Abstract: Limited research exists on impacts of air pollution on non-human mammals, particularly animal athletes such as Thoroughbred racehorses. Athletes have a greater risk of exposure as heightened exertion and increased airflow carry more pollutants deeper into the respiratory tract. Objective: To provide insights into the impact of ambient air pollution, particularly fine particulate matter (PM), on race speed. Methods: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Data were obtained from The Jockey Club Information Systems, covering 31 407 winning races by Thoroughbred horses in California spanning 10 years (2011-2020) and evaluated the association between air pollution and winning race speeds. For race days, we collected PM data from the nearest U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitoring site within 100 km of each racetrack (n = 12). We assessed the associations between daily average PM concentrations and speed of winning horses with linear mixed effects regression. We adjusted for horse characteristics, race-related covariates, temporal indicators (e.g., year), other air pollutants and temperature. We conducted sensitivity analyses by adjusting extreme air pollution days by reassigning values to the 95th percentile value and conducting linear mixed effects regression on series of datasets with incremental cutpoints of PM. Results: In the cutpoint analysis, we found that for PM between 4 and 23.6 μg/m, speed decreased 0.0008 m/s (95% CI: -0.0014562 to -0.00018) for every 1 μg/m increase of PM. Conclusions: Limitations include the use of offsite monitors leading to imprecise exposure measurements, not using training practice data, and generalisability as the study focuses on California racetracks. Conclusions: This study highlights the need to create advisories to safeguard the performance of horses during periods of poor air quality. Further research is recommended to explore additional factors influencing the relationship between air pollution and equine welfare.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research examines the impact of air pollution on the performance of Thoroughbred racehorses in California, finding a correlation between higher levels of particulates and diminished racing speeds.
Study Objectives
The study specifically aimed to assess the impact of fine particulate matter, also known as PM, on racehorse speed and performance.
Methodology
The study was retrospective and observational, using data from The Jockey Club Information Systems. This data encompassed 31,407 winning horse races in California over a span of ten years, from 2011 to 2020.
On race days, PM data was collected from the nearest U.S. Environment Protection Agency monitoring site within a 100 km radius of each racetrack.
The researchers used linear mixed effects regression to analyze the associations between average daily PM concentrations and the speed of winning horses.
The analysis adjusted for horse characteristics, race-related variables, temporal factors such as the year of the race, and other air pollutants and temperature conditions.
Results
The study found a decrease in speed of 0.0008 m/s for every 1 μg/m increase in PM for levels between 4 and 23.6 μg/m; this is based on the cutpoint analysis method wherein the data is divided into different zones based on PM levels.
Conclusion & Recommendations
While potential limitations included the use of offsite monitors which could have lead to inaccurate exposure measurements and the specificity of the study to California racetracks, the research highlights the need to create advisories to protect horses’ performance during periods of subpar air quality.
It is recommended that further research be conducted to explore additional factors that could be influencing the relationship between air pollution and equine welfare, such as training practices.
Cite This Article
APA
Kim LD, Kreitner K, Scott DM, Seabaugh K, Duncan CG, Magzamen S.
(2024).
The effects of ambient air pollution exposure on Thoroughbred racehorse performance.
Equine Vet J.
https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14415
Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Kreitner, Kimberly
Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Scott, Danielle M
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Seabaugh, Katie
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Duncan, Colleen G
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Magzamen, Sheryl
Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Grant Funding
College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University
References
This article includes 57 references
US EPA. Integrated science assessment (ISA) for particulate matter [Final report, 2019]. Published online 2019.
Schraufnagel DE, Balmes JR, Cowl CT, De Matteis S, Jung S‐H, Mortimer K. Air pollution and noncommunicable diseases: a review by the forum of international respiratory societies' environmental committee, part 1: the damaging effects of air pollution. Chest 2019;155(2):409–416.
Schraufnagel DE, Balmes JR, Cowl CT, De Matteis S, Jung S‐H, Mortimer K. Air pollution and noncommunicable diseases: a review by the forum of international respiratory societies' environmental committee, part 2: air pollution and organ systems. Chest 2019;155(2):417–426.
Liu Q, Babadjouni R, Radwanski R, Cheng H, Patel A, Hodis DM. Stroke damage is exacerbated by nano‐size particulate matter in a mouse model. PLoS One 2016;11(4):e0153376.
Ying Z, Allen K, Zhong J, Chen M, Williams KM, Wagner JG. Subacute inhalation exposure to ozone induces systemic inflammation but not insulin resistance in a diabetic mouse model. Inhal Toxicol 2016;28(4):155–163.
Cox B, Gasparrini A, Catry B, Fierens F, Vangronsveld J, Nawrot TS. Ambient air pollution‐related mortality in dairy cattle: does it corroborate human findings?. Epidemiol Camb Mass 2016;27(6):779–786.
Beaupied BL, Martinez H, Martenies S, McConnel CS, Pollack IB, Giardina D. Cows as canaries: the effects of ambient air pollution exposure on milk production and somatic cell count in dairy cows. Environ Res 2022;207:112197.
Montrose L, Noonan CW, Cho YH, Lee J, Harley J, O'Hara T. Evaluating the effect of ambient particulate pollution on DNA methylation in Alaskan sled dogs: potential applications for a sentinel model of human health. Sci Total Environ 2015;512–513:489–494.
Westerling AL. Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2016;371(1696):20150178.
O'Dell K, Bilsback K, Ford B, Martenies SE, Magzamen S, Fischer EV. Estimated mortality and morbidity attributable to smoke plumes in the United States: not just a Western US problem. GeoHealth 2021;5(9):e2021GH000457.
Di Virgilio G, Evans JP, Blake SAP, Armstrong M, Dowdy AJ, Sharples J. Climate change increases the potential for extreme wildfires. Geophys Res Lett 2019;46(14):8517–8526.
Dupuy J‐L, Fargeon H, Martin‐StPaul N, Pimont F, Ruffault J, Guijarro M. Climate change impact on future wildfire danger and activity in southern Europe: a review. Ann For Sci 2020;77(2):35.
Araneda OF, Cavada G. Atmospheric pollutants affect physical performance: a natural experiment in horse racing studied by principal component analysis. Biology 2022;11(5):687.
United States Equestrian Federation. USEF competitions update: wildfires and air quality impacting Canada and the East Coast. US Equestrian .
Léguillette R, Greco‐Otto P, Sides R, Bond SL, El Alami S, Bayly W. Relative aerobic and anaerobic energy contribution in race fit endurance and Thoroughbred racehorses during strenuous exercise. Comp Exerc Physiol 2019;15(5):299–306.
Blagrove RC, Howatson G, Hayes PR. Effects of strength training on the physiological determinants of middle‐ and long‐distance running performance: a systematic review. Sports Med Auckl NZ 2018;48(5):1117–1149.
US EPA. The benefits and costs of the clean air act from 1990 to 2020. [Summary report]. Published online 2011.
American Horse Council. Economic impact of the United States horse industry. .
US EPA. Pre‐generated data files. Air Quality System Data Mart .
Magzamen S, Oron AP, Locke ER, Fan VS. Association of ambient pollution with inhaler use among patients with COPD: a panel study. Occup Environ Med 2018;75(5):382–388.
Oki H, Sasaki Y, Willham RL. Genetics of racing performance in the Japanese Thoroughbred horse: II. Environmental variation of racing time on turf and dirt tracks and the influence of sex, age, and weight carried on racing time. J Anim Breed Genet Z Tierzuchtung Zuchtungsbiologie 1994;111(1–6):128–137.
Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE. Regression methods in biostatistics: linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. Vol xv. New York, NY: Springer Publishing; 2005. p. 340.
Benka‐Coker W, Hoskovec L, Severson R, Balmes J, Wilson A, Magzamen S. The joint effect of ambient air pollution and agricultural pesticide exposures on lung function among children with asthma. Environ Res 2020;190:109903.
US EPA. Air quality trends show clean air progress. US EPA .
US Department of Agriculture. Wildfire. US Department of Agriculture .
Zhao N, Liu Y, Vanos JK, Cao G. Day‐of‐week and seasonal patterns of PM2.5 concentrations over the United States: time‐series analyses using the Prophet procedure. Atmos Environ 2018;192:116–127.
US EPA. Guide for particle pollution. US EPA Published online 2023.
Tuomisto JT, Wilson A, Evans JS, Tainio M. Uncertainty in mortality response to airborne fine particulate matter: combining European air pollution experts. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2008;93(5):732–744.
Maciejczyk P, Chen LC, Thurston G. The role of fossil fuel combustion metals in PM2.5 air pollution health associations. Atmos 2021;12(9):1086.
Hemmerling K, Sanz M, Wang Y, Fisher A, Sellon D, Gold J. Relationship of post‐race tracheal mucus scores to performance and the environment in 2‐year‐old Thoroughbreds. Comp Exerc Physiol 2023;19(5):419–427.