Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(12); 1731; doi: 10.3390/ani14121731

The Evolution of Lesions on Follow-Up Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Proximal Metacarpal Region in Non-Racing Sport Horses That Returned to Work (2015-2023).

Abstract: This study evaluates the change in an MRI of the proximal metacarpal region in a group of sport horses that returned to work. This retrospective analysis evaluated 18 limbs represented by 17 horses. Results: The hyperintense signal within the dorsal collagenous part of the proximal suspensory ligament (PSL) on T1W/T2*W GRE sequences decreased or stayed the same in the majority of cases. The hyperintense STIR signal within the dorsal collagenous part of the PSL resolved in the majority of the patients, and the third metacarpal bone (McIII) hyperintense STIR signal resolved in all patients. The dorsal margin irregularity of the PSL stayed the same, and McIII sclerosis and resorption of the palmar margin of McIII stayed the same in the majority of cases. McIII hyperintense STIR signal resolution carries a broad time range, with a mean of 94 days and a range of 47-202 days. Conclusions: Complete normalization of the dorsal collagenous part of the PSL does not appear necessary for a return to soundness, but a resolution of the McIII hyperintense STIR signal is expected for horses returning to soundness. A rescan period of 120 days for the proximal metacarpal region is suggested. In addition, there was no significant change in the size of the PSL between the initial and final MRI.
Publication Date: 2024-06-08 PubMed ID: 38929351PubMed Central: PMC11201264DOI: 10.3390/ani14121731Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates how horse injuries in the proximal metacarpal region evolve, as detected by MRI, when those horses return to work. The findings suggest disease in the suspensory ligament (PSL) can improve or remain stable, and resolution of bone issues is necessary for horses to return to good health.

Research Methodology

  • This study is a retrospective analysis. This is an observational method that looks backwards in time, usually using medical records and self-reporting.
  • It involved 18 limbs from a sample size of 17 non-racing sport horses.
  • Limb injuries were tracked through follow-up Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans. The MRI is an imaging technique used in radiology to visualize internal structures.

Findings

  • The hyperintense signal, an indication of inflammation or lesion, within the dorsal collagenous part of the proximal suspensory ligament (PSL) on MRIs primarily decreased or remained the same.
  • The majority of the horses showed resolution of the hyperintense STIR (Short TI Inversion Recovery) signal within the PSL. STIR is a specific MRI sequence that highlights the presence of water (inflammation) against fat.
  • Interestingly, all horses showed resolution of a hyperintense STIR signal in the third metacarpal bone (McIII), another key area of the horse’s leg.
  • However, irregularities to the dorsal margin of the PSL, i.e., the border towards the rear part of the horse, largely stayed the same.
  • Similarly, the McIII sclerosis (hardening of tissue) and resorption of the palmar margin (inner margin, towards the horse’s palm) of McIII also didn’t change much in the majority of horses.

Conclusions

  • The study revealed that for horses to return to soundness, or proper functioning without discomfort, complete normalization of the dorsal collagenous part of the PSL isn’t necessary. However, resolution of the McIII hyperintense STIR signal was expected.
  • The researchers suggest a rescan period of 120 days for the proximal metacarpal region to track recovery progress.
  • There was no significant change in the size of the PSL between the initial and final MRI.

Cite This Article

APA
van Veggel ECS, Vanderperren K, Selberg KT, Bergman HJ, Hoogelander B. (2024). The Evolution of Lesions on Follow-Up Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Proximal Metacarpal Region in Non-Racing Sport Horses That Returned to Work (2015-2023). Animals (Basel), 14(12), 1731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14121731

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 12
PII: 1731

Researcher Affiliations

van Veggel, Elisabeth C S
  • Sporthorse Medical Diagnostic Centre (SMDC), 5384 RC Heesch, The Netherlands.
Vanderperren, Katrien
  • Department of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Selberg, Kurt T
  • Johnson Family Equine Hospital, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Bergman, Hendrik-Jan
  • Sporthorse Medical Diagnostic Centre (SMDC), 5384 RC Heesch, The Netherlands.
Hoogelander, Brenda
  • Sporthorse Medical Diagnostic Centre (SMDC), 5384 RC Heesch, The Netherlands.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 34 references
  1. Denoix J, Perrot B, Bousseau B, Sciciuna C. Images Échographiques Des Lesions Du Muscle Interosseoux III (Ligament Suspenseur Du Boulet). Prat. Vet. Equine 1991;23:23–33.
  2. Gibson KT, Steel CM. Conditions of the Suspensory Ligament Causing Lameness in Horses. Equine Vet. Educ. 2002;14:39–50.
  3. Meehan L, Labens R. Diagnosing Desmitis of the Origin of the Suspensory Ligament. Equine Vet. Educ. 2016;28:335–343.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12331google scholar: lookup
  4. Dyson SJ. Proximal Metacarpal and Metatarsal Pain: A Diagnostic Challenge. Equine Vet. Educ. 2003;15:134–138.
  5. Dyson S. Diagnosis and Management of Common Suspensory Lesions in the Forelimbs and Hindlimbs of Sport Horses. Clin. Tech. Equine Pract. 2007;6:179–188.
  6. Bischofberger AS, Konar M, Ohlerth S, Geyer H, Lang J, Ueltschi G, Lischer CJ. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasonography and Histology of the Suspensory Ligament Origin: A Comparative Study of Normal Anatomy of Warmblood Horses. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38:508–516.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406X156109pubmed: 17124840google scholar: lookup
  7. Werpy NM, Denoix J-M. Imaging of the Equine Proximal Suspensory Ligament. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2012;28:507–525.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.08.005pubmed: 23177129google scholar: lookup
  8. Werpy NM, Denoix JM, McIlwraith CW, Frisbie DD. Comparison between Standard Ultrasonography, Angle Contrast Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics of the Normal Equine Proximal Suspensory Ligament. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2013;54:536–547.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12051pubmed: 23718137google scholar: lookup
  9. Denoix J-M, Coudry V, Jacquet S. Ultrasonographic Procedure for a Complete Examination of the Proximal Third Interosseous Muscle (Proximal Suspensory Ligament) in the Equine Forelimbs. Equine Vet. Educ. 2008;20:148–153.
    doi: 10.2746/095777308X282381google scholar: lookup
  10. Brokken MT, Schneider RK, Sampson SN, Tucker RL, Gavin PR, Ho CP. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of the Proximal Metacarpal and Metatarsal Injuries in the Horse. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2007;48:507–517.
  11. Powell SE, Ramzan PHL, Head MJ, Shepherd MC, Baldwin GI, Steven WN. Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detection of Bone Marrow Oedema-type Signal Pattern Associated with Subcarpal Pain in 8 Racehorses: A Prospective Study. Equine Vet. J. 2010;42:10–17.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X471467pubmed: 20121907google scholar: lookup
  12. Nagy A, Dyson S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in the Carpus and Proximal Metacarpal Region of 50 Lame Horses. Equine Vet. J. 2012;44:163–168.
  13. Murray RC, Tranquille CA, Walker VA, Milmine RC, Bak L, Tacey JB, Bolas NM. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in the Proximal Metacarpal Region of 359 Horses and Proximal Metatarsal Region of 64 Horses Acquired under Standing Sedation. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;94:103268.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103268pubmed: 33077090google scholar: lookup
  14. van Veggel E, Selberg K, van der Velde-Hoogelander B, Bolas N, Vanderperren K, Bergman HJ. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of the Proximal Metacarpal Region in Warmblood Horses: 36 Lame and 26 Control Limbs (2015–2021). Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;8:714423.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.714423pmc: PMC8388851pubmed: 34458356google scholar: lookup
  15. Werpy NM. Recheck Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examinations for Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Injury. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2012;28:659–680.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.09.003pubmed: 23177138google scholar: lookup
  16. Barrett MF, Manchon PT, Hersman J, Kawcak CE. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of the Proximal Metacarpus in Quarter Horses Used for Cutting: Retrospective Analysis of 32 Horses 2009–2012. Equine Vet. J. 2018;50:172–178.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12746pubmed: 28833365google scholar: lookup
  17. Nagy A, Dyson S. Magnetic Resonance Anatomy of the Proximal Metacarpal Region of the Horse Described from Images Acquired from Low- and High-Field Magnets. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2009;50:595–605.
  18. Murray RC, Blunden TS, Schramme MC, Dyson SJ. How Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Represent Histologic Findings in the Equine Digit ?. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2006;47:17–31.
  19. Dyson S, Blunden T, Murray R. Comparison between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histological Findings in the Navicular Bone of Horses with Foot Pain. Equine Vet. J. 2012;44:692–698.
  20. Mizobe F, Nomura M, Kato T, Nambo Y, Yamada K. Signal Changes in Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Osseous Injury at the Origin of the Suspensory Ligament in Four Thoroughbred Racehorses under Tiludronic Acid Treatment. J. Equine Sci. 2017;28:87–97.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.28.87pmc: PMC5608961pubmed: 28955160google scholar: lookup
  21. Costa-Paz M, Muscolo DL, Ayerza M, Makino A, Aponte-Tinao L. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-up Study of Bone Bruises Associated with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 2001;17:445–449.
    doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.23581pubmed: 11337710google scholar: lookup
  22. Roemer F, Bohndorf K. Long-Term Osseous Sequelae after Acute Trauma of the Knee Joint Evaluated by MRI. Skelet. Radiol. 2002;31:615–623.
    doi: 10.1007/s00256-002-0575-zpubmed: 12395272google scholar: lookup
  23. Mandalia V, Fogg AJB, Chari R, Murray J, Beale A, Henson JHL. Bone Bruising of the Knee. Clin. Radiol. 2005;60:627–636.
    doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.01.014pubmed: 16038689google scholar: lookup
  24. Gold SJ, Werpy NM, Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD. Injuries of the Sagittal Groove of the Proximal Phalanx in Warmblood Horses Detected with Low-Field Magnetic Imaging: 19 Cases (2007–2016). Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2017;58:344–353.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12488pubmed: 28281306google scholar: lookup
  25. Faulkner JE, Joostens Z, Broeckx BJG, Hauspie S, Mariën T, Vanderperren K. Follow-Up Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Sagittal Groove Disease of the Equine Proximal Phalanx Using a Classification System in 29 Non-Racing Sports Horses. Animals 2023;14:34.
    doi: 10.3390/ani14010034pmc: PMC10778323pubmed: 38200766google scholar: lookup
  26. Dyson S, Nagy A, Murray R. Clinical and Diagnostic Imaging Findings in Horses with Subchondral Bone Trauma of the Sagittal Groove of the Proximal Phalanx. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2011;52:596–604.
  27. Ramzan PHL, Powell SE. Clinical and Imaging Features of Suspected Prodromal Fracture of the Proximal Phalanx in Three Thoroughbred Racehorses. Equine Vet. J. 2010;42:164–169.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X478695pubmed: 20156254google scholar: lookup
  28. Bertone AL. Suspensory Ligament Desmitis. In: Baxter GM, editor. Adams and Stashak’s Lameness in Horses. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; West Sussex, UK: 2011. pp. 644–648.
  29. Vanel M, Olive J, Gold S, Mitchell RD, Walker L. Clinical Significance and Prognosis of Deep Digital Flexor Tendinopathy Assessed over Time Using MRI. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2012;53:621–627.
  30. Holowinski M, Judy C, Saveraid T, Maranda L. Resolution of Lesions on STIR Images Is Associated with Improved Lameness Status in Horses. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2010;51:479–484.
  31. Werpy NM. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Equine Patient: A Comparison of High- and Low-Field Systems. Clin. Tech. Equine Pract. 2007;6:37–45.
  32. Likon I, Dyson S, Nagy A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of the Proximal Palmar Cortex of the Third Metacarpal Bone and the Suspensory Ligament in Non-Lame Endurance Horses before and after Six Months of Training. Animals 2023;13:1106.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13061106pmc: PMC10044202pubmed: 36978646google scholar: lookup
  33. Dancot M, Joostens Z, Audigié F, Busoni V. The Plantar Proximal Cortex of the Third Metatarsal Bone Shows Raised Longitudinal Ridges at the Suspensory Ligament Enthesis in Normal Equine Isolated Limbs—A Radiographic, Computed Tomography, and MRI Study. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023;10:1265116.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1265116pmc: PMC10687415pubmed: 38033644google scholar: lookup
  34. Scharf A, de Solis CN, Sampson SN, Glass K, Watts AE. Suspensory Ligament Size Does Not Change after Plantar Fasciotomy and Neurectomy of the Deep Branch of the Lateral Plantar Nerve by Ultrasonographic Assessment. Vet. Surg. 2022;51:259–269.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13757pmc: PMC9306907pubmed: 34970755google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.