epidemiology and control of equine strongylosis at Newmarket.. Equine Vet J 1986 Nov;18(6):447-52.
            34. Matthee S, McGeoch MA. Helminths in horses: use of selective treatment for the control of strongyles.. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2004 Sep;75(3):129-36.
              pubmed: 15628805doi: 10.4102/jsava.v75i3.468google scholar: lookup
            35. Durie PH. Parasitic gastro-enteritis of cattle: the distribution and survival of infective strongyle larvae on pasture.. Aust J Agric Res 1961;12:1200–1211.
              doi: 10.1071/AR9611200google scholar: lookup
            36. English AW. The epidemiology of equine strongylosis in southern Queensland. 1. The bionomics of the free-living stages in faeces and on pasture.. Aust Vet J 1979 Jul;55(7):299-305.
            37. Larsen M. Biological control of helminths.. Int J Parasitol 1999 Jan;29(1):139-46; discussion 153-4.
              doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00185-4pubmed: 10048826google scholar: lookup
            38. Basáñez MG, Marshall C, Carabin H, Gyorkos T, Joseph L. Bayesian statistics for parasitologists.. Trends Parasitol 2004 Feb;20(2):85-91.
              doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2003.11.008pubmed: 14747022google scholar: lookup
            39. Paterson S, Lello J. Mixed models: getting the best use of parasitological data.. Trends Parasitol 2003 Aug;19(8):370-5.
              doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(03)00149-1pubmed: 12901939google scholar: lookup
            40. Wilson K, Grenfell BT. Generalized linear modelling for parasitologists.. Parasitol Today 1997 Jan;13(1):33-8.
              doi: 10.1016/S0169-4758(96)40009-6pubmed: 15275165google scholar: lookup
            41. O’Hara RB, Kotze DJ. Do not log-transform count data.. Methods Ecol Evol 2010;1:118–122.
            42. Denwood MJ, Stear MJ, Matthews L, Reid SW, Toft N, Innocent GT. The distribution of the pathogenic nematode Nematodirus battus in lambs is zero-inflated.. Parasitology 2008 Sep;135(10):1225-35.
              pubmed: 18620622doi: 10.1017/s0031182008004708google scholar: lookup
            43. Denwood MJ, Reid SW, Love S, Nielsen MK, Matthews L, McKendrick IJ, Innocent GT. Comparison of three alternative methods for analysis of equine Faecal Egg Count Reduction Test data.. Prev Vet Med 2010 Mar 1;93(4):316-23.
            44. Matthee S, Krecek RC, Guthrie AJ. Effect of management interventions on the helminth parasites recovered from donkeys in South Africa.. J Parasitol 2002 Feb;88(1):171-9.
            45. Oryan A, Farjani Kish G, Rajabloo M. Larval cyathostominosis in a working donkey.. J Parasit Dis 2015 Jun;39(2):324-7.
              pmc: PMC4456546pubmed: 26064028doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0313-6google scholar: lookup
            46. Seri HI, Abakar AD, Abdelrahman A, Tigani TA. Efficacy of Ivermectin in an injectable formulation against gastrointestinal nematodes of donkeys ( Equus asinus ). Vet Arh 2005;75:369–374.
            47. Döpfer D, Kerssens CM, Meijer YG, Boersema JH, Eysker M. Shedding consistency of strongyle-type eggs in Dutch boarding horses.. Vet Parasitol 2004 Oct 5;124(3-4):249-58.
              doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.06.028pubmed: 15381304google scholar: lookup
            48. von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Traversa D, Demeler J, Rohn K, Milillo P, Schurmann S, Lia R, Perrucci S, di Regalbono AF, Beraldo P, Barnes H, Cobb R, Boeckh A. Effects of worm control practices examined by a combined faecal egg count and questionnaire survey on horse farms in Germany, Italy and the UK.. Parasit Vectors 2009 Sep 25;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S3.
              pmc: PMC2751839pubmed: 19778464doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-s2-s3google scholar: lookup

            Citations

            This article has been cited 11 times.
            1. Osterman-Lind E, Holmberg M, Grandi G. Selective Anthelmintic Treatment in Horses in Sweden Based on Coprological Analyses: Ten-Year Results.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 28;13(17).
              doi: 10.3390/ani13172741pubmed: 37685005google scholar: lookup
            2. Bull KE, Allen KJ, Hodgkinson JE, Peachey LE. The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2023 Apr;21:125-130.
              doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2023.03.001pubmed: 36940551google scholar: lookup
            3. Osterman-Lind E, Hedberg Alm Y, Hassler H, Wilderoth H, Thorolfson H, Tydén E. Evaluation of Strategies to Reduce Equine Strongyle Infective Larvae on Pasture and Study of Larval Migration and Overwintering in a Nordic Climate.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 10;12(22).
              doi: 10.3390/ani12223093pubmed: 36428321google scholar: lookup
            4. Maestrini M, Nardoni S, Mancianti F, Mancini S, Perrucci S. In Vitro Inhibiting Effects of Three Fungal Species on Eggs of Donkey Gastrointestinal Strongyles.. Vet Sci 2020 Apr 25;7(2).
              doi: 10.3390/vetsci7020053pubmed: 32344915google scholar: lookup
            5. Hedberg-Alm Y, Penell J, Riihimäki M, Osterman-Lind E, Nielsen MK, Tydén E. Parasite Occurrence and Parasite Management in Swedish Horses Presenting with Gastrointestinal Disease-A Case-Control Study.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Apr 7;10(4).
              doi: 10.3390/ani10040638pubmed: 32272754google scholar: lookup
            6. Cain JL, Foulk D, Jedrzejewski E, Stofanak H, Nielsen MK. The importance of anthelmintic efficacy monitoring: results of an outreach effort.. Parasitol Res 2019 Oct;118(10):2877-2883.
              doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06423-6pubmed: 31422463google scholar: lookup
            7. Yngvesson J, Rey Torres JC, Lindholm J, Pättiniemi A, Andersson P, Sassner H. Health and Body Conditions of Riding School Horses Housed in Groups or Kept in Conventional Tie-Stall/Box Housing.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Feb 26;9(3).
              doi: 10.3390/ani9030073pubmed: 30813613google scholar: lookup
            8. Palomero AM, Hernández JA, Cazapal-Monteiro CF, Balán FA, Silva MI, Paz-Silva A, Sánchez-Andrade R, Vázquez MSA. Implementation of Biological Control to the Integrated Control of Strongyle Infection among Wild Captive Equids in a Zoological Park.. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:4267683.
              doi: 10.1155/2018/4267683pubmed: 29984232google scholar: lookup
            9. Misuno E, Clark CR, Anderson SL, Jenkins E, Wagner B, Dembek K, Petrie L. Characteristics of parasitic egg shedding over a 1-year period in foals and their dams in 2 farms in central Saskatchewan.. Can Vet J 2018 Mar;59(3):284-292.
              pubmed: 29599559
            10. Sallé G, Cortet J, Bois I, Dubès C, Guyot-Sionest Q, Larrieu C, Landrin V, Majorel G, Wittreck S, Woringer E, Couroucé A, Guillot J, Jacquiet P, Guégnard F, Blanchard A, Leblond A. Risk factor analysis of equine strongyle resistance to anthelmintics.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2017 Dec;7(3):407-415.
              doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2017.10.007pubmed: 29149701google scholar: lookup
            11. Matthews JB. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2014 Dec;4(3):310-5.
              doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2014.10.003pubmed: 25516842google scholar: lookup